RPI (for capt. douche bag)

[johngateswhiteley]

i didn't format this, but whatever, its pretty easy to follow. anyway, A&M is now at 11 and SC 44, but who gives a crap....they are both making the tournament.


SOS 1-50 51-100 101-200 201+ Non Conference L10 RD/NT
Rnk Team Conf W-L RPI SOS Rk W-L W-L W-L W-L W-L RPI SOS W-L W-L
1 UCLA P10 19-2 .6987 .6230 2 7-2 6-0 4-0 2-0 10-0 1 2 8-2 6-2
2 North Carolina ACC 20-3 .6658 .5939 11 7-1 4-1 6-1 3-0 14-1 4 16 8-2 7-3
3 Pittsburgh BE 20-3 .6611 .5976 8 3-3 7-0 8-0 2-0 12-2 9 15 9-1 7-2
4 Wisconsin B10 22-2 .6597 .5741 29 7-2 4-0 6-0 5-0 14-1 11 61 9-1 6-2
5 Ohio St. B10 20-3 .6579 .5783 23 6-3 1-0 10-0 3-0 12-2 25 97 9-1 5-3
6 Kentucky SEC 17-5 .6559 .6227 3 3-5 9-0 3-0 2-0 11-3 5 3 8-2 6-4
7 Arizona P10 15-7 .6444 .6481 1 4-7 7-0 3-0 1-0 9-2 2 1 4-6 4-4
8 Duke ACC 18-5 .6389 .6101 5 5-4 3-1 7-0 3-0 13-1 3 8 6-4 4-3
9 Memphis CUSA 19-3 .6383 .5593 52 1-2 3-1 11-0 4-0 10-3 19 22 10-0 6-3
10 Nevada Las Vegas MWC 18-5 .6379 .5811 20 3-3 5-0 8-2 2-0 12-2 12 36 7-3 7-4

11 Texas A&M B12 20-3 .6377 .5590 53 3-2 5-1 5-0 7-0 12-2 31 135 9-1 4-3
12 Southern Illinois MVC 18-5 .6375 .5717 32 3-3 6-1 7-1 2-0 8-2 17 54 7-3 9-5
13 Florida SEC 21-2 .6347 .5429 79 6-2 5-0 2-0 8-0 13-2 46 182 10-0 6-2
14 Air Force MWC 19-3 .6311 .5472 73 3-2 4-0 6-1 6-0 12-1 20 132 8-2 8-3
15 Marquette BE 19-4 .6299 .5827 16 5-2 3-1 7-1 4-0 12-2 35 81 8-2 7-1
16 Tennessee SEC 15-8 .6272 .6154 4 3-6 4-2 5-0 3-0 12-3 10 7 4-6 4-8
17 Oregon P10 19-4 .6259 .5551 60 5-3 2-1 4-0 8-0 12-0 30 259 6-4 7-3
18 Indiana B10 16-6 .6240 .5820 18 4-5 4-1 4-0 4-0 10-3 37 98 7-3 4-6
19 Florida St. ACC 17-6 .6239 .5828 15 5-5 0-1 6-0 6-0 12-2 15 77 6-4 4-5
20 Villanova BE 14-7 .6213 .6062 6 3-4 4-3 3-0 4-0 10-2 24 58 5-5 8-4

21 Oklahoma St. B12 17-4 .6194 .5548 61 2-3 5-0 4-0 6-1 13-1 16 102 6-4 5-4
22 Kansas B12 19-4 .6194 .5599 50 4-2 4-1 6-1 5-0 13-2 28 87 8-2 7-2
23 Butler Horz 21-2 .6166 .5082 135 4-0 1-1 10-1 6-0 11-1 6 39 9-1 11-2
24 Clemson ACC 18-5 .6160 .5639 43 3-4 5-1 3-0 7-0 14-0 22 206 5-5 7-3
25 Creighton MVC 16-7 .6154 .5731 31 5-1 3-5 6-1 2-0 6-4 62 74 8-2 7-6
26 Alabama SEC 17-5 .6126 .5572 56 2-4 5-1 6-0 4-0 13-1 14 110 6-4 6-4
27 Brigham Young MWC 16-6 .6121 .5662 39 2-3 2-0 9-2 3-1 9-4 57 100 8-2 3-6
28 Boston College ACC 16-6 .6118 .5832 14 5-4 1-1 7-1 3-0 9-4 76 70 8-2 3-4
29 Nevada WAC 20-2 .6109 .5139 129 0-1 7-1 6-0 7-0 11-1 27 128 9-1 9-1
30 Maryland ACC 17-6 .6087 .5682 36 3-5 3-0 5-1 6-0 14-1 13 68 6-4 4-5

