More slime from Coulter: calls Edwards a faggot

[boutons_]

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/03/03/fallout-over-coulters-anti-gay-remark/

March 3, 2007, 10:32 am Fallout Over Coulter’s Anti-Gay Remark (http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/03/03/fallout-over-coulters-anti-gay-remark/)

By Adam Nagourney (http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/author/anagourney/)


There’s some big fallout from the meeting in Washington of the Conservative Political Action Conference, three days of conferencing, caucusing, presidential addressing and book-hawking. These conferences have historically been known for displaying what its own organizers would describe as over-the-top behavior, and one of the regular speakers – Ann Coulter – offered an example of it when she used an anti-gay epithet on Friday to describe John Edwards, the former senator from North Carolina and Democratic presidential contender.

“I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word ‘faggot,’ so I — so kind of an impasse, can’t really talk about Edwards,” she said (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxgVuB3TyaU), speaking to
an overflow room of activists.

================


Coulter isn't distraught, messed up, amateur Iraqi mother like Sheehan, and she's been invited to speak at a main gathering of hard-core, rabid conservatives, so she can't be ridiculed as a side-show. She's a professional slime-bot central to the conservative ethos. Michelle Malkin is another conservative, spittle-spewing slime-bot.

[whottt]

If she pisses you off, she must be doing something right. Like W.

[pussyface]

...much as i dont like anne other than for the obvious entertainment value, i think this is kinda funny. sure, its out of line and all that i guess, but it is kind of funny. shes got balls, ill give her that.

[boutons_]

she doesn't piss me off. She just yet another indicator of how low and slimy the Repugs/conservatives are. And these are the same people who thought Clinton disgraced the WH? GMAFB.

whott "vores" Coulter's "yoni", like he suck dubya.

You're all a bunch of fucking losers.

[johnsmith]

You're all a bunch of fucking losers.


:lol :lol :lol

6,892 of damn near the same posts, and you're calling others a bunch of losers.......


Priceless.

[Boris]

Ann is just a hateful bitch who needs to get laid.

[ChumpDumper]

Who?

[boutons_]

March 4, 2007

Candidates Criticize Slur by Conservative Author

By ADAM NAGOURNEY

WASHINGTON, March 3 — Three of the leading Republican presidential candidates on Saturday denounced one of their party’s best-known conservative commentators for using an antigay epithet when discussing a Democratic presidential contender at a gathering of conservatives here.

The remarks by Ann Coulter, an author who regularly speaks at conservative events, were sharply denounced by the candidates, Senator John McCain of Arizona, Rudolph W. Giuliani of New York and Mitt Romney of Massachusetts. Their statements came after Democrats, gay rights groups and bloggers raised a storm of protest over the remarks.

Speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference before an overflow crowd on Friday, Ms. Coulter said, “I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word ‘faggot,’ so I — so kind of an impasse, can’t really talk about Edwards.”

Mr. Edwards’s aides responded with an e-mail message that attacked Ms. Coulter and urged supporters to donate to Mr. Edwards’s campaign. “John was singled out for a personal attack because the Republican establishment knows he poses the greatest threat to their power,” said his campaign manager, David E. Bonior. “Since they have nothing real to use against him, Coulter’s resorting to the classic right-wing strategy of riling up hate to smear a progressive champion.”

Ms. Coulter, asked for a reaction to the Republican criticism, said in an e-mail message: “C’mon, it was a joke. I would never insult gays by suggesting that they are like John Edwards. That would be mean.”

At the conference, she said she was likely to support Mr. Romney.

The criticisms by the Republican candidates put them in a difficult position because the Conservative Political Action Conference has been gathering for conservative and Republican leaders for over 25 years.

The speakers this year included Vice President Dick Cheney and most of the presidential candidates, whose presence suggested the political influence the group holds in the party’s nominating process. Mr. Cheney was not at the event on Friday.

Of the major Republican candidates, only Mr. McCain did not attend, but he denounced her remarks on Saturday morning. “The comments were wildly inappropriate,” said his spokesman, Brian Jones.

Mr. Giuliani said, “The comments were completely inappropriate and there should be no place for such name-calling in political debate.”

Kevin Madden, a spokesman for Mr. Romney, said: “It was an offensive remark. Governor Romney believes all people should be treated with dignity and respect.”

Mr. Romney preceded Ms. Coulter at the event and mentioned that she was speaking later — he jokingly referred to her as a “moderate.” But he was not in the room when she spoke, Mr. Madden said.

