PDA

View Full Version : Audio video question



PhotoShop
11-15-2006, 10:24 PM
A friend of mine has two copies of Saw III, the one in English looks like crap. and you can see peoples heads and hear folks talking. (camcorder) The other copy is DVD excellent quailty and very good picture but is in French.

How can I add the sound track from the English movie to the French movie?

Thank you.

ZStomp
11-15-2006, 10:28 PM
Je ne comprends pas votre question.

Marklar MM
11-15-2006, 10:30 PM
Are you trying to make a Chinese movie with American voice over, only French.

ChumpDumper
11-15-2006, 10:32 PM
http://www.fandango.com/

PhotoShop
11-15-2006, 11:42 PM
Thanks for the link. The French seem to get the movies on DVD since they dont have many theaters I guess, I figured there has to be some sort of Video audio software that will let you add and erase sound.

The only things I can think of is either open two players at the same time, and have one for sound, and one for picture, or I can learn to speak French.

Thanks for the help, I did not see any Audio video forums so I picked this one. I hope the moderators understand.
Thank you.




http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/silver-spurs-fancy.gif

King
11-15-2006, 11:46 PM
Do you have any video editing equipment? Look for the avid or adobe trials. Import both, and take the vid track from one, and the audio track from the other.

Good luck syncing it, though.

PhotoShop
11-15-2006, 11:59 PM
Thanks for the info , mouse told me at the club spurs site you was the man who does this for a living. How much you charge to do it for me?

PhotoShop
11-16-2006, 12:10 AM
I wonder if I take out the audio file from the DVD folder after the burn and replace it with the audio folder from the crappy file if it will automatically play insync.

ChumpDumper
11-16-2006, 12:23 AM
Couldn't you just score another illegal copy somewhere?

PhotoShop
11-16-2006, 12:43 AM
Hey king, while I have you real quick, I have another question.

have you ever seen a picture that was 43.4 MBs big? I down loaded a 911 WTC satelite photo and this bad boy is so big I cant get photo bucket to down load all of it.

Is that normal for a satelite photo, or do you think it has a hidden trojan or maybe it's a different file than a JPG?

here it is at 1% and it is zoomed out, The original pic you can see the people and cars.


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/NewYorkSatellitePhotoAfterTerror-1.jpg

King
11-16-2006, 01:00 AM
Photo manipulating isn't my thing, so I can't tell you anything about that. But 43.4 MB seems huge for a picture. Not sure if it's malicious - just abnormally large. I'll have to get back to you on doing it for you. I'm absolutely slammed with stuff right now at work. If you can download a trial, though, it should be pretty easy to pull the audio from one and add it to the other.

But a torrent might be the way to go on getting a decent SawIII copy.

PhotoShop
11-16-2006, 01:25 AM
Couldn't you just score another illegal copy somewhere?


My friend paid 19.00 dollars to join a legal movie file downloading site, there are many on the www, its just the Saw III files are crappy at this time.

here is the 911 pic at 25% zoom but only 5% of the picture.


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/25percent-WTC.jpg

PhotoShop
11-16-2006, 01:29 AM
Thanks King.

I will tell mouse and the others @ClubSpurs you helped me. I hope to meet you and others from here some day.
peace out............

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/banner-of-fire.gif

ChumpDumper
11-16-2006, 01:47 AM
My friend paid 19.00 dollars to join a legal movie file downloading site, there are many on the www, its just the Saw III files are crappy at this time.link.

I'll have to call bullshit on this one.

PixelPusher
11-16-2006, 02:04 AM
Hey king, while I have you real quick, I have another question.

have you ever seen a picture that was 43.4 MBs big? I down loaded a 911 WTC satelite photo and this bad boy is so big I cant get photo bucket to down load all of it.

Is that normal for a satelite photo, or do you think it has a hidden trojan or maybe it's a different file than a JPG?

here it is at 1% and it is zoomed out, The original pic you can see the people and cars.
Based on the parallaxing, I think that's a hi-rez arial photo, since a satellite photo would have a consistent angle for all the buildings in the frame.

PhotoShop
11-16-2006, 02:09 AM
Today, 12:47 AM #14
ChumpDumper


I'll have to call bullshit on this one.





http://www.butterflydownloadnetwork.com/top20movies.html


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/movie-6.jpg



http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/movies-1.jpg

ChumpDumper
11-16-2006, 02:31 AM
:lmao

PhotoShop
11-16-2006, 02:32 AM
Based on the parallaxing, I think that's a hi-rez arial photo, since a satellite photo would have a consistent angle for all the buildings in the frame.


But have you ever really seen a picture over 10MBs? this one is 43 MBs?

This is a first for me. :wakeup

ChumpDumper
11-16-2006, 02:46 AM
I strongly suggest your friend stop his "membership" at this site and change his CC number.

