it doesn't look like there will be a lot of blockbuster trades

[td4mvp3]

does that make a repeat a better possibility?

[Johnny_Blaze_47]

Define "a lot."

J-Rich, Ray Allen, Zach Randolph.

That's three.

Rashard might be leaving Seattle.

There's another big move.

Kobe's either getting traded or the Lakers are bringing in somebody to appease him.

That's another.

KG's going to another team before the trade deadline, and it'd likely be a contender.

Three teams in the West lost legitimate stars (granted, Portland and Seattle gained their own through the draft), but without seeing teams' opening day rosters, it's very hard to answer your question.

[Aggie Hoopsfan]

No. We still have some holes to address for matchup with Dallas. And unless we address them, better be rooting for GS - Dallas again.

[Atl Spur]

what do guys think about travis outlaw from the blazers?

[Mr.Bottomtooth]

Word is that the Mavs have Gerald Wallace as #1 on their free agent targets list.

[picnroll]

Word is that the Mavs have Gerald Wallace as #1 on their free agent targets list.
Word is Dallas doesn't have the money.

One thing you can count on every summer is Cuban and Zeke talking about getting every high profile FA.

[Aggie Hoopsfan]

Word is Cuban gets his name in the papers all the time up here in Dallas when it comes to FA, and then they don't do anything with it. It' a shell game for him, he talks the talks and all the 30K millionaires worship the ground he walks on for it.

[VinnyTestesVerde]

Word is Cuban gets his name in the papers all the time up here in Dallas when it comes to FA, and then they don't do anything with it. It' a shell game for him, he talks the talks and all the 30K millionaires worship the ground he walks on for it.

well said. hard to tell which one's more prevalent sometimes. Cuban's idiocy vs. the 30K millionaires. got plenty of both, but i think Cuban has the lead right now with his "confidential information" suit that he has going. :lol

[Darkwaters]

Define "a lot."

J-Rich, Ray Allen, Zach Randolph.

That's three.

Rashard might be leaving Seattle.

There's another big move.

Kobe's either getting traded or the Lakers are bringing in somebody to appease him.

That's another.

KG's going to another team before the trade deadline, and it'd likely be a contender.

Three teams in the West lost legitimate stars (granted, Portland and Seattle gained their own through the draft), but without seeing teams' opening day rosters, it's very hard to answer your question.


I think you can include Golden State as a potential big trade threat. With that 10M dollar trade exception from the Bobcats they could be quite competitive.

[MrChug]

Don't be blinded by all these changes. Trade or not, Garnett or not...the Spurs will repeat.

If the Suns OR the Mavs (who are our only threats) get Garnett they will have to part with far too much of their core. Such monumental changes to any "contender" normally screws chemistry far more than it helps it. PHX would lose Amare and Kurt (the only defender to slow down Tim) and the Mavs would have to part with Harris, Howard, and Jet or any combination thereof. I see Terry as the only clutch player besides Stack on that roster. If they lose him, it will be Nick Van Exel all over again, he was their heart.

One of the many reasons for our greatness? We don't fuck with our chemistry. Take that shit to the bank.

**EDIT**-I have to include Rasheed to the Pistons as the only exception. Props to Larry Brown.

[SpursDynasty]

The Spurs will just shine their trophy while Suns and Mavs figure out what went wrong (no defense, all jump shooting). Bringing in scorers (KS, Kobe) is not the answer. The answer is defense.

I predict 0 blockbuster trades this summer. KG and Kobe are the only blockbuster trade names out there. Everyone else (Ray Allen, etc.) is not considered blockbuster. The Lakers and Wolves won't trade because Kobe and KG are supposedly "valuable". T-Wolves will continue to not make the playoffs, while the Lakers will go something like 40-42, make the 8th seed, and get eliminated in the first round. Repeat that cycle for 7 more years or so then KG retires with no championship, and Kobe eventually retires with no championship to add to his three.

[Money316]

Word is Dallas doesn't have the money.

