Bloomberg Leaves GOP

[Jamtas#2]

link (http://wcbstv.com/topstories/local_story_170181024.html)

NEW YORK CBS 2 HD has learned New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is leaving the Republican party and has announced he is currently unaffiliated with a political party.

The move will clearly begin advancing rumors that the mayor is gearing towards a presidential run, which he has denied in the past.

In a statement, Bloomberg said:

"I have filed papers with the New York City Board of Elections to change my status as a voter and register as unaffiliated with any political party. Although my plans for the future haven’t changed, I believe this brings my affiliation into alignment with how I have led and will continue to lead our City."

On Tuesday, Bloomberg was in California attending a conference at the University of Southern California along with California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. The pair appeared on this week's cover of Time magazine.



In his statement, Bloomberg went on to discuss his progress leading New York City.

“A nonpartisan approach has worked wonders in New York: we’ve balanced budgets, grown our economy, improved public health, reformed the school system and made the nation’s safest city even safer.

“We have achieved real progress by overcoming the partisanship that too often puts narrow interests above the common good. As a political independent, I will continue to work with those in all political parties to find common ground, to put partisanship aside and to achieve real solutions to the challenges we face.

“Any successful elected executive knows that real results are more important than partisan battles and that good ideas should take precedence over rigid adherence to any particular political ideology. Working together, there’s no limit to what we can do.”

[Yonivore]

He was a Republican?

[clambake]

Bloomberg explores the possibility.....gains momentum and becomes a true force......decides to run as an independent and selects Schwarzenegger as his running mate.....Arnold has always wanted to be President.......some kind of (wink wink) accident or illness overcomes President Bloomberg.

Would this scenario make Arnold eligible to be Pres?

[exstatic]

Bloomberg explores the possibility.....gains momentum and becomes a true force......decides to run as an independent and selects Schwarzenegger as his running mate.....Arnold has always wanted to be President.......some kind of (wink wink) accident or illness overcomes President Bloomberg.

Would this scenario make Arnold eligible to be Pres?
No. He's still foreign born. I think it would take a Constitutional amendment.

[clambake]

No. He's still foreign born. I think it would take a Constitutional amendment.
BFD. Shouldn't be a problem. We're about to give citizenship to millions of illegals. Can't we pretend that one guy was "Born in the U.S.A."?

[Wild Cobra]

He was a Republican?
LOL... I didn't know that either. I assumed he was a democrat as liberal as he can be.

[Wild Cobra]

I found out yesterday he was a democrat. There were so many democrats running for the election for Mayor, he switched parties for an easier primary!

[boutons_]

http://www.uclick.com/feature/07/06/21/tt070621.gif

[smeagol]

Bloomberg has less charisma than a carrot

[boutons_]

If anybody's interested in MB, here's long piece, fluff piece? legit? It's NYTimes, so undoubtedly it's total bullshit.

But the facts of his private and public career far exceed the facts of dubya's "career".

Anti-charisma didn't stop the Repugs from nominating dubya, but of course, the Repug power players knew dubya, essentially offering nothing but the Bush brand name, would be a total stooge for dickhead, who would be the real president.

=============

June 24, 2007

Bloomberg Is a Wild Card for the Nation

By DIANE CARDWELL

He no longer brags about his dating exploits or shows off his impolitic side. He has largely reined in his temper with reporters and loosened his manner with voters. But Michael R. Bloomberg, New York’s once-improbable mayor, would still be a highly unlikely presidential contender.

A zealot for privacy, he slips away to Bermuda on weekends to practice his golf game. Divorced with a steady companion, he frequently indulges a louche sense of humor, joking at a dinner one night that if Salma Hayek joined him at the official mayor’s residence, he might actually live there. And he still likes to end his evenings with a nightcap out, leading to the occasional public admission of having had perhaps a merlot or two too many.

New Yorkers may have become accustomed to the eccentricities of the billionaire information mogul who took an unorthodox path to public service. But, as he has thrust himself more fully into national politics, even Mr. Bloomberg has questioned whether the rest of the country is ready for him.

“He’s still himself,” said Douglas A. Muzzio, a professor at the Baruch School of Public Affairs. “His dislike of and unwillingness to engage in traditional politics provides both the raison d’être for his candidacy and the unlikelihood of winning.”

And yet, since his election in 2001, he has become more adept at the political game he had so assiduously shunned, gaining increasing prominence as a symbol of centrist, nonpartisan leadership.

His recent defection from the Republican Party set off speculation about his possible presidential ambitions. Some analysts dismissed the move as a tactic to retain influence as he approaches 2009, when term limits will force him from office.

But Mr. Bloomberg has been underestimated before — few political experts believed he could win City Hall, for instance — and his don’t-sweat-the-small-stuff manner can mask what associates say is an intense focus and determination.

“He’s completely goal-oriented,” said Steven Rattner, a Democratic donor who is close to the mayor. “He picked up golf, and now he’s determined to catch Tiger Woods. He decided he wanted to learn Spanish and carves out the time for lessons, no matter how busy he is.”

That focus has its roots in his middle-class upbringing in Medford, Mass., helping him climb from the lower rungs of Wall Street to the top of his own multibillion-dollar enterprise and then the thin-air precincts of New York’s high society. That, in turn, helped his political ascent.

