View Full Version : Ignore Lists
MannyIsGod
11-29-2004, 04:54 PM
I haven't put anyone on ignore yet, but Dan is pushing the damn limit.
STOP SPAMMING THE FORUM WITH YOUR ARTICLES!
sbsquared
11-29-2004, 05:09 PM
I agree! On the first page, there are 19 threads started by Nbadan! Of course, most people are "on to him" and very few of his threads get commented on - but still, enough is enough! :nope
3rdCoast
11-29-2004, 05:12 PM
Of course, most people are "on to him"
what does that mean exactly?
sbsquared
11-29-2004, 05:31 PM
We know Dan is a left-wing nutjob who loves to start arguments with his nutty posts! :lol
MsMcGillyCutty
11-29-2004, 05:34 PM
With out Dan, where would this forum be?
If you want to ignore him then do so but don't come in here and try to change the forum.
I like variety.
Duff McCartney
11-29-2004, 05:41 PM
Somebody should put this thread on ignore.
whottt
11-29-2004, 06:50 PM
I ignore no one...and while Dan is a nutjob and terrorist sympathizer...I think it takes a lot of gaul(sic) to claim he is a problem in this forum...
I know he was taking a deep interest in this forum long before I was and it was the juicy and ample chance to destroy some of his many flawed views that first got me posting in here.
So no, I won't be ignoring Dan, even though I pretty much know the slant of every article he posts without having to read it...if the thread title of one of this threads looks too predictable I just won't click on the link.
Besides, the sun even shines on a dogs ass every once in a while...sooner or later he is bound to get lucky and hit a home run on one of his ridiculous conspiracy theories...and I kind of want to see that when it happens.
CrazyOne
11-29-2004, 08:05 PM
By then, the mother ship will have taken him home anyway... don't hold your breath. :spin
Hook Dem
11-29-2004, 08:16 PM
No one is more critical of Dan than I but I won't put him on ignore either. I don't have anyone on ignore. Thats like burying your head in the sand and hoping the "problem" will go away. I'll just continue to take issue with almost everything he posts. To ignore your advesary or think he is stupid will eventually be your undoing. I don't hate Dan. I feel sorry for him in the fact that he feels it necessary to draw so much attention to himself. I think it makes him feel important. Stay with me now............................................... .....................http://tinypic.com/p7jp1
MannyIsGod
11-29-2004, 08:52 PM
I only get a chance to view the forum a couple of times a day now, if that, and when it's all the same articles I just glanced at on news.yahoo.com , it's annoying.
MannyIsGod
11-29-2004, 08:53 PM
Duff, you are an expert on ignore. After all, the entire female population of the planet has you on ignore isn't that right?
Hook Dem
11-29-2004, 08:54 PM
^^^Rack^^^ :lol :lol :lol
Duff McCartney
11-29-2004, 08:56 PM
Duff, you are an expert on ignore. After all, the entire female population of the planet has you on ignore isn't that right?
Wrong.
MannyIsGod
11-29-2004, 09:02 PM
excluding family, MY BAD!
Duff McCartney
11-29-2004, 09:06 PM
excluding family, MY BAD!
You mean your family?
MannyIsGod
11-29-2004, 09:11 PM
yeah, you hitting it with my sisters? Somehow, I doubt that.
Duff McCartney
11-29-2004, 09:13 PM
And me being ignored by the female population? Are you like really lonely Manny? Cause you don't even know me but you think you do by sentences that I write on an internet message board.
MannyIsGod
11-29-2004, 09:27 PM
I am incredibly lonely Duff. I just like screwing with you because you're an idiot.
Duff McCartney
11-29-2004, 09:29 PM
You're not really screwing with me...I don't take anything you say seriously, cause I think you're an idiot anyway. It's just annoying that you think you know everything about somebody by just what they post here, I mean I don't claim to know anything about you.
MannyIsGod
11-29-2004, 09:32 PM
if you can go back and find where I claimed knowing everything about you, feel free.
I make fun of you based on what I do know.
IE:
1. You've never been to a concert yet consider yourself a muscian. Riiiiiiiiiiiiight.
2. You are a virgin who has absolutely no idea of how to talk to women.
3. You're an outright loser.
:D
Have a nice day Duff!
Duff McCartney
11-29-2004, 09:45 PM
2. You are a virgin who has absolutely no idea of how to talk to women.
See you don't know shit manny. I also wonder how you came to this conclusion.
MannyIsGod
11-29-2004, 09:49 PM
I don't know but it's fun either way. Regardless of what your mother tells you Duff, you can't lose your virginity to your hands.
Duff McCartney
11-29-2004, 09:55 PM
Seems like you have an obsession about what goes on with my dick Manny. Are you hiding something? It's okay to come out of the closet.
Nbadan
11-30-2004, 01:03 AM
haven't put anyone on ignore yet, but Dan is pushing the damn limit.
STOP SPAMMING THE FORUM WITH YOUR ARTICLES!
Common Manny, if don't like my articles then just don't read them, but insinuating that there should be some type of limit on the number of threads started is silly. Maybe if I were starting senseless threads that went nowhere your arguments may hold more water, but each thread I start has possible discussion points. Whether you feel like discussing those particular issues or not.
