Log in

View Full Version : W.H. Gets Burned By Another Lie



Nbadan
01-09-2007, 11:57 AM
Wag the dog?


http://www.citizensforethics.org/filelibrary/JAGWB.jpg
Strangely, have never met

The Associated Press
Monday, January 8, 2007; 7:35 PM


WASHINGTON -- A liberal watchdog group published on its Web site Monday a picture of President Bush and imprisoned lobbyist Jack Abramoff, the kind of photo the White House has refused to release.

The picture was taken at a campaign fundraiser in December 2003, according to the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. It was taken by a private photo contractor who posted it on a Web site, but then was removed before it made it into distribution, said Melanie Sloan, CREW's director.

--

Kim Eisler, Washingtonian magazine writer and a friend of Abramoff's, confirmed the photo's authenticity for The Associated Press. He said he had seen the picture at Abramoff's house.

Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/08/AR2007010801326.html)


"The President does not know him, nor does the President recall ever meeting him."

~Scott McClellan, White House Press Secretary.

PixelPusher
01-09-2007, 12:02 PM
Good thing they managed to keep that pic out of the press before the election last year...oh, wait...

xrayzebra
01-09-2007, 03:32 PM
I'll bet with all the pictures Bush or any other President makes with people we
could even find one of Bush and boutons. :lol

ChumpDumper
01-09-2007, 03:33 PM
It's not the picture. It's the lying about the picture.

xrayzebra
01-09-2007, 03:52 PM
You mean like: "I didn't have sex with that woman" or lying to a grand jury.
Something like that.

My understanding was that they just would release any pictures. But I could be
wrong. Everyone knew whathisface made lots of trips to the WH.

But...oh, never mind.

ChumpDumper
01-09-2007, 03:55 PM
You mean like: "I didn't have sex with that woman" or lying to a grand jury.
Something like that.Exactly like that.

PixelPusher
01-09-2007, 06:08 PM
Exactly like that.
Impeachably, Starr Report like that.

Yonivore
01-09-2007, 07:06 PM
Hell, I have a picture with the President and he doesn't know me from Jack.

Anyone in here ever heard of a photo op?

Trivia question for the day. Just how many people have their picture taken with the President of the United States every year?

Bonus: How many of those people does the President know personally?

Oh, and SpunkChomper, I think you'd have a point if Jack Abramhoff had sucked W's dick and the President was testifying under oath.

PixelPusher
01-09-2007, 07:16 PM
Oh, and SpunkChomper, I think you'd have a point if Jack Abramhoff had sucked W's dick and the President was testifying under oath.
Yeah, Chumper! Quit hating on the Prez. He didn't lie under oath, he just lied normally, which is perfectly acceptable. :rolleyes

gtownspur
01-09-2007, 08:13 PM
Yeah, Chumper! Quit hating on the Prez. He didn't lie under oath, he just lied normally, which is perfectly acceptable. :rolleyes


You know for a matter of fact that he's lying from one photo. Ok.

ChumpDumper
01-09-2007, 11:28 PM
I think you'd have a pointYou couldn't think no matter what I have, dipshit.

See you next blog ripoff, Clintonbot.

exstatic
01-09-2007, 11:54 PM
You know for a matter of fact that he's lying from one photo. Ok.
Abramhoff was the single biggest GOP fundraiser, and had his pic snapped with Georgie. Either Shrub is as stupid as we say he is, or he's a liar extraordinaire. I would like to give him the benefit of the doubt and say that politician's know their donors, and he fibbed, but you may actually be right: he may be that stupid, and not lying.

Trainwreck2100
01-10-2007, 01:08 AM
I hate W, but this could easily be written off as a photoshop or a photo op, lie or no, this is too easy to wiggle out of.

exstatic
01-10-2007, 08:20 AM
Kim Eisler, Washingtonian magazine writer and a friend of Abramoff's, confirmed the photo's authenticity for The Associated Press. He said he had seen the picture at Abramoff's house.
Photo shops are usually VERY easy to spot by experts, and don't you think the White House would have brought some in by now? Their silence is deafening.

01Snake
01-10-2007, 11:52 AM
Who gives a fuck??

ChumpDumper
01-10-2007, 03:09 PM
Obviously Bushco did.

xrayzebra
01-10-2007, 03:19 PM
^^And the dimm-o-craps.

ChumpDumper
01-10-2007, 03:27 PM
So both sides agree that was a silly question.

Oh, Gee!!
01-11-2007, 02:13 PM
Hell, I have a picture with the President and he doesn't know me from Jack.

Anyone in here ever heard of a photo op?

Trivia question for the day. Just how many people have their picture taken with the President of the United States every year?

Bonus: How many of those people does the President know personally?

Oh, and SpunkChomper, I think you'd have a point if Jack Abramhoff had sucked W's dick and the President was testifying under oath.


whatevz. If you found a picture with OBL and Saddam arm-in-arm, you'd be the first one screaming that it proved conclusively that the Iraq war was justified. You're so full of crap sometimes.

Yonivore
01-12-2007, 10:54 AM
whatevz. If you found a picture with OBL and Saddam arm-in-arm, you'd be the first one screaming that it proved conclusively that the Iraq war was justified. You're so full of crap sometimes.
Yeah, when you combine the photo with the megabytes and reams of documentation of their relationship, already recovered from Iraq, yep, I'd say that would be pretty conclusive. But, I don't expect a photo because it appears they operated through proxies.