samikeyp
06-14-2007, 11:01 PM
At the beginning of the season, I posed this question...
Are the Spurs the team of the decade?
The argument was by some people...mostly Spur haters (DirkAB comes to mind) said "no, no...its the Lakers because they have three!" even though the decade started with the 2000-01 season and the Lakers won two not three and the Spurs had more wins. You know..winning, the only thing that matters.
So I pose the question again.
Are the Spurs the team of the decade?
The most wins and most titles in the decade so far.
I think the answer is a resounding yes. :toast
Are the Spurs the team of the decade?
The argument was by some people...mostly Spur haters (DirkAB comes to mind) said "no, no...its the Lakers because they have three!" even though the decade started with the 2000-01 season and the Lakers won two not three and the Spurs had more wins. You know..winning, the only thing that matters.
So I pose the question again.
Are the Spurs the team of the decade?
The most wins and most titles in the decade so far.
I think the answer is a resounding yes. :toast