PDA

View Full Version : Get paid for NOT having a NBA team



clubalien
08-01-2006, 10:29 PM
The TV Deal the NBA Wishes It Had Not Made
The Silnas of the ABA's St. Louis Spirits still cash in on the contract that began with the merger in 1976.
By Jonathan Abrams, Times Staff Writer
July 31, 2006

Roughly once a month, the NBA cuts 31 checks to NBA teams as revenue from its multibillion-dollar national television contract.

There are only 30 NBA franchises, so who gets the extra check?

ADVERTISEMENT
The money goes to brothers Ozzie and Dan Silna, co-owners of the long-forgotten ABA team, the Spirits of St. Louis.

Thirty years ago, Ozzie Silna, with attorney Donald Schupak, negotiated a deal that cleared the way for the ABA to merge with the NBA. It ranks as one of the best sports deals in modern times, one that has paid the Silnas about $168 million and continues to pay off.

"I would have loved to have an NBA team," said Ozzie Silna, 73, a Malibu resident and environmental activist. "But if I look at it retrospectively over what I would have gotten, versus what I've received now, then I'm a happy camper."

Part of the Silnas' deal called for them to receive one-seventh of the annual TV revenue from each of the four ABA teams entering the NBA. The deal turned out to be so lucrative that several NBA teams have tried to break it, without success.

"We honor the deal," said Donnie Walsh, the Indiana Pacers' chief executive. "I can't say we haven't met and tried to settle it. But it's the greatest deal known to man. What more can you say?"

The key line in the Silnas' TV contract that makes NBA executives cringe reads: "The right to receive such revenues shall continue for as long as the NBA or its successors continues in its existence."

In other words, the deal lasts as long as the NBA does.

Another key component is that Silna, anticipating the NBA expanding, capped the brothers' portion of shared television revenue at a maximum of 28 teams. The other NBA teams share their revenue among all 30 teams.

The Silnas' contract stands ironclad, despite occasional court challenges. Harry Weltman, former general manager of the Spirits, argued to the Supreme Court in 1991 that he was entitled to a share of the revenue to no avail.

Still, the four ABA teams now in the NBA — the Denver Nuggets, Indiana Pacers, New Jersey Nets (formerly the New York Nets) and San Antonio Spurs — have spent plenty in legal fees searching for wiggle room out of the Silnas' contract.

"I think nearly every single attorney and sports executive from those four franchises has taken a look at the deal to see if they can break it," said Gary Hunter, a former Nuggets executive. "I've yet to talk to anybody who can say it can be broken. Every year, when it came down to take a look at the budgeting process we would all just shake our heads."

Three decades ago when the Silnas struck their deal, the renegade ABA, known for its red-white-and-blue ball, three-point shots and star Julius Erving, was struggling financially.

In 1976 the ABA reached a merger deal with the NBA. The NBA agreed to take four of the six teams from the dismantling ABA. The Spirits and the Kentucky Colonels were not invited to join the league. However, the ABA owners needed to reach unanimous approval for the merger to take place.

John Y. Brown, owner of the Kentucky Colonels, quickly accepted a $3.3-million buyout as compensation. That deal was also offered to the Silnas.

But Ozzie Silna kept haggling for more, and he finally reached a deal in a swank Massachusetts hotel room. The Silnas would get $3 million, plus a share of the TV revenue from the four teams entering the NBA.

"When we accepted the arrangement, the big thing was that the NBA had television" and the ABA didn't, said Silna. "But still, the TV revenue was minuscule compared with baseball and the NFL."

Initially, the contract netted the Silnas about $300,000 a year as the NBA struggled with spotty attendance and weak TV ratings until the '80s, when Magic Johnson, Larry Bird and Michael Jordan catapulted the league to a higher profile.

As the NBA's popularity rose, so did the league's TV contract and the Silnas' cut. For the NBA's last contract, they averaged $15 million a year.

"The process never even entered our minds of how high it would get," Ozzie Silna said. "We just wanted a piece of the action."