===============

CPAC invited her,
she probably got a standing ovation after her speech,
they get slimed by her behavior.

[Bob Lanier]

whott "vores" Coulter's "yoni", like he suck dubya.
OK, that was funny.

[johngateswhiteley]

Anne Coulter is frickin awesome...always has been.

[PixelPusher]

Slurring political adversaries by calling them "faggot"...she'd feel right at home on this board.

[boutons_]

Didn't she know, it's well known, that the conservative ranks, eg, the group she was speaking to, are riddled with faggots? Log Cabin Repugs, etc.

[whottt]

I believe boutons. I think he speaks from experience.

[ggoose25]

Coulter is a dirty whore

[pussyface]

I believe boutons. I think he speaks from experience.

how old are you? 12?

[Melmart1]

...much as i dont like anne other than for the obvious entertainment value, i think this is kinda funny. sure, its out of line and all that i guess, but it is kind of funny. shes got balls, ill give her that.
I'm of the opinion that balls are not the only male physical attribute that she has.

In all seriousness, I used to admire her gutsiness but now its just a schtick and she has become a mockery of herself. It's too bad that the right continues to give her airtime, that really breaks down some of their credibility (especially the more moderate Republicans) and gives unlimited fodder to guys like boutons.

[Extra Stout]

Espousing that kind of rhetoric at a CPAC event is not helpful.

[whottt]

how old are you? 12?


Did I offend you again...pussyface? My bad.

[jochhejaam]

King of slime boutons posts an article about slime.
You and Coulter are at opposite ends of the idealogical spectrum, yet your rhetoric is similar in that it's simultaneously grandiloquent and pathological.
How sad.





Conservatives would do well to distance themselves from the loose cannon Coulter.

[exstatic]

Actually, I wish they'd drop the pretense, and embrace her. Gay jokes and denigration are basically written into the GOP platform. Why act like this is a group they give a shit about?

[boutons_]

"not helpful"

Bitches and bastards like her aren't trying to be helpful in a general sense. They are solely interested in being famous, celebrities, and in that "business", turning literally any trick is OK with the target group of johns, who are ideologically inclined, even bound, to support ANYTHING their group members espouse, espeicially in tent meeting like CPAC meeting, just like "believers" will go along with any shit a Robertson or Hagee or Hubbard or Jim Jones come up with. The more outrageous (to serioius folk), divisive, and polarizing you are, the more $$ opportunities you have on your side of the divide.

The GOP is all about conserving minorities under-privileged and discriminated against, being anti-progress (anti-progressive), exclusive rather than inclusive, divisive rather than uniting, pissed off rather than serious and sober ("Eratus Sum, Ergo Sum")

That Coulter was even invited to speak at CPAC indicates what kind of group CPAC is. She is, with all here divisive shit, one of their heroes. She can get away with, be applauded for, "faggot" in front of CPAC faggots because the CPAC faggots are mostly closet faggots who publicly are faggot-bashers.

[whottt]

"not helpful"

Bitches and bastards like her aren't trying to be helpful in a general sense. They are solely interested in being famous, celebrities, and in that "business", turning literally any trick is OK with the target group of johns, who are ideologically inclined, even bound, to support ANYTHING their group members espouse, espeicially in tent meeting like CPAC meeting, just like "believers" will go along with any shit a Robertson or Hagee or Hubbard or Jim Jones come up with. The more outrageous (to serioius folk), divisive, and polarizing you are, the more $$ opportunities you have on your side of the divide.

The GOP is all about conserving minorities under-privileged and discriminated against, being anti-progress (anti-progressive), exclusive rather than inclusive, divisive rather than uniting, pissed off rather than serious and sober ("Eratus Sum, Ergo Sum")

That Coulter was even invited to speak at CPAC indicates what kind of group CPAC is. She is, with all here divisive shit, one of their heroes. She can get away with, be applauded for, "faggot" in front of CPAC faggots because the CPAC faggots are mostly closet faggots who publicly are faggot-bashers.


Fag

[mookie2001]

hasnt it been proved coulter is man?

[whottt]

Hey...at least she's easier on the eyes than Michael Moore...and less biased.

[whottt]

Conservatives would do well to distance themselves from the loose cannon Coulter.



Libs would give their left nut to have Coulter on their side...

[JoeChalupa]

Hey...at least she's easier on the eyes than Michael Moore...and less biased.

less biased?..... Brahahahahahahaha!!! :lmao

[Yonivore]

So, is the left as upset at Bill Maher for wishing the assassination attempt on Vice President Cheney had succeeded?

