PDA

View Full Version : scary stat



T-Pain
05-14-2006, 12:06 AM
the spurs have never won a playoff series since Timmy came to SA, and this is the first time trailing a series since the Spurs played the Lakers in the 2002 semifinals. Saw it on ESPN. Time to overcome the odds...

Kori Ellis
05-14-2006, 12:07 AM
the spurs have never won a playoff series since Timmy came to SA

Come again?

1Parker1
05-14-2006, 12:07 AM
the spurs have never won a playoff series since Timmy came to SA,

:wtf Umm, what?

Cant_Be_Faded
05-14-2006, 12:07 AM
ehhhhhhhhhh

1Parker1
05-14-2006, 12:08 AM
:lol @ Kori

Spurologist
05-14-2006, 12:08 AM
:wtf Umm, what?

when trailing after 3 games

Winnipeg_Spur
05-14-2006, 12:08 AM
the spurs have never won a playoff series since Timmy came to SA
I coulda sworn they won one or two...

Tobias
05-14-2006, 12:08 AM
2-1 isn't anything. Just means we have to play for 48 every night from now on. We played 20 mins tonight and were THAT close

timvp
05-14-2006, 12:08 AM
Spurs have been down 0-1 before.

Same shyt.

Aggie Hoopsfan
05-14-2006, 12:08 AM
Try getting it right.

Spurs have never won a series when trailing after the third game since Duncan got here.

Deb
05-14-2006, 12:08 AM
[QUOTE=T-Pain]the spurs have never won a playoff series since Timmy came to SA, and this is the first time trailing a series since the Spurs played the Lakers in the 2002 semifinals. Saw it on ESPN. Time to overcome the odds...[/Q
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT

Trifecta
05-14-2006, 12:08 AM
Since TD arrived, the Spurs have never won a playoff series WHEN trailing after three games!

1Parker1
05-14-2006, 12:09 AM
Well, if they play Detroit, I'm sure that was gonna happen anways. Good thing they have a chance now to overcome those odds :smokin

Melmart1
05-14-2006, 12:09 AM
There is a first time for everything. Spurs in 6.

T Park
05-14-2006, 12:09 AM
Time to change shit isn't it.

Spurologist
05-14-2006, 12:10 AM
Spurs have never won a series when trailing after the third game since Duncan got here.

now it should be very visible

T-Pain
05-14-2006, 12:10 AM
o shit!!! i meant that the Spurs have never won a playoff series while trailing since TD came to town. Sorry!!!!!!!

Tobias
05-14-2006, 12:10 AM
T-pain got the line all wrong. The line was "The Spurs have only been down 2-1 once before in the Duncan era, and it was a losing effort"

1Parker1
05-14-2006, 12:12 AM
The Spurs are not known for overcoming this kind of trouble.

Game 7 in the NBA Finals anyone?

T-Pain
05-14-2006, 12:12 AM
T-pain got the line all wrong. The line was "The Spurs have only been down 2-1 once before in the Duncan era, and it was a losing effort"
yeah somethin like that, thanks. Sorry for the confusion guys!

NASpurs
05-14-2006, 12:12 AM
75% of teams that win game 3 after being tied win the series..

The odds are agaisnt you and like I said, The Spurs are not known for overcoming this kind of trouble.And teams that win game 1 of the series, win 79% of the time.

Spurs in 6 http://spurstalk.com/forums/images/smilies/smiafro.gif

Melmart1
05-14-2006, 12:12 AM
75% of teams that win game 3 after being tied win the series..

The odds are agaisnt you and like I said, The Spurs are not known for overcoming this kind of trouble.

The Spurs have dug themselves out of tons of holes.

Mr. Peabody
05-14-2006, 12:13 AM
Game 7 in the NBA Finals anyone?

That was here at home. The odds are on your side in that scenario.

NASpurs
05-14-2006, 12:15 AM
Well, we'll found out after Game 4 :rolleyesAll I have to say is my percentage is way higher than yours :lol

1Parker1
05-14-2006, 12:15 AM
That was here at home. The odds are on your side in that scenario.

That Game 7 was up for grabs for anyone. After 3 quarters, still tied...come on...that's still overcomming obstacles. Especially after losing Game 6 at home.

