Mavs 26 years 0 Titles

[Chris Childs]

History of the Loser Mavs:

Franchise started: 1980/81

NBA Champions:(0)
None

NBA Finals: (1)
2006

Confrence Finals: (3)
1988, 2003, 2006

Division Champions: (1)
1987

Playoff Appearences: (12)
1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1990, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006

NBA Finals MVP:
None

Worst Season:
1992/93 (11-71)

Hall of Famers:
None

NBA All-Star Game MVP: None

Awards:
4

There has never been more of a loser franchise than the pathetic dallas mavs.

[u2sarajevo]

Yep. The Mavericks suck.

[CubanMustGo]

There has never been more of a loser franchise than the pathetic dallas mavs.
Umm, I guess you're not familiar with the Clippers. Or the Cavaliers, who used to be known as the Cadavers.

[Flight3107]

The Knicks are AWESOME !!

[Findog]

Umm, I guess you're not familiar with the Clippers. Or the Cavaliers, who used to be known as the Cadavers.

It's a troll thread. Dude has nothing better to do with his time than hate on the Mavs on an internet messageboard. He doth protest too much.

[Texas_Ranger]

They've got a big chance to go all the way this year. I hope Spurs'll stop them.

[BigBinBigD]

History of the Loser Mavs:

Franchise started: 1980/81

NBA Champions:(0)
None

NBA Finals: (1)
2006

Confrence Finals: (3)
1988, 2003, 2006

Division Champions: (1)
1987

Playoff Appearences: (12)
1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1990, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006

NBA Finals MVP:
None

Worst Season:
1992/93 (11-71)

Hall of Famers:
None

NBA All-Star Game MVP: None

Awards:
4

There has never been more of a loser franchise than the pathetic dallas mavs.

It's been tough being a Mavericks fan for all these years.

I, however, prefer to live in the present. Your team sux right now. And mine doesn't.

[confined]

History of the Loser Mavs:

Franchise started: 1980/81

NBA Champions:(0)
None

NBA Finals: (1)
2006

Confrence Finals: (3)
1988, 2003, 2006

Division Champions: (1)
1987

Playoff Appearences: (12)
1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1990, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006

NBA Finals MVP:
None

Worst Season:
1992/93 (11-71)

Hall of Famers:
None

NBA All-Star Game MVP: None

Awards:
4

There has never been more of a loser franchise than the pathetic dallas mavs.

ive said it before and ill say it again....you sir, are an idiot

[ponky]

haha, keep hate alive, i love it!

[Shank]

Trolling mission accomplished. Pat yourself on the back, douchey.

[RonMexico]

Boston Celtics - 18 games, 0 hope...

New York Knicks - Gay coach, $1 billion over the salary cap...

[mavsfan1000]

Don't pat yourself on the back too much now. You might wake up and find yourself in the present. :D

[Holmes_Fans]

Spurs didn't win their first title until their 30th year of existence.

[bulletedge]

If you guys think the Mavs are bad, you ought to check the history of the Texas Rangers!

Oh yeah, I forgot to add, the regular season doesn't mean shit in the NBA. The Mavs are consummate chokers and will get killed in the playoffs. Dirk will choke again. Did I cover everything?

And there isn't a single person badmouthing the Mavs on these forums who wouldn't trade their team's recprd (Spurs/Suns/Pistons/Heat/Who ever) so far this season for the Mav's record so far...in like half a heartbeat.

[Burn531]

umm.... who cares?

[bulletedge]

umm.... who cares?

I agree...who cares? Its only the NBA for chrissakes!

[MrChug]

Look, all we're saying is that your franchise had better dispel any and all of these tags on you soon. If a franchise goes this long without winning a championship it has failed as an organization. FAILED. It just shows a lack of commitment to the ultimate goal as a sports franchise. That was a tag that we had pre-99. We shook it. You can too. The time is now. You know the time is now. Hell, WE know your time is now. EVERYONE knows now is YOUR time. With that said, that monkey gets bigger and heavier and more hairy every year you DONT win a championship. If you don't win this year, the ridicule you'll feel will be unbearable to you DIEHARD fans. I'm assuming all of you are DIEHARD instead of BANDWAGON, right? Well...believe me. Us "diehard" Spurs fans? We've lived thru it. God help you if the Spurs win again.

