PDA

View Full Version : If the Spurs were a musical group...



GhostofAlfrederickHughes
06-15-2007, 09:37 AM
...who would they be? My vote is they're The Band. Remember them?
Probably not. Best group of the late 60s/early 70s. String of hits ("The Weight," "Up on Cripple Creek", "The Night they Drove Old Dixie Down" etc.).
Just five solid musicians that played awesome, no-frills music at a time when everyone was looking for psychedelic guitar solos and crazy personalities.

As drummer Levon Helm said: "The rock star stuff never came up for us. The Band was never attacked by groupies before, during or after any show that we ever played."

Just like the Spurs---no hype, no frills, no nonsense. Just pure, unadulterated hoops.

(Hopefully the Duncan-Parker relationship won't break down into a Helm-Robbie Robertson feud....)

http://spurstalk.com/forums/images/smilies/smimusic.gif

Kermit
06-15-2007, 09:39 AM
great analogy. does that make the 2000-2002 laker "dynasty" hall & oates? and if it does, who is john oates?

TampaDude
06-15-2007, 09:42 AM
Yup...the Spurs are all business...they just get it done. :toast

beirmeistr
06-15-2007, 09:51 AM
yea, I remember the Band. Their album Music from Big Pink was awesome.

SRJ
06-15-2007, 09:55 AM
My favorite band, Quadro Nuevo.

This hugely talented quartet of virtuoso musicians play a variety of styles and has a highly individual style, with an old-world feel. They obviously dodn't have a huge following, but if you've heard them you'd realize that they're as good as it gets.

Spurminator
06-15-2007, 10:03 AM
I think you pretty much nailed it. The Band didn't generate high sales, they didn't appeal to a wide audience, but those who appreciated them were passionate about them. And people in the business knew what they were about and wanted to play with them.

Spurminator
06-15-2007, 10:05 AM
great analogy. does that make the 2000-2002 laker "dynasty" hall & oates?


Fleetwood Mac. :lol

The in-fighting, the short-term dominance, the oversaturation, the overratedness....

zrinkill
06-15-2007, 10:06 AM
DethKloK

ShoogarBear
06-15-2007, 10:07 AM
The Spurs would be a be-bop jazz band.

Old school, fundamentals, no modern hype, appealing only to the hard core aficionados.

mathbzh
06-15-2007, 10:10 AM
Toto
The best "studio sharks" (do you say that in english?) united in the same band.

Russ
06-15-2007, 10:20 AM
Eva has been compared to Yoko Ono. So that means the Spurs must be the . . . .

41times
06-15-2007, 12:51 PM
something like David Gates and Bread.

wildbill2u
06-15-2007, 04:53 PM
Foreigner?

gino>yourlife
06-15-2007, 05:07 PM
Slayer

take a good guess why..

Vito Corleone
06-15-2007, 05:10 PM
If the Spurs were a band they would be Run DMC, their game has changed the face of basketball and crossed new boundries. That is what Run DMC did in the Music industry.

tlongII
06-15-2007, 05:12 PM
The Spurs would be a be-bop jazz band.

Old school, fundamentals, no modern hype, appealing only to the hard core aficionados.

Nah. Couldn't be. I like be-bop.

ChumpDumper
06-15-2007, 05:14 PM
Nah. Couldn't be. I like be-bop."Tears of Rage"

Borosai
06-15-2007, 05:17 PM
ABBA

Most people hate them, but their fans adore them. :lol

L.I.T
06-15-2007, 05:17 PM
Jazz vocalist: Johnny Hartman.

Smooth, distinctive, brilliant...completely overlooked.

marini martini
06-15-2007, 05:33 PM
I remember & love "The Band" but.

My pick would be The Best Little Band in Texas .......ZZ Top!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

word
06-15-2007, 05:52 PM
Percy Faith and his Orchestra

My bad ...