PDA

View Full Version : Harvard to clone human embryos



MaNuMaNiAc
06-07-2006, 04:43 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/06/07/harvard.cloning.ap/index.html


(AP) -- Stepping into a research area marked by controversy and fraud, Harvard University scientists said Tuesday they are trying to clone human embryos to create stem cells they hope can be used one day to help conquer a host of diseases.

"We are convinced that work with embryonic stem cells holds enormous promise," said Harvard provost Dr. Steven Hyman.

The privately funded work is aimed at devising treatments for such ailments as diabetes, Lou Gehrig's disease, sickle-cell anemia and leukemia. Harvard is only the second American university to announce its venture into the challenging, politically charged research field.

The University of California, San Francisco, began efforts at embryo cloning a few years ago, only to lose a top scientist to England. It has since resumed its work but is not as far along as experiments already under way by the Harvard group.

A company, Advanced Cell Technology Inc. of Alameda, California, is trying to restart its embryo cloning efforts. And British scientists said last year that they had cloned a human embryo, though without extracting stem cells.

Scientists have long held out the hope of "therapeutic cloning" against diseases like diabetes, Parkinson's disease and spinal cord injury. But such work has run into ethical objections, a ban on federal funding and the embarrassment of a spectacular scandal in South Korea.

Now, using private money to get around the federal financing ban, the Harvard researchers are joining the international effort to produce stem cells from cloned human embryos.

"We're in the forefront of this science and in some ways we're setting the bar for the rest of the world," said Dr. Leonard Zon of the Harvard Stem Cell Institute.

Dr. George Daley of Children's Hospital Boston, a Harvard teaching hospital, said his lab has begun its experiments. He declined to describe the results so far, saying the work is in very early stages.

Two other members of the Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Douglas Melton and Kevin Eggan, have also received permission from a series of review boards to begin human embryo cloning, the institute announced.

Daley's work is aimed at eventually creating cells that can be used to treat people with such blood diseases as sickle-cell anemia and leukemia. Melton and Eggan plan to focus on diabetes and neurodegenerative disorders like Lou Gehrig's disease, striving to produce cells that can be studied in the lab to understand those disorders.

"We think that this research is very important, very promising, and we applaud Harvard for taking the initiative to move this work forward," said Sean Tipton, president of the Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research, which supports cloning to produce stem cells.

Cloning an embryo means taking DNA from a person and inserting it into an egg, which is then grown for about five days until it is an early embryo, a hollow ball of cells smaller than a grain of sand. Stem cells can then be recovered from the interior, and spurred to give rise to specialized cells or tissues that carry the DNA of the donor.

So this material could be transplanted back into the donor without fear of rejection, perhaps after the disease-promoting defects in the DNA have been fixed. That strategy may someday be useful for treating diseases, though Daley said its use in blood diseases may be a decade or more away.

Daley's current research is using unfertilized eggs from an in-vitro fertilization clinic and DNA from embryos that were unable to produce a pregnancy. Both are byproducts of the IVF process and should provide a ready supply of material for research, Daley said in a statement. Later, his team hopes to use newly harvested eggs and DNA from patients.

Eggan said he and Melton will collaborate on work that uses DNA from skin cells of diabetes patients and eggs donated by women who will be reimbursed for expenses but not otherwise paid.

Harvesting stem cells destroys the embryo, one reason that therapeutic cloning has sparked ethical concerns. The Rev. Tad Pacholczyk, director of education for the National Catholic Bioethics Center in Philadelphia, said he found the Harvard developments troubling.

By cloning human embryos to extract stem cells, he said, "you are creating life precisely to destroy it. You are making young humans simply to strip-mine them for their desired cells and parts. And that is at root a fundamentally immoral project that cannot be made moral, no matter how desirable the cells might be that would be procured."

Apart from the controversy, human embryo cloning has also been the subject of a gigantic fraud.

Hwang Woo-suk of Seoul National University in South Korea caused a sensation in February 2004 he and colleagues claimed to be the first to clone a human embryo and recover stem cells from it.

He hit the headlines again in May of last year when he said his lab had created 11 lines of embryonic stem cells genetically matched to human patients.