[George Gervin's Afro]

It's been tough being a Mavericks fan for all these years.

I, however, prefer to live in the present. Your team sux right now. And mine doesn't.


Now this is funny! :lol

[confined]

Look, all we're saying is that your franchise had better dispel any and all of these tags on you soon. If a franchise goes this long without winning a championship it has failed as an organization. FAILED. It just shows a lack of commitment to the ultimate goal as a sports franchise. That was a tag that we had pre-99. We shook it. You can too. The time is now. You know the time is now. Hell, WE know your time is now. EVERYONE knows now is YOUR time. With that said, that monkey gets bigger and heavier and more hairy every year you DONT win a championship. If you don't win this year, the ridicule you'll feel will be unbearable to you DIEHARD fans. I'm assuming all of you are DIEHARD instead of BANDWAGON, right? Well...believe me. Us "diehard" Spurs fans? We've lived thru it. God help you if the Spurs win again.
o no the end of the world as we know it!!!

[sandman]

It's been tough being a Mavericks fan for all these years.

I, however, prefer to live in the present. Your team sux right now. And mine doesn't.


I swear, is there some drug in the beer at the AAC that makes their fans focus only on the regular season record of the current year in discussing greatness?

[Rip-Hamilton32]

And there isn't a single person badmouthing the Mavs on these forums who wouldn't trade their team's recprd (Spurs/Suns/Pistons/Heat/Who ever) so far this season for the Mav's record so far...in like half a heartbeat.

lol no thanks we set our record last season

[TheMulvany]

At least the Mavs didnt ever finish with the worst record in the NBA when they had the highest payroll. The Knicks have the most embarassing teams in the history of sports. The end. Live with that. The Mavs have only been spending money for a few years and guess what, unlike the Knicks, they're winning.

The Knicks have a $100 million payroll with $20 million results. The same goes for the Yankees. Got owned by the Tigers. The Knicks WISH they we good enough to get beat badly by a team in the playoffs.

[sandman]

At least the Mavs didnt ever finish with the worst record in the NBA when they had the highest payroll. The Knicks have the most embarassing teams in the history of sports. The end. Live with that. The Mavs have only been spending money for a few years and guess what, unlike the Knicks, they're winning.

The Knicks have a $100 million payroll with $20 million results. The same goes for the Yankees. Got owned by the Tigers. The Knicks WISH they we good enough to get beat badly by a team in the playoffs.

Um, so Mavs fans can call upon history when it suits their purpose, but when dealing with the Spurs only this current year counts? Why am I not surprised.

[nkdlunch]

Tony Parker 23 years 2 titles

[confined]

Tony Parker 23 years 2 titles
2 words....tim duncan

[Ignorant Spurs fan]

Look, all we're saying is that your franchise had better dispel any and all of these tags on you soon. If a franchise goes this long without winning a championship it has failed as an organization. FAILED. It just shows a lack of commitment to the ultimate goal as a sports franchise. That was a tag that we had pre-99. We shook it. You can too. The time is now. You know the time is now. Hell, WE know your time is now. EVERYONE knows now is YOUR time. With that said, that monkey gets bigger and heavier and more hairy every year you DONT win a championship. If you don't win this year, the ridicule you'll feel will be unbearable to you DIEHARD fans. I'm assuming all of you are DIEHARD instead of BANDWAGON, right? Well...believe me. Us "diehard" Spurs fans? We've lived thru it. God help you if the Spurs win again.

..........i think that the Mav fans will be fine :lol

[Johnny RIngo]

Not only are the Mavs one of the worst franchises in the NBA, they're also the worst team in Texas.

San Antonio Spurs: 3 championships
Houston Rockets: 2 championships
Dallas Chokers: LMFA0!!

Hell, Mavs can win a championship this year and they'll still be the worst basketball franchise in the state. They got quite a bit of catching up to do IMO

[Amarelooms]

Not only are the Mavs one of the worst franchises in the NBA, they're also the worst team in Texas.

San Antonio Spurs: 3 championships
Houston Rockets: 2 championships
Dallas Chokers: LMFA0!!

