Yonivore
09-29-2006, 08:25 PM
...on lies and not facts when opposing this administration.
This Editors' Note in today's New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/ref/pageoneplus/corrections.html) as case #1:
A front-page article on Sept. 14 reported that the inspector general of the Interior Department had accused top officials at the agency of tolerating widespread ethical failures. The article said that the inspector general in a 2004 report had described J. Steven Griles, a deputy secretary accused of more than two dozen ethical lapses, as a “train wreck waiting to happen.” That quotation was taken out of context. The quotation said in full: “Framed within the context of a train wreck waiting to happen, the Department of the Interior was presented with its most complex set of ethical issues with Mr. J. Steven Griles appointment at a time that, following years of neglect, demise and compartmentalization, the ethics program was wholly incapable of addressing them.”
The article also said that Mr. Griles resigned after the accusations against him surfaced. In fairness, the article should have made clear that his resignation came nine months after a government ethics office and his boss concluded that he had committed no ethical breach.
The article also said that efforts to reach Mr. Griles for comment the night before publication were unsuccessful. But the article was posted on the Web site of The Times that night shortly after a message was left for Mr. Griles. In fairness, further efforts should have been made to contact Mr. Griles between the time of the Web posting and the final deadline for the print edition.
Note that Griles was appointed as Deputy Secretary in 2001, so the "years of neglect, demise and compartmentalization" occurred during the Clinton administration. And the Times smeared Griles without bothering to mention that he had been cleared of the ethical charges that the paper repeated.
I keep waiting for the Times to hit bottom, but it hasn't happened yet. The paper's hyper-partisan culture has made it impossible for anyone to rely on its reporting.
Blogger, Dafydd ab Hugh (http://biglizards.net/blog/archives/history/) catches the demagogic Senator Leahy in what appears to be a gross misstatement of recent history. According to Daffyd, this is what Leahy said on the floor of the Senate, presented as case #2:
Even though they [the Bush administration] had him [Osama bin Laden] cornered at Tora Bora, they yanked the special forces out of there to send them to Iraq.
But the Battle of Tora Bora took place in December of 2001, when there was not even a resolution on the table to invade Iraq. As far as I know, we sent no special forces to Iraq until February 2003 (http://www.npr.org/programs/atc/transcripts/2003/feb/030213.gjelten.html).
Does Senator Leahy have any evidence that special forces were re-deployed from Afghanistan to Iraq as early as December 2001? If not, then we must conclude that Leahy is so blinded by hatred of the president that he has told a whopper in order to cast our government in a false and negative light during a time of war.
Leahy should either produce evidence for his unlikely claim or correct the record and apologize. Don't hold your breath, though.
These two cases exemplify nearly daily occurrences of leftist bias and lying.
This Editors' Note in today's New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/ref/pageoneplus/corrections.html) as case #1:
A front-page article on Sept. 14 reported that the inspector general of the Interior Department had accused top officials at the agency of tolerating widespread ethical failures. The article said that the inspector general in a 2004 report had described J. Steven Griles, a deputy secretary accused of more than two dozen ethical lapses, as a “train wreck waiting to happen.” That quotation was taken out of context. The quotation said in full: “Framed within the context of a train wreck waiting to happen, the Department of the Interior was presented with its most complex set of ethical issues with Mr. J. Steven Griles appointment at a time that, following years of neglect, demise and compartmentalization, the ethics program was wholly incapable of addressing them.”
The article also said that Mr. Griles resigned after the accusations against him surfaced. In fairness, the article should have made clear that his resignation came nine months after a government ethics office and his boss concluded that he had committed no ethical breach.
The article also said that efforts to reach Mr. Griles for comment the night before publication were unsuccessful. But the article was posted on the Web site of The Times that night shortly after a message was left for Mr. Griles. In fairness, further efforts should have been made to contact Mr. Griles between the time of the Web posting and the final deadline for the print edition.
Note that Griles was appointed as Deputy Secretary in 2001, so the "years of neglect, demise and compartmentalization" occurred during the Clinton administration. And the Times smeared Griles without bothering to mention that he had been cleared of the ethical charges that the paper repeated.
I keep waiting for the Times to hit bottom, but it hasn't happened yet. The paper's hyper-partisan culture has made it impossible for anyone to rely on its reporting.
Blogger, Dafydd ab Hugh (http://biglizards.net/blog/archives/history/) catches the demagogic Senator Leahy in what appears to be a gross misstatement of recent history. According to Daffyd, this is what Leahy said on the floor of the Senate, presented as case #2:
Even though they [the Bush administration] had him [Osama bin Laden] cornered at Tora Bora, they yanked the special forces out of there to send them to Iraq.
But the Battle of Tora Bora took place in December of 2001, when there was not even a resolution on the table to invade Iraq. As far as I know, we sent no special forces to Iraq until February 2003 (http://www.npr.org/programs/atc/transcripts/2003/feb/030213.gjelten.html).
Does Senator Leahy have any evidence that special forces were re-deployed from Afghanistan to Iraq as early as December 2001? If not, then we must conclude that Leahy is so blinded by hatred of the president that he has told a whopper in order to cast our government in a false and negative light during a time of war.
Leahy should either produce evidence for his unlikely claim or correct the record and apologize. Don't hold your breath, though.
These two cases exemplify nearly daily occurrences of leftist bias and lying.