“People don’t take it seriously; they think it’s something to amuse yourself with, but it’s where the power is,” said David Patrick Columbia, who chronicles the haute life on his Web site, newyorksocialdiary.com. “Everybody wanted him at their dinner tables, and by the time he was ready to run for office, all of those important and influential people thought he ran a good business, he could run a good city.”

With his popularity soaring, many New Yorkers would now seem to agree. But that was not always the case. Associates say Mr. Bloomberg would be the first to admit he did not so much win the election as his opponent, Mark Green, lost it, though the novice politician was also helped by the endorsement of former Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, as well as his near-limitless ability to finance his own campaign.

After his surprising win, however, Mr. Bloomberg wasted no time getting to work. Even before taking office, associates say, he began calling business leaders, urging them to stay and to move back downtown in a city still wrenched by the human and economic toll of 9/11. He attacked looming deficits with an 18.5 percent property tax increase and pursued his own interest in improving public health by pushing through an unpopular smoking ban.

“He came in with a businessman’s mind-set,” said Edward Skyler, a deputy mayor who followed Mr. Bloomberg from his company to the mayoral campaign, then to City Hall. “Basically his mentality was: ‘Let’s do it and get it over with. It’s not going to get any better by waiting.’ He knew what was ahead of him.”

That willingness to take on difficult problems like a troubled school system, housing that is beyond the reach of many residents and entrenched poverty, and an ability to promote his pursuits to the public, have earned him widespread support among voters. Some experts say it is unclear whether his administration is making significant or long-lasting strides in these areas, but others applaud at least the efforts.

At the same time, Mr. Bloomberg’s unwillingness to engage in the symbolic acts many constituents find meaningful and what some see as an inability to project empathy with the travails of ordinary New Yorkers have led to accusations that he is out of touch.

But colleagues describe a hard-working boss who would rather be on the telephone or in meetings with deputies and commissioners doing the business of the city than at ribbon-cuttings and news conferences. Those who have worked with him over the years say that although he lets his staff pursue projects in their own way and does not micromanage, he is deeply engaged in the details of their work, rewriting and editing speeches and policy papers himself.

“He delegates but really requires accountability,” said Patricia E. Harris, his closest deputy.

Current and former associates say that Mr. Bloomberg is demanding, expecting those around him to be able to defend their proposals from all angles and at any time. He can also be short-tempered and impatient, they say, though his anger is generally brief.

They also describe a manager who pays attention to their lives, asking about their children and spouses.

Friends and associates say he is extremely loyal. Merryl H. Tisch, a philanthropist and vice chancellor of the state Board of Regents who has known Mr. Bloomberg for decades, said that she saw him the evening he returned from his recent trip to California, during which he had announced his split with the Republican party. He was at a reception in honor of her longtime building superintendent, who had died about a year ago. The man, Ms. Tisch said, had also helped look after Mr. Bloomberg’s town house a few doors down from her building, and Mr. Bloomberg had spoken at the man’s funeral, and stayed for the entire service.

“It’s not like he’s doing it because he’s running,” she said. “He’s doing it because that’s the Michael who did it last week like this, who did it 10 years ago like this, who did it 20 years ago like this. There’s a natural sense of grace to him.”

It is clear that Mr. Bloomberg enjoys his Manhattan life, from his Upper East side town house to his sparkling social circle. Even before becoming mayor, he was an unabashed enthusiast for New York.

With his companion, Diana L. Taylor, the former state banking superintendent, he still spends many evenings traipsing through the benefit circuit as well as visiting community and political organizations throughout the city, or having lively conversation with friends over dinner with lots of red wine.

Still, as his profile rises nationally, these same qualities many New Yorkers embrace about Mr. Bloomberg may make him seem faintly exotic to middle-American voters.

“I still think we’re a country that has a certain distrust of things that happen in cities,” said Fred P. Hochberg, dean of Milano The New School for Management and Urban Policy, in discussing what Mr. Bloomberg would have to overcome. He added that the nation had not elected an unmarried president since the 19th century, “because voters tend to look for a parental figure in their executive leaders, there is an official residence and we think about families living there.”

James Barron contributed reporting.

=================

America runs on bullshit, childish, naivie myths and fairy tales, indicating that the US hasn't really matured as nation, compared with European nations and electorateds.

[johnsmith]

America runs on bullshit, childish, naivie myths and fairy tales, indicating that the US hasn't really matured as nation, compared with European nations and electorateds.


you love France don't you?

[Marcus Bryant]

The interesting thing is he can run and finance a presidential campaign without taking donations or having to suck up to a particular party.

[Wild Cobra]

The interesting thing is he can run and finance a presidential campaign without taking donations or having to suck up to a particular party.
Just like Ross Perot did in '92, right?

Maybe it's a good thing. He will likely siphon more votes from democrats rather than republicans.

Perot in '92 = Clinton win (siphon republican votes)

Bloomberg in '08 = republican win (siphon democrat votes)

[xrayzebra]

The interesting thing is he can run and finance a presidential campaign without taking donations or having to suck up to a particular party.

But that's not fair. According to all the
liberals on this board. He gets to
spend his own money. :wtf

[xrayzebra]

http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z273/xrayzebra/bloomburg.gif :drunk :smokin :hungry: