boutons_
11-06-2006, 12:41 AM
Bush Says U.S. Pullout Would Let Iraq Radicals Use Oil as a Weapon
By Peter Baker
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, November 5, 2006; A06
GREELEY, Colo., Nov. 4 -- During the run-up to the invasion of Iraq (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/countries/iraq.html?nav=el), President Bush and his aides sternly dismissed suggestions that the war was all about oil. "Nonsense," Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld declared. "This is not about that," said White House spokesman Ari Fleischer.
Now, more than 3 1/2 years later, someone else is asserting that the war is about oil -- President Bush.
As he barnstorms across the country campaigning for Republican candidates in Tuesday's elections, Bush has been citing oil as a reason to stay in Iraq. If the United States pulled its troops out prematurely and surrendered the country to insurgents, he warns audiences, it would effectively hand over Iraq's considerable petroleum reserves to terrorists who would use it as a weapon against other countries.
"You can imagine a world in which these extremists and radicals got control of energy resources," he said at a rally here Saturday for Rep. Marilyn Musgrave (R-Colo.). "And then you can imagine them saying, 'We're going to pull a bunch of oil off the market to run your price of oil up unless you do the following. And the following would be along the lines of, well, 'Retreat and let us continue to expand our dark vision.' "
Bush said extremists controlling Iraq "would use energy as economic blackmail" and try to pressure the United States to abandon its alliance with Israel (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/countries/israel.html?nav=el). At a stop in Missouri on Friday, he suggested that such radicals would be "able to pull millions of barrels of oil off the market, driving the price up to $300 or $400 a barrel."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/04/AR2006110401025_pf.html
==============
Or they could keep selling oil the way the Saudis do, the price high enough to haul in petrodollar $Bs but not high enough to push the world into recession and lower oil demand. $4B/month in terrorist Iran and $4B/month into terrorist Iraq is quite enough to pay for 1000s of terrorists attacks.
... oil is another reason why the Repugs invading and losing Iraq makes the USA and world so much more in danger.
You're doing a heckuva job, dubya
By Peter Baker
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, November 5, 2006; A06
GREELEY, Colo., Nov. 4 -- During the run-up to the invasion of Iraq (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/countries/iraq.html?nav=el), President Bush and his aides sternly dismissed suggestions that the war was all about oil. "Nonsense," Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld declared. "This is not about that," said White House spokesman Ari Fleischer.
Now, more than 3 1/2 years later, someone else is asserting that the war is about oil -- President Bush.
As he barnstorms across the country campaigning for Republican candidates in Tuesday's elections, Bush has been citing oil as a reason to stay in Iraq. If the United States pulled its troops out prematurely and surrendered the country to insurgents, he warns audiences, it would effectively hand over Iraq's considerable petroleum reserves to terrorists who would use it as a weapon against other countries.
"You can imagine a world in which these extremists and radicals got control of energy resources," he said at a rally here Saturday for Rep. Marilyn Musgrave (R-Colo.). "And then you can imagine them saying, 'We're going to pull a bunch of oil off the market to run your price of oil up unless you do the following. And the following would be along the lines of, well, 'Retreat and let us continue to expand our dark vision.' "
Bush said extremists controlling Iraq "would use energy as economic blackmail" and try to pressure the United States to abandon its alliance with Israel (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/countries/israel.html?nav=el). At a stop in Missouri on Friday, he suggested that such radicals would be "able to pull millions of barrels of oil off the market, driving the price up to $300 or $400 a barrel."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/04/AR2006110401025_pf.html
==============
Or they could keep selling oil the way the Saudis do, the price high enough to haul in petrodollar $Bs but not high enough to push the world into recession and lower oil demand. $4B/month in terrorist Iran and $4B/month into terrorist Iraq is quite enough to pay for 1000s of terrorists attacks.
... oil is another reason why the Repugs invading and losing Iraq makes the USA and world so much more in danger.
You're doing a heckuva job, dubya