Big 12 Standings / Remaining Games

[SrA Husker]

NR TEAM CONF OVRL REMAINING
=================================================
(3) Kansas 13-2 26-4 UT
(6) Texas A&M 12-2 24-4 @UT, MIZ
(15) Texas 11-3 21-7 aTm, @KU
(rv) Kansas State 9-5 20-9 @OSU, OU
Texas Tech 7-7 18-11 BAY, @ISU
Missouri 6-8 17-10 CU, @aTm
Oklahoma 6-9 15-13 @KSU
Oklahoma State 5-8 19-9 KSU, @BAY, @NEB
Nebraska 5-8 16-11 ISU, @CU, OSU
Iowa State 5-9 14-14 @NEB, TTU
Baylor 3-11 13-14 @TTU, OSU
Colorado 2-12 6-18 @MIZ, NEB

All teams except KU, aTm, UT eliminated from Regular Season Championship.
In case of tie, co-champions will be named with Tiebreaker only used for Conference Championship seeding purposes.

Texas #1 Seed Scenarios:
- Must win out

Texas A&M #1 Seed Scenarios:
- Win Out or
- Beat UT, Lose to MIZ, UT beats KU

Kansas #1 Seed Scenarios:
- Must Beat UT with aTm losing once

[johngateswhiteley]

A&M is sitting pretty...can we close it out?

[SrA Husker]

A&M is sitting pretty...can we close it out?

I can't believe it's this tight of a race in the final week of the season. A&M has to win at Texas for a chance at the championship, otherwise, the UT-KU game is for it 'all' (Yes, I realize there would be co-champions, but lets be honest, top dog gets the bragging rights)




Capt. Mike - My, how the mighty have fallen.

[johngateswhiteley]

A&M has to win at Texas for a chance at the championship, otherwise, the UT-KU game is for it 'all' (Yes, I realize there would be co-champions, but lets be honest, top dog gets the bragging rights)

sorry genius, we already beat kansas and t.u.. not sure where you get your logic from...? in any case, we'll beat t.u. this wednesday.

[SrA Husker]

sorry genius, we already beat kansas and t.u.. not sure where you get your logic from...? in any case, we'll beat t.u. this wednesday.

Big 12 Tiebreakers - the four situations I posted above are the four possible outcomes based on these guidelines:


(a) If two teams are tied and they are from different divisions, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the higher seed.
(b) If two teams are tied and they are from the same division, the team with an advantage in head-to-head competition shall be the higher seed.
(c) If two teams remain tied, there will be a comparison of overall record against division teams only (10 divisional games).
(d) If two teams remain tied, there will be a comparison of record against the highest ranked team(s) (based upon Conference winning percentage) in the division and proceeding through in order of divisional record.
(e) If two teams remain tied, there will be a *comparison of record against the highest ranked team(s) (based upon Conference winning percentage) in the opposite division and proceeding through in order of divisional record.
(f) If two teams remain tied, the higher seed will be chosen by draw.

If Texas wins out, they will win the tiebreaker over Texas A&M based on Division record, and the tiebreaker over Kansas based on head-to-head matchup.

If Texas A&M wins out while Kansas defeats Texas, Texas A&M will win the tiebreaker over Kansas based on head-to-head matchup.

If Texas defeats A&M but loses to Kansas, Kansas will win the conference outright.

If Texas A&M and Kansas both beat Texas but A&M loses to Missouri, Kansas will win the conference outright.

and so on and so on and so on....

[ggoose25]

wreck em tech!

[Oscar DeLa]

I don't know what it is but whaaaaaaaaaattttt???

[johngateswhiteley]

Big 12 Tiebreakers - the four situations I posted above are the four possible outcomes based on these guidelines:



If Texas wins out, they will win the tiebreaker over Texas A&M based on Division record, and the tiebreaker over Kansas based on head-to-head matchup.

If Texas A&M wins out while Kansas defeats Texas, Texas A&M will win the tiebreaker over Kansas based on head-to-head matchup.

If Texas defeats A&M but loses to Kansas, Kansas will win the conference outright.

If Texas A&M and Kansas both beat Texas but A&M loses to Missouri, Kansas will win the conference outright.

and so on and so on and so on....

so its the divisional record, if t.u. beats A&M and kansas, then? i must apologize, although you must understand there is a zero chance t.u. beats A&M and kansas. i already told the t.u. fans here...just that.

good work :tu

[RonMexico]

You lost me when you called a team that can't win on the road "mighty."

[Aggie Hoopsfan]

If Texas wins out, they will win the tiebreaker over Texas A&M based on Division record, and the tiebreaker over Kansas based on head-to-head matchup.


Correct



If Texas A&M wins out while Kansas defeats Texas, Texas A&M will win the tiebreaker over Kansas based on head-to-head matchup.


This is only for purposes of seeding in the conference tourney. A&M and KU would share the conference 'title'.



If Texas defeats A&M but loses to Kansas, Kansas will win the conference outright.


Correct.

[MajorMike]

Capt. Mike - My, how the mighty have fallen.

Seriously. Its completely embarassing to have the same conf record as Neb.

[MajorMike]

UT is playing well. I could see them winning @ KU or home vs atm. Most likely scenario if you are going with the home team fave is KU beating UT and UT beating atm giving KU the outright B12.

[Jimcs50]

UT is playing well. I could see them winning @ KU or home vs atm. Most likely scenario if you are going with the home team fave is KU beating UT and UT beating atm giving KU the outright B12.