Fillmoe
11-16-2006, 02:54 AM
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/movie-6.jpg



:lol :lol

PhotoShop
11-16-2006, 03:49 AM
When I open a picture using photoshop it can take from one 10th of a second to 3 seconds to open up. This picture takes one minute. to give you an idea on the size?




This picture is 3551 X 2351 and it is only 398.9 KBs It will take up your monitor easy.

http://justpickone.org/davidtg/PIX/T-G/sunset2.huge.jpg

this is where it fits on my picture to give you a base idea how huge this photo is.


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/test.jpg

PhotoShop
11-16-2006, 03:55 AM
I strongly suggest your friend stop his "membership" at this site and change his CC number.
The site and many like it would be shut down if it was not legal. And why would Google want to steer folks into getting in trouble?

The FEDs are after folks who make over 50 copies and sell them. They are not after the average pork skin eating web surfer. With all the folks you have met in your life on the www, can you name any of them, or any of their friends who got in trouble? :wakeup

ChumpDumper
11-16-2006, 04:03 AM
The site and many like it would be shut down if it was not legal.:lmao

Please tell me where this company is located. Should be easy for you, right?
And why would Google want to steer folks into getting in trouble?They, like "Butterfly Download Network," take no legal resposibility for what is being downloaded. Read their legal page.
With all the folks you have meet in your life on the www, can you name any of them, or any of their friends who got caught?My brother. He got off with a warning and temporary suspension of service from Cox. Happy now?

Please, tell me what city Butterfly is in.

Ricardo Romo
11-16-2006, 04:04 AM
That photo is not for public use, may I ask how you got your hands on it?

PhotoShop
11-16-2006, 04:08 AM
That photo is not for public use, may I ask how you got your hands on it?

It was on my Dads HD when he gave me his PC. He works at Randolph AFB.

PhotoShop
11-16-2006, 04:15 AM
My brother. He got off with a warning and temporary suspension of service from Cox. Happy now?


There is more to the story, first off who uses COX? and out of all the web surfers in Texas why did they go after him? and what movie was it that was so evil to draw attention to him? How to make a bomb, or Zoolander 3?

He would be famous all over the www. His picture would be on Google. even a small film on YouTube on how he got in trouble.

Out of all the sites I go to, and all the posters who have all thier friends and your the speacial person who knows someone who acually got in trouble?

what are the chances I meet you?

ChumpDumper
11-16-2006, 07:19 AM
There is more to the story, first off who uses COX?People who live in Cox Cable areas. Are you really this ignorant?
and out of all the web surfers in Texas why did they go after him?Cox was told by the MPAA to crack down, and at the time it was relatively easy to see who was using the P2P software. Don't you read the papers?
and what movie was it that was so evil to draw attention to him?Who knows? He downloaded alot of movies.
He would be famous all over the www.No, the ones who were prosecuted got their names in the news. I told you he wasn't.
Out of all the sites I go to, and all the posters who have all thier friends and your the speacial person who knows someone who acually got in trouble?There are many more than myself. Use your little Google to find the stories.
what are the chances I meet you?Are you coming on to me?

Look, I tried to do you and your friend a favor. He's getting ripped off paying for illegal downloads he could just as easily find for free, if that's what he's into. Your copies of Saw III are not legal. If you really want your download to work, why not send an inquiry to Lionsgate Films and ask them how to fix the soundtrack of your download of Saw III from Butterfly Download Network.

Here is their email:

[email protected]

and their other information:

Los Angeles
Lionsgate
2700 Colorado Ave.
Santa Monica, CA 90404
Telephone (310) 449-9200
Facsimile (310) 255-3870

I am sure they will be eager to help you.

Now, where is Butterfly Downloads located again?

KFFL
11-16-2006, 08:04 AM
I would like to see the story on these folks who got arrested. Does the paper have a web site? I looked on Google and I could not find anyone who has been arrested for downloading a movie. go check for yourself.


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/pirates2.jpg

PhotoShop
11-16-2006, 08:19 AM
People who live in Cox Cable areas. Are you really this ignorant?

Dude I was born in Canada cox is not something you get everyday, (unless your gay) relax I'm just fucking with cha, you know, for shits and giggles.


Look, I tried to do you and your friend a favor. He's getting ripped off paying for illegal downloads he could just as easily find for free, if that's what he's into. Your copies of Saw III are not legal.

I will pass this info on to him. now if I can only warn others before it's to late..............

Now, where is Butterfly Downloads located again?

I am not sure, I don't know how to download movies, and If I did, it wouldn't be SAW III. I am a huge Hockey fan I like sports. I just got word of this site last week from mouse at club spurs. he said folks here know all kinds of shit so I gave it a shot. I told him about you he said to watch out your a moderator.


Anyway thanks for the heads up, I really like your forum I may come back one day.

