Mavs<Spurs
05-30-2006, 02:22 PM
What's the verdict on Pat Riley and the big shake up moves that he made last off season?
I will admit that I thought that he made major mistakes. At that time, I thought:
Why change a team that was 2 injuries and 2 minutes away from the Finals? With a healthy Wade and Shaq, I must believe that Miami would have won that series last year against the Pistons.
Why get rid of your best 3 point shooters which help space the floor for Shaq and Wade? Why get rid of your 3rd leading scorer?
Why add JWill (shooting/defense/turnover issues), Antoine Walker (ballhog, shoots 3 too frequently at too low a percentage and does not play defense) ? Won't team chemistry be hurt by these moves?
However, now I understand what he was thinking more:
He wanted to add another couple of threats on offense: Jwill to help run the floor to give easy transition baskets against that tough Detroit defense and Antoine Walker to be another playmaker and another offensive scorer that would be able to score if Detroit were to double Wade and Shaq and ignore everybody else.
He also thought that Posey and Payton would be helps on defense. Payton would avoid turnovers and help slow down Chauncey late in the game. Posey adds a threat from distance and a good defensive player as well if you need some stops.
I wondered why he would get rid of Stan Van Gundy and take over the helm himself? I know he was a great coach, but could Riley coach in 2006? Also, is it Stan's fault that Shaq was injured 20 games? Was is Stan's fault that he lost game 7 by 2 minutes due to 2 bad injuries on his star player?
I am now considering whether Pat Riley might have been right after all. IMO, he seems to have improved their defense, based off of this series with Detroit anyway (e.g. look at Shaq coming out on pick and roll...).
What's your opinion?
I will admit that I thought that he made major mistakes. At that time, I thought:
Why change a team that was 2 injuries and 2 minutes away from the Finals? With a healthy Wade and Shaq, I must believe that Miami would have won that series last year against the Pistons.
Why get rid of your best 3 point shooters which help space the floor for Shaq and Wade? Why get rid of your 3rd leading scorer?
Why add JWill (shooting/defense/turnover issues), Antoine Walker (ballhog, shoots 3 too frequently at too low a percentage and does not play defense) ? Won't team chemistry be hurt by these moves?
However, now I understand what he was thinking more:
He wanted to add another couple of threats on offense: Jwill to help run the floor to give easy transition baskets against that tough Detroit defense and Antoine Walker to be another playmaker and another offensive scorer that would be able to score if Detroit were to double Wade and Shaq and ignore everybody else.
He also thought that Posey and Payton would be helps on defense. Payton would avoid turnovers and help slow down Chauncey late in the game. Posey adds a threat from distance and a good defensive player as well if you need some stops.
I wondered why he would get rid of Stan Van Gundy and take over the helm himself? I know he was a great coach, but could Riley coach in 2006? Also, is it Stan's fault that Shaq was injured 20 games? Was is Stan's fault that he lost game 7 by 2 minutes due to 2 bad injuries on his star player?
I am now considering whether Pat Riley might have been right after all. IMO, he seems to have improved their defense, based off of this series with Detroit anyway (e.g. look at Shaq coming out on pick and roll...).
What's your opinion?