Hell, Mavs can win a championship this year and they'll still be the worst basketball franchise in the state. They got quite a bit of catching up to do IMO

Nice...guess what THIS YEAR.....MAVS >>>>> "your team" lol Focus on the past...best thing for the Spurs to do :elephant

[Rip-Hamilton32]

Nice...guess what THIS YEAR.....MAVS >>>>> "your team" lol Focus on the past...best thing for the Spurs to do :elephant

it doesn't matter how the mavs play in the regular season, they still have not changed they don't have a player thats going to take control of the game later on and which is why you will not win the ship

[Findog]

Here's their playoff history in all its glory:

Aguirre-Blackman

83-84: 43-39 (4-6)
W Seattle
L LA Lakers

84-85: 44-38 (1-3)
L Portland

85-86: 44-38 (5-5)
W Utah
L LA Lakers

86-87: 55-27 (1-3)
L Seattle

87-88: 53-29 (10-10)
W Houston
W Denver
L LA Lakers

88-89: 38-44
No Playoffs

89-90: 47-35 (0-3)
L Portland

4-6
21-27

Dirk
00-01: 53-29 (4-6)
W Utah
L San Antonio

01-02: 57-25 (4-4)
W Minnesota
L Sacramento

02-03: 60-22 (10-10)
W Portland
W Sacramento
L San Antonio

03-04: 52-30 (1-4)
L Sacramento

04-05: 58-24 (6-7)
W Houston
L Phoenix

05-06: 60-22 (14-9)
W Memphis
W San Antonio
W Phoenix
L Miami

8-6
39-40

12-12 (* 1 Finals appearance)
60-67

2-0 Houston
2-0 Utah
1-0 Denver
1-0 Minnesota
1-0 Memphis
1-1 Phoenix
1-1 Seattle
1-2 Portland
1-2 Sacramento
1-2 San Antonio
0-1 Miami
0-3 LA Lakers

[v2freak]

History of the Loser Mavs:

Franchise started: 1980/81

NBA Champions:(0)
None

NBA Finals: (1)
2006

Confrence Finals: (3)
1988, 2003, 2006

Division Champions: (1)
1987

Playoff Appearences: (12)
1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1990, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006

NBA Finals MVP:
None

Worst Season:
1992/93 (11-71)

Hall of Famers:
None

NBA All-Star Game MVP: None

Awards:
4

There has never been more of a loser franchise than the pathetic dallas mavs.

Haha

[Willinsa]

Here's their playoff history in all its glory:

Aguirre-Blackman

83-84: 43-39 (4-6)
W Seattle
L LA Lakers

84-85: 44-38 (1-3)
L Portland

85-86: 44-38 (5-5)
W Utah
L LA Lakers

86-87: 55-27 (1-3)
L Seattle

87-88: 53-29 (10-10)
W Houston
W Denver
L LA Lakers

88-89: 38-44
No Playoffs

89-90: 47-35 (0-3)
L Portland

4-6
21-27

Dirk
00-01: 53-29 (4-6)
W Utah
L San Antonio

01-02: 57-25 (4-4)
W Minnesota
L Sacramento

02-03: 60-22 (10-10)
W Portland
W Sacramento
L San Antonio

03-04: 52-30 (1-4)
L Sacramento

04-05: 58-24 (6-7)
W Houston
L Phoenix

05-06: 60-22 (14-9)
W Memphis
W San Antonio
W Phoenix
L Miami

8-6
39-40

12-12 (* 1 Finals appearance)
60-67

2-0 Houston
2-0 Utah
1-0 Denver
1-0 Minnesota
1-0 Memphis
1-1 Phoenix
1-1 Seattle
1-2 Portland
1-2 Sacramento
1-2 San Antonio
0-1 Miami
0-3 LA Lakers


ALL that equals is ZERO titles. :lol

[Shank]

I don't get it. What the hell was this thread for? And why was it brought back up today?

[LB7]

I'm asking this because I really don't know the answer and would like to find out. How long were the Spurs in existence before they won a title and how many unsuccesful playoff runs did they have to get there?

[Chris Childs]

I'm asking this because I really don't know the answer and would like to find out. How long were the Spurs in existence before they won a title and how many unsuccesful playoff runs did they have to get there?

My friend, I could answer those questions but the mavs have to win a title.
But until then............

[LB7]

My friend, I could answer those questions but the mavs have to win a title.
But until then............
Has nothing to do with my question. I'll wait for someone with a real response. Spurs fans? I could look it all up and post myself but I figured a Spurs fan would know faster.