They are due an even larger jackpot from the NBA's current contract, which began in 2002. That six-year, $4.6-billion deal with ABC/ESPN and TNT could earn them upward of $24 million annually, according to Silna.

Without having to dole out salaries or money on stadium leases, the Silnas earn more each season than most NBA teams.

Silna is quick to point out that today's NBA teams are worth hundreds of millions. Indeed, the Lakers are worth $529 million, and the lowly New Orleans Hornets are valued at $225 million, according to Forbes.

The irony is that Ozzie Silna said he never thought the Spirits would be one of the ABA teams that folded.

The Silnas, who originally earned their money as textile manufacturers, purchased the North Carolina franchise and moved it to St. Louis in 1974. The colorful team featured future NBA players Marvin Barnes, Maurice Lucas and Moses Malone and young radio announcer Bob Costas.

Attendance stagnated in the team's second year, and it soon became apparent the Spirits would not survive the impending merger. In all, the Silnas spent about $5 million on the Spirits.

In 1982, after several years of cashing TV checks, the Silnas came close to accepting a new buyout. The NBA offered them $5 million over eight years, but the Silnas countered with a demand of $8 million over five.

The league balked at that number, so the Silnas have kept cashing in.

http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-aba31jul31,0,917243.story
http://digg.com/basketball/The_TV_Deal_the_NBA_Wishes_It_Had_Not_Made_3

reydawg
08-01-2006, 10:40 PM
Wow.

TheSanityAnnex
08-01-2006, 10:45 PM
this is old old news

clubalien
08-02-2006, 12:01 AM
well since the ABA has been gone for YEARS I am sure it is old news. but the article is new and I am sure some people haven;t heard about it. I just found out myself.

NBA Junkie
08-02-2006, 12:17 AM
Where do I sign up?

Rip-Hamilton32
08-02-2006, 12:54 AM
lol..its not that strange..marbury is getting paid tons of cash to lose games..

reydawg
08-02-2006, 08:34 AM
I'm with clubalien - it's obviously old news, but I'd never heard of it. Thanks for posting it.

ShoogarBear
08-02-2006, 10:11 AM
The Spirits of St. Louis, one of the greatest collection of head cases in sports history.

If you haven't read Loose Balls yet, run out and get a copy now.

DarkReign
08-02-2006, 12:39 PM
this is old old news

I never heard it before.

Amazing. Big props to the Silnas. Smart and lucky is something to behold.

BTW, "Ozzie Silna, 73, a Malibu resident and environmental activist..."

:lmao

mabber
08-02-2006, 01:24 PM
Newspapers must just pass this story around (and maybe tweak it a little each year) as I've read the exact same story 3-4 times in the past few years in different papers.

Fabbs
08-02-2006, 01:53 PM
well since the ABA has been gone for YEARS I am sure it is old news. but the article is new and I am sure some people haven;t heard about it. I just found out myself.
Me too, thanks for posting. Very interesting.

GrandeDavid
08-02-2006, 02:30 PM
Phat deal. Wow. I'm looking for something like that in the automotive industry, receiving phat ass royalties on sales.

SilverPlayer
08-02-2006, 03:44 PM
It is very very possible to get out of a contract like this. If you look at what happened to Enron and its way of hiding debts you can see a way (be it shady) the NBA can get out of this. Play a shell game with the entity of the NBA. Form a new company that's not the NBA and switch everyone over to it. The Spurs, Pacers, Nuggets, and Nets might have to change names or be placed in the shell company depending on the original contract. But if you make the NBA cease to be as an entity and keep everything running under a new "managment" that should work. Now you just have to convince 30 teams to go along with it.

Obstructed_View
08-02-2006, 03:49 PM
It is very very possible to get out of a contract like this. If you look at what happened to Enron and its way of hiding debts you can see a way (be it shady) the NBA can get out of this. Play a shell game with the entity of the NBA. Form a new company that's not the NBA and switch everyone over to it. The Spurs, Pacers, Nuggets, and Nets might have to change names or be placed in the shell company depending on the original contract. But if you make the NBA cease to be as an entity and keep everything running under a new "managment" that should work. Now you just have to convince 30 teams to go along with it.
That would be a successor, as specified in the agreement.

reydawg
08-02-2006, 04:34 PM
That would be a successor, as specified in the agreement.