ManuTim_best of Fwiendz
05-14-2006, 12:15 AM
I don't believe in the statistic crap.. You just gotta play in the now.. none of this odds bullshit. That's why the Suns are still around.

Winnipeg_Spur
05-14-2006, 12:16 AM
75% of teams that win game 3 after being tied win the series..

The odds are agaisnt you and like I said, The Spurs are not known for overcoming this kind of trouble.
100% of the time Dallas and SA have played in the playoffs the Spurs have won the series.

Uh oh, the odds must be against you and the Mavs, and the Mavericks aren't known for winning anything, period.

T-Pain
05-14-2006, 12:16 AM
yeah lets hope we change history here. Thanks for fixin the thread kori!

timvp
05-14-2006, 12:16 AM
I remember back when the Spurs had never won a series after losing Game 1.

:jack

spurs=bling
05-14-2006, 12:17 AM
the spurs have never won a playoff series since Timmy came to SA, and this is the first time trailing a series since the Spurs played the Lakers in the 2002 semifinals. Saw it on ESPN. Time to overcome the odds...
WTF??????? :wtf

T-Pain
05-14-2006, 12:17 AM
I don't believe in the statistic crap.. You just gotta play in the now.. none of this odds bullshit. That's why the Suns are still around.
i dont mean to jinx them, i thought it was somethin that a spurs fan should keep in mind and know the spurs' situation

ManuTim_best of Fwiendz
05-14-2006, 12:17 AM
100% of the time Dallas and SA have played in the playoffs the Spurs have won the series.

Uh oh, the odds must be against you and the Mavs, and the Mavericks aren't known for winning anything, period.
Hey this a great Mavs team we're playing against this year give them some cred. We can't get cocky. The Spurs have to go out there and play their asses off. They were right there tonight in Dallas. Next game, the same intensity. A few more corrections. Dallas is a tough challenge we need to overcome.

ManuTim_best of Fwiendz
05-14-2006, 12:20 AM
i dont mean to jinx them, i thought it was somethin that a spurs fan should keep in mind and know the spurs' situation
Sorry, I wasn't looking call you out or anything. I guess I was talking about the odds in General...whenver they bring it up, or players bring it up...it's like "cmon forget about the odds and just play for the win that night" cuz you're still in it.

T-Pain
05-14-2006, 12:20 AM
T-pain got the line all wrong. The line was "The Spurs have only been down 2-1 once before in the Duncan era, and it was a losing effort"
already been corrected

T-Pain
05-14-2006, 12:21 AM
Sorry, I wasn't looking call you out or anything. I guess I was talking about the odds in General...whenver they bring it up, or players bring it up...it's like "cmon forget about the odds and just play for the win that night" cuz you're still in it.
o i hear ya, i understand where youre comin from. stats really shouldnt matter, because as soon as the ball is thrown up in the air for tipoff, all of that dont matter anymore

tetasfromtejas
05-14-2006, 12:22 AM
Well this is a stat you can fucking toss out the window

Spurs lost game 3 in Sacramento

as did Miami and Detroit in the first round

Spurologist
05-14-2006, 12:24 AM
I wonder what the record is when trailing after 3 games in the TD era. It's probably only a couple of losses

whottt
05-14-2006, 12:25 AM
How many times have the Spurs been trailing after 3 games in the Tim Duncan era?

Like 4 times? 3 of them to the Lakers? Once to the Jazz?


Last year we hadn't ever won a playoff series in which we didn't have HCA when we faced the Suns(who had bounced the Mavs)...Guess what? That was our easiest series of the playoffs...


I believe in 2003 we hadn't ever won a game in the Duncan era in which we were down 0-1...That year we did it...after going down 0-1 to guess who? The Mavs. Or maybe it was the Suns...

Hadn't ever played in a game 7 before last years Finals...and Detroit hadn't lost a game 7 in forever...Guess what happened?


These stats are meaningless...Like the one in 04...you know, the one where we had never lost a series after being up 2-0? With a team even Phil Jackson
said it probably wasn't possible to beat 4 times in a row?

whottt
05-14-2006, 12:30 AM
BTW...We will win this series. You know why?