Nbadan
11-30-2004, 01:06 AM
We know Dan is a left-wing nutjob who loves to start arguments with his nutty posts!
Wouldn't it be Ironic if I was the sane person, and all of you were the ones that were out of your collective minds? Think about that for awhile.
Nbadan
11-30-2004, 01:08 AM
With out Dan, where would this forum be?
If you want to ignore him then do so but don't come in here and try to change the forum.
I like variety.
Thank you Ms. McGillyCutty. We need more people like yourself with open minds in this forum.
Nbadan
11-30-2004, 01:25 AM
ignore no one...and while Dan is a nutjob and terrorist sympathizer...I think it takes a lot of gaul(sic) to claim he is a problem in this forum...
I know he was taking a deep interest in this forum long before I was and it was the juicy and ample chance to destroy some of his many flawed views that first got me posting in here.
So no, I won't be ignoring Dan, even though I pretty much know the slant of every article he posts without having to read it...if the thread title of one of this threads looks too predictable I just won't click on the link.
Besides, the sun even shines on a dogs ass every once in a while...sooner or later he is bound to get lucky and hit a home run on one of his ridiculous conspiracy theories...and I kind of want to see that when it happens.
I ignore no one also. The main impedious for this whole forum is to get people with diffferent political phylosophies talking. If everyone is just blabbing while ignoring everyone else then we are no better than AM Talk radio and Fox News.
For instance, Whott has some pretty radical ideas, and if he wants to keep believing that he somehow got the best of me, even though I can't recall one argument where he proved conclusively that his 'opinion' was right over my own, then that is for Whott to believe. Who am I to burst his little bubble?
Forming political opinions of your own and taking the time to write them here is tiring, time consuming, and stressful unless you are a serious political junkie like myself. That's why I don't fault anyone for having a opinion that is different from mine.
What I can't stand is people who come in here with the same ole rhetorical political cliches that do little to add to the overall depth of the subject of the thread. If your gonna make a snide comment at least be original.
The forum is still young, and I never expected a rose party when I started this forum. I know eventually we'll get to where we want to be. We just have some bugs to work out. Thanks for your patience.
Hook Dem
11-30-2004, 08:58 AM
I ignore no one also. The main impedious for this whole forum is to get people with diffferent political phylosophies talking. If everyone is just blabbing while ignoring everyone else then we are no better than AM Talk radio and Fox News.
For instance, Whott has some pretty radical ideas, and if he wants to keep believing that he somehow got the best of me, even though I can't recall one argument where he proved conclusively that his 'opinion' was right over my own, then that is for Whott to believe. Who am I to burst his little bubble?
Forming political opinions of your own and taking the time to write them here is tiring, time consuming, and stressful unless you are a serious political junkie like myself. That's why I don't fault anyone for having a opinion that is different from mine.
What I can't stand is people who come in here with the same ole rhetorical political cliches that do little to add to the overall depth of the subject of the thread. If your gonna make a snide comment at least be original.
The forum is still young, and I never expected a rose party when I started this forum. I know eventually we'll get to where we want to be. We just have some bugs to work out. Thanks for your patience.
Damn!!!!! An intellegent post from Dan. All things are possible. I wish I could believe you actually subscribe to what you posted but I won't get my hopes up. Anyway, congratulations to you.
gophergeorge
11-30-2004, 09:35 AM
Dan reminds me of Tracy Bogert.... I didn't like him either.... :)
Useruser666
11-30-2004, 10:19 AM
Sometimes in order to feel better, people block out events in their past that hurt them. Like getting owned in a political forum. Dan, even you must admit that some of your threads are pretty much stretching it. You bring up good on topic posts sometimes, and some of your implosions are entertaining.
I just noticed something rather funny. Duff and Manny are spamming a NBAdan thread. Holy crap!!! :lol
spurster
11-30-2004, 10:28 AM
I think all we need to do is to nicely ask Danny to limit his new threads to say 3-5 a day on average.
You can't have a serious discussion if the whole 1st page changes every day. You will only get the few who check this forum every 5 minutes or so.
Useruser666
11-30-2004, 11:51 AM
The thing I don't like about your posting Dan, is that you post a bunch of threads, then I respond to some of them, and since there are so many you don't even reply back till they're off the first page. You don't seem to finish what you started in the first place. You are Shock and Awing the rest of us.
Nbadan
11-30-2004, 12:01 PM
News moves fast. You either stay on top of it or your already behind. Look, there are many issues to discuss and many are time sensitive. Meaning that if they aren't talked about then when they are hot, most people won't be interested later. Yes this forum moves fast and a lot of times I won't reply again in a thread unless there is a important point being made that I think warrants a response. So if you wanna debate then lets debate, but don't expect me to reply to ad havoc attacks and point-less rhetoric.
Useruser666
11-30-2004, 02:09 PM
News moves fast. You either stay on top of it or your already behind. Look, there are many issues to discuss and many are time sensitive. Meaning that if they aren't talked about then when they are hot, most people won't be interested later. Yes this forum moves fast and a lot of times I won't reply again in a thread unless there is a important point being made that I think warrants a response. So if you wanna debate then lets debate, but don't expect me to reply to ad havoc attacks and point-less rhetoric.
Um, maybe to some your posts are......
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.