But the promise came crashing down last December and January when Hwang's university concluded that both announcements were bogus.

boutons_
06-07-2006, 05:12 PM
June 6, 2006


Monster Tumors Show Scientific Potential in War Against Cancer

By ELIZABETH SVOBODA

Doctors had diagnosed an ear infection in Robyn Miller's 5-week-old daughter Megan, but Ms. Miller had only to gaze into Megan's blank face to know that something more was going on.

"Her eyes dipped down so low that most of what you could see was white," she recalled.

M.R.I. scans revealed a teratoma in Megan's skull * a noncancerous mass of rapidly dividing cells, the result of natural developmental processes gone awry.

"I always thought a benign tumor meant you were going to be O.K.," said Ms. Miller, who lives in Melbourne, Australia. "But this tumor was the size of a clenched fist, and it was expanding inside her brain."

A tumor's encroachment is always terrifying, but teratomas, literally "monster tumors," exert a macabre hold on the imagination because they contain human elements remixed with Frankensteinian logic. It is not unusual for a teratoma to contain patches of hair, errant wedges of cartilage and even fully formed teeth.

In the movie "My Big Fat Greek Wedding," Toula's Aunt Voula describes her teratoma as a mutant version of herself: "I had a lump at the back of my neck," she says. "So I go to the doctor, and inside the lump he found teeth and a spinal cord. Inside the lump was my twin."

Yet new research suggests that the very property that makes these tumors sinister * their ability to spawn human tissues * makes them valuable scientifically.

As clusters of human cells that are not independent organisms, teratomas may prove better test subjects for drugs than lab animals, and they are inspiring ways to grow stem cells without harvesting embryos.

Karl Skorecki, a biologist at Technion University in Haifa, Israel, is among a handful of researchers hoping to turn this rare affliction into biological gold. Dr. Skorecki's teratoma studies arose out of his frustration with animal models that were ineffective for testing cancer medicines.

"Drugs that work well in mice don't always pan out in humans, because with mice, you have a microenvironment with no human cells," he said.

To surmount this problem, Dr. Skorecki and a colleague, Mati Zuckerman, induced teratomas in mice by injecting human embryonic stem cells into their legs.

They then injected laboratory-grown cancer cells into the benign tumors, which spread swiftly throughout the teratoma clusters. The result, they believe, is an ideal test bed for anticancer agents.

Teratomas' most fascinating quality, Dr. Skorecki said, is their capacity to generate a smorgasbord of human tissue varieties, including bones, skin and ligaments. As a result, researchers testing a new medicine on a cancer-seeded teratoma can gauge what effects the drug will have on different cell types without enlisting human subjects.

"Right now, there isn't a good way to derive primary human cells in the lab, other than a few limited types," Dr. Skorecki said. "With this model, you can see how different kinds of cells respond to the drugs."

Pharmaceutical companies have expressed interest in his approach as a substitute for early-stage human trials.

Dr. William Hurlbut, a biologist and ethicist at Stanford, sees teratomas not as potential drug-testing sites but as models for generating stem cells without killing embryos. The tumors, he said, commonly result when egg cells spontaneously develop as though they had been fertilized, proceeding through the first few embryonic divisions.

Like ordinary embryos, the tumors produce stem cells that have the potential to develop into hundreds of tissue types * raw material researchers may need to treat diseases like Alzheimer's. But because they are missing the biological programming embryos need, the teratomas then degenerate into what Dr. Hurlbut calls "jumbled puzzle parts," hodgepodges of hair, fingernails and teeth.

"Teratomas are like model airplanes without the glue," he said. "The tissues go through fairly normal cell divisions, but there's no independent growth and development."

Dr. Hurlbut has proposed that instead of using embryos as sources of stem cells, researchers should harvest the cells from teratoma-like tissue masses that cannot develop into humans. Doing so, he thinks, would "give scientists a chance to start over in stem cell research without moral quandaries," because the structures would never have the potential to develop.

For teratoma sufferers like Megan, the hope is that biological investigations into the tumors' development will help explain why they form and how they can be treated. Surgeons removed most of Megan's teratoma, but it has left an indelible stamp: now 5 years old, she can't talk, walk or sit up unassisted. Still, she is working on learning the alphabet, and the sloppy kisses she blows endear her to new acquaintances.

"She's full of personality," her mother said. "I'm awed by everything she does."

DarkReign
06-08-2006, 10:15 AM
Bush will veto this shit.

Cant have scientific progress in His country if it in anyway kills an unborn semi-human.

Whose fucking liberal now?