Princeton Video Exposes 'How To' Diebold Voter Fraud

[Nbadan]

Princeton University Exposes Diebold Flaws

Main Findings The main findings of our study are:


1. Malicious software running on a single voting machine can steal votes with little ... all » if any risk of detection. The malicious software can modify all of the records, audit logs, and counters kept by the voting machine, so that even careful forensic examination of these records will find nothing amiss. We have constructed demonstration software that carries out this vote-stealing attack.

2. Anyone who has physical access to a voting machine, or to a memory card that will later be inserted into a machine, can install said malicious software using a simple method that takes as little as one minute. In practice, poll workers and others often have unsupervised access to the machines.

3. AccuVote-TS machines are susceptible to voting-machine viruse! s - computer viruses that can spread malicious software automatically and invisibly from machine to machine during normal pre- ! and post-election activity. We have constructed a demonstration virus that spreads in this way, installing our demonstration vote-stealing program on every machine it infects.

4. While some of these problems can be eliminated by improving Diebold's software, others cannot be remedied without replacing the machines' hardware. Changes to election procedures would also be required to ensure security.

Diebold E-voting Fraud Exposed (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6590793631232799613&hl=en)

The video is a 'how-to' the Neocons keep winning elections without winning historically accurate exit-polls, in some cases defying exit polls by double-digits, and why the needs and wants of constituents don't matter.

[boutons_]

USA Today

Election glitches 'could get ugly'

By Richard Wolf, USA TODAY

WASHINGTON — Eight weeks before elections that will decide control of Congress, a rush by state and local governments to prepare new voting machines and train poll workers is raising the possibility of trouble reminiscent of the 2000 presidential election standoff.

Problems range from delayed delivery of new equipment to an insufficient supply of trained technicians to fix anticipated problems, voting experts say.

Already this year, glitches have occurred in Arkansas, California, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas and West Virginia. Maryland became the latest on Tuesday, when technical problems, human errors and staff shortages led officials to keep some polls open an extra hour.

The fall elections shape up as the most technologically perilous since 2000, election officials say, because 30% of the nation's voting jurisdictions will be using new equipment. They include large parts of Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia, scenes of key Senate races. "If you're ever going to have a problem, it's going to be that first election," says Kimball Brace, president of Election Data Services.

Since 2000, nearly half of U.S. counties have switched from punch cards, lever machines and paper ballots to electronic voting or optical-scan ballots read by a computer.

They continue to rely on poll workers who are on average 72 years old and lack computer experience.

Since 2002, the federal government has given states $3 billion to upgrade registration and voting systems. Some states, however, still don't have statewide voter registration databases or equipment that people with disabilities can use independently.

Among the other concerns:

• Demand for new equipment, produced largely by four manufacturers, has delayed deliveries.

• States, counties and manufacturers don't have enough technical support staff. Spokesmen for Diebold and Election Systems & Software, two major vendors, say they're continuously seeking people. States such as Maryland, Mississippi and Pennsylvania have advertised for help on the jobs website Monster.com.

"The vendors have done a much better job of selling the machines than they have of servicing them," says Doug Chapin, director of Electionline.org, which monitors voting changes.

• Touch-screen machines with a paper backup for recounts have caused problems in primaries. Twenty-seven states require a paper trail, up from one in 2004.

"There are so many potential failure points this year that some of it could get ugly," says R. Doug Lewis, executive director of the Election Center, which represents state and local election officials.

Posted 9/14/2006 12:00 AM ET

====================

Ain't democracy in high-tech, super-wealthy USA just great?