PDA

View Full Version : Tony Parker: The Upside



boutons
11-19-2004, 12:57 PM
For the last 2 years, Tony has been about a 15P / 5R / 4A / 1S PG.

@PHI, he was 0 / 8 / 6 / 3.

Anybody who looks at the single "0" is a myopic dumbass. It's about 240 games since his last "0". Last night had 3 columns well above his career avg, to say nothing of his nose-in-the-belly, hands-out defense from half-court. Everybody can see he's making a huge effort on D vs last year, and very effective against the Starburys, and the Answers, and why not, tonight, The Gloves?

He's playing like a champion in every category right through his scoring drought, exactly what any coach would demand.

We're FUCKING 7-1!

And WE CAN ONLY FUCKING GET FUCKING BETTER as Tony and Brent start hitting, without any doubt, their career PPG and %-ages. And as the defense gels even more, not that our 4th qtr D, esp the crunch minutes, was anything less punishing last night.

I can't wait until SEA's O, if it stays hot til then, runs into Spurs D on 8 Dec @SBC.

Marcus Bryant
11-19-2004, 12:59 PM
FUCK YEAH

spurs_fan_in_exile
11-19-2004, 01:01 PM
Hooray for curse words!!! Fuckity fuck fuck fuck. Whoo!

Oh yeah, and go Tony.

2centsworth
11-19-2004, 01:08 PM
It's so bad we have to manipulate his career stats.

Its 13.1pts, 5asst, 2.8rbs, .95stls. That earned him $11mm and he's playing worse.

maxpower
11-19-2004, 01:17 PM
...a myopic dumbass.

Here?!? myopia??? GET OUT!


But one thing I am sure of is Barry is worthless...he shot under 50% for the game. Trade him.

bigzak25
11-19-2004, 01:40 PM
Hooray for curse words!!! Fuckity fuck fuck fuck. Whoo!


fuckin a man..... :lol

boutons
11-19-2004, 01:48 PM
"It's so bad we have to manipulate his career stats."

No manipulation, just unbridled, multi-thread negativity from you.

I was using only the last 2 years when he had fully "arrived", as being more predictive of what to expect this year, than his rookie year.

bigzak25
11-19-2004, 01:50 PM
Tony should be judged on his playoff performance. No more, no less. Long way to go.

2centsworth
11-19-2004, 02:03 PM
Negative yes, blind no.