boutons_
07-30-2007, 06:17 PM
Bush's Turkish Gamble
By Robert D. Novak
Monday, July 30, 2007; A15
The