[TheMulvany]

Keep living in the past...it just proves that you have no confidence in the Spurs present. You're already admitting defeat this season. I love it.

[LB7]

well it took the Spurs 23 years to win a title so you have us beat obviously but not by much if we win one soon. i don't feel so bad now.

[G-Money]

Boston Celtics - 18 games, 0 hope...

New York Knicks - Gay coach, $1 billion over the salary cap...


Don't hate on Isiah Thomas :madrun

[Chris Childs]

Has nothing to do with my question. I'll wait for someone with a real response. Spurs fans? I could look it all up and post myself but I figured a Spurs fan would know faster.

But it does relate to your question. You said ''How long were the Spurs in existence before they won a title and how many unsuccesful playoff runs did they have to get there?'' and I said I could answer that question but the mavs have to win a title in order for me to do so. But until then........... I can't answer it. Sorry.

[Fillmoe]

best thread ever

[THE SIXTH MAN]

well it took the Spurs 23 years to win a title so you have us beat obviously but not by much if we win one soon. i don't feel so bad now.
Dude the Spurs franchise history is waaaaaaaaaaaay different then the mavs.
I don't know why some of you guys use that as a gauge to measure up the two teams.

[LB7]

Dude the Spurs franchise history is waaaaaaaaaaaay different then the mavs.
I don't know why some of you guys use that as a gauge to measure up the two teams.
And how else would you like to do so? Oh yeah, the only way that makes the Spurs out to be so much better. You measure franchise success by franchise success. Thats all I was doing. Apparently, thats wrong. I don't get some of you Spurs fans. It was a simple question which no one would answer but yet everyone was quick to put every last detail of the Mavs franchise up. Makes no sense to me.

Everyone was making a big deal about how we have been in exitence for 26 years with no titles. I only wanted to know how that stacked up against other franchises with titles. Thats it...but no one wanted to step up and answer so I did it myself and the difference wasn't so big. Take it for what is worth but when the thread title says 26 years 0 titles...here is what the one about the Spurs would have said: 23 years 0 titles. See, not that big of a difference in that regard.

[THE SIXTH MAN]

And how else would you like to do so? Oh yeah, the only way that makes the Spurs out to be so much better. You measure franchise success by franchise success. Thats all I was doing. Apparently, thats wrong. I don't get some of you Spurs fans. It was a simple question which no one would answer but yet everyone was quick to put every last detail of the Mavs franchise up. Makes no sense to me.

Everyone was making a big deal about how we have been in exitence for 26 years with no titles. I only wanted to know how that stacked up against other franchises with titles. Thats it...but no one wanted to step up and answer so I did it myself and the difference wasn't so big. Take it for what is worth but when the thread title says 26 years 0 titles...here is what the one about the Spurs would have said: 23 years 0 titles. See, not that big of a difference in that regard.
1. The person who started this thread is a Knicks fan.

2. This thread was started a couple weeks back. For some reason a mav fan bumped it.


You measure franchise success by franchise success.
Exactly, but comparing how many years it took for a team to win a championship is not the way to do it.


Everyone was making a big deal about how we have been in exitence for 26 years with no titles.
I don't think he was really referencing the fact that since the mavs have existed that they have no titles(although I think that's one thing the thread starter wanted to rub in). I think the point he was trying to get across was that since they've existed they haven't enjoyed any success. That's why he posted the teams history.

[TheMulvany]

Its funny how Spurs fans brag that the Spurs won 3 championships with the only professional team they have. They better be good...or your city would suck even worse than it does now.

but heres a question: How many professional sports championships does Dallas have over San Antonio? A LOT more.

[THE SIXTH MAN]

Its funny how Spurs fans brag that the Spurs won 3 championships with the only professional team they have. They better be good...or your city would suck even worse than it does now.

but heres a question: How many professional sports championships does Dallas have over San Antonio? A LOT more.
Who the fucks bragging? Did you ever stop and think that not all spurs fans are from San Antonio? Its funny how mav homers from Dallas bring this up when a lot of people from San Antonio are cowboy fans, or actually live in Dallas. :lol

Try harder son. Professional sport franchises don't define a city. :spin

[mavsfan1000]

:bang why did you bump this thread Findog? This thread sucks.

