Will you ever vote for Female President?

[Suns Fan]

Or would you rather vote for a Black man instead?

[ChumpDumper]

Depends on who the woman is. I'm not crazy about Hillary or Condi.

[johngateswhiteley]

women are emotional and irrational, so i think men would do a better job. that being said, if there was an amazing female candidate and i trusted she could handle the job...sure, i'd vote for her. but i don't see any candidates that fit that billing as of yet.

[TheSanityAnnex]

:lol

[JoeChalupa]

Yes. But I'll be voting for Barack.

[xrayzebra]

Yes. But I'll be voting for Barack.

Now Joe is someone who has all the facts two years before
an election. Shows how he has an open mind. Yeah babe!
:dizzy

[Oh, Gee!!]

Now Joe is someone who has all the facts two years before
an election. Shows how he has an open mind. Yeah babe!
:dizzy


and you're not going to vote for whoever the Republican candidate happens to be? Yeah, right!

[Oh, Gee!!]

women are emotional and irrational, so i think men would do a better job. that being said, if there was an amazing female candidate and i trusted she could handle the job...sure, i'd vote for her. but i don't see any candidates that fit that billing as of yet.

and you probably never will. just be honest and say that you would never vote for a woman.

[Mr. Peabody]

and you probably never will. just be honest and say that you would never vote for a woman.


Haven't seen Oh, Gee!! around here lately.

[Oh, Gee!!]

I'm back, baby!!

[Kori Ellis]

I don't think I would ever vote for a woman for President. Too emotional. Too hormonal. And in general, not as bright as men. (I said in general - that's not saying I think all women are dumber than men.)

[Nbadan]

I think Margaret Thatcher (sp?) was a decent PM in Britian, despite being a woman. I wouldn't have a problem with electing a female, just not Hillary or Condi or Hutchinson.

[Oh, Gee!!]

I don't think I would ever vote for a woman for President. Too emotional. Too hormonal. And in general, not as bright as men. (I said in general - that's not saying I think all women are dumber than men.)

sounds like something a Miss USA contestant would say.....


















in 1959!!!

[Extra Stout]

What if the woman was gay and had a masculine quality to her?

[shelshor]

Of course, on both the woman and Black man question--it just depends on whether I agree with their stand on the cam-pain issues
Couldn't vote for either Hillary or Condi

[xrayzebra]

and you're not going to vote for whoever the Republican candidate happens to be? Yeah, right!


At least I am going to wait until the election to make my
mind up. Of course OG, I know this may be a problem for
you, you have to have mind to make up. :lol

[jochhejaam]

What if the woman was gay and had a masculine quality to her?
You're talking about your typical bull-dyke here...interesting...very interesting...,but no.

[Mr. Peabody]

At least I am going to wait until the election to make my
mind up. Of course OG, I know this may be a problem for
you, you have to have mind to make up. :lol

To make your mind up about what? You're not going to vote for the Democratic candidate and I don't know if Pat Buchanan is running this year, so you may not have a lot of choices.

[Mr. Peabody]

You're talking about your typical bull-dyke here...interesting...very interesting...,but no.

Well, hold on now, some of those bull dykes are more agressive than men. Plus, it would be great to have a president with a mullet.

[Extra Stout]

You're talking about your typical bull-dyke here...interesting...very interesting...,but no.
But...

1) You wouldn't have to worry about her being emotional or irrational

2) She and Dick Cheney would have something to talk about

3) She and Bill Clinton would have something to talk about

4) She could have a "Sister Souljah" moment when she condemns some radical feminist calling for the abolition of men.

5) We could still have a "First Lady."

[jochhejaam]

But...

1) You wouldn't have to worry about her being emotional or irrational

2) She and Dick Cheney would have something to talk about

3) She and Bill Clinton would have something to talk about

4) She could have a "Sister Souljah" moment when she condemns some radical feminist calling for the abolition of men.

5) We could still have a "First Lady."

6) She and the Log Cabin Republicans would have something to talk about

[Extra Stout]

6) She and the Log Cabin Republicans would have something to talk about
7) Muslims would freak out even more

[Bob Lanier]

I think Margaret Thatcher (sp?) was a decent PM in Britian
That's idiotic.

Same applies to Kori's post.

[mikejones99]

most women would never vote for a woman and besides most are too busy gettin knocked up and stealin the mans cash. :hungry:

[Extra Stout]

most women would never vote for a woman and besides most are too busy gettin knocked up and stealin the mans cash. :hungry:
See, here's another couple reasons to vote for the masculine lesbian.

8) Not getting knocked up

9) Not stealing the man's cash

[DarkReign]

Hmmm, reasons to NOT vote for a bull-dyke....

1) The inevitable awkward moment when being addressed by foreign media as "Mr. President"...to her complete satisfaction.

Actually...this may be a good reason to vote for a bull-dyke, I cant really tell anymore.

[jochhejaam]

See, here's another couple reasons to vote for the masculine lesbian.

8) Not getting knocked up

9) Not stealing the man's cash
Kinda suck that Amelie Mauresmo isn't an Politically savvy American citizen.

[Nbadan]

That's idiotic.

Same applies to Kori's post.


So, Thatcher, like Reagan had little to do with the West inevitably winning the cold war - check.

[Nbadan]

Wasn't it a chick who financed CC to sail the ocean blue and inevitably kill the natives that thought them to survive?

[johngateswhiteley]

I don't think I would ever vote for a woman for President. Too emotional. Too hormonal. And in general, not as bright as men. (I said in general - that's not saying I think all women are dumber than men.)

impressive Kori...impressive. ;)