PDA

View Full Version : I want to know why Tim ducan doesn't have his 4th finals mvp trophy


melo061
06-15-2007, 01:36 AM
I watched every game and to me Duncan had a bigger impact on the series and played better. If you think it's all about points then fine. But duncan's overall play to me trumped parker's scoring. His job on the boards and his overall precense defensively has been passed over for a guy who scores and who's defense isn't even comparable.

And even statistically, duncan beats parker ther. More rebounds, more assits, more blocks, more steals, better ft%. The categories parker is better in is Points and fg%.
makedamnsure
06-15-2007, 01:37 AM
parker led the show. it's timmy's team but tp really stepped up. finally.
Spurs>All
06-15-2007, 01:38 AM
TD struggled offensively the last two games. It's that simple; the Finals MVP has nearly always been an offense-first award.

Congrats to TP, who deserved the honor.
SequSpur
06-15-2007, 01:39 AM
Parker won 3 out of the 4 games.
Phil Hellmuth
06-15-2007, 02:35 AM
parker wins by default. stats wise and the short series, its a good sell.
v2freak
06-15-2007, 03:15 AM
Parker was more assertive on offense, taking more shots, scoring more points and doing all of it at a higher clip. That's what matters to the people who vote. That, and flash (as evidenced by TD and Bruce not getting much consideration or none at all). Everything else becomes worthless
td4mvp21
06-15-2007, 07:35 AM
Parker had a good game basically every game, Duncan really only had 2. So Parker gets it.
MadDog73
06-15-2007, 08:37 AM
The categories parker is better in is Points and fg%.


You answered your own question.

Why did Billups win over Ben Wallace in 2004?

Same deal.
ducks
06-15-2007, 08:43 AM
going to last nights game oposing starting point guards shot 2-20
v2freak
06-15-2007, 11:53 AM
You answered your own question.

Why did Billups win over Ben Wallace in 2004?

Same deal.

Billups was clutch, a playmaker and also a beast on defense. Ben Wallace was only a beast on defense, and did not even cover TD one on one.
himat
06-15-2007, 12:18 PM
Manu should of won in 05 in my opinion.
jesse
06-15-2007, 01:46 PM
tony runs the show now, its still tims team but the cavs couldnt stop tony!!!
MONTENEGRINO
06-15-2007, 03:28 PM
Parker won 3 out of the 4 games.
Bullshit. If Timmy didn't do what he has done, Tony could score 40 ppg and Spurs would be beaten anyway.
gaKNOW!blee
06-15-2007, 04:54 PM
Manu should of won in 05 in my opinion.


no.
ducks
06-15-2007, 04:55 PM
9-1 in votes why duncan did not get it
bdictjames
06-15-2007, 08:23 PM
Spurs knew Parker would be MVP. Duncan would have trouble with a lengthy Varejao and Ilgauskas while Parker would drive around an old Snow, a hobbled Hughes, and a noob in Gibson. Plus Parker wouldnt spend energy defending the 3, while Duncan has his hands full down the paint with LBJ and Big Z.
Obstructed_View
06-15-2007, 08:44 PM
Who's Tim Ducan?
HJNTX
06-15-2007, 10:11 PM
parker led the show. it's timmy's team but tp really stepped up. finally.
..and I'm sure Timmy could care less whether he received the trophy or not .. He's a real winner!!
HJNTX
06-15-2007, 10:12 PM
Who's Tim Ducan?
:rolleyes
SpursIndonesia
06-17-2007, 04:28 AM
Bullshit. If Timmy didn't do what he has done, Tony could score 40 ppg and Spurs would be beaten anyway.

Bullshit. If Tony didn't average that kinda number in scoring while doing it efficiently, the Spurs will be beaten anyway, since the margin of winning in each games were not bigger than the difference beetween Tony's reg season scoring AVG vs post season AVG.
SpursIndonesia
06-17-2007, 04:30 AM
Tim Ducan, a romanian guy ? :lol
Josepatches
06-18-2007, 07:52 PM
Bullshit. If Tony didn't average that kinda number in scoring while doing it efficiently, the Spurs will be beaten anyway, since the margin of winning in each games were not bigger than the difference beetween Tony's reg season scoring AVG vs post season AVG.

Bullshit.Do you believe that we can't win against The Cavs without TP?
do you believe that we can't win against the Cavs without TD?
Without Parker I'm pretty sure we could have a chance to win against The Cavs but I'm not sure if we could win the series without Duncan.
Parker deserves The MVP but the defend was the key of our team and TD is the key of our defend.
v2freak
06-18-2007, 08:35 PM
I'm with Montengrino. You could just as easily argue that taking away TD's rebounds, points, assists and blocked shots would result in a loss each game.
MrChug
06-18-2007, 08:51 PM
Who's Tim Ducan?

Awww shit OV...did we go off and sign another damn euro?!?!?!?! DAMNIT! This "Ducan" guy better produce or BACK TO GREECE YA GO M-F'er!!!! :madrun
Spurminator
06-18-2007, 08:53 PM
It was a dead heat after three games, but Tony won it in the first half of Game 4.
FromWayDowntown
06-18-2007, 10:05 PM
I'd agree that Duncan's contributions to the Spurs' Finals sweep were fairly underrated. I understand why Parker won the MVP award, but I would have voted for Duncan.
Obstructed_View
06-18-2007, 10:09 PM
Duncan should win MVP every year and win finals MVP every time the Spurs are there.

We all fucking know that. Tim Duncan knows it. Tony Parker knows it.

That said, Parker did exactly what everyone's been riding him for in virtually every big game or series in his career until this year. The Spurs may not win without Duncan, but they wouldn't have won this year without Parker. He earned that trophy. Congrats to him.
Brutalis
06-19-2007, 12:21 AM
Duncan got us here Tony went through the door first.
dbreiden83080
06-19-2007, 12:28 AM
Basically Tony led the team in scoring shot a high percantage the series was a breeze so they gave it to him. Tim needed a monster offensive game in game 4 to have a good shot at it and he did not play well so Tony deserved it by a little bit over him. In a sweep it really means very little. If this series had gone 6 or 7 it would have been Duncan because he would have needed to do more for the Spurs to win.