PDA

View Full Version : Top 10 ways for the Demoncratic Party...


Yonivore
11-09-2004, 12:37 PM
...to secure a majority:

10. Appoint Terry McAullife Party chairman for life. If McAuliffe isn't available, this guy (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20041108/ap_on_re_us/dean_dnc) would be great.

9. Close the telepathic subliminal electioneering gap (http://www.livejournal.com/community/pagan/1334906.html).

8. Nominate more Massachusetts liberals. C'mon, give Teddy "Splash" Kennedy another shot. After all, he hasn't drowned anyone this century.

7. Start a nationwide Guardian letter writing campaign.

6. Can Bob Shrum (http://www.weeklystandard.com/Check.asp?idArticle=4875&r=wkfmq) run a campaign or what? Don't change a thing.

5. Don't just legalize gay marriage, make it mandatory.

4. There's no such thing as too much Michael Moore.

3. More, not fewer, CBS News exposes.

2. That's right, you guessed it; "I'm Hillary Rodham Clinton and I'm reporting for duty."

And the number 1 way for Demoncrats to regain the majority...

1. Explain to 51% of the electorate that they're stupid (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/08/opinion/08herbert.html?ex=1257656400&en=90f84dcc6f03f494&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland). They will eventually realize that you are smarter than they are and will vote as you tell them to. It has only taken them this long because they really are sooo (http://www.scalzi.com/whatever/002872.html) fucking stoopid (http://slate.msn.com/id/2109218/).

You're welcome
JoeChalupa
11-09-2004, 12:47 PM
Again..it is DEMOCRAT.

Get it right man!!!!!
Yonivore
11-09-2004, 01:16 PM
Again..it is DEMOCRAT.

Get it right man!!!!!
Or what?
JoeChalupa
11-09-2004, 01:19 PM
Or nothing...just looking for a little respect.

I figured you'd be a good winner, although your libertarian candidate got punked, and stop the hating...but I understand and don't worry..maybe..in a few decades a few light years there just may a libertarian candidate with a prayer.

Or do only conservative candidates pray?
Yonivore
11-09-2004, 01:27 PM
I don't hate, Joe.

There are Democrats (who are ideologically challenged) and there are Demoncrats (who are ideologically challenged and willing to do anything to force that ideology on the rest of us).

I don't speak ill of Democrats...just Demoncrats and, Joe, this election hasn't done anything to stop their desire for power.
samikeyp
11-09-2004, 01:47 PM
There are Democrats (who are ideologically challenged)

isn't that just a little hate? :p
dcole50
11-09-2004, 02:03 PM
isn't that just a little hate? :pHeheh, being called ideology challenged is better than being called a God hater. I'm referring to the right winged extremist Dr. James Dobson who went on George Stephanopoulos' show and called Democratic senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont a "God-people hater" and provided no evidence of any statements Leahy had made to indicate that he was against the Christian faith.

Being told I’m immoral for endorsing one candidate over another is unbelievably frustrating.

My point is that extremists on both sides really agitate me to no end. The less of them, the better for America.
Duff McCartney
11-09-2004, 02:25 PM
Demoncrats (who are ideologically challenged and willing to do anything to force that ideology on the rest of us).

Sounds like some right wing Christian nut jobs I know.
Hook Dem
11-09-2004, 02:27 PM
" I didn't vote!" "I don't really care who president is"......Guess who!!!!! :lol
samikeyp
11-09-2004, 02:44 PM
My point is that extremists on both sides really agitate me to no end. The less of them, the better for America.

I would agree.
Yonivore
11-09-2004, 04:06 PM
isn't that just a little hate? :p
Nope, just a fact.
Duff McCartney
11-09-2004, 04:08 PM
" I didn't vote!" "I don't really care who president is"......Guess who!!!!! :lol

Seriously, my nuts are getting tired it's time for you to get off of them.
JoeChalupa
11-09-2004, 04:10 PM
I don't hate, Joe.

There are Democrats (who are ideologically challenged) and there are Demoncrats (who are ideologically challenged and willing to do anything to force that ideology on the rest of us).

I don't speak ill of Democrats...just Demoncrats and, Joe, this election hasn't done anything to stop their desire for power.

It hasn't stopped the republicans either. Do you think they would have campaigned so hard if they didn't?
samikeyp
11-09-2004, 04:12 PM
actually its not a fact. its your opinion, to which you are entitled. I am sure there are democrats on this board who think you are equally challenged. Doesn't mean they are right, its their opinion.
Opinionater
11-09-2004, 04:22 PM
IHMO, everyone has an opinion and more often than not it goes against yours.
Yonivore
11-09-2004, 04:23 PM
It hasn't stopped the republicans either. Do you think they would have campaigned so hard if they didn't?
The Republicans campaigned hard because they knew the Demoncrats would cause our Republic to spin into oblivion. It had nothing to do with power...