[kalikot_boy_kr]

:elephant :elephant :elephant ....MAVS IN THE PAST= 0 MAVS IN THE PRESENT= STILL "O"..................SO JUST KEEP UR MOUTH SUCKS.... :elephant :elephant

[Islymore]

:elephant :elephant :elephant ....MAVS IN THE PAST= 0 MAVS IN THE PRESENT= STILL "O"..................SO JUST KEEP UR MOUTH SUCKS.... :elephant :elephant


hmm... keep your mouth sucks... ?? :smokin

[Bartzini]

Worst Season:
1992/93 (11-71)



:toast


Mavs were a D league team playing in the NBA that year.

[kskonn]

Its funny how Spurs fans brag that the Spurs won 3 championships with the only professional team they have. They better be good...or your city would suck even worse than it does now.

but heres a question: How many professional sports championships does Dallas have over San Antonio? A LOT more.


well spurs fans have been very spoiled even in non championship years, I could be wrong but I believe that the spurs have only had 2 losing seasons in their existense, someone please correct me if I am wrong. Some of their best teams ran in to the incredible lakers in the 80's.


As far as your other question I believe Dallas has 7 championships among their teams, unless you count the championship the stars won when they were the Minnesota north stars then it would be 8. I know this because I am a huge cowboys fans(I have season tickets and go to every game from San Antonio) I am also a pretty big stars fan, I have not really been able to get back into hockey since the strike. the strike season made me realize how unimportant it was to me.

[kskonn]

:toast


Mavs were a D league team playing in the NBA that year.

was that the year that Jason Kidd was asked what he most wanted for christmas? and he replied " David Robinson."

[jacobdrj]

You don't have to win a title to be a good franchise. Period.

You just have to be good to your fans and make a lagit attempt to win.

[SAtown]

You don't have to win a title to be a good franchise. Period.

You just have to be good to your fans and make a lagit attempt to win.

Yeah, but the fanbase has to be in existence for at least 10-15 years or so.

[jacobdrj]

Yeah, but the fanbase has to be in existence for at least 10-15 years or so.

That goes hand-in-hand with how the franchise treats the fans. However, these 2 things are not completely inter-related. Case-in-point: New Jersy and Miami.

Terrible fans, despite franchises trying (and succeding) in winning.

[Celtic Pride]

Key Dates in Spurs History


Here are the most important dates in the history of the San Antonio Spurs.

October 1973 San Antonio Spurs franchise leased by Angelo
Drossos from the ABA Dallas Chapparals and moved
to San Antonio

January 1974 Paid Virginia Squires for the rights to George Gervin

November 1974 Partnership lead by Drossos and Red McCombs buy the Spurs ABA Franchise

October 1976 Spurs join the NBA

May 1987 Spurs win the ‘87 NBA Draft Lottery – David Robinson

May 1988 Red McCombs buys out majority control of the Spurs

March 1993 Red McCombs sells the Spurs to local investors

November 1993 Spurs play first game in the Alamodome

September 1996 Holt Family becomes principal owner of the Spurs

May 1997 Spurs win the ‘97 NBA Draft Lottery – Tim Duncan

June 1999 Spurs win first NBA Championship. 26 years to win 1st title

November 2000 Referendum passed by voters to build SBC Center

October 2003 Spurs play preseason game, first event in the SBC Center

June 2003 Spurs win second NBA Championship

June 2005 Spurs win third NBA Championship


Houston Rockets History
Houston Has Been Home Of The Big Man-From Moses To Ralph To Hakeem

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1967-68: A Disappointing Debut
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1968-71: "The Big E"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1971-72: Basketball Comes To Football-Crazed Houston
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1972-74: Rockets Trade Hayes, But Still Endure Losing Ways
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1974-76: A Glimmer Of Progress
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1976-77: Rockets Find A Savior In Moses
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1977-78: The Night A Boxing Match Broke Out
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1978-80: Malone Shines, But Houston Stumbles In Playoffs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1980-81: Rockets Take An Improbable Trip
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1981-82: Malone Cops Second MVP Award
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1982-83: Basketball's $13.2 Million Man
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1983-85: How Do You Stop Two 7-Footers?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1985-86: "Twin Towers" Lead Rockets Back To Finals
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1986-88: Changing Of The Guard
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1988-90: Rockets Set A New Trend-Quick Playoff Exits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1990-92: Houston Struggles Without Hakeem
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1992-93: "Rudy T" Sees Season End In OT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1993-94: Rockets Shoot To NBA Title. 27 years to win 1st title.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1994-95: "Clutch City" - Rockets Repeat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995-96: Bid For Three Swept Away
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996-97: Barkley, Rockets Fly High
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997-98: High on Heart
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1998-99: Scottie Beams Aboard


It took the Spurs 26 years to win 1st title and 27 years for the Rockets to win 1st title. So the Mavs are right on track acording to the history of the Spurs and Rockets.