ChumpDumper
11-16-2006, 01:23 PM
I would like to see the story on these folks who got arrested. Does the paper have a web site? I looked on Google and I could not find anyone who has been arrested for downloading a movie. go check for yourself.


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/pirates2.jpg
:lol

Here's the most recent one I could find:

Locals sued over downloads
Movie, music industries target activity in Valley.
By John Ellis / The Fresno Bee
10/30/06 05:18:16

A few months ago, the Motion Picture Association of America sent a not-so-gentle reminder to the San Joaquin Valley when it sued four residents it claims illegally downloaded movies from the Internet.

Such actions by the movie and music industries no longer are headline news, but that doesn't mean both have stopped using the legal system as a tool in their battles against copyright infringement.

In fact, their legal offensives are as active as ever, and both industries say they intend to continue suing individuals.

"Our lawsuits are definitely an ongoing program," said Amanda Hunter, a spokeswoman for the Recording Industry Association of America.

The most recent MPAA lawsuits were filed in U.S. District Court in Fresno against Lupe Carillo of Avenal, Paula Dixon and Brandy Sherman of Bakersfield and Michael Martinez of Fresno. The civil suits seek monetary damages and a legal prohibition against the individuals illegally downloading movies.

Martinez, for instance, is alleged to have illegally downloaded five movies, including "Constantine," "Meet the Fockers" and "Are We There Yet?"

Each of those sued was found by their use of "peer-to-peer" networks — which enable digital files to be transferred directly from one computer to another.

The technology was first popularized by Napster for transferring music files, but with the advent of high-speed modems that can move larger files faster, many people began illegally swapping movies online.

Those alleged to have illegally downloaded material are found because each computer has a unique address. Once that address is determined, the movie or music industries seek a subpoena to force an Internet provider to divulge the name of the person who holds that address.

None of the four recently sued could be reached to comment.

These latest actions come as the tide may be turning against those who seek to illegally download music.

In June 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the movie and music industries can file piracy lawsuits against technology companies that encourage illegal downloading of copyrighted material over the Internet.

This past July, Sharman Networks, which distributes "peer-to-peer" software known as Kazaa, agreed to redesign its file-sharing program so that it will stop those who try to download copyrighted movies and music.

And three weeks ago, a federal judge in Los Angeles ruled that StreamCast Networks Inc. — which distributes the Morpheus online file-sharing software — encouraged computer users to share copyrighted material without permission.

At the same time, legal music downloads have been increasing, the RIAA's Hunter said.

Still, illegal downloading of movies and music outpaces legal purchases of digital media.

"We've put a tourniquet on a hemorrhaging problem," said Jonathan Lamy, another RIAA spokesman, "but it is by no means acceptable."

Lamy said the recording industry knows it won't totally eliminate illegal downloading of music, but believes it can control the problem with a combination of education and lawsuits.

As the next step in that ongoing fight, the movie and music industries have started taking a more local and regional approach in their efforts to stop the illegal downloads.

In the recent civil lawsuits filed by the Motion Picture Association of America, for instance, the headline of the announcement read: "Motion Picture Industry Takes Action Against Central California Internet Movie Thieves."

"The purpose of the suits are twofold — to recover damages, and to raise public awareness about Internet piracy and its consequences," said the MPAA's Elizabeth Kaltman.

The end result can be painful for those cited.

On Aug. 31, U.S. District Judge Oliver W. Wanger approved an agreement between Veronica Ontiveros and six record companies, including Sony BMG Music Entertainment and Atlantic Recording Corp.

The settlement will require the Bakersfield resident to pay $10,700 for illegally downloading and sharing music.

On the movie side, Columbia Pictures Film Production Asia Limited has filed paperwork seeking $6,000 in damages and close to $2,000 in attorney's fees from Visalia resident Lisa Marks, who the movie company claims illegally downloaded the film "Kung Fu Hustle."

Brian Marks, who identified himself as the son of Lisa Marks, said a reporter's call was the first he had heard of the lawsuit.

"I don't even know how to download movies like this," he said. "We shouldn't have to pay a damn thing because we didn't do it."

Marks, 20, said the house he shares with his mother has a wireless network that isn't encrypted. He thinks somebody else used their Internet connection to download the movie.

"It's like me stealing your car and robbing a bank and you getting in trouble for it," he said.

The movie company, however, said Lisa Marks never responded to the lawsuit and it is seeking a judgment in its favor.

Though the fines sought in these cases are large, federal statues allow the industries to seek penalties up to $30,000 per film or song.

http://www.fresnobee.com/263/story/10198.html

Duped again.

:clap

KFFL
11-17-2006, 04:00 AM
I asked crazyone about that picture he said real satellite photos are really that big and he has one that is 200 MBs so good luck downloading that bad boy :lol

Ps: Thank you Mr. Dumper for that info I was about to join that site! :madrun

ChumpDumper
11-17-2006, 06:23 AM
Rub it in, why don't you?