PDA

View Full Version : Salary cap for 2006-07 season set at $53.135M



DieMrBond
07-11-2006, 08:51 PM
Salary cap for 2006-07 season set at $53.135M
By Chad Ford
ESPN Insider

Lawyers for the league and the players' association had been working nearly around the clock for the past week counting revenues in order to calculate this year's salary cap. NBA teams received word late Tuesday on the new numbers.

The 2006-07 salary cap will be set at $53.135 million, an increase of $3.6 million from last season.

NBA Salary Cap History
CAP AVG. SALARY
1984-85 $3.6 million $330,000
1985-86 $4.2 million $382,000
1986-87 $4.9 million $431,000
1987-88 $6.2 million $502,000
1988-89 $7.2 million $575,000
1989-90 $9.8 million $717,000
1990-91 $11.9 million $927,000
1991-92 $12.5 million $1.1 million
1992-93 $14.0 million $1.3 million
1993-94 $15.1 million $1.5 million
1994-95 $15.9 million $1.8 million
1995-96 $23.0 million $2.0 million
1996-97 $24.4 million $2.3 million
1997-98 $26.9 million $2.6 million
1998-99 $30.0 million $3.0 million
1999-00 $34.0 million $3.6 million
2000-01 $35.5 million $4.2 million
2001-02 $42.5 million $4.5 million
2002-03 $40.27 million $4.546 million
2003-04 $43.84 million $4.917 million
2004-05 $43.87 million $4.9 million
2005-06 $49.5 million $5 million
2006-07 $53.135 million $5.215 million
The luxury tax threshold will be $65.42 million, up $3.7 million from the $61.7 million threshold last season. Teams with payrolls over that will have to pay a dollar-for-dollar tax on the amount of their payroll that exceeds the $65 million.

The luxury tax threat seems to be working. As it stands right now, only one team, the Knicks, are way over the luxury tax threshold. Two other teams, the Warriors and the Mavs, are projected to be just barely over. Every other team in the league is projected to be under the threshold barring more free-agent spending this summer.

With the new cap set, the NBA moratorium on free-agent signings and player movement will be lifted at 12.01 a.m. Wednesday. Free agents signing under the mid-level exception, which can offered by teams that are over the salary cap, can sign contracts beginning at $5.215 million annually.

Players like Yao Ming and Amare Stoudemire who signed max rookie extension contracts last summer found out what their starting numbers would be next season. Players with less than seven years of experience in the league can have a contract start at the maximum of $12.45 million this season.

Players with seven to nine years of experience can have a contract that starts at $14.94 million. For players with 10 or more years of experience, the max starting salary is $17.43 million.

The Hawks, Bobcats, Bulls, Clippers, Hornets, Raptors and Jazz are the only teams to have significant salary cap room this summer. For the most part it's all been spent.

• The Bulls spent most of their $18 million in cap room on free agent Ben Wallace, giving him a deal that starts at roughly $14 million per.

• The Clippers spent the majority of their $9 million in cap room re-signing Sam Cassell and signing free agent Tim Thomas.

• The Hornets spent their $17.5 million fortune on free agents Peja Stojakovic and Bobby Jackson.

• The Jazz used all of their $6.5 million in room to re-sign Matt Harpring.

Still, there's some money left to spend.

The Bobcats have been eerily quiet despite the fact that they have more cap room ($25 million) than any team in the league. The Bobcats will have to spend more than $12 million to get to the league minimum salary cap of $39.85 million.

The Hawks are expected to sign Speedy Claxton to a four-year contract but still have roughly $12 million in room if they don't do a sign-and-trade for Al Harrington.

The Raptors are expected to sign a couple Euroleague veterans: Spanish forward Jorge Garbosa and American swingman Anthony Parker. But that should only take roughly $6 million of the $12.4 million they have under the cap.

Chad Ford covers the NBA for ESPN Insider.

baseline bum
07-11-2006, 08:58 PM
So the Spurs can use their MLE and only pay $50,000 in tax. There's absolutely no excuse for them not to use it now.

strangeweather
07-11-2006, 09:06 PM
I thought that while the salary cap was set before the season, the actual luxury tax threshold was determined at the end of the season, based on that season's actual revenues -- and I thought teams never knew exactly where it was going to end up, so they had to work from estimates.

Am I wrong on this one?

Kori Ellis
07-11-2006, 09:23 PM
So the Spurs can use their MLE and only pay $50,000 in tax. There's absolutely no excuse for them not to use it now.

How do you figure that?

The Spurs salary is $59,965,471 with only 11 players.

timvp
07-11-2006, 09:23 PM
$65,420,000 - Luxury Tax Threshold
$59,965,471 - Spurs' 2006-07 Salaries
$5,215,000 - Mid-Level Exception


So if the Spurs spend their entire MLE, they should be $239,529 below the luxury tax threshold. The LLE of $1,747,000 would push them about $1,500,000 over the luxury tax.