[LB7]

No, no, no, Celtic Pride. Spurs fans will tell you that the Spurs franchise is "waaaaaay different" and that they can't be compared that way. I already tried to do that. Lol, nice post. Lets see what kind of response you get.

[THE SIXTH MAN]

No, no, no, Celtic Pride. Spurs fans will tell you that the Spurs franchise is "waaaaaay different" and that they can't be compared that way. I already tried to do that. Lol, nice post. Lets see what kind of response you get.
:dramaquee Quit acting like a bitch, the retard your giving props to is as clueless about basketball as you are.

[LB7]

:dramaquee Quit acting like a bitch, the retard your giving props to is as clueless about basketball as you are.
Posting facts doesn't take a whole lot of basketball IQ. You get them off the internet and post em. They're facts that you can't debate and that pisses you off. All you can do is insult me and him/her.

Also, I like the fact that you think you know anything about me or what I know about basketball. Nice. And calling me a bitch...well I am female so if that makes you feel better, fine by me.

[THE SIXTH MAN]

Posting facts doesn't take a whole lot of basketball IQ. You get them off the internet and post em. They're facts that you can't debate and that pisses you off. All you can do is insult me and him/her.
Whats to debate? Until you guys win one then you can look at it in that light. As of right now its still February and there's still a lot of basketball to be played. Nothings guaranteed.

[LB7]

Whats to debate? Until you guys win one then you can look at it in that light. As of right now its still February and there's still a lot of basketball to be played. Nothings guaranteed.
Fair enough.

[THE SIXTH MAN]

Nice. And calling me a bitch...well I am female so if that makes you feel better, fine by me.
Well then that changes everything. :eyebrows :makeout

[Celtic Pride]

:dramaquee Quit acting like a bitch, the retard your giving props to is as clueless about basketball as you are.

I'll give you props for being more clueless than I am as I don't think you were around when the Spurs moved from Dallas. I think you jumped on the bandwagon way after that. Get a clue, Celts 16 and Spurs 3.

[THE SIXTH MAN]

I'll give you props for being more clueless than I am as I don't think you were around when the Spurs moved from Dallas. I think you jumped on the bandwagon way after that. Get a clue, Celts 16 and Spurs 3.
:lol
OK MFFL....

[Celtic Pride]

:lol
OK MFFL....

If the shoe fits. It's better than being an uninformed Spurs Fan Since Championships = SFSC. :lol

[THE SIXTH MAN]

If the shoe fits. It's better than being an uninformed Spurs Fan Since Championships = SFSC. :lol
Link?

[Celtic Pride]

Link?

http://www.nba.com/spurs/history/key_dates.html :lol

[THE SIXTH MAN]

http://www.nba.com/spurs/history/key_dates.html :lol
:lol
No dumb ass, the link you have on my life. Since your making the claim that Ive been a spurs fan since they've won championships. I said you were clueless about basketball because of the retarded things you post.

[Celtic Pride]

:lol
No dumb ass, the link you have on my life. Since your making the claim that Ive been a spurs fan since they've won championships. I said you were clueless about basketball because of the retarded things you post.

That is the link to your life since your a SFSC. :lol
And the retarded things you say.

[THE SIXTH MAN]

That is the link to your life
Um no, that's a link to the spurs history page on spurs.com. You must be the kind of person that laughs at his own jokes. Good for you.


since your a SFSC. :lol
Again with the lame attempt at being funny. Here's a question, was it this year or last year that you hopped on the mavs bandwagon?


And the retarded things you say.
Bitch can you complete a sentence.

[mavs>spurs2]

Um no, that's a link to the spurs history page on spurs.com. You must be the kind of person that laughs at his own jokes. Good for you.


Again with the lame attempt at being funny. Here's a question, was it this year or last year that you hopped on the mavs bandwagon?