Probably not.

[boutons_]

Cheney actuall merits impeachment and assassination, at least of his character, for all the crimes he has committed, starting with his lies about Iraq.

Edwards has done what? other than not be a pissed off, over-the-top right-winger?

Maher is primarily a comedian, jokes are his trade. Only Coulter is calling her faggot statement a joke.

[PixelPusher]

So, is the left as upset at Bill Maher for wishing the assassination attempt on Vice President Cheney had succeeded?

Probably not.
Did you watch that Bill Maher episode, or have the blogs told you to be angry at him?

[Yonivore]

Did you watch that Bill Maher episode, or have the blogs told you to be angry at him?
Actually, I saw a transcript of his comments.

[PixelPusher]

Actually, I saw a transcript of his comments.

Maher: What about the people who got onto the Huffington Post – and these weren’t even the bloggers, these were just the comments section – who said they, they expressed regret that the attack on Dick Cheney failed.

Joe Scarborough: Right.

Maher: Now…

John Ridley: More than regret.

Maher: Well, what did they say?

Ridley: They said “We wish he would die.” I mean, it was (?) hate language.

Barney Frank: They said the bomb was wasted. (laughter and applause)

Maher: That’s a funny joke. But, seriously, if this isn’t China, shouldn’t you be able to say that? Why did Arianna Huffington, my girlfriend, I love her, but why did she take that off right away?

After some discussion about why Huffington should or shouldn’t have taken these comments down, the following occurred:

Ridley: It’s one thing to say you hate Dick Cheney, which applies to his politics. It’s another thing to say, “I’m sorry he didn’t die in an explosion." And I think, you know…

Maher: But you should be able to say it. And by the way...

Frank: Excuse me, Bill, but can I ask you a question? Do you decide what the topics are for this show?

Maher: Yeah, I decide the topics, they don’t go there.

Frank: But you exercise control over the show the way that she does over her blog.

Maher: But I have zero doubt that if Dick Cheney was not in power, people wouldn’t be dying needlessly tomorrow. (applause)

Scarborough: If someone on this panel said that they wished that Dick Cheney had been blown up, and you didn’t say…

Frank: I think he did.

Scarborough: Okay. Did you say…

Maher: No, no. I quoted that.

Frank: You don’t believe that?

Maher: I’m just saying if he did die, other people, more people would live. That’s a fact.
There is no "regret" or "wish fulfillment" involved in those statements. You should brush up on your reading comprehension skills.

[Yonivore]

There is no "regret" or "wish fulfillment" involved in those statements. You should brush up on your reading comprehension skills.
Said in the context of defending those who were saying just that on Huffington, is no different.

C'mon, you don't see agreement with the Huffington commenters that wished the Vice President had been killed?

Maybe you need to brush up on your reading comprehension.

[PixelPusher]

Said in the context of defending those who were saying just that on Huffington, is no different.

C'mon, you don't see agreement with the Huffington commenters that wished the Vice President had been killed?

Maybe you need to brush up on your reading comprehension.
Pretty hypocritical coming from someone who went apeshit when ChumperDumper called you on your Saddamm-9/11 connection comments, claiming your words weren't properly parsed.

[PixelPusher]

Said in the context of defending those who were saying just that on Huffington, is no different.

He was defending their right to say it, and Bill Maher has consistently defended free speech for everyone, including Ann Coulter, who was a frequent guest of Bill Maher's for many years before the creation of FNC.

[FromWayDowntown]

Said in the context of defending those who were saying just that on Huffington, is no different.

C'mon, you don't see agreement with the Huffington commenters that wished the Vice President had been killed?

Maybe you need to brush up on your reading comprehension.

So supporting a First Amendment argument for allowing people to say that they wish the Vice President had been killed is now tantamount to having taken that position for himself? That's quite a stretch. He didn't even expressly agree with the posters, except to state a belief that if Cheney died, the war in Iraq might end (or end sooner) and that lives would be saved.

[Yonivore]

So supporting a First Amendment argument for allowing people to say that they wish the Vice President had been killed is now tantamount to having taken that position for himself? That's quite a stretch. He didn't even expressly agree with the posters, except to state a belief that if Cheney died, the war in Iraq might end (or end sooner) and that lives would be saved.
And then saying that things would be better if he were dead. Yeah. That's tantamount to having taken that position for himself.

