PDA

View Full Version : (Pssttt...don't tell Manny) - Report: Global Warming Due To Human Influence



Nbadan
06-22-2006, 06:47 PM
Earth hottest it's been in 2,000 years
By JOHN HEILPRIN, Associated Press Writer 34 minutes ago



WASHINGTON - The Earth is running a slight fever from greenhouse gases, after enjoying relatively stable temperatures for 2,000 years. The
National Academy of Sciences, after reconstructing global average surface temperatures for the past two millennia, said Thursday the data are "additional supporting evidence ... that human activities are responsible for much of the recent warming."

Other new research showed that global warming produced about half of the extra hurricane-fueled warmth in the North Atlantic in 2005, and natural cycles were a minor factor, according to Kevin Trenberth and Dennis Shea of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, a research lab sponsored by the National Science Foundation and universities.

The academy had been asked to report to Congress on how researchers drew conclusions about the Earth's climate going back thousands of years, before data was available from modern scientific instruments. The academy convened a panel of 12 climate experts, chaired by Gerald North, a geosciences professor at Texas A&M University, to look at the "proxy" evidence before then, such as tree rings, corals, marine and lake sediments, ice cores, boreholes and glaciers.

Combining that information gave the panel "a high level of confidence that the last few decades of the 20th century were warmer than any comparable period in the last 400 years," the panel wrote. It said the "recent warmth is unprecedented for at least the last 400 years and potentially the last several millennia," though it was relatively warm around the year 1000 followed by a "Little Ice Age" from about 1500 to 1850.

Their conclusions were meant to address, and they lent credibility to, a well-known graphic among climate researchers — a "hockey-stick" chart that climate scientists Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley and Malcolm Hughes created in the late 1990s to show the Northern Hemisphere was the warmest it has been in 2,000 years.

It had compared the sharp curve of the hockey blade to the recent uptick in temperatures — a 1 degree rise in global average surface temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere during the 20th century — and the stick's long shaft to centuries of previous climate stability.

That research is "likely" true and is supported by more recent data, said John "Mike" Wallace, an atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Washington and a panel member.

Rep. Sherwood Boehlert (news, bio, voting record), R-N.Y., chairman of the House Science Committee, had asked the academy for the report last year after the House Energy and Commerce Committee chairman, Rep. Joe Barton (news, bio, voting record), R-Texas, launched an investigation of the three climate scientists.

The Bush administration has maintained that the threat from global warming is not severe enough to warrant new pollution controls that the White House says would have cost 5 million Americans their jobs.

"This report shows the value of Congress handling scientific disputes by asking scientists to give us guidance," Boehlert said Thursday. "There is nothing in this report that should raise any doubts about the broad scientific consensus on global climate change."

The academy panel said it had less confidence in the evidence of temperatures before 1600.

But it considered the evidence reliable enough to conclude there were sharp spikes in carbon dioxide and methane, the two major "greenhouse" gases blamed for trapping heat in the atmosphere, beginning in the 20th century, after remaining fairly level for 12,000 years.

Between 1 A.D. and 1850, volcanic eruptions and solar fluctuations had the biggest effects on climate. But those temperature changes "were much less pronounced than the warming due to greenhouse gas" levels by pollution since the mid-19th century, the panel said.

The National Academy of Sciences is a private organization chartered by Congress to advise the government of scientific matters.

Yahoo News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060622/ap_on_sc/global_warming)

Of course, you would already know all this if you listened to me.

:hat

xrayzebra
06-22-2006, 07:00 PM
Sheeeeeesh dan. Make up your mind. Is the earth warming every year or just
now. What was the temp 400 years ago? And how many cars did they have
then. Do you have any common sense at all?

xrayzebra
06-22-2006, 07:08 PM
Was Antony and Cleopatra on a boat floating down it? :lol :drunk

pussyface
06-22-2006, 07:30 PM
xray said it best.
all you need is common sense to realize that global warming is a bunch of hype.
f science.

Cant_Be_Faded
06-22-2006, 08:52 PM
a bunch of hype, but to what end?

boutons_
06-22-2006, 09:31 PM
Study Confirms Past Few Decades Warmest on Record

By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, June 23, 2006; A03

An independent scientific panel largely ratified the findings of a controversial climate study yesterday, saying the past few decades amount to the hottest period in the last 400 years.

But the National Academy of Sciences report on the "hockey stick graph" -- a much-discussed chart showing a sudden rise in temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere since the Industrial Revolution began -- voiced less confidence about the graph's conclusion that the climate is hotter now than it has been in 1,000 years. As a result, the academy report is not likely to resolve the fierce debate over the extent to which human-generated greenhouse gas emissions are responsible for warming the earth.

The new report provides ammunition to those who say the evidence is overwhelming that industrial activity is transforming the planet by spewing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, as well as to those who see it as confirmation that significant uncertainty still exists in climate change science.

The report concludes "it can be said with a high level of confidence that global mean surface temperature was higher during the last few decades of the 20th century than during any comparable period during the preceding four centuries." The academy is chartered to advise the government on scientific issues.

NASA scientists have concluded from direct temperature measurements that 2005 was the hottest year on record, with 1998 a close second. Because direct temperature readings only date back to 1860, however, Penn State University climatologist Michael Mann and two colleagues used "proxy" data from ice cores, coral reefs and lake sediments to estimate temperatures back 1,000 years in creating the "hockey stick" -- which gained its name from its distinctive shape.

Panel member Kurt M. Cuffey, a geography professor at the University of California at Berkeley, said at a news briefing that the report "essentially validated" the conclusions Mann reported in 1998 and 1999 using temperature records. The panel also estimated there is a roughly 67 percent chance that Mann is right in saying the past 25 years were the warmest in a 1,000 years. But it noted it is difficult to draw conclusions on temperatures before 1600 because, Cuffey said, "you start relying more and more on data from fewer geographic locations."

House Science Committee Chairman Sherwood L. Boehlert (R-N.Y.) sought the study last year after Energy and Committee Chairman Joe Barton (R-Tex.), a global-warming skeptic, subpoenaed Mann's computer programs, funding sources and other documents.

Boehlert said in a statement yesterday that the academy "shows the value of Congress handling scientific disputes by asking scientists to give us guidance. The report clearly lays out a scientific consensus position on the historic temperature record."

But Sen. James M. Inhofe (R-Okla.), another skeptic, said the academy's report highlights the flaws in Mann's conclusions: "Today's NAS report reaffirms what I have been saying all along, that Mann's 'hockey stick' is broken."

Two non-climate academics in Canada -- mathematician and industry consultant Steve McIntyre and University of Guelph economist Ross McKitrick -- have questioned Mann's methodology. They published a paper in the journal Geophysical Research Letters two years ago suggesting that Mann's approach underplayed the importance of natural variability and that temperatures in the 15th century rivaled current levels.

Mann said in an interview that some news reports and advocates had taken his work "out of context" by minimizing the uncertainty he and his co-authors had acknowledged about their findings.

Researcher Rena Kirsch contributed to this report.

© 2006 The Washington Post Company