The only way UT beats A&M is if A&M plays D like they did against Baylor. Not likely, because I am sure Billy is working on them about that very point right this minute.

I seriously think A&M is too good offensively to be kept in check by Texas' defense, and too good defensively to allow UT to out score them.

I see a good game, but A&M will win by 7-11 pts.

[johngateswhiteley]

UT is playing well. I could see them winning @ KU or home vs atm. Most likely scenario if you are going with the home team fave is KU beating UT and UT beating atm giving KU the outright B12.

nah, my 'crazy' prediction will come true. t.u. isn't capable of beating A&M on any court...t.u. loses the next two.

[MajorMike]

nah, my 'crazy' prediction will come true. t.u. isn't capable of beating A&M on any court...t.u. loses the next two.

And neither is ttek.

[RonMexico]

I guess if A&M blows the next two can we call it "pulling an OSU"?

[MajorMike]

Lame flame. Such is what we have come to expect from you, however. You really should take lessons from a few of your aggrot friends here.

[RonMexico]

I don't know what you're talking about. I just remember 15-1 being a very distant memory.

[RonMexico]

I also love the moral and stylistic high ground that CaptMike has adopted the more his team has sucked.

Days of him bleating "RPI" are also a thing of the past.

[Doug Collins]

I guess if A&M blows the next two can we call it "pulling an OSU"?

For that to happen we'd have to borrow a DeLorean with a flux capacitor, go back to the beginning of the conf. season, and then proceed to lose all our road games. Then we could call it "pulling an OSU". Losing two important games in a row is just "pulling a dirk".

[Doug Collins]

I also love the moral and stylistic high ground that CaptMike has adopted the more his team has sucked.

Days of him bleating "RPI" are also a thing of the past.

Are we both at work posting on this message board?

[RonMexico]

Yes we are - and I have a notice at the top of my screen informing me that I'm at a "non-approved" website.

[Doug Collins]

Yes we are - and I have a notice at the top of my screen informing me that I'm at a "non-approved" website.

I have a powerpoint open on my big monitor and this board on my laptop...the illusion is complete.

[RonMexico]

I have a powerpoint open on my big monitor and this board on my laptop...the illusion is complete.

They have PowerPoint in Arkansas?

[Doug Collins]

They have PowerPoint in Arkansas?

And Wal-Mart

[SrA Husker]

This is only for purposes of seeding in the conference tourney. A&M and KU would share the conference 'title'.


Hence, why the first thing I stated was that...

In case of tie, co-champions will be named with Tiebreaker only used for Conference Championship seeding purposes.

!!!!!

[ggoose25]

tech is going to upset some people in the tourney. I'm thinking sweet sixteen

[SrA Husker]

Tech has to make it to the tourney first.

[K-State Spur]

If the Cats are still firmly on the bubble (and on the outside looking in according to many prognosticators), I don't see how Tech can be "in" right now being a full 2 games behind them in the standings.

[Cant_Be_Faded]

I cannot believe noone has mentioned UT has teh best chance out of all three teams for this reason alone:


They are in complete control of their destiny.

See, JGW, cannot say shit to this argument (lest he prove himself to be an even bigger moron) cuz he used this very same argument in favor of USC towards the end of last CFB season.

So, using JGW logic, "t.u." has the best chance to win, cuz we're in complete control of our destiny.

sorrrrrryyyy agggggggs

[samikeyp]

If K-State does not get in this year...they will next year. Huggins is a beast and the best thing for that program. I think if they do get in, he should get Coach of the Year.

[K-State Spur]

I cannot believe noone has mentioned UT has teh best chance out of all three teams for this reason alone:


They are in complete control of their destiny.

See, JGW, cannot say shit to this argument (lest he prove himself to be an even bigger moron) cuz he used this very same argument in favor of USC towards the end of last CFB season.

So, using JGW logic, "t.u." has the best chance to win, cuz we're in complete control of our destiny.

sorrrrrryyyy agggggggs


If the Cats can pull one out tonight, I think there is a pretty good chance UT falls all the way to the 4 seed.

[SrA Husker]

I cannot believe noone has mentioned UT has teh best chance out of all three teams for this reason alone:


They are in complete control of their destiny.

See, JGW, cannot say shit to this argument (lest he prove himself to be an even bigger moron) cuz he used this very same argument in favor of USC towards the end of last CFB season.

So, using JGW logic, "t.u." has the best chance to win, cuz we're in complete control of our destiny.

sorrrrrryyyy agggggggs

Just for the record, Texas A&M is also in complete control of their destiny.

Kansas is the only team that is not.

[Cant_Be_Faded]

Yeah but i dont think Acie has the boys sleepin' in the trainstation tonight! That gives us the edge.

[johngateswhiteley]

I cannot believe noone has mentioned UT has teh best chance out of all three teams for this reason alone:


They are in complete control of their destiny.

See, JGW, cannot say shit to this argument (lest he prove himself to be an even bigger moron) cuz he used this very same argument in favor of USC towards the end of last CFB season.

So, using JGW logic, "t.u." has the best chance to win, cuz we're in complete control of our destiny.

sorrrrrryyyy agggggggs

are you mentally retarded? A&M is in the best position of any team in the Big 12. not only do we control our own destiny, we have the tiebreaker against kansas. is this what they teach at t.u.?

[Cant_Be_Faded]

i guess you're counting on Acie captaining his team to sleep the night at the local trainstation, else you wouldn't be talking so cocky, AGGGGGGGS