There is no excuse for the Spurs not to use the entire MLE. Perhpas they can save the LLE for next season but if it comes down to them using it, Holt won't exactly have to starve.

Overall, good news that the cap came in a little higher than expected.

BillsCarnage
07-11-2006, 09:29 PM
How do you figure that?

The Spurs salary is $59,965,471 with only 11 players.

Kori, where do you get your salary #'s from? Seems as though the sites i use all have different salaries listed. For the Suns there is about a $1-1.5mil difference in total salaries between insidehoops and hoopshype.

baseline bum
07-11-2006, 09:29 PM
I misread. I thought it was $64.5 million for the tax, not $65.4.

Kori Ellis
07-11-2006, 09:35 PM
Kori, where do you get your salary #'s from? Seems as though the sites i use all have different salaries listed. For the Suns there is about a $1-1.5mil difference in total salaries between insidehoops and hoopshype.

I just used hoopshype. You are right though, there are slight differences everywhere. Mainly because no team really announces the contract amounts.

Solid D
07-11-2006, 10:00 PM
Relatively good news. Thanks for posting!

Kori Ellis
07-11-2006, 10:10 PM
So a five-year MLE deal comes out to $30.247M. Seems reasonable.

timvp
07-11-2006, 10:16 PM
So a five-year MLE deal comes out to $30.247M. Seems reasonable.

What does a four-year MLE deal come out to?


:spin

yavozerb
07-11-2006, 10:18 PM
So if we could include say barry and williams in a trade we would get their combined 9 million off the books to possible afford maybe murphy from GS and still have our mle to use for a back up pg, correct??

Kori Ellis
07-11-2006, 10:18 PM
What does a four-year MLE deal come out to?


:spin


$23,363,200

timvp
07-11-2006, 10:19 PM
So if we could include say barry and williams in a trade we would get their combined 9 million off the books to possible afford maybe murphy from GS and still have our mle to use for a back up pg, correct??

In theory, yes.

furry_spurry
07-11-2006, 10:21 PM
Williams can't be traded with another player- yet. That trade already went through. Now the GS-Utah trade has not gone through yet so that is why there was some talk of "expanding" it.

yavozerb
07-11-2006, 10:26 PM
How long until we could trade williams?

SequNets
07-11-2006, 10:31 PM
What is a 2 year MLE worth?

Kori Ellis
07-11-2006, 10:33 PM
What is a 2 year MLE worth?

~3.5M (it's 1.747M a year)

Kori Ellis
07-11-2006, 10:33 PM
How long until we could trade williams?

August 21st I believe.

strangeweather
07-11-2006, 10:34 PM
~3.5M (it's 1.747M a year)
You mean LLE, right?

ducks
07-11-2006, 10:34 PM
$5,215,000 + $5,215,000 + 10% (raise)

Kori Ellis
07-11-2006, 10:35 PM
You mean LLE, right?

Yeah sorry I thought he said LLE.

Kori Ellis
07-11-2006, 10:35 PM
$5,215,000 + $5,215,000 + 10% (raise)

There's only 8% raises on MLE.

SequNets
07-11-2006, 10:35 PM
~3.5M (it's 1.747M a year)

Hey thanks, Is that the lle or the mle?

Can we trade someone for Stephen Jackson?

I would get an extra job just so I could get season tickets.

Kori Ellis
07-11-2006, 10:36 PM
Hey thanks, Is that the lle or the mle?

Can we trade someone for Stephen Jackson?

I would get an extra job just so I could get season tickets.

Sorry I read it as LLE.

Who do you want to trade for Jack?

ducks
07-11-2006, 10:37 PM
sj is worth beno
except salaries do not work

SequNets
07-11-2006, 10:38 PM
Sorry I read it as LLE.

Who do you want to trade for Jack?

Finley, Barry, Beno... thats about all that's left.

ducks
07-11-2006, 10:39 PM
why would you trade finely for sj?

MIKE stays!

SequNets
07-11-2006, 10:40 PM
Stephen Jackson wins championships.

ducks
07-11-2006, 10:42 PM
sj wants his contract to guarantee he starts so he does not have to work out during the summer and improve

yavozerb
07-11-2006, 10:44 PM
Jackson is not coming back this year and nor do we need him...Spurs need to focus on pf/c and/or pg.....We have barry as trade bait along with possible contracts of williams when they become available..Beno is so cheap right now the spurs should hold onto him for this year...We also have mle to use if need be

ducks
07-11-2006, 10:47 PM
spurs will draft bowen's replacement or barry's in the first round next year

SequNets
07-11-2006, 10:58 PM
I don't understand the looking ahead crap when you have Tim Duncan right now. WGAF when he leaves, they are going to blow anyways.