View Full Version : Charles E Butt
bob bass sucks
06-24-2007, 05:04 PM
Getting tired of Peter Holt crying about money. I wish Mr Butt(H.E.B), would buy the team!!! Peter wants to keep the hotel tax so upgrades can be done at the center.
CubanMustGo
06-24-2007, 05:06 PM
Four Championships.
next
ZStomp
06-24-2007, 05:07 PM
What are you talking about? How about a link?
bob bass sucks
06-24-2007, 05:25 PM
Spurs, county eye tourism tax extension for AT&T renovation. Dated on june 9, 2007, on the metro section.
dknights411
06-24-2007, 05:58 PM
Spurs, county eye tourism tax extension for AT&T renovation. Dated on june 9, 2007, on the metro section.
Ummm..... link?
ChumpDumper
06-24-2007, 06:02 PM
http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/stories/MYSA061007.10S.BKNspurs.attcenter.31636b6.html
Butt how does this affect anyone not renting a car or hotel room?
ZStomp
06-24-2007, 06:10 PM
"We don't want it to fall behind others that are being built or upgraded," Holt said. "Our fans demand the best, and we want to give them the best.
How about starting with getting rid of "Ya'll Ready for this?"
:lol
picnroll
06-24-2007, 06:15 PM
Seems to me the Butt's like to hold on to their money more than most ultra-wealthy. I've lived in other areas where there were families that were mega-wealthy from food chains, VA, St Louis, NY, and those families were much more into public giving than the Butt's. You may need to seek out another chartiable owner.
HJNTX
06-24-2007, 06:18 PM
Hmmmm... I won't vote the the tax...We're already taxed to death here ...
ChumpDumper
06-24-2007, 06:22 PM
Rent alot of cars and hotel rooms in SA?
mikeanthony21
06-24-2007, 06:37 PM
Getting tired of Peter Holt crying about money. I wish Mr Butt(H.E.B), would buy the team!!! Peter wants to keep the hotel tax so upgrades can be done at the center.
It wont happen. Charles Butt is retiring next year and handing over HEB to his nephew who runs HEB-Mexico.
Aggie Hoopsfan
06-24-2007, 06:53 PM
The Butts are actually pretty charitable, you just don't see them in the public eye when they make their donations.
That said, not sure how getting them into an ownership position would change matters, it's still a conglomerate that owns the Spurs and they'd still operate the same way all others sports teams do - pass as much of the cost to the general public as possible.
cherylsteele
06-24-2007, 06:57 PM
Getting tired of Peter Holt crying about money. I wish Mr Butt(H.E.B), would buy the team!!! Peter wants to keep the hotel tax so upgrades can be done at the center.
Well then he should have bought the team when it was up for sale awhile back. Holt stepped up...along with other investors and bought the team where was Mr. Butt's butt then?
bob bass sucks
06-24-2007, 07:00 PM
So I take nobody rents a hotel room or a car in San Antonio? How the hell does the center already need repairs? Have some nuts Holt and pay for the repairs!
SAGambler
06-24-2007, 07:02 PM
Hmmmm... I won't vote the the tax...We're already taxed to death here ...
But this is just a tax on out of towners. The tourista. Helps pay the tab for the things we use here.
SAGambler
06-24-2007, 07:05 PM
So I take nobody rents a hotel room or a car in San Antonio? How the hell does the center already need repairs? Have some nuts Holt and pay for the repairs!
Because it is used by 20,000 people, several nights a year. Wear and tear occurs.
ChumpDumper
06-24-2007, 07:07 PM
So I take nobody rents a hotel room or a car in San Antonio?I don't.
How the hell does the center already need repairs? Have some nuts Holt and pay for the repairs!They didn't say anything about repairs.
And it's rather specious to speculate a different owner would act differently.
bob bass sucks
06-24-2007, 07:20 PM
The funny thing is that, I read a story in the newspaper. I think it was a couple of days before or after this article. A health clinic for the poor in this area was closing, because of lack of money. 18,500 is the seating capacity for the center. Rumor is that, some of the money is going to be used to buy new plasma tvs for the rest of the center
ChumpDumper
06-24-2007, 07:30 PM
I think it was a couple of days before or after this article. A health clinic for the poor in this area was closing, because of lack of money.And?
18,500 is the seating capacity for the center.And?
Rumor is that, some of the money is going to be used to buy new plasma tvs for the rest of the centerI wouldn't doubt that. Wolff (not anyone from the Spurs) actually said what it would be used for.