One thing you can count on every summer is Cuban and Zeke talking about getting every high profile FA.
Maybe they should as Fin for another payday loan.

[T Park]

When did the Spurs prove they could beat Dallas?

You don't just "bring back" the same team. You always have to improve.

The Spurs "brought back" the same team from 99 to 2000 and were clearly outclassed by the Lakers that year.

[Kori Ellis]

KG and Kobe probably won't be back on their teams come fall. So I'll wait to say there's not going to be any major trades.

Likely Jermaine O'Neal is gone from Indy as well.

[ManuTastic]

The biggest postseason victory for SA was GS beating Dallas. We still need to address how we match up with the Mavs.
I'm not really worried about anyone else out there. East? Hah. West: Suns are run-n-gun-n-dun, Utah's too young (but getting better), Denver's got a little problem named AI (but if they could shed him for some defense they'd be scary quickly), there are no other real contenders. If Suns get KG but give up Amare they're back where they started, it's really only Dallas that worries me. Even after the GS debacle.

[Ken Loomis]

does that make a repeat a better possibility?


As long as the Mavs keep their team together, the only way Spurs win the west is if they get the luxary of avoiding the Mavs again.

[Johnny_Blaze_47]

As long as the Mavs keep their team together, the only way Spurs win the west is if they get the luxary of avoiding the Mavs again.

I'm not trying to start a flamefest, but is there really anyway the Mavs keep that team intact?

[OldDirtMcGirt]

I think that a wild card championship contender could be Chicago if they acquired Kevin Garnett. A Deng-Garnett-Wallace frontcourt would be sick.

[MrChug]

As long as the Mavs keep their team together, the only way Spurs win the west is if they get the luxary of avoiding the Mavs again.

...or if the Mavs get the LUXARY :lol of finding a pair of nuts big enough to be seen without a microscope

[MrChug]

I'm not trying to start a flamefest, but is there really anyway the Mavs keep that team intact?

:dont

...and JB, don't you mean FLAMER fest?? Looking at the pic, this guy is playing for the pink team.

[td4mvp3]

Define "a lot."

J-Rich, Ray Allen, Zach Randolph.

That's three.

Rashard might be leaving Seattle.

There's another big move.

Kobe's either getting traded or the Lakers are bringing in somebody to appease him.

That's another.

KG's going to another team before the trade deadline, and it'd likely be a contender.

Three teams in the West lost legitimate stars (granted, Portland and Seattle gained their own through the draft), but without seeing teams' opening day rosters, it's very hard to answer your question.
i guess "blockbuster," for me, is when a team is made demonstrably better. kg to suns, demonstrably better because of his defense; mavs getting billups or low-post threat, demonstrably better. randolph to knicks ... eh, they'll win maybe another 5-10 games; ditto with ray allen to boston, nothing to really worry about. i lean more toward garnett staying in minnesota, but i'm never right at anything so who knows. mavs remain the obstacle, of course, but if they ship off terry, that makes them a lot less scary to me. hopefully they ship off stackhouse, too, or do some boneheaded s-n-t that gets rid of josh howard.

[td4mvp3]

should the early rash of signings be any indication of how unremarkable this trade season will be? i don't remember so many players being signed up so quickly last year (carter, walton, kapono, feel like someone else but i can't remember who).

[CosmicCowboy]

:lmao

Kori, is Ken Loomis Mouse? So far he just looks like the Dallas based Sonny Melendrez of sports prognosticators...

[Switchman]

...or if the Mavs get the LUXARY :lol of finding a pair of nuts big enough to be seen without a microscope

lol luxary.

[exstatic]

When did the Spurs prove they could beat Dallas?

You don't just "bring back" the same team. You always have to improve.

The Spurs "brought back" the same team from 99 to 2000 and were clearly outclassed by the Lakers that year.
We lost a starter from that team, and no, I don't mean Tim in the playoffs, although that didn't help either. Sean played only a handful of games after his transplant.

If we lose Manu to kidney disease, and Tim misses the playoffs, then yes, our chances aren't good. Otherwise, it's a bad comparison.