Oh, and he didn't state a belief, he said it was a FACT that lives would be saved if Cheney were dead. That's tantamount to inciting assassination.

[PixelPusher]

That's tantamount to inciting assassination.
More irresponsible and unqualified legal opinions from Yoni.

[ChumpDumper]

That's tantamount to inciting assassination.Wake me when the indictments come out.

[smeagol]

Coulter is an idiot (and so is Maher, albeit, a funny one).

[FromWayDowntown]

And then saying that things would be better if he were dead. Yeah. That's tantamount to having taken that position for himself.

Oh, and he didn't state a belief, he said it was a FACT that lives would be saved if Cheney were dead. That's tantamount to inciting assassination.

Why couldn't he consider that to be a fact? After all, there are certainly are reports to suggest that without Cheney, there would have been no war. I suppose that now I'll be deemed to have incited assassination, too.

You sure do take a broad view of other people's words while taking a ridiculously cabined reading of your own.

[Spurminator]

Traitor!

[Yonivore]

Why couldn't he consider that to be a fact?
Because it's unknowable.


After all, there are certainly are reports to suggest that without Cheney, there would have been no war. I suppose that now I'll be deemed to have incited assassination, too.
Suggestions aren't facts. Facts are facts.

Well, if you're defending those commenters and saying that it is a fact that if Cheney were dead, we'd be better off; yeah, that's tantamount to inciting assassination.


You sure do take a broad view of other people's words while taking a ridiculously cabined reading of your own.
Except that Maher stated as fact a positive consequence to Cheney being dead and, did so in defense of those who promoted that.

I've never stated anything as fact that I did not know to be fact.

[E20]

I don't know why anybody would take Coulter seriously, except if you're a WASP.

Chances are if this were the 1880's or the 1960's she'd be wearing a white hood and also would hold the world record of lynches.

Basically, what I'm saying: she is a joke.

[Ya Vez]

next thing you know they we will be outlawing the phrases Illegal Alien! and thats gay!

that my friends is gay...

[Bob Lanier]

You and Coulter are at opposite ends of the idealogical spectrum
Pretty narrow spectrum you've got there.

[jochhejaam]

Pretty narrow spectrum you've got there.
The narrow spectrum is for the narrow-minded, and they are there by choice.


(thanks for the setup Bob)

[George Gervin's Afro]

Coulter is a dirty whore


you do dirty whores a disservice when you compare them to m-ann coulter. come on man think!

[George Gervin's Afro]

Because it's unknowable.


Suggestions aren't facts. Facts are facts.

Well, if you're defending those commenters and saying that it is a fact that if Cheney were dead, we'd be better off; yeah, that's tantamount to inciting assassination.


Except that Maher stated as fact a positive consequence to Cheney being dead and, did so in defense of those who promoted that.

I've never stated anything as fact that I did not know to be fact.


So if I agree that we are better of the Saddam is dead because it will save lives it's ok but I can't feel the same way about 5 deferrment dick? Dick Cheney wanted war even is it was unecesary. If he were not VP then we may not have ended up with hundred's of thousands of dead folks. If he were no longer VP I believe it would save more lives than lost. Am I advocating assassination? Or stating a fact?

[clambake]

We have to know if it would save lives if Cheney were dead. We're obligated now. Consider it a science project.

Let's kill him, so that others can live. Or not. The conclusion to this experiment will reveal the truth.

[Yonivore]

So if I agree that we are better of the Saddam is dead because it will save lives it's ok but I can't feel the same way about 5 deferrment dick?
Correct. Saddam Hussein isn't your sitting Vice President and, secondly, things are demonstrably better now that Saddam Hussein is dead; it's no longer a hypothesis.


Dick Cheney wanted war even is it was unecesary. If he were not VP then we may not have ended up with hundred's of thousands of dead folks. If he were no longer VP I believe it would save more lives than lost. Am I advocating assassination? Or stating a fact?
First things first; you're not stating any facts. You're stating a belief in something that is unknowable; that things would be better if Dick Cheney were not Vice President. He is Vice President so, suppositions about what things would be without him being in that office can't be facts.

Second, Nowhere in your damn-near-illiterate paragraph did you say anything about the Vice President being dead; you merely hypothesized things would be better if he weren't Vice President. That's a perfectly fair, if wrong, statement to make.

Not true for Maher. He specifically stated things would be better if the Vice President were dead.

[Yonivore]

We have to know if it would save lives if Cheney were dead. We're obligated now. Consider it a science project.