We've got guys that can hit their outside shots when they are left open....whenever we have that we win championships. That's my stat...

T-Pain
05-14-2006, 12:32 AM
How many times have the Spurs been trailing after 3 games in the Tim Duncan era?

Like 4 times? 3 of them to the Lakers? Once to the Jazz?


Last year we hadn't ever won a playoff series in which we didn't have HCA when we faced the Suns(who had bounced the Mavs)...Guess what? That was our easiest series of the playoffs...


I believe in 2003 we hadn't ever won a game in the Duncan era in which we were down 0-1...That year we did it...after going down 0-1 to guess who? The Mavs. Or maybe it was the Suns...

Hadn't ever played in a game 7 before last years Finals...and Detroit hadn't lost a game 7 in forever...Guess what happened?


These stats are meaningless...Like the one in 04...you know, the one where we had never lost a series after being up 2-0? With a team even Phil Jackson
said it probably wasn't possible to beat 4 times in a row?

but have we won a series when trailing 2-1 since Duncan arrived? what about 3-1?

whottt
05-14-2006, 12:34 AM
but have we won a series when trailing 2-1 since Duncan arrived? what about 3-1?


Um the only teams that have had us down 1-2 are the Lakers...and the Jazz in Duncan's rookie year.

Shit any stat you want to use works against us when the Lakers are involved.

whottt
05-14-2006, 12:39 AM
Um the only teams that have had us down 1-2 are the Lakers...and the Jazz in Duncan's rookie year.

Shit any stat you want to use works against us when the Lakers are involved.


Scratch that..we've only been down 1-2 2 times in the Duncan era...the Jazz in 98 and the Lakers in 02...

Not a real big sample size there.


But if it makes you feel any better....Neither of those Spurs teams were as good as this one...and the Mavs aren't anywhere near as good as those Lakers and Jazz teams.

T-Pain
05-14-2006, 12:40 AM
Um the only teams that have had us down 1-2 are the Lakers...and the Jazz in Duncan's rookie year.

Shit any stat you want to use works against us when the Lakers are involved.
dude im not posting this to go against the spurs.

whottt
05-14-2006, 12:42 AM
Here I'll give you a stat to put your mind at rest...


The Mavs are 0-2 against us in the Duncan era....even when they get the series lead.

They are 0-1 in series against us in which they have the lead.


0-2 against us when they don't have HCA.

0-1 when they lost the first game of a series against us.


I mean these stats have as much meaning as anything else...

A-Train
05-14-2006, 12:43 AM
Damn, remember when the Spurs hadn't won a series against the Shaq-Kobe-Zen Lakers?

Now we're talking about being down a game to the Mavs?

T-Pain
05-14-2006, 12:45 AM
Damn, remember when the Spurs hadn't won a series against the Shaq-Kobe-Zen Lakers?

Now we're talking about being down a game to the Mavs?
hey the mavs are good too.

A-Train
05-14-2006, 12:49 AM
Dude, it's the Mavs.

whottt
05-14-2006, 12:50 AM
Here's a stat for ya...

The Spurs are 15-2 in series in which they have HCA in the Tim Duncan era.


My bad...16-2...forgot about the Kings. Who kicked our ass a lot worse in game 3 than the Mavs did.

whottt
05-14-2006, 12:54 AM
The Spurs are 15-1 when they win game 1 in the Tim Duncan era.


I mean the stats have as much meaning as anything else...and the sample size is a hell of a lot bigger.

T-Pain
05-14-2006, 04:01 AM
Here's a stat for ya...

The Spurs are 15-2 in series in which they have HCA in the Tim Duncan era.


My bad...16-2...forgot about the Kings. Who kicked our ass a lot worse in game 3 than the Mavs did.
hey...nice stat! Why does ESPN have to be so negative...

SpursGo25
05-14-2006, 04:10 AM
Fuck it. Spurs will win if the game is called fairly. Plain and Simple. Three games in this series. Two games called WAY FUCKING LOPSIDED. Mavs won both due to lopsided officiating. Mavs better pray for more Stern based horrible refs for the series because they cant win without it.

themvp
05-14-2006, 04:12 AM
Spurs in 6.