Bitch can you complete a sentence.

He may be retarded but what's really funny is that you actually responded to him.

[Celtic Pride]

Um no, that's a link to the spurs history page on spurs.com. You must be the kind of person that laughs at his own jokes. Good for you.


Again with the lame attempt at being funny. Here's a question, was it this year or last year that you hopped on the mavs bandwagon?


Bitch can you complete a sentence.

Again, your wisdom comes to the fore front. You don't even know your own teams history or you would have known the facts that I brought up. You are the one who started the personal attacks because you feel legit facts don't apply to you or your team. I'm done replying to your ignorant posts.


Spurs took 26 years to win 1st title. FACT Deal with it.

[THE SIXTH MAN]

He may be retarded but what's really funny is that you actually responded to him.
:lol True.

[Gino20]

This is so crazy!!!! The Mavs are good, but they are not in the league of those Bulls, the great Celtics teams, etc. Sometimes records simply don't do justice... :madrun

[Chris Childs]

This is so crazy!!!! The Mavs are good, but they are not in the league of those Bulls, the great Celtics teams, etc. Sometimes records simply don't do justice... :madrun

Your right! Record season records don't do justice. I know the spurs don't have more titles than the bulls, lakers, and celts but they do have at least ONE! Not at best but at least one. At best, The mavs have 0 and spurs least is better than mavs best. So with that said, the mavs can go 73-9 this year and if they don't win it all, it will be a disgrace to their franchise and a HUGE disappointment to their fans. That is all. :toast

[LB7]

Your right! Record season records don't do justice. I know the spurs don't have more titles than the bulls, lakers, and celts but they do have at least ONE! Not at best but at least one. At best, The mavs have 0 and spurs least is better than mavs best. So with that said, the mavs can go 73-9 this year and if they don't win it all, it will be a disgrace to their franchise and a HUGE disappointment to their fans. That is all. :toast
You're exactly right about that. All these wins will mean jackcrap without the ring at the end.

[Chris Childs]

Bump :spin

[ponky]

Bump :spin

http://www.kinderkorner.com/cricket.gif

[mqywaaah]

You're exactly right about that. All these wins will mean jackcrap without the ring at the end.

Oh believe me this season will be worth it. Just watch. :smokin

[Holmes_Fans]

I think the rule should be, If your team hasn't won a championship since the creation of another team, you are not allowed to talk shit about them never having a championship. I.E. the Knicks

[Holmes_Fans]

No. The Knicks haven't won a championship since 1973, 34 years ago. That is well before the mavericks were even being thought of as an organization. Chris is talking shit about the mavs not winning in 26 years, when it has been 34 since the Knicks last won.

[Chris Childs]

No. The Knicks haven't won a championship since 1973, 34 years ago. That is well before the mavericks were even being thought of as an organization. Chris is talking shit about the mavs not winning in 26 years, when it has been 34 since the Knicks last won.

How many times have the mavs gone to the finals? 1
Now how many times have the knicks gone to the finals?8
Now how many times have the mavs won a title?0
Now how many time have the knicks won a title? 2 which is 2>0 More than your team, so therefore.................
















:owned

Oh by the way......
2/8>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>0/1

[FromWayDowntown]

It took the Knicks 24 years to win a title.

I'm just saying.

[Chris Childs]

^^^^^^^^
More OWNAGE!!

THis time by a spurs fan! HEHEHEHEHEHHE :lol

[mqywaaah]

"Hahahahahahaha" laughed the fan of the has been team.

[Holmes_Fans]

^^^^^^^^
More OWNAGE!!

THis time by a spurs fan! HEHEHEHEHEHHE :lol
No, he just owned you dumbass. :lol :lol




and saying 2/8 is like a cowboys fan talking shit to a seahawks fan using the 5 super bowls from last century.

[FromWayDowntown]

There is no logic to any of the arguments in this thread, because the greatness of a franchise shouldn't be (and usually isn't) measured by how long it took the franchise to win its first title, if it has won a title at all.

For instance, the Warriors won the first BAA/NBA title -- meaning they won a title in the first year of their existence. Applying the "logic" that has been thrown around in this thread, the Warriors own all.

By contrast, it took the Bulls 25 years to win a title and it took the Pistons 41 years to win a title.