TheTruth
06-24-2007, 08:34 PM
Seems to me the Butt's like to hold on to their money more than most ultra-wealthy. I've lived in other areas where there were families that were mega-wealthy from food chains, VA, St Louis, NY, and those families were much more into public giving than the Butt's. You may need to seek out another chartiable owner.
The Butt's give a lot of money to charities every year. They just don't feel the need to advertise it to everyone.
Extra Stout
06-24-2007, 08:39 PM
The funny thing is that, I read a story in the newspaper. I think it was a couple of days before or after this article. A health clinic for the poor in this area was closing, because of lack of money. 18,500 is the seating capacity for the center. Rumor is that, some of the money is going to be used to buy new plasma tvs for the rest of the center
Portland and Seattle refuse to give any further subsidies to their pro sports teams. Move there.
FromWayDowntown
06-24-2007, 08:42 PM
As charitable as the Butt family is, I'm not sure that there's any evidence that a Butt purchase of the Spurs would loosen the pursestrings on AT&T Center Parkway. That seems like a rather significant assumption, particularly given that the Butt family could long ago have purchased the Spurs, when the purchase price (and the necessary capital outlays to run an NBA franchise) was much smaller.
T Park
06-24-2007, 08:53 PM
The funny thing is that, I read a story in the newspaper. I think it was a couple of days before or after this article. A health clinic for the poor in this area was closing,
Why should tax money go for charity?
Sec24Row7
06-24-2007, 09:54 PM
ROFL... I love the morons on this site.
Pick a Billionaire he has to be better than Holt right?
:jack
bob bass sucks
06-24-2007, 10:19 PM
Let's see George Steinberg. The Yankees lost 25 million last year. Dude, we are talking about the 2 or 3 million that are needed to upgrade the center. That's the whole topic, an owner crying about a few mil. Holt is a poor rich owner.
ChumpDumper
06-24-2007, 10:31 PM
Steinbrenner.
The Yankees lost 25 million last year.This is a good thing?
Of course, the Yankees own their own sports TV network in the largest media market in the US that makes up for any operating losses.
That's the whole topic, an owner crying about a few mil. Holt is a poor rich owner.Maybe you should own the Spurs. You make it sound so easy.
Manuismyhomeboy
06-24-2007, 10:43 PM
Yeah I am higher up in HEB, and Mr. Butt is very, very charitable. He gives alot back to every community HEB is present in, and he is also very good to his partners. For example, he gave every partner in the company a $100 bonus check for the last two years straight. However, I never see the Mr. Butt spending money on something such as a sports franchise, as he would much rather spent that on charity operations or giving back to his partners. Also, HEB is about to expand into the Dallas- Fort Worth area with plus stores only, so he has many expenses ahead of him.
dknights411
06-25-2007, 01:48 AM
Hmmmm... I won't vote the the tax...We're already taxed to death here ...
Trust me. Taxes here in San Antonio don't even hold a candle to my own native Montreal (the city is STILL paying for the 1976 Olympics!!! :dizzy )
johngateswhiteley
06-25-2007, 02:14 AM
this thread is hilarious. i'll pass the word on to Mr. Butt...maybe i'll even get him to read this thread, lol.
spurscenter
06-25-2007, 06:48 AM
when u win 4 championships in 9 years, give the man some love for paying all the spurs salries and operation.
I hate taxing tourists, they are the ones who spread the word on S.A.
but thats why u all vote, go vote.
CosmicCowboy
06-25-2007, 08:45 AM
Yeah I am higher up in HEB, and Mr. Butt is very, very charitable. He gives alot back to every community HEB is present in, and he is also very good to his partners. For example, he gave every partner in the company a $100 bonus check for the last two years straight. However, I never see the Mr. Butt spending money on something such as a sports franchise, as he would much rather spent that on charity operations or giving back to his partners. Also, HEB is about to expand into the Dallas- Fort Worth area with plus stores only, so he has many expenses ahead of him.
fuck Dallas / Fort Worth!
build a fucking Central Market on the north side first!
RC's Boss
06-25-2007, 08:49 AM
An owner that's a Butt.... Nice????
ploto
06-25-2007, 09:22 AM
People seem to have no clue how much the county (that is, the citizens of the county) got screwed on the original arena deal. I find it odd that people gripe about using tax money to subsidize healthcare for the poor- but not to subsidize business profits for the wealthy. Is the county going to build ANY other business in San Antonio their headquarters- I don't think so. The Spurs think they can bank on another championship to get the county to continue this tax, but it's time and intent is over.
ChumpDumper
06-25-2007, 09:27 AM
The Spurs think they can bank on another championship to get the county to continue this tax, but it's time and intent is over.From the article, it looks like several other entities are looking to take a piece of the tax revenues.