Not to mention that would hurt the league much much more than $15M/year.

SilverPlayer
08-02-2006, 05:23 PM
That would be a successor, as specified in the agreement.

In that case you could stop just short of destroying the nba entirely to prevent the successor clause from kicking in. Basically the nba could continue to exist in name only as a PO box and a janitor.

Yeah it might cost the nba more than the 15 million a year, but at 20 years at 15 million it might become worth it.

But anyways this action would be taken just as a bluff. You take the paper work to the St Louis Spirit owners and demand they settle for so many million or you do this. It's a way of forcing the settlement, which is what you wanted in the first place.

I also wonder what happens when the orignal parties to the contract die. Is there an inheritance clause too?

DarkReign
08-02-2006, 07:04 PM
In that case you could stop just short of destroying the nba entirely to prevent the successor clause from kicking in. Basically the nba could continue to exist in name only as a PO box and a janitor.

Yeah it might cost the nba more than the 15 million a year, but at 20 years at 15 million it might become worth it.

But anyways this action would be taken just as a bluff. You take the paper work to the St Louis Spirit owners and demand they settle for so many million or you do this. It's a way of forcing the settlement, which is what you wanted in the first place.

I also wonder what happens when the orignal parties to the contract die. Is there an inheritance clause too?

Cmon man, the NBA isnt going to do anything like that for a mear $24 million dollars a year.

Realism ftw.

johngateswhiteley
08-02-2006, 08:41 PM
this is old old news

why does someone always have to chime in with a comment like this. who gives a damn....plenty have never heard of this story before.

DeMarcus Bryant
08-02-2006, 09:20 PM
well since the ABA has been gone for YEARS I am sure it is old news. but the article is new and I am sure some people haven;t heard about it. I just found out myself.
yeah i never knew nothin about this until now. these guys are lucky.

ShoogarBear
08-02-2006, 10:21 PM
No offense, but if David The Prince of Fucking Darkness Stern hasn't figured a way out of it, I doubt that anyone on this board can.

SilverPlayer
08-03-2006, 03:07 AM
David Stern couldn't foresee the seeding problem last year nor has he found a way to market the NBA post Jordan. I think it would be a mistake to assume he has all the answers.

There might be another way out of this contract. Contracts can not be used to create indentured servants. This leads to a very practical guideline to most contractual law in the US. IE - you can't make a contract that places an undue burden on one side, such contracts can be voided. It's a more academicl/obscure argument But hey don't listen to me; I know nothing about what I'm talking about.

mabber
08-03-2006, 06:49 AM
David Stern couldn't foresee the seeding problem last year nor has he found a way to market the NBA post Jordan. I think it would be a mistake to assume he has all the answers.

There might be another way out of this contract. Contracts can not be used to create indentured servants. This leads to a very practical guideline to most contractual law in the US. IE - you can't make a contract that places an undue burden on one side, such contracts can be voided. It's a more academicl/obscure argument But hey don't listen to me; I know nothing about what I'm talking about.

Although Stern is ultimately responsible, the seeding problem was not something he was involved in. His right hand man (forget his name...he's stepping down) was responsible for that. Stern may not have all the answers but I guarantee you he's had that contract situation analyzed by in house and outside attorneys (probably more than once) and is going forward with what saves the most money for the league. If they could get out of that contract for less money than they're paying...I'm sure they would :lol

boutons_
08-03-2006, 08:30 AM
"places an undue burden on one side"

What the NBA is paying the Silnas is still just crumbs in the NBA's $Bs, hardly "undue".

These kinds of legal deals, in perpetuity or not, and unending tax cuts for ther rich running to 100's of Bs, make one feel like a sucker for actually having to earn your money.

btw, the Silnas are members of Mad Mel's favorite people:

http://www.changela.com/jewish_support.htm