I guess Warriors > Lakers (took them 2 years to win a title); Warriors > Celtics (11 years); Warriors > Bulls; Warriors > Spurs; and Warriors > Pistons. And Warriors definitely > Knicks. Right?

The same must be true of the Kings (won a title in their 3rd year), the Bucks (won a title in their 3rd year), the Sixers (won a title in their 6th year), the Blazers (won a title in their 7th year), the Hawks (won a title in their 9th year), and the Sonics (won a title in their 12th year).

[johngateswhiteley]

i don't know what it is, but the mavs still don't have a title...

[Chris Childs]

No, he just owned you dumbass. :lol :lol




and saying 2/8 is like a cowboys fan talking shit to a seahawks fan using the 5 super bowls from last century.

How did he own me? He said It took the knicks 24 years to win a title. GET IT?
It took them 24 years to WIN a TITLE. When was the last time the mavs done that? Oh yeah...... NEVER.

And it's not like a cowboys fan talking shit.......
The fact of the matter is that in the 26 years of the Dallas mavs existence, they have yet to win a title and probably never will.

I just believe fans of the team that don't have no success in the post-season like have no Larry O' in their Trophy case , then they can't talk shit. Stop saying this and that about the mavs when your team has 'no right' to talk shit about anyone, anything, or any group given their history. I know alot of mavs fans talk alot of crap on here and I get sick of it. They act all cocky just because their team is tops and is almost unstoppable right now just like the pistons last year and we seen what happened to them. Even though the spurs wasn't apart of the finals last season or might not be apart of it this season, the spurs fans have 'the right' to talk shit about anyone, anything, or any group given their teams' history(Trophy Case). They know how it feel to win it all, your team doesn't!
Now continue to watch the spurs and rockets go all the way as your team will NEVER win the big one. MUAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA :lol

[dirk4mvp]

The Pistons/Mavs comparison kills me every time.

[trueD]

There is no logic to any of the arguments in this thread, because the greatness of a franchise shouldn't be (and usually isn't) measured by how long it took the franchise to win its first title, if it has won a title at all.

For instance, the Warriors won the first BAA/NBA title -- meaning they won a title in the first year of their existence. Applying the "logic" that has been thrown around in this thread, the Warriors own all.

By contrast, it took the Bulls 25 years to win a title and it took the Pistons 41 years to win a title.

I guess Warriors > Lakers (took them 2 years to win a title); Warriors > Celtics (11 years); Warriors > Bulls; Warriors > Spurs; and Warriors > Pistons. And Warriors definitely > Knicks. Right?

The same must be true of the Kings (won a title in their 3rd year), the Bucks (won a title in their 3rd year), the Sixers (won a title in their 6th year), the Blazers (won a title in their 7th year), the Hawks (won a title in their 9th year), and the Sonics (won a title in their 12th year).

Nice. A little research goes a lawng ways. :smokin

[Dirkadirkastan]

If I were a mod I would ban anybody who was completely incapable of discussing anything other than sheer number of titles. Seriously, if you see everything in basketball in terms of black-and-white "does your franchise history have a title", then you're retarded.

The 2007 Larry O'Brien trophy is still up for grabs, so anybody has "the right" to talk about it. Man, I can't believe how obvious this is, yet some dense Knicks fans still can't comprehend it.

[Holmes_Fans]

How did he own me? He said It took the knicks 24 years to win a title. GET IT?
It took them 24 years to WIN a TITLE. When was the last time the mavs done that? Oh yeah...... NEVER.

And it's not like a cowboys fan talking shit.......
The fact of the matter is that in the 26 years of the Dallas mavs existence, they have yet to win a title and probably never will.

I know, it tooks the Knicks 24 years to win a title. It has only been 26 for the mavs and you are acting like that is the longest a team has ever gone without winning in their existance. When really the mavs are only 2 short years past what it took the knicks to win.

[z0sa]

IF you win the title this year.

[RonMexico]

I know, it tooks the Knicks 24 years to win a title. It has only been 26 for the mavs and you are acting like that is the longest a team has ever gone without winning in their existance. When really the mavs are only 2 short years past what it took the knicks to win.

Suns are on year 39 with none.

[Agloco]

Keep living in the past...it just proves that you have no confidence in the Spurs present. You're already admitting defeat this season. I love it.


Uh, I believe this thread was started by a Knicks fan eh?