PDA

View Full Version : Chris Paul is sick



Brutalis
04-18-2007, 09:48 PM
Put him on a team like SA, Dallas or Phoenix and holy shit @ dynasty

Chris Childs
04-18-2007, 09:59 PM
I would trade Tony Parker for him in a heartbeat.

ducks
04-18-2007, 11:13 PM
I would trade Tony Parker for him in a heartbeat.
you are a fucking fool

ducks
04-18-2007, 11:13 PM
Put him on a team like SA, Dallas or Phoenix and holy shit @ dynasty
do you really think he is so much better then nash?

ponky
04-18-2007, 11:14 PM
Put him on a team like SA, Dallas or Phoenix and holy shit @ dynasty

uh, no

Fillmoe
04-19-2007, 12:13 AM
chris paul >>>>>>> nash

mavsfan1000
04-19-2007, 03:55 AM
Chris Paul in a couple years from now >>>>> Nash. Not right now though.

TDMVPDPOY
04-19-2007, 04:09 AM
cp3 on the spurs = dynasty

look at what his doing with the hornets

something tp cant do imo.....

Flopper
04-19-2007, 07:48 AM
Rockets would kill for Chris Paul.

kingsfan
04-19-2007, 07:49 AM
Much as I love CP3, he is not better than Nash right now, but he has youth and for a team rebuilding cough*Kings*cough, he would be perfect. :elephant Look how well Hornets did this year. If they hadn't had the injuries they'd be a contender.

dg7md
04-19-2007, 08:39 AM
Much as I love CP3, he is not better than Nash right now, but he has youth and for a team rebuilding cough*Kings*cough, he would be perfect. :elephant Look how well Hornets did this year. If they hadn't had the injuries they'd be a contender.

Contender? Nah, but a strong 6th seed in the west seems pretty likely. Too many quality teams in the west that are better chemistry-wise and talent-wise.

ducks
04-19-2007, 08:50 AM
Much as I love CP3, he is not better than Nash right now, but he has youth and for a team rebuilding cough*Kings*cough, he would be perfect. :elephant Look how well Hornets did this year. If they hadn't had the injuries they'd be a contender.
hornets have a team of decent players
chris paul is good but if he was on the hawks what would their record be?

Sec24Row7
04-19-2007, 09:22 AM
Chris paul is better than nash...

He plays Defense...

mavsfan1000
04-20-2007, 12:41 AM
Chris Paul will NEVER be considered a better player than Steve Nash. No way in hell.
Nash is 33 and Paul is something like 23 so Chris Paul will eventually be better than Nash.

JamStone
04-20-2007, 12:45 AM
I hope he feels better and gets better from whatever he is sick with.

mavs>spurs2
04-20-2007, 01:18 AM
you are a fucking fool

No, you're the fool. CP3 is the real deal and he's only gonna get better.

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/chris_paul/index.html

Chris Paul
2006-07 Statistics
PPG 17.3
RPG 4.40
APG 8.9
EFF + 21.22

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/tony_parker/index.html

Tony Parker
2006-07 Statistics
PPG 18.6
RPG 3.20
APG 5.5
EFF + 18.10

jmard5
04-20-2007, 03:31 AM
I agree, Chris Paul is sick.

He's got good basketball IQ and paired with Duncan and Manu, that is very good. He can pass (tons of assists) and can shoot. Not as quick as Parker but can hold his own.

Spurs is a different team with Parker as the scoring PG. The Spurs should also be a different team with Paul as PG. Both sure have their advantages. I guess, we cannot have both worlds and the bad thing is, we will never truly know.

If he plays really well along with Chandler then he should have no problem playing along with Duncan.

And, man, Paul can also stuff the stat sheet on any fantasy team!