PDA

View Full Version : No blood for Cocoa?



whottt
11-07-2004, 07:00 PM
www.mensnewsdaily.com (http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/m-n/mariani/2004/mariani110704.htm)

No Blood for Cocoa?

November 7, 2004
by Joe Mariani

A unilateral invasion without the permission of the United Nations. Thousands of civilian deaths. Mass graves uncovered. A foreign power imposing its will on a xenophobic, restless, resentful populace. Massive protests in the streets against the meddling foreigners, calling their leader a "terrorist" and "enslaver." More troops pouring in, desperately trying to keep order and failing. Widespread fear of a quagmire. Whole segments of the population begging President Bush to help them expel the hated French invaders...

Hang on... what was that last part again?

On 19 September 2002, Côte d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast) erupted into civil war. Two separate rebel factions fought each other and the government for control of the African nation, which produces about 43% of the world's cocoa. Both the Popular Ivorian Movement for the Far West (MPIGO) and the Ivory Coast Patriotic Movement (MPCI) attempted to overthrow President Laurent Gbagbo, taking control of the largely Muslim northern part of the country. At least one of the rebel groups (MCPI) may have ties to the neighboring country of Burkina Faso. The rebels claim to be loyal to the country's former leader, General Robert Guei, who seized power in a military coup in 1999 but lost power in the election of 2001. He died on the first day of fighting, but the various insurrections continued. A few hundred French paratroopers entered the country to protect the 19,000 French nationals living there, but soon found themselves battling the rebels. American Special Forces landed as well, but only to evacuate trapped students from an American school. Over 1,000 French troops set up a "buffer zone" to divide the country in half in October 2002, but it had little effect. French troops put down protesters with tear-gas as they chanted "Down with France" and "Chirac the enslaver."

A third major rebel group emerged by January 2003 -- the Movement for Peace and Justice (MJP). They absorbed MPIGO, but continued the fighting. The other main group, the MCPI, signed a cease-fire with the Ivorian government. With the emergence of new rebel groups and political parties, the fractured nation had over ten sides to the war by that time. The French government drew up a peace plan that divided the Ivorian President's power. The Linas-Marcoussis Peace Accord created a new cabinet, which would draw members from various opposition parties and rebel groups, and declared that Gbagbo may not run for office again. When Gbagbo and the leaders of several groups signed the plan, the populace erupted in protest against the French. Carrying signs declaring "Chirac is a terrorist" and declaring that "he is killing democracy in Ivory Coast" while begging the US to help expel the French troops, over 100,000 Ivorians marched for four days in the nation's economic capitol, Abidjan, even bombing the French Embassy. President Gbagbo declared the plan he signed to be "null and void."

Finally, in February 2003, the United Nations quietly passed a resolution agreeing to the deployment of the French troops that had been there for five months already. Remember the huge outcry by American Liberals against the unilateral French invasion of Côte d'Iviore? Don't feel badly -- neither do I. Keep in mind that this was the same time period during which the French (and Liberals) were condemning the 46-nation Coalition of the Willing for the "unilateral" invasion of Iraq. By March 2003, there were over 3,000 French troops attempting to put down the rebellion and protect the peace treaty, to no avail. France continued to send troops, and by July 2003, a shaky peace was declared, protected by the 4,000 French troops in the country by then. But the protests, if not the fighting, continued.

After Ivorian security forces fired on protesters in March 2004, the rebel groups and the main opposition party withdrew from the government in protest themselves, but rejoined the government after two days of talks. 6,000 UN peacekeeping troops were deployed. The country has been relatively quiet since, except for the discovery of mass graves as fighting between rebel factions continues. Now the virulently anti-French protests continue amid escalating violence in Côte d'Ivoire. French troops fought Ivorian soldiers and angry mobs alike, after Ivorian planes killed 9 French soldiers and one American. The French retaliated by destroying the Ivorian planes and helicopters. On 6 November 2004, Reuters reported:

Mob violence erupted in Ivory Coast's national commercial capital, Abidjan, upon France's retaliation, sending thousands of angry loyalists armed with machetes, axes and clubs out into the streets in fiery rampages in search of French targets.
"French go home!" loyalist mobs shouted, as thousands set fire to at least two French schools and tried to storm a French military base, seeking out French civilians as French and Ivory Coast forces briefly traded gunfire.
"Everybody get your Frenchman!" young men screamed to each other, swinging machetes.