Let's kill him, so that others can live. Or not. The conclusion to this experiment will reveal the truth.
That's exactly what it would take for Maher's FACT to be proven. Hence, the outrage over his statement and why -- in spite of the ignorance being demonstrated by the left -- it was tantamount to advocating assassination.

[PixelPusher]

That's exactly what it would take for Maher's FACT to be proven. Hence, the outrage over his statement and why -- in spite of the ignorance being demonstrated by the left -- it was tantamount to advocating assassination.
You have yet to show the connection between Maher's "statement of fact" and "inciting assassination". It's been 3 days...where's the "knock on the door from the Secret Service" or a preliminary investigation from the FBI? You are not a lawyer; you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

[Yonivore]

You have yet to show the connection between Maher's "statement of fact" and "inciting assassination". It's been 3 days...where's the "knock on the door from the Secret Service" or a preliminary investigation from the FBI?
Actually, the original criticism was that Maher was disappointed that Cheney wasn't killed in the attack at Bagram. He not only defended the rights of Huffington's commenters to say what they did but, augmented the statements by asserting something as fact they he could not know.

And, again, being entitled to my opinion -- not stating this a definitive legal finding -- I believe that his stating as "fact" that fewer people would be dead if the Vice President were killed is tantamount to advocating assassination.

That's my opinion and I don't have any control over what the FBI or Secret Service think or do.

[George Gervin's Afro]

Actually, the original criticism was that Maher was disappointed that Cheney wasn't killed in the attack at Bagram. He not only defended the rights of Huffington's commenters to say what they did but, augmented the statements by asserting something as fact they he could not know.

And, again, being entitled to my opinion -- not stating this a definitive legal finding -- I believe that his stating as "fact" that fewer people would be dead if the Vice President were killed is tantamount to advocating assassination.

That's my opinion and I don't have any control over what the FBI or Secret Service think or do.


Thank God for that.

[Yonivore]

[/B]Thank God for that.
If you wish.

There's a lot of things for which I thank God.

[xrayzebra]

You have yet to show the connection between Maher's "statement of fact" and "inciting assassination". It's been 3 days...where's the "knock on the door from the Secret Service" or a preliminary investigation from the FBI? You are not a lawyer; you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

Then in your estimation, it is okay to wish the VP dead.
But wrong for AC to call someone a gay person, which is
suppose to be an okay thing. Dead = Gay. Okay, know
how your thinking process works. :dizzy

[George Gervin's Afro]

Then in your estimation, it is okay to wish the VP dead.
But wrong for AC to call someone a gay person, which is
suppose to be an okay thing. Dead = Gay. Okay, know
how your thinking process works. :dizzy


Ok ray I guess Mahr offended dead people and Coulter offended everybody..well everybody but you and Yoni..

[clambake]

Cheney taken to hospital with blood clot.

Maybe the big guy is listening.

[xrayzebra]

Ok ray I guess Mahr offended dead people and Coulter offended everybody..well everybody but you and Yoni..

But I thought under your terms, being gay was a good
thing. But guess as usual you have different standards for
different things and being gay is bad. Right?

Under the dimm-o-crap terms being called gay is not a
bad thing. Nor wishing the VP dead via assassination is
bad. You tell me GGA. Mahr didn't offend dead people he
offended the United States by even thinking about killing
the VP. But with you way of thinking that is okay.

[George Gervin's Afro]

Cheney taken to hospital with blood clot.

Maybe the big guy is listening.


You hateful peice of trash... :lol

[PixelPusher]

Then in your estimation, it is okay to wish the VP dead.
But wrong for AC to call someone a gay person, which is
suppose to be an okay thing. Dead = Gay. Okay, know
how your thinking process works. :dizzy
No, you assume to know my thought process. I'm fine with Ann Coulter tossing out 5th grader insults. I support free speech for everyone.

[clambake]

I find myself strangely attracted to blood clots.

[PixelPusher]

What I didn't say (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-maher/what-i-didnt-say_b_42687.html)
Bill Maher

On Saturday, the website NewsBusters.org. posted a story under the headline "Bill Maher Sorry the Assassination Attempt on Dick Cheney Failed."

There's just one problem: As a fair reading of the show's transcript makes clear, I never said those words. Still, over the weekend, dozens of websites, mostly right wing, picked up the story (with headline intact) thus proliferating the myth that comic Maher somehow advocates the whacking of our Veep.