SOS 1-50 51-100 101-200 201+ Non Conference L10 RD/NT
Rnk Team Conf W-L RPI SOS Rk W-L W-L W-L W-L W-L RPI SOS W-L W-L
31 Missouri St. MVC 16-7 .6068 .5741 28 3-4 5-2 5-1 3-0 8-2 23 53 6-4 7-5
32 Washington St. P10 19-4 .6063 .5259 108 3-3 4-0 4-1 8-0 11-1 60 301 8-2 10-3
33 Arkansas SEC 14-8 .6027 .6021 7 4-4 2-4 3-0 5-0 11-3 21 38 5-5 4-6
34 Texas Tech B12 15-8 .6027 .5957 10 4-4 1-3 6-1 4-0 11-4 32 32 5-5 5-6
35 Stanford P10 15-6 .6009 .5800 22 5-3 2-3 4-0 4-0 8-3 77 80 7-3 6-2
36 Virginia Tech ACC 15-7 .5994 .5735 30 3-3 4-1 3-3 5-0 9-4 78 120 7-3 6-6
37 Georgetown BE 16-5 .5983 .5553 59 2-4 2-1 6-0 6-0 10-3 52 103 8-2 6-2
38 Michigan St. B10 17-7 .5968 .5670 38 3-6 3-1 8-0 3-0 13-2 26 84 5-5 3-6
39 Virginia ACC 14-6 .5961 .5755 25 4-4 1-1 4-1 5-0 7-4 150 151 7-3 2-5
40 West Virginia BE 17-4 .5959 .5161 125 1-3 2-0 8-1 6-0 10-1 73 294 7-3 7-4

41 Kansas St. B12 17-6 .5936 .5389 88 1-3 4-1 7-2 5-0 11-4 74 197 7-3 7-5
42 Notre Dame BE 18-5 .5909 .5262 107 4-3 2-0 2-2 10-0 12-1 71 289 6-4 3-5
43 Illinois B10 17-8 .5899 .5826 17 3-7 2-1 8-0 4-0 12-3 44 66 5-5 5-5
44 Southern California P10 18-6 .5896 .5574 55 3-5 5-1 4-0 6-0 10-3 94 187 7-3 5-3
45 Purdue B10 15-8 .5885 .5768 24 2-4 5-3 4-1 4-0 11-3 42 73 5-5 3-7
46 Xavier A10 16-7 .5882 .5498 68 3-2 3-2 5-3 5-0 10-4 41 42 7-3 6-6
47 Georgia SEC 12-8 .5874 .5867 12 3-6 3-2 1-0 5-0 7-4 114 137 5-5 3-6
48 Vanderbilt SEC 15-7 .5874 .5646 42 4-3 4-2 4-2 3-0 9-4 129 184 7-3 4-5
49 Providence BE 14-7 .5872 .5839 13 2-4 3-1 6-1 3-1 10-3 43 40 5-5 1-5
50 Bradley MVC 15-9 .5871 .5753 27 1-6 3-2 10-1 1-0 8-3 34 56 6-4 5-7

[Jimcs50]

I do not even know how in the hell they figure RPI out, and I could care less.

The Aggies will be a 2 seed and that is all that matters.


BTW, has a team ever gone from a 12 seed to a 2 seed in one year?

I think not.

[johngateswhiteley]

I do not even know how in the hell they figure RPI out, and I could care less.

The Aggies will be a 2 seed and that is all that matters.


BTW, has a team ever gone from a 12 seed to a 2 seed in one year?

I think not.

thats my point, its not a big deal. florida is 13 right now and they would, 100%, be a #1 seed. A&M would be a #2 even though they are 11....its stupid really. just a loose seeding determinant, imo.

[MajorMike]

I do not even know how in the hell they figure RPI out, and I could care less.

The Aggies will be a 2 seed and that is all that matters.


BTW, has a team ever gone from a 12 seed to a 2 seed in one year?

I think not.

How about from a 2 seed to a 12 seed? Think Zona.

Besides, RPI doesn't mean anything and nobody uses it or cares, right jgw?

[johngateswhiteley]

Besides, RPI doesn't mean anything and nobody uses it or cares, right jgw?

well, they probably shouldn't. i'll admit the tool has some uses, but its vastly overrated and, as you can see, meaningless for some of the (what will be) higher seeded teams.

[RonMexico]

RPI is only used so that they can make quick decisions among the remaining at-large bids on selection Sunday... Lunardi uses adjusted scoring margin and that shows where A&M and Florida truly rank among all this bullshit RPI talk.