Will the Spurs catch the Suns?

[Kori Ellis]

This will be a vBookie

[polandprzem]

Yes they will not

[polandprzem]

But listen if it realy that important - all in all the 2nd round will be between spurs and suns (if bothe teams will make it trough first one)

6th and seveth spot is still unsure as well

[ManuTim_best of Fwiendz]

oh no...wait,

does this mean I can't bet on anything else til the end of the season?

[Johnny_Blaze_47]

oh no...wait,

does this mean I can't bet on anything else til the end of the season?

Nah, Kori will usually add $25 to people who zero out.

[ManuTim_best of Fwiendz]

Ah ok, thanks.

[Fernando TD21]

Manu made me loose my vbookie $$, this time I'll bet against the spurs. I really don't think they will be able to catch the Suns and I don't think they need to.

[mathbzh]

I don't think so. And I don't really care.
I am fine with the third seed.

[Texas_Ranger]

I don't think so. And I don't really care.
I am fine with the third seed.

Agree.

[polandprzem]

Nah, Kori will usually add $25 to people who zero out.

Kori is generous ;)

[Spurminator]

I almost posted a new thread but I decided it didn't warrant one, so I'll post in here.

I've heard this several times since last night:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dailydime-070406


The Suns' lead has slipped to just two games on the Spurs in the standings, but it's effectively one game since the Spurs hold the tiebreaker by virtue of taking the season series, 2-1.

This is false. It is not "effectively a one game lead." If San Antonio wins one more and Phoenix loses one more, the Spurs will still be 1 game behind the Suns.

I've heard this in the past in instances where it makes sense. An example would be if the Suns had a 2-1 season series lead, you might say they "effectively have a three game lead on the Spurs." Because the Spurs would need to be one game ahead of them to get the 2 seed.


No big deal, just bugged me.

[/rant]

[polandprzem]

I almost posted a new thread but I decided it didn't warrant one, so I'll post in here.

I've heard this several times since last night:

"The Suns' lead has slipped to just two games on the Spurs in the standings, but it's effectively one game since the Spurs hold the tiebreaker by virtue of taking the season series, 2-1. "

This is false. It is not "effectively a one game lead." If San Antonio wins one more and Phoenix loses one more, the Spurs will still be 1 game behind the Suns.

I've heard this in the past in instances where it makes sense. An example would be if the Suns had a 2-1 season series lead, you might say they "effectively have a three game lead on the Spurs." Because the Spurs would need to be one game ahead of them to get the 2 seed.


No big deal, just bugged me.

[/rant]

:lol



cool :cooldevil

[Kobulingam]

Spurs messed it up by putting up a piss poor performance against Indiana.

[wildbill2u]

I'm betting no because my bets are usually wrong. Maybe my betting jinx will help the Spurs.

[ducks]

Suns remaining schedule:

@ LAL
vs. SEA
vs. LAL
@ UTA b2b
@ HOU
vs. LAC b2b

Spurs remaining schedule:

vs. GSW
vs. POR
vs. SAC
@ MIN
@ DAL
@ MEM b2b
vs. DEN

[ALVAREZ6]

No they won't.


Money for me.

[Kobulingam]

It's in Kobe's hands. All it takes is for Nash to diss Kobe's mom in the papers.

[milkyway21]

probably. there's a 3-1 chance.

Spurs remaining schedule will be against Portland, Denver, Sacramento, Memphis, and Dallas
while;
Phoenix are yet to play 2 games against the Lakers, 1 game vs Utah, Houston, & Clippers-all are playoff-bound teams and, Seattle.