PDA

View Full Version : Hot off the Press--Rosen goes crazy over Spurs...



Big Shot Rob
03-14-2007, 12:59 PM
Spurs flying under radar ... but flying high
Story Tools:
Print Email Blog This Subscribe
Charley Rosen / Special to FOXSports.com
Posted: 1 hour ago



As the season rounds the clubhouse turn, all eyes have been glued to the front-running Mavs. Meanwhile, there's been minimal pressure on the Spurs as they gradually and methodically gear up for the playoffs. On the basis of their 93-84 victory over the Clippers, the Spurs are just about ready.

Here are the keys to San Antonio's game plan:

Offensive precision
There were only three sequences in the entire game when the offense broke down. Otherwise, they ran their high screen/rolls, their curls and double-curls, and their post-ups to perfection.

The Spurs look for several things to happen when they execute their high screen-and-rolls. The first option is defensive switches, as when Tim Thomas picked up the rolling Tim Duncan and then was easily abused when TD posted, snatched the incoming pass, and drove hoopwards for an easy baby hook.

Also, Tony Parker took advantage of any slow baseline rotations by recognizing open lanes and going into his dribble-and-find-a-flipper routine. Parker wound up with 25 points on 8-of-16 shooting, most of these coming on ventures into the paint.

On several occasions the Spurs spread their offense so that Duncan had the ball down low while everybody else was stationed on the weak side. This alignment meant that the Clippers' designated double-teamers had to travel a long way to get to Duncan in time to inhibit his free-wheeling moves. As a result, Duncan was dynamic in the pivot — 8-16, 19 points — even scoring a gritty third-quarter basket in the teeth of a late-arriving triple-team.

Even Parker posted up once — and drew a foul against Jason Hart.

A textbook screen-and-fade opened Matt Bonner for an 18-footer which he drained.


Recognize and counter
Most of the curls were performed by Manu Ginobili and Michael Finley. But just to keep the Clippers honest, they each made nifty backdoor cuts that resulted in either buckets or free throws.

Also, when Duncan was three-quartered on the left box by Chris Kaman and thereby prevented from receiving an entry pass, Duncan circled to the top of the key and received the ball there. Unimpeded jumpers and drives were readily available as Kaman got lost in the shuffle.


The bench delivers

Manu Ginobili is the Spurs' X-factor and so far, he's been looking like he's ready to help San Antonio contend for another title. (D. Clarke Evans / Getty Images)

Ginobili is the Spurs' X-factor. Duncan and Parker will usually do their accustomed damage, but whenever Ginobili goes off, the Spurs can beat anybody. Against the Clips, Ginobili came into the game all saddled up and ready to ride — hitting a 3-pointer on his first touch, operating a slick drive-and-dish that would have been an assist except that TD missed a wide-open 17-footer, then pulling left and netting a long-range jumper. On his fourth touch, Ginobili buried another 3-ball. For the game, Ginobili was 5-8, including 3-for-3 from beyond the arc, plus nine rebounds, and 16 points.

Finley's offensive output is nearly as crucial as Ginobili's, since he must provide some scoring balance on the second unit. If Finley is tickling the twine, then the defense can't lock in on Ginobili. While Finley wasn't exactly unconscious — 5-for-12 for 13 points — he certainly forced the Clippers to pay attention to him.

Jacque Vaughn's 3-for-4 shooting was an unexpected bonus.


Role players do their jobs
Fabricio Oberto bulls and tiptoes his way around the glass, while Francisco Elson slides and jumps. With these two leading the way, the Spurs managed to corral virtually every loose ball. Oberto even scored on a fancy spin-and-re-spin move in the lane.

Bruce Bowen has added a "dribble, pull and shoot" move to his offensive repertoire and is therefore much more proactive on offense. Corey Maggette was a handful, but Bowen's tenacious defense kept him from running totally wild.

Vaughn played adhesive defense on the ball, and is much more athletic than Beno Udrih.


Duncan at top of his game
In addition to his prowess in the pivot, Duncan's mid-range jumper was operational — he was 4-for-6 from 15-18-feet. It's his jumper that sets up his drives and makes the Spurs' high screen-and-rolls extremely dangerous.

Also, except for one ball that Duncan tried to force through a crowd, his passing was excellent.


Defensive rotations
The Spurs' perfectly synchronized baseline rotations allowed their bigs to show and hold for a count in defense of the Clippers' screen-and-rolls. This coordination was actually the key to San Antonio's defense since it just about nullified LA's favorite offensive ploy.

Elson and Ginobili (who played with as much freedom as a free safety) were particularly adept in this department. However, if Oberto always made the proper rotations, he was often too slow getting there and was repeatedly whistled for fouls.

Brent Barry and Matt Bonner are simply playing the best team-defense of their entire careers.