And, Democrats are ideologically challenged...it's a fact. Look it up!
Marcus Bryant
11-09-2004, 04:25 PM
#1 without a doubt. I cannot think of a more compelling political argument than "you're an idiot if you don't agree with us."
JoeChalupa
11-09-2004, 04:34 PM
The Republicans campaigned hard because they knew the Demoncrats would cause our Republic to spin into oblivion. It had nothing to do with power...

And, Democrats are ideologically challenged...it's a fact. Look it up!

Oh you cannot be serious. Of course the republicans wanted to keep the power in the House and Senate!
Where the hell have you been.
Do you really think Bush doesn't get a hard-on when he swaggers across the White House lawn knowing he is the most powerful man on earth!?

Of course it's about power..deep down they all like the precious.
Shelly
11-09-2004, 04:38 PM
Being told I’m immoral for endorsing one candidate over another is unbelievably frustrating.

My point is that extremists on both sides really agitate me to no end. The less of them, the better for America.

amen!
Yonivore
11-09-2004, 04:39 PM
Oh you cannot be serious. Of course the republicans wanted to keep the power in the House and Senate!
Where the hell have you been.
Do you really think Bush doesn't get a hard-on when he swaggers across the White House lawn knowing he is the most powerful man on earth!?

Of course it's about power..deep down they all like the precious.
It's all about motivation.
JoeChalupa
11-09-2004, 04:48 PM
Oh, I get it. Power is the motivation!
Yonivore
11-09-2004, 04:54 PM
Oh, I get it. Power is the motivation!
I believe it is for the Demoncrats...yes.

For the Republicans, it was survival of the nation.
JoeChalupa
11-09-2004, 05:39 PM
Oh please. Brahahahahahaha!!!!

You just made me spit and guffaw!! :) :) :) :)
Yonivore
11-09-2004, 05:55 PM
Oh please. Brahahahahahaha!!!!

You just made me spit and guffaw!! :) :) :) :)
What are you? A spazz or something? (Spazz's aren't a protected class, are they?)

Seriously though; think about the last two candidates the Demoncrats have fielded for President. Both spent their entire lives, all of it, since birth, being prepped for the office of President (Gore more so than Kerry). It was always about holding the office, for them...never what they'd do with it if they won. Need I remind you of Kerry's "I have a plan..." mantra?

Bill Clinton, on the other hand (the last winning Demoncrat), came from humble beginnings and mispent his youth, just like the current President, obviously with not inkling of the future they'd fulfill.

Yeah, I think there's something to it. Not as simple as I'm making it out to be here...but, none-the-less, I think it fits.
JoeChalupa
11-09-2004, 06:04 PM
What are you? A spazz or something? (Spazz's aren't a protected class, are they?)

Seriously though; think about the last two candidates the Demoncrats have fielded for President. Both spent their entire lives, all of it, since birth, being prepped for the office of President (Gore more so than Kerry). It was always about holding the office, for them...never what they'd do with it if they won. Need I remind you of Kerry's "I have a plan..." mantra?

Bill Clinton, on the other hand (the last winning Demoncrat), came from humble beginnings and mispent his youth, just like the current President, obviously with not inkling of the future they'd fulfill.

Yeah, I think there's something to it. Not as simple as I'm making it out to be here...but, none-the-less, I think it fits.

Perhaps Dubya wanted to follow in daddy's steps...without the tripping that is..and once he felt the power of the Oval office (the precious) he was hooked and wanted re-election so bad he could taste it.

Just a thought.
Yonivore
11-09-2004, 06:09 PM
Perhaps Dubya wanted to follow in daddy's steps...without the tripping that is..and once he felt the power of the Oval office (the precious) he was hooked and wanted re-election so bad he could taste it.

Just a thought.
Well, keep thinking...
dcole50
11-09-2004, 10:46 PM
The Republicans campaigned hard because they knew the Demoncrats would cause our Republic to spin into oblivion. It had nothing to do with power...

And, Democrats are ideologically challenged...it's a fact. Look it up!
And elitism is only a problem on the left?

:lol
Yonivore
11-10-2004, 10:30 AM
And elitism is only a problem on the left?

:lol
Socialist ideals and viewing terrorism as a nuisance are the two most prevalent liberal positions that lead me to believe that way.
JoeChalupa
11-10-2004, 11:12 AM
Stop spinning everything.
Nobody is saying terrorism is a nuisance. :Bang

You make me want to scream!!
Yonivore
11-10-2004, 12:28 PM
Stop spinning everything.
Nobody is saying terrorism is a nuisance. :Bang

You make me want to scream!!
Joe, you never get a second chance to make a first impression. Whether or not that was his message -- it's what 60 million voters, in part, believed was his message.

Scream already...who the fuck cares?