PDA

View Full Version : Channing's Starting Job In Danger



ducks
12-03-2006, 09:56 AM
CHANNING'S STARTING JOB IN DANGER
By MARC BERMAN
'FRANCHISE' DRIVE: The Knicks Steve Francis drives to the basket during the first half of last night's game against the Raptors.December 3, 2006 -- The idea of trading Channing Frye last season was blasphemy - as much as Larry Brown tried.

But with David Lee emerging as a major force, Eddy Curry becoming the go-to guy in the post and 6-foot-11 Jared Jeffries soon to return, Frye appears to have lost his status as one of Thomas' chief building blocks - and perhaps is close to losing his starting job.

Frye's trade value was sky-high last season, but Thomas would not budge. His value has dropped, but there's still interest in the 23-year big man selected eighth overall.

The Cavaliers have taken a long look at Frye this season, according to a source, before he got injured eight days ago, spraining his left ankle. Thomas has always had interest in Drew Gooden of the Cavaliers, whom he wanted to swap for Kurt Thomas before Cavaliers ownership put the kibosh on it two years ago.

The Lakers were so enthralled with Frye they were willing to depart with Lamar Odom in a package last season. Sadly, it looks like Thomas erred big-time in choosing Frye over Lakers teenage center, Andrew Bynum of Metuchen, N.J, who is averaging 8.3 points-per-game. If Frye wasn't there, Thomas would have taken Bynum, which at the time was considered a major reach, but now would look pretty good.

Frye said believes he's still two weeks away from returning, though he ditched the crutches a few days ago. But Isiah Thomas gave a hint that Frye's role might be decreased, and he could be removed as starter. Plus, Thomas this week called the Knicks Eddy Curry's team.

When asked if Frye would regain his starting job, Thomas said, "Definitely." But then he added, "Unless Jeffries comes back first."

Thomas would not elaborate but Jeffries was signed for his versatility. If Thomas is really stuck on having Lee come off the bench, he could insert him at power forward and keep steady Quentin Richardson at small forward.


*

Thomas, fighting for his basketball life, said in Detroit he felt this was "professionally, the most pressure" he has faced. It was a stunning remark considering how many big playoff games and championship-round games Thomas has played.

"It's different now you have to inspire, motivate and educate," Thomas said last night. "You have to do it in an environment that's particularly tough where you have a lot of doubters and have a lot know-it-alls.

"You don't have quiet classroom to teach in. We do have obstacles. That's not to say we can't overcome them. Don't misunderstand me. They're not complaints. They're acknowledgements. You acknowledge the pressure and acknowledge the atmosphere."
http://www.nypost.com/seven/12032006/sports/knicks/the_frye_is_falling_knicks_marc_berman.htm

JamStone
12-03-2006, 11:33 AM
Lee should start especially with Curry being the no. 1 post option in the starting line-up. Frye off the bench can be more of a featured player in the second unit. Win-win, unless Frye has an ego about it or is too sensitive to take the demotion.

Mr.Bottomtooth
12-03-2006, 11:46 AM
Fuck that. Anyone else can have their starting spot in danger but not Channing Frye's.

JMarkJohns
12-03-2006, 02:11 PM
That articles a bit unfair. Channing injured his knee at the end of last season and was unable to do basketball stuff for a good part of the summer. On top of that, have you seen his PGs? Yeah, not much of a chance for pic-n-rolls with that group.

If I'm the Suns, I offer a package of their acquired Cleveland 1st and a future 1st and James Jones for him. They won't get a star any longer, but if they can get a solid player and some picks, they can save face.

Plus, this move makes perfect sense for Phoenix as Channing is athletic, alters plenty of shots, shoots well from the perimeter and is a legit 6-10, 235, giving them the skills they want and size they need.

JamStone
12-03-2006, 04:36 PM
Channing Frye might have lost some value, but to give up a legit big for James Jones and two high twenty draft picks is absurd.

That's not even close to being a fair trade.

Phoenix had two first round picks this past summer and they gave both away for nothing. Not even giving up the Atlanta first round pick in the Joe Johnson deal? Come on, man.

And, James Jones doesn't even play any minutes. With Jared Jeffries coming back, Quentin Richardson playing well, and Renaldo Balkman looking like a decent rookie, why would the Knicks want another small forward?

Why can't people be realistic when they propose trades?

JMarkJohns
12-03-2006, 08:12 PM
Unrealistic? With Isiah, I'm not sure there even is such a thing.

Your point is taken, but I think two firsts is a solid starting point. If they are thinking so little of him that he's the fourth or fifth big in their rotation, then two 1sts and an inexpensive role player could be tempting.

It's not like Thomas has a penchant for coming out the winner of trades of late.

You ask why Thomas would take a third or fourth SF when he's already got some quality players at that position already. Well, He did acquire Francis last year when he had two HUGE salary, 30 minute players at his position(s) already (Marbury and Crawford), on top of a promising rookie with nice upside (Robinson).

So come on. Throw in a little context to this trade proposal and it's not as absurd an offer as you proclaim. Two 1sts and an inexpensive role player for a possible soon-to-be fourth or fifth big... potential is only worth so much. If he's being benched and essentually moved past by a lottory team, then perhaps he's not worth much more.

Just 'cause Darko got a protected lottory pick for his potential, doesn't mean every promising big will net the same via trade. Darko couldn't crack a Finals rotation. Frye could be benched from a lottory rotation.

TDMVPDPOY
12-03-2006, 11:49 PM
busts