Straight-up basic defense
Duncan, Oberto and Elson took turns containing the otherwise explosive Elton Brand. In general, the Spurs' defensive philosophy is to rotate and then hold their ground. The soundness of this fundamentalist approach was evident in their collective failure to block a shot, and in their committing only 11 team fouls. As a result, the Clips shot only seven free throws while the Spurs earned 23.

Moreover, every one of the Clippers' shots was challenged. And the Spurs controlled the defensive glass — yielding only six offensive rebounds. (The Spurs only captured seven, but that's because they concentrated on getting back on defense to stifle the Clips' running game.)


Popovich's perfectionism
Pop called a timeout only 60 seconds into the third quarter when he wasn't satisfied with the Spurs defense. They were too conscious of ball-penetration and bunching themselves in the paint. After the timeout, Pop sent Finley in for Bowen and Vaughn in for Parker.

Starters get no extra courtesy if they mess up. Period. That's why the Spurs leave their egos in the locker room.


Championship experience
The Spurs know how to win. Different players can take over the offense for short stretches throughout the game — Duncan, Parker, Ginobili, Finley, and even Vaughn.

The Spurs understand that any given play can turn a ball game. So they value every single offensive possession, and they also work their butts off on every defensive sequence.


Here's your chance to fire back at Charley Rosen. Got a question or a comment
Subject:

Comment/Question:

Name: (ex, john doe)
Email: (ex, [email protected])
Hometown:




Okay, then, what if anything remains to be done over the next five weeks?


Parker must relocate his perimeter shot. He was only 1-of-4 against L.A. and lacked the easy stroke that characterized his shooting last season.

Robert Horry has to be dropped from the rotation. His one 3-ball nearly cracked the backboard, and his defense was less than ordinary. It would be a miracle of Biblical proportions if Horry can resurrect his game in the playoffs.

Barry is still out of control when he lowers his head and dribbles into the paint. This is a problem that has plagued him throughout his career.

Bowen has to hire a private eye to track down and locate his long-lost long-range jump shot.

Popovich has to continue carefully rationing his starters' playing time.

At all costs, the Spurs have to avoid winding up with the fourth seed and facing Dallas in the second round. Actually, since 11 of their remaining 18 games are at home, and 13 of these are against teams with losing records, the Spurs have a decent shot at overtaking the Suns and gaining the second seed.
That grinding sound escaping from the bowels of the AT&T Center is the Spurs putting a razor-sharp edge on their game. Just imagine what a rousing battle an all-Texas Western Conference final would be.

Charley Rosen is FOXSports.com's NBA analyst and author of 13 books about hoops, the current one being "The pivotal season — How the 1971-72 L.A. Lakers changed the NBA."

Extra Stout
03-14-2007, 01:04 PM
I don't care how many glowing articles Rosen writes about the Spurs; he is still a senile idiot.

smeagol
03-14-2007, 01:09 PM
Championship experience
The Spurs know how to win. Different players can take over the offense for short stretches throughout the game — Duncan, Parker, Ginobili, Finley, and even Vaughn.

Is he serious?

sa_butta
03-14-2007, 01:10 PM
Okay, then, what if anything remains to be done over the next five weeks?


Parker must relocate his perimeter shot. He was only 1-of-4 against L.A. and lacked the easy stroke that characterized his shooting last season.

Robert Horry has to be dropped from the rotation. His one 3-ball nearly cracked the backboard, and his defense was less than ordinary. It would be a miracle of Biblical proportions if Horry can resurrect his game in the playoffs.

Barry is still out of control when he lowers his head and dribbles into the paint. This is a problem that has plagued him throughout his career.

Bowen has to hire a private eye to track down and locate his long-lost long-range jump shot.

Popovich has to continue carefully rationing his starters' playing time.
All good points and these will be crucial in determing how far we get in the playoffs. They mentioned Ginobili as an X factor, but if Horry, Barry and Bowen dont show up in the playoffs we will have an early exit. I still question Parker in the playoffs also. All of the looks will be different and scoring will not come as easy.

Vingianx
03-14-2007, 01:11 PM
:lol

boutons_
03-14-2007, 01:15 PM
"remains to be done over the next five weeks?"

I'd like to see some games, tough in diverse ways, where the Spurs prevail.

Have big lead and then hold off a big charge in the 4th.

Have lottery team come out way overy their heads (GSW vs Mavs) but Spus don't panic, keep plugging away to win by a nose.

Some really close crunch times.

an OT.

etc,etc. some real tests, not boring shit like vs clips.

phyzik
03-14-2007, 01:29 PM
Have lottery team come out way overy their heads (GSW vs Mavs) but Spus don't panic, keep plugging away to win by a nose.

Trail Blazers.... although not exactly a lottery team.

CubanMustGo
03-14-2007, 01:31 PM
One of the worst games the Spurs have played on the streak and Rosen waxes rhapsodic about it? What a tool.

Southwest Texas Fan
03-14-2007, 01:55 PM
Whats a tool?

phyzik
03-14-2007, 02:13 PM
Whats a tool?