Tourism industry representatives want to see at least $125 million earmarked for San Antonio River improvement projects. Other groups are also pushing for a sizeable chunk, including youth-sports advocates who say San Antonio desperately needs more sports fields to aid in the fight against childhood obesity.Is the time for the river and the fat kids over too?
FromWayDowntown
06-25-2007, 10:19 AM
People seem to have no clue how much the county (that is, the citizens of the county) got screwed on the original arena deal.
Losing the Spurs to another community would have been a far better deal.
I'm not exactly sure how the county got screwed on the original arena deal, since the Spurs organization kicked in at least some percentage of the costs to build the arena and the majority of the financing came from a tax increase that hadn't otherwise been in place -- a tax that is imposed only upon those who use car rentals and local hotel rooms, which means that it tends to be a more progressive tax.
So, it's money that didn't exist before, taken largely from those who can afford those payments, that was used to keep a beneficial asset in the community while at the same time providing increased revenues for one of the county's premier annual events.
cherylsteele
06-25-2007, 10:52 AM
Yeah I am higher up in HEB
I find this statement rather curious....how can you be higher up than the CEO of a company?
On top of that the company is named after his very family.
I don't deny Butt's charitable donations at all, it is just certain people think that a different owner would make a world of difference in the team. Until Holt became majority owner the Spurs were also-rans every year....now the Spurs have 4 rings.
The hotel tax didn't hurt the local economy then, that I know of, it shouldn't now....if it did hurt the economy please show me a link to that and maybe I'll change my mind about the tax.
michaelwcho
06-25-2007, 11:06 AM
People seem to have no clue how much the county (that is, the citizens of the county) got screwed on the original arena deal. I find it odd that people gripe about using tax money to subsidize healthcare for the poor- but not to subsidize business profits for the wealthy. Is the county going to build ANY other business in San Antonio their headquarters- I don't think so. The Spurs think they can bank on another championship to get the county to continue this tax, but it's time and intent is over.
Insurance companies, banks, and the oil people run this country, and have waged a long and successful PR war to keep us all in the dark. So we tilt at windmills like personal injury lawyers, illegal immigration, and universal healthcare while "the rich get richer and poor get poorer". In other words, the people get screwed left and right, stadium deals just being the smallest tip of the iceberg. I like the quote from The Edge, where the Anthony Hopkins character says "Never feel sorry for a man who owns a plane."
TheTruth
06-25-2007, 11:19 AM
I find this statement rather curious....how can you be higher up than the CEO of a company?
On top of that the company is named after his very family.
.
I think that he forgot to put an "A" in that first sentence. he claims to be A higher up in the company.
ChumpDumper
06-25-2007, 11:20 AM
Last year he was working at an HEB and going to UTSA. Now he's a VP?
T Park
06-25-2007, 11:28 AM
Insurance companies, banks, and the oil people run this country, and have waged a long and successful PR war to keep us all in the dark. So we tilt at windmills like personal injury lawyers, illegal immigration, and universal healthcare while "the rich get richer and poor get poorer". In other words, the people get screwed left and right, stadium deals just being the smallest tip of the iceberg. I like the quote from The Edge, where the Anthony Hopkins character says "Never feel sorry for a man who owns a plane."
:lol
FIGHT THE MAN!!!
:lmao
FromWayDowntown
06-25-2007, 11:37 AM
In other words, the people get screwed left and right, stadium deals just being the smallest tip of the iceberg.
What about the AT&T Center deal has screwed the people of Bexar County?
Just something -- some proof of an adverse impact upon rank-and-file citizens as a result of the deal by which the arena was financed and is operated. Any proof at all would be great.
I'm still not sure exactly how a never before enacted, truly progressive tax was somehow harmful to Bexar County citizens. I've seen no proof that tourists are staying away from San Antonio because of the tax; remarkably, in fact, hoteliers are building new (and, in some cases, even larger) structures -- that would be an odd business choice of taxes were causing people to stay away from San Antonio. So, we've managed to make those who visit our city the people who have financed the construction of an arena that proved to be the only workable solution for keeping the Spurs in San Antonio. That effort has offered employment opportunities that wouldn't have otherwise existed, both on the immediate premises of the arena as well as at other more distant locations that are benefitted by the events that take place at the arena.
Yeah, I just don't see how any citizen of Bexar County has gotten screwed over by that deal. I'd be interested to see what the proof of such injury is.
Marcus Bryant
06-25-2007, 11:39 AM
IIRC, the Spurs used the proceeds from the naming rights deal to cover their portion of the construction costs.
