PDA

View Full Version : Free Agent: Brevin Knight


Marcus Bryant
07-19-2007, 06:39 PM
http://www.nba.com/media/act_brevin_knight.jpg

Brevin Knight | PG
Born: Nov 8, 1975
Height: 5-10 / 1,78
Weight: 170 lbs. / 77,1 kg.
College : Stanford
Years Pro: 10

Info (http://www.nba.com/playerfile/brevin_knight/index.html)

Beno's Spurs career hangs by a thread. Jacque Vaughn still makes one uneasy.
T Park
07-19-2007, 06:59 PM
unfortunately Vaughn > Knight

but agreed, he would be a solid number 3.

What?

He wants to get paid?

Forget it.
BIG z
07-19-2007, 08:13 PM
I would love to have him as a back up, he is a good ball handler and distributer.
mystargtr34
07-19-2007, 08:17 PM
Darker than KG. I think he would be our second PG if we did bring him over. Vet min?
BIG z
07-19-2007, 08:21 PM
He would be my number two option over vaughn also.
T Park
07-19-2007, 08:36 PM
when did he develop a better than Vaughn jumper?
Darkwaters
07-19-2007, 10:08 PM
I'd start him in front of Vaughn. But Jacque would still get a lot of burn once Knight goes down with his annual injury. Regardless, I'd love to sign him for the minimum.
Flight3107
07-19-2007, 10:11 PM
Vaughn > Knight




:lmao :lmao :lmao
Aggie Hoopsfan
07-19-2007, 10:17 PM
unfortunately Vaughn > Knight

but agreed, he would be a solid number 3.

What?

He wants to get paid?

Forget it.

I must have missed Vaughn just missing averaging a double double in points and assists last year.
justanotherspursfan
07-19-2007, 10:38 PM
I must have missed Vaughn just missing averaging a double double in points and assists last year.
I think Knight is generally better than Vaughn (except on defense), but I don't know that I'd call 9.1 pts/6.6 asts just missing a double-double.

Also, he only played 45 games last year, and has never played more than 69 since his rookie year. So even if Knight were our second stringer, JV had better not get too comfortable on the bench.

Overall, if we could get him for the minimum, I'd take him in a heartbeat. I wouldn't pay much more for him, however.
jag
07-19-2007, 10:40 PM
:lmao :lmao :lmao

You obviously know a lot about knight .... :rolleyes
ABDENOUR POWER
07-19-2007, 10:42 PM
unfortunately Vaughn > Knight

You're kidding right? :lol

Unless your case is based almost solely on Knight's injury history, I just flat out think you're wrong.
jag
07-19-2007, 10:54 PM
Knight is a little bit better passer, but vaughn actually has a better shot. In the end, the change isnt a whole lot different.