How long will it be, I wonder, before the French ask for our help? What should we tell them? Should we say that our own troops are busy fighting in Iraq -- you remember, the place you refused to send troops when we asked for help? Should we remind them that the last time they got in over their heads and asked for American aid was in a place called Dien Bien Phu in 1954, and we'd rather not repeat history? The French loss at Dien Bien Phu led to Vietnam being split in two, and America, having already become invested in the outcome, was almost inexorably drawn into the conflict between North and South. Will we turn our backs on the French in Côte d'Iviore as they continue to do in Iraq, even after the emergence of a democratic government? Jacques Chirac is still trying to cause trouble by snubbing Iraqi Prime Minister Ayad Allawi. Chirac skipped out on greeting him in Brussels to visit dying terrorist Yasser Arafat.

The question is, can we turn our backs on the Ivorians if they need our help? On the other hand, can we deal with more anti-war protesters in the streets of New York, this time chanting "No Blood For Cocoa?"

Yonivore
11-07-2004, 07:06 PM
The French have been doing shit like that, in Africa, for as long as I can remember...

ChumpDumper
11-07-2004, 07:09 PM
Ugly aftereffects of colonialism.

Not unlike Iraq.

whottt
11-07-2004, 07:32 PM
No shit, but Iraq was never a US colony. But guess whose colony Syria was, Lebanon was, Algeria was, Vietnam was, and so on and so forth...starting to see a fucking pattern dumbass?

Saudiy Arabia wasn't a US colony, nor was Pakistan, nor was Iran.

We also weren't t he ones that lied to both the Arabs and the Jews and promised them both land in the same location...


What you dumbasses that are so worried about Europe and the UN not liking us don't realize...These are the people that install sadistic dictators. That's why everyone of their former colonies is a human rights catastrophe.

What you don't get...

Is that the reason the Western World is so hated in the Middle East is because of what the colonial powers did there...that's why they don't trust us, that's why they get all this total fucking bull shit that we are just going to install puppet governments...even though we have never done that 1 single time after a war.

We get blamed for Europe's past actions in the middle east, just like what the terrorist most hate about us is our liberalism.

They think we are a bunch of godless hedonists and faggots and they want to destroy us for it. And dumbass liberals just want to let them grow in power and get nuclear weapons to be able to do it.

And Europe doesn't want to be over there because they truly believe these people are fucking savages incapable of self government...that's why they installed the dictators in the first place.



So when I hear about you guys leaving the country en masse...I literally say to myself, thank god. Please, I hope they all go to our worst enemy and fuck that country up instead of mine....

They are dangerous because they think they have their pulse on the world when really these so called high educated liberals are a bunch of silverspoon babies that are out of touch with the real world...they live in a world of aristocracy, in which they think they are better than everyone else.

And basically they just want to sit around on their impotent fucking asses debating the issue while people live in terrorist breeding shitholes.

That's where the Arabs get all this bullshit that we are just there for Oil profiteering...why? Because that's what fucking WWI and WWII were essentially about. Wars we tried to stay out of.


They view Europe as the West and they view us as the most powerful nation in the West.

When they hate the West, accuse us of imperialism, they are referring to things done to them by Europe...and they just dont' draw the discerning line.

And BTW, France is totally over there in the Ivory Coast for economic reasons 100%.

They acted unilaterally, that was no international forces like it was with us when we went into Iraq, Natrually King of Africa Koffi Anan has no problem getting the back of his French Collaborators...he has no problem with Ivory Coastians being killed...

Over there you have a population revolting nearly 100% against the UN forces and the French..

I just want to hear you guys bitch about the coffee killers like you do about us when we go into take out a potential nuclear threat who has violated the conditions of his surrender 1.6 billion times since 1993.



Open your eyes and you will see who the real dickheads are, apart from yourself of course. Now STFU and support the troops and President until this bullshit is over. If that's too hard to do just pretend our government is French or the PLO or something...you should love it then.

And don't say you guys won't defend their war actions...I have a whole thread of you doing it.