Marcus Bryant
06-25-2007, 11:41 AM
What about the AT&T Center deal has screwed the people of Bexar County?
Just something -- some proof of an adverse impact upon rank-and-file citizens as a result of the deal by which the arena was financed and is operated. Any proof at all would be great.
Well, the funds generated from the tax could've been used for other purposes.
ploto
06-25-2007, 12:09 PM
IIRC, the Spurs used the proceeds from the naming rights deal to cover their portion of the construction costs.
Wherein the screwing occurred. Thank you.
How on earth the county agreed to give the naming rights revenue to the Spurs is beyond me. Spurs get, if I understand correctly, $2M per year for 20 years for an arena built by the county. Shouldn't the county get that money?
What about the AT&T Center deal has screwed the people of Bexar County?
Screwed out of $40M.
ChumpDumper
06-25-2007, 12:12 PM
Anaheim Spurs? St. Louis Spurs has a decent flow to it.
Marcus Bryant
06-25-2007, 12:12 PM
Sure, the county also gave the Spurs most of the other revenue streams from the arena as well.
Newsflash: it was a sweetheart deal. Any other stale revelations?
ChumpDumper
06-25-2007, 12:14 PM
Sure, that's how an NBA team stays in podunk.
Marcus Bryant
06-25-2007, 12:24 PM
Look at it this way. Without the Spurs providing the impetus as well as providing a guaranteed 45 or so plus games a year there is no way a state of the art arena facility opens in San Antonio 5 years ago. Like it or not, the Spurs do provide a great deal of value to San Antonio in terms of direct expenditures, free nat'l and int'l advertising, civic pride, etc... Is it the absolute best way to spend those tax receipts? No, but now San Antonio has a real arena and not the 40 year old Hemisfair or the 130 year old Freeman.
Bitching about taxes going to major public works projects is a San Antonio de Bexar pasttime. Between the CA Stubbs crowd and LULAC or whoever it's a wonder that San Antonio is able to progress at all as a community.
Clutch20
06-25-2007, 01:09 PM
wow...and I always thought HEB meant "Hispanic Enterprises (in the) Barrio........ :spin
.
.
.
.
.
.
__________________________________________________
“They do a great job of their system and staying true to form,
making big plays in big moments,” Suns coach Mike D'Antoni
told reporters in Phoenix on Thursday. “That's what we're
trying to get. Mental toughness, being lucky, I don't know
what it is.”
The Spurs, D”Antoni added, just seem to “believe a little bit
more.”
“All the time,” he said.
Billy The Kid
06-25-2007, 01:10 PM
henry e. butt
Marcus Bryant
06-25-2007, 01:11 PM
I think the fundamental problem is that there are those who want San Antonio to remain a sleepy backwater forever.
Clutch20
06-25-2007, 01:15 PM
I know, I was just funnin'........
T Park
06-25-2007, 01:17 PM
exactly right Marcus.
Alot of people want this town to be the sleepy town of 1988 again...
picnroll
06-25-2007, 01:23 PM
this thread is hilarious. i'll pass the word on to Mr. Butt...maybe i'll even get him to read this thread, lol.
While you're at it tell him to check out Wegman's. Damn I miss that chain. They make the best the Butt's have to offer look like a convenience store.
SequSpur
06-25-2007, 01:24 PM
wgas
degenerate_gambler
06-25-2007, 01:29 PM
...and Mr. Butt is very, very straight.
that's not what i heard..
FromWayDowntown
06-25-2007, 01:50 PM
Well, the funds generated from the tax could've been used for other purposes.
I'm not even sure that that's legally correct. IIRC, there are some limitations on the purposes for which the hotel/rental car tax may be imposed. I suppose I could go look, but I'm not really that interested in the question. For some reason, though, I recall that in the 1999 timeframe, part of the debate centered on whether a tax should be used to fund the County's part of the construction and if so, what sort of tax that should be. I thought the latter question had a lot to do with limitations on the available taxes for particular purposes, but I'll admit that I might be wrong in that recollection.
MisterWhodat
06-25-2007, 01:59 PM
People are going to bitch no matter what when taxes are involved, even if they aren't necessarily affected. Same story in New Orleans about the Super Dome reopening last year.
spurscenter
06-25-2007, 04:27 PM
Seattle Spurs once Seattle leaves to Kansas.
johngateswhiteley
06-25-2007, 05:28 PM
that's not what i heard..
he's straight, i can attest to that as well.
johngateswhiteley
06-25-2007, 05:29 PM
While you're at it tell him to check out Wegman's. Damn I miss that chain. They make the best the Butt's have to offer look like a convenience store.
sure. keep in mind this may take me a few days...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.