PDA

View Full Version : The illusion of security



PixelPusher
07-10-2007, 09:47 PM
Yep, it's yet another one of those "we managed to sneak a buttload of bombs and weapons past airport security" stories...but this one has a nice twist.


Fake bomb eludes security test (http://timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=603177&category=REGIONOTHER&BCCode=&newsdate=7/9/2007)
Albany facility's security measures fail in 5 of 7 trials, mostly at the passenger checkpoint

By BRENDAN J. LYONS, Senior writer
Click byline for more stories by writer.
First published: Wednesday, July 4, 2007

COLONIE -- Federal inspectors were able to slip a fake bomb through a checkpoint at Albany International Airport during a test of the facility's Transportation Security Administration screeners, according to individuals familiar with the incident.

The unannounced inspection by TSA officials took place early last week. The airport's security measures failed in five of seven tests, most of the problems occurring at the passenger checkpoint, the sources said.

In one test, TSA inspectors hid the components of a fake bomb in carry-on luggage that also contained a bottle of water. Passengers are prohibited from carrying containers holding more than three ounces of liquids, gels or aerosols through airport checkpoints.

The screeners at Albany International confiscated the water bottle but missed the bomb. In all, the inspectors slipped four banned items through the main checkpoint during the test, sources said.

The TSA, which took over security at the nation's commercial airports after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, conducts random tests of its workforce on a regular basis and failures are common, officials said.

Paul Varville, the TSA's security director at Albany International, could not be reached for comment.

Ann Davis, a TSA spokeswoman, declined to discuss the circumstances of the covert test at Albany International.

"We don't discuss the results because they tend to paint an inaccurate picture of the competency of our work force," she said. "The tests are designed to be incredibly difficult and TSA does anticipate a fair level of failure." :dizzy

Screeners who flunk the test routinely receive immediate training on the mistakes to improve their detection skills, according to officials familiar with the spot checks.

Last October, the Star-Ledger newspaper of Newark, citing unnamed federal security officials, reported screeners at Newark Liberty International Airport flunked 20 of 22 tests, including failing to detect bombs and guns in luggage at checkpoints.

The TSA responded to the report by launching an internal investigation in which federal employees were interrogated about whether they had leaked the results, the newspaper said.

Not all of the TSA's checks are done at passenger checkpoints. In some instances, TSA inspectors try to gain access to restricted airport areas and see how many employees they can get by before someone asks to see or verify their credentials.

At two airports in Houston last month, TSA officials swarmed the facilities as security and "behavior detection" officers conducted random screening of approximately 5,200 employees and passengers at boarding gates, according to the TSA.

Five employees with expired airport security badges were found as were two who did not have credentials. The expired badges were confiscated and the employees in violation were escorted off airport property, according to a TSA news release.

Davis said security screeners who fail tests must undergo extra training in addition to annual recertification exams.

"These covert tests conducted by security personnel simply augment their training regimen," Davis said.

Brendan J. Lyons can be reached at 454-5547 or by e-mail at [email protected].

"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." – Benjamin Franklin

boutons_
07-10-2007, 10:07 PM
"The tests are designed to be incredibly difficult and TSA does anticipate a fair level of failure."

whew!! I'm so relieved, because we know terrorists will design weapons that will be incredibly easy to detect by the rocket scientist-level inspectors of the TSA.

Wild Cobra
07-11-2007, 02:15 AM
I think most of it's a sham, but something is working right. No successful direct attacks since 9/11.

Caution, entering sarcasm mode:

Come on now. We can’t be telling everyone the truth. They would trip out on the truth, just like if we told them the truth about UFO's.

DarkReign
07-11-2007, 10:44 AM
I think most of it's a sham, but something is working right. No successful direct attacks since 9/11.

Waaaaait a minute...wait just a second...

Are you trying to say that because there havent been any more "attacks" since 9/11 that something is working?!

Soooooo....when the inevitable "attack" does happen, whose fault is it?

Oh, Gee!!
07-11-2007, 11:10 AM
I think most of it's a sham, but something is working right. No successful direct attacks since 9/11.

No direct attack since I got married. I guess I can't leave my wife. :pwnt

Mr. Peabody
07-11-2007, 11:25 AM
No direct attack since I got married. I guess I can't leave my wife. :pwnt

Have there been any direct attacks on you since you've been married....?

Nbadan
07-11-2007, 02:22 PM
Soooooo....when the inevitable "attack" does happen, whose fault is it?

then the new GOP slogan will be: No new terra attacks from 01 - 0?.. (tm)

Oh, Gee!!
07-11-2007, 02:36 PM
Have there been any direct attacks on you since you've been married....?

if you call getting hit on by the ladies "direct attacks," then no.

Winehole23
12-02-2013, 12:45 PM
http://www.wired.com/design/2013/12/terminal-cornucopia/