Hook Dem
10-08-2004, 08:47 PM
If your want to know more about the tactics the Democratic Party has been using against the Republican Party and the citizens of this country, for the last 40 years, then read below. They have been using the tactics of Marxist Saul Alinsky. One of the main rules is that anything goes in an effort to gain power, locally, statewide or nationally. That means if you have to lie, do it over and over until people think it is the truth. The same thing with cheating, stealing, you name it. What you have been seeing with the Democrats running this election are their Talking Points, said over, and over and over. It does not matter which is speaking. They will all say the same thing. It is their attempt to drown out the opposition and make you think it is THEY who are telling the truth. It is a tactic that was used very well by the Nazi’s in WW II.
To give you an example, they have been bringing up the Cheney/Halliburton connection for months, trying to establish a connection between the two. This afternoon, I saw, on FoxNews, an interview with a non-partisan person with in depth knowledge of the Cheney/Halliburton situation. The Democrats keep charging that Cheney received $2 million dollars from Halliburton. According to the man they were interviewing, that is not a true statement. Cheney has received money from Halliburton for services due him as CEO, BEFORE he became Vice-President, but not the amount they claim. They claim that he still controls the actions of Halliburton. Not true, this man says. Cheney has no position of influence in Halliburton affairs since he became Vice-President. All of Halliburton and other stocks owned by Cheney and his wife were put into a blind trust before Cheney became Vice-President. They claim that Halliburton receives special favors because of Cheney, that they get no-bid contracts. The first part is not true, as stated above. Cheney has no say in the operation of the company. The latter part is true, that Halliburton does receive no-bid contracts, and has done so for the many years of the CLINTON administration also.. He went on to explain that it is because the Halliburton company and it’s subsidiaries perform many specialized types of work that other companies cannot do, or will not bid. Therefore, the Clinton administration had selected them because there is no other company capable of doing that work, or no other company willing to. The same thing applies to the Bush administration. These services are required and only Halliburton can do many of them. So again, this is an example of the Democrats repeating their Halliburton Talking Points over and over again, in an attempt to make you, the voter, think they are true...
Many prominent local, area and national Democrats have studied and applied his teachings. What follows is only a small part of this article. Read the 12 Rules For Radicals. The Clintons, Nancy Pelosi, and many other Democrats have been using them very effectively for years. See what Alinksy said about Hillary Clinton. You can bet on it that John Forbes Kerry is a student of Saul Alinsky also. You will find it all at this URL:
<a href="http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/1/7/21053.shtml">Saul Alinsky</a>
Diane Alden
Tuesday, Jan. 7, 2003
Saul Alinsky died in 1972. He was a Marxist grassroots organizer who spent much of his life organizing rent strikes and protesting conditions of the poor in Chicago in the 1930s. However, unlike Christian socialist and activist for the poor Dorothy Day, Alinsky's real claim to fame was as strategist for anti-establishment '60s radicals and revolutionaries.
Indeed, Alinsky wrote the rule book for '60s radicals like Bill and Hillary Clinton, George Miller and Nancy Pelosi. He considered Hillary Rodham to be one of his better students and asked her to join him in his efforts as an organizer of radical leftist causes. But Hillary had other fish to fry on her climb to national prominence.
Alinsky had a true genius for formulating tactical battle plans for the radical left. He wrote two books outlining his organizational principles and strategies: "Reveille for Radicals" (1946) and "Rules for Radicals" (1971).
To give you an example, they have been bringing up the Cheney/Halliburton connection for months, trying to establish a connection between the two. This afternoon, I saw, on FoxNews, an interview with a non-partisan person with in depth knowledge of the Cheney/Halliburton situation. The Democrats keep charging that Cheney received $2 million dollars from Halliburton. According to the man they were interviewing, that is not a true statement. Cheney has received money from Halliburton for services due him as CEO, BEFORE he became Vice-President, but not the amount they claim. They claim that he still controls the actions of Halliburton. Not true, this man says. Cheney has no position of influence in Halliburton affairs since he became Vice-President. All of Halliburton and other stocks owned by Cheney and his wife were put into a blind trust before Cheney became Vice-President. They claim that Halliburton receives special favors because of Cheney, that they get no-bid contracts. The first part is not true, as stated above. Cheney has no say in the operation of the company. The latter part is true, that Halliburton does receive no-bid contracts, and has done so for the many years of the CLINTON administration also.. He went on to explain that it is because the Halliburton company and it’s subsidiaries perform many specialized types of work that other companies cannot do, or will not bid. Therefore, the Clinton administration had selected them because there is no other company capable of doing that work, or no other company willing to. The same thing applies to the Bush administration. These services are required and only Halliburton can do many of them. So again, this is an example of the Democrats repeating their Halliburton Talking Points over and over again, in an attempt to make you, the voter, think they are true...
Many prominent local, area and national Democrats have studied and applied his teachings. What follows is only a small part of this article. Read the 12 Rules For Radicals. The Clintons, Nancy Pelosi, and many other Democrats have been using them very effectively for years. See what Alinksy said about Hillary Clinton. You can bet on it that John Forbes Kerry is a student of Saul Alinsky also. You will find it all at this URL:
<a href="http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/1/7/21053.shtml">Saul Alinsky</a>
Diane Alden
Tuesday, Jan. 7, 2003
Saul Alinsky died in 1972. He was a Marxist grassroots organizer who spent much of his life organizing rent strikes and protesting conditions of the poor in Chicago in the 1930s. However, unlike Christian socialist and activist for the poor Dorothy Day, Alinsky's real claim to fame was as strategist for anti-establishment '60s radicals and revolutionaries.
Indeed, Alinsky wrote the rule book for '60s radicals like Bill and Hillary Clinton, George Miller and Nancy Pelosi. He considered Hillary Rodham to be one of his better students and asked her to join him in his efforts as an organizer of radical leftist causes. But Hillary had other fish to fry on her climb to national prominence.
Alinsky had a true genius for formulating tactical battle plans for the radical left. He wrote two books outlining his organizational principles and strategies: "Reveille for Radicals" (1946) and "Rules for Radicals" (1971).