From the Urban Dictionary:

Tool: One who lacks the mental capacity to know he is being used. A fool. A cretin. Characterized by low intelligence and/or self-steem.

boutons_
03-14-2007, 02:21 PM
"tool" is a synonym "stooge"

example: dubya is tool/stooge for dickhead/PNAC/AEI/neo-cunts.

td4mvp3
03-14-2007, 03:33 PM
for some reason, i'm not buying the "spurs have rediscovered their defense" speil. their last couple of opponents have scored on 45+ percent shooting, hardly lock down. the team just seems poised for a rude awakening in the playoffs.

doldrums
03-14-2007, 03:39 PM
He must have watched the game 3x to come up with all that info and in counting the times the offensive scheme brokedown, he had to watch carefully. I give him credit for that.

polandprzem
03-14-2007, 03:49 PM
Anybody remember his article when the spurs lost to Lakers at the beginnig of a season and that the spurs are done and have no chance repeating?

wildbill2u
03-14-2007, 03:50 PM
The fact that the Clipper game was boring says a lot. The Spurs were never scintillating, but they kept the pressure on and methodically put away a team that was rated a pretty good playoff contender earlier.

I like it when they bring the lunchpails to work and do whatever it takes to win.

ambchang
03-14-2007, 03:58 PM
I actually thought the Spurs sucked last night. A championship caliber team should not go down to the wire with their starters against a borderline playoff team, especially with the disparity in quality of teams in the league this year.

Obstructed_View
03-14-2007, 04:13 PM
I actually thought the Spurs sucked last night. A championship caliber team should not go down to the wire with their starters against a borderline playoff team, especially with the disparity in quality of teams in the league this year.
Just because it's happened so many times this year doesn't mean that winning 13 games in a row in the NBA is easy.

Most teams lose that game against the Clippers last night. A month ago the Spurs would have lost that game. A championship caliber team plays good defense even when they are struggling to score, which is what the Spurs have always needed to be successful. It's the reason smallball sucks so badly, because it relies on having to keep up with the other team on the offensive end while not providing stops.

slayermin
03-14-2007, 04:30 PM
It's the reason smallball sucks so badly, because it relies on having to keep up with the other team on the offensive end while not providing stops.

Great point. I don't think I have read anyone explain it that way before.

Ed Helicopter Jones
03-14-2007, 04:44 PM
Reporters are the ultimate bandwagonners.

I remember 1999 when the Spurs lost to the TWolves at home in the first round and everyone, especially Peter Vescey, were saying how the Spurs are just regular season wonders and never have any playoff presence. Then, by the end of the playoffs, especially after the MDM, everyone was touting the Spurs as this amazing playoff team.

If the Spurs slip soon most media will jump off their bandwagon again.

td4mvp3
03-14-2007, 04:47 PM
Just because it's happened so many times this year doesn't mean that winning 13 games in a row in the NBA is easy.

Most teams lose that game against the Clippers last night. A month ago the Spurs would have lost that game. A championship caliber team plays good defense even when they are struggling to score, which is what the Spurs have always needed to be successful. It's the reason smallball sucks so badly, because it relies on having to keep up with the other team on the offensive end while not providing stops.
the clips shot nearly 50 percent on the night.

FromWayDowntown
03-14-2007, 04:51 PM
Taking for granted that Charley Rosen knows more basketball than I do, I take some solace in his stellar review of the Spurs' game and effort last night. I'm with Pop in thinking that the Spurs were generally lethargic and didn't appear to pay much attention to detail. So, if the Spurs looked that good to Rosen on a night when those who watch the team the most thought they were pretty bad, it might say a lot about upside and where this team can go.

Frankly, though, I'm inclined to just believe that Charley Rosen is full of crap. As usual.

boutons_
03-14-2007, 04:54 PM
When a team is hot, they're hot. There's not much a great defense can do about it. but the Spurs didn't play great defense any way. Very mediocre effort from the Spurs, no intensity.

Looks at the AST/FG, quite a bit lower than Spurs avg.

Obstructed_View
03-14-2007, 06:15 PM
the clips shot nearly 50 percent on the night.
And scored 84 whole points. Your point? ;)

td4mvp21
03-14-2007, 06:19 PM
The Spurs are better at holding their opponents from scoring rather than to a low fg%. Kind of weird. I'd like to see them get the Opponent FG% down below 44%.

Cant_Be_Faded
03-14-2007, 06:58 PM
Is Elson really picking it up defensively? How has his progress been in general?

exstatic
03-14-2007, 07:00 PM
Maybe Rosen interpreted Phil Jakass's rant about a Kobe conspiracy the way I did: throwing in the towel for this year's playoffs.

Pop OFits
03-14-2007, 07:15 PM
The timeout to start the 3rd quarter was to remove Parker and Brent Barry. Parker and Barry played the high pick and pop like they were disinterested. The help defense tried to compensate, broke down, crashed and burned with a Maggette bunny.