Don't get me wrong: I've never joined the Dick Cheney Fan Club. But what I said Friday -- and what I believe -- is that the Vice President has presided over a bungled execution of a war in which thousands of our bravest continue to die. And I believe that were he not in power, our troops would likely come home sooner. But I don't wish him dead.

Ironically, I made my comments during a discussion about Free Speech, which is one of the chief reasons that I love my country.

To see a complete transcript from the March 2, 2007 episode of "Real Time with Bill Maher" go to:
www.billmaher.com.

[boutons_]

"our troops would likely come home sooner"

even better, with dickhead dead in 2000, or unelected, US troops wouldn't be in Iraq.

[ggoose25]

http://static.flickr.com/49/163110152_fced7366ae.jpg

[Yonivore]

"our troops would likely come home sooner"

even better, with dickhead dead in 2000, or unelected, US troops wouldn't be in Iraq.
Again with the unknowables.

[clambake]

How come coulter didn't attack cheney for being a faggot producer?

[ggoose25]

^^^ :lol low blow, but :rollin

[boutons_]

"Again with the unknowables."

Not at all. We know that the ideological decision to invade Iraq was made BY THE REPUGS + AEI + PNAC + neo-cunts before 2000. Along with tax cuts for the super-rich and corps, Iraq and it oil can be seen as a key plank in the Repug hidden platform. dickhead orchestrated the cherry-picking and got his good buddy rummy to run DoD.

Has any heard of any such decision to invade Iraq on the Dem side?

Dems elected = NO Iraq war.

And perhaps no 9/11, either, as I doubt the Dems, esp under Gore Exec actually respecting and wanting to govern seriously, would have ignored totally all the red lights in the summer of 2001.

[JoeChalupa]

She a shock-whore and she's pimpin' her shit and I ain't buying it.

[Guru of Nothing]

And then saying that things would be better if he were dead. Yeah. That's tantamount to having taken that position for himself.

Oh, and he didn't state a belief, he said it was a FACT that lives would be saved if Cheney were dead. That's tantamount to inciting assassination.

Let's set the table ...

How many family members do you have serving in Iraq?

BTW, now that I started keeping score, that is the absolute worst ever use of the word "tantamount" I've seen used. It's akin to me saying that Cheney has "assassinated" 3000 American soldiers.

[ponky]

How come coulter didn't attack cheney for being a faggot producer?

:lmao

[Bob Lanier]

Is that a knowable unknowable or an unknowable unknowable?

[sabar]

Who actually takes Coulter seriously?

I think she is a mockery of the GOP. She's a mockery of a human being. The morons that take her seriously are blind loyal party-line voters anyways. She's redundant to the whole system and just gives the left a lot of fodder to slam the right with.

[Mr. Peabody]

Who actually takes Coulter seriously?

I think she is a mockery of the GOP. She's a mockery of a human being. The morons that take her seriously are blind loyal party-line voters anyways. She's redundant to the whole system and just gives the left a lot of fodder to slam the right with.

And yet there are people on here defending her.... :bang

[whottt]

Who actually takes Coulter seriously?

Um...


I think she is a mockery of the GOP. She's a mockery of a human being.

You do, evidentally.



The morons that take her seriously are blind loyal party-line voters anyways. She's redundant to the whole system and just gives the left a lot of fodder to slam the right with.


You really just kicked your own ass there...

Coulter does what she does because it makes her a lot of $$$ and she gets attention for doing it.

The Left has their share of similar types...Coulter just stands out because she is a conservative female.

People bag on her looks, but she's pretty hot compared to anyone else closely involved with politics.

Right now she's the Republican Version of Michael Moore, a conservative Jane Fonda...and she's less offensive than they are IMO(though not for a lack of trying on her part).


If I could make millions and garner fame by amping up my views to the point that they get a reaction out of people and the media, I'd do it. I'd enjoy it immensely in fact. Get a rise out of all the stiffasses? Hell I already do it here for nothing.

Coulter has made some scathing comments, but it's not like she goes around asking for people to take it easy on her and crying that she's a victim. She pisses people off and then laughs about the fact that they can't do shit about it. And makes an assload of $$$ for doing it.


Where do I sign up?

[Mr. Peabody]

Coulter does what she does because it makes her a lot of $$$ and she gets attention for doing it.



Exactly. I doubt she believes half the shit that comes out of her mouth and yet, people rush to defend her comments. It's infuriating when the partisans, on both sides, refuse to acknowledge when one of their own makes a ridiculous comment. She's probably laughing her ass off that people are actually trying to justify the nonsense that flies from her mouth.