MajorMike
03-26-2007, 12:16 PM
Tubby's Smith's replacement should be?
By Bobby Brockman, Sports Editor
It's hard to figure out who were the happiest people in the United States on Thursday afternoon: those in Minnesota or those who live and die with University of Kentucky basketball?
Both groups were elated for different reasons.
The ones in the state of 1,000 lakes actually think they now have a legitimate men's basketball coach.
While those that think they know more basketball than Dr. James Naismith ever did, think they will be much better off with anyone other than Orlando Smith calling the shots in Lexington.
It's a fact that Smith's recruiting has been off in some years which shouldn't happen at UK. It also seems that his offense has become very stagnant.
Recruiting woes can't be blamed exclusively on Smith. All a recruit or his family has to do is listen to a talk show in the Commonwealth and why would they want to play under the scrutiny of those know-it-alls.
The Big Blue experts figure it will be easy to replace Smith and the program will be much better off.
Don't be so sure about that.
Taking away 10 or so years in the 1940s and 1950s and the 1996 through 1998 run and UK's run at national titles is similar to a bunch of collegiate hoop squads.
The next UK coach does need to play a racehorse brand of basketball. However, it does seem like the shot clock was installed, point totals have gone down.
Here's a look at some of the names mentioned for the post and why or why not they might not take the Wildcat head spot should Mitch Barnhart come a calling.
Billy Donovan: Why would anyone in their right mind leave a program which could be coming off back-to-back national championships and the tranquillity of Gainesville, Fla.
Rick Pitino: Bringing him back would make UK fans as big of a hypocrite as they claimed he was when he took the University of Louisville job.
Tom Crean: He would probably crawl to Lexington. But, is his offense any more wide-open than Smith's?
Tom Izzo: His offense is similar to Crean's with the only difference being he probably wouldn't crawl to Lexington.
Mark Few: Gonzaga does play a wide-open offense, but is Few ready to recruit east of the Mississippi and handle the media and fans who want to know everything about you (i.e. the names of your dogs' offspring and who is now their owners).
Bruce Pearl: Two years ago, maybe. But, why would he want to leave a spot where he is worshipped, opposite in Lexington where the players are put on a pedestal.
Mike Brey: Probably makes the most sense since his style is a shoot-the-three at anytime and he can recruit nationally. But, his biggest bugaboo is he used to coach under Coach K and Duke is one of the many teams UK fans will stay up late at night if they figure they have a chance to lose.
Billy Gillispie: There aren't five people who could say they had heard this name two years ago. So, why would someone want him since he has won at Texas A&M with Melvin Watkins' leftovers just like Smith supposedly did with Pitino's holders in 1997-98.
John Calipari: Similar actions and results to Pitino, but would his questionable recruiting tactics be overlooked by the Kentucky media, which scrutinizes everything before, during and after the fact. They only do that with barbecue in Memphis.
Travis Ford: He's probably kicking himself that Smith didn't stay a couple of years longer. Unless Barnhart strikes out a few times, it's probably too early for Ford to get the nod. He might be one more move from being in serious consideration for a return to his alma mater.
John Pelphrey: He's already being mentioned for the South Florida opening and, like Ford, probably needs to prove a bit more before being the thick brush.
That's 11 names and the surface has only been scratched. The eventual replacement is probably not on this list. Was Rich Brooks on the UK football radar 24 hours before getting that post?
The job description is quite simple for the next University of Kentucky men's basketball coach.
He needs to have extremely thick skin, which Smith did for the first half or so of his tenure, be able to recruit the hamburger All-Americans, play an exciting brand of basketball, win at a rate that only UCLA did (10 titles in 11 years) and answer questions similar to "is Richie going to play tonight" on the weekly radio show.
By Bobby Brockman, Sports Editor
It's hard to figure out who were the happiest people in the United States on Thursday afternoon: those in Minnesota or those who live and die with University of Kentucky basketball?
Both groups were elated for different reasons.
The ones in the state of 1,000 lakes actually think they now have a legitimate men's basketball coach.
While those that think they know more basketball than Dr. James Naismith ever did, think they will be much better off with anyone other than Orlando Smith calling the shots in Lexington.
It's a fact that Smith's recruiting has been off in some years which shouldn't happen at UK. It also seems that his offense has become very stagnant.
Recruiting woes can't be blamed exclusively on Smith. All a recruit or his family has to do is listen to a talk show in the Commonwealth and why would they want to play under the scrutiny of those know-it-alls.
The Big Blue experts figure it will be easy to replace Smith and the program will be much better off.
Don't be so sure about that.
Taking away 10 or so years in the 1940s and 1950s and the 1996 through 1998 run and UK's run at national titles is similar to a bunch of collegiate hoop squads.
The next UK coach does need to play a racehorse brand of basketball. However, it does seem like the shot clock was installed, point totals have gone down.
Here's a look at some of the names mentioned for the post and why or why not they might not take the Wildcat head spot should Mitch Barnhart come a calling.
Billy Donovan: Why would anyone in their right mind leave a program which could be coming off back-to-back national championships and the tranquillity of Gainesville, Fla.
Rick Pitino: Bringing him back would make UK fans as big of a hypocrite as they claimed he was when he took the University of Louisville job.
Tom Crean: He would probably crawl to Lexington. But, is his offense any more wide-open than Smith's?
Tom Izzo: His offense is similar to Crean's with the only difference being he probably wouldn't crawl to Lexington.
Mark Few: Gonzaga does play a wide-open offense, but is Few ready to recruit east of the Mississippi and handle the media and fans who want to know everything about you (i.e. the names of your dogs' offspring and who is now their owners).
Bruce Pearl: Two years ago, maybe. But, why would he want to leave a spot where he is worshipped, opposite in Lexington where the players are put on a pedestal.
Mike Brey: Probably makes the most sense since his style is a shoot-the-three at anytime and he can recruit nationally. But, his biggest bugaboo is he used to coach under Coach K and Duke is one of the many teams UK fans will stay up late at night if they figure they have a chance to lose.
Billy Gillispie: There aren't five people who could say they had heard this name two years ago. So, why would someone want him since he has won at Texas A&M with Melvin Watkins' leftovers just like Smith supposedly did with Pitino's holders in 1997-98.
John Calipari: Similar actions and results to Pitino, but would his questionable recruiting tactics be overlooked by the Kentucky media, which scrutinizes everything before, during and after the fact. They only do that with barbecue in Memphis.
Travis Ford: He's probably kicking himself that Smith didn't stay a couple of years longer. Unless Barnhart strikes out a few times, it's probably too early for Ford to get the nod. He might be one more move from being in serious consideration for a return to his alma mater.
John Pelphrey: He's already being mentioned for the South Florida opening and, like Ford, probably needs to prove a bit more before being the thick brush.
That's 11 names and the surface has only been scratched. The eventual replacement is probably not on this list. Was Rich Brooks on the UK football radar 24 hours before getting that post?
The job description is quite simple for the next University of Kentucky men's basketball coach.
He needs to have extremely thick skin, which Smith did for the first half or so of his tenure, be able to recruit the hamburger All-Americans, play an exciting brand of basketball, win at a rate that only UCLA did (10 titles in 11 years) and answer questions similar to "is Richie going to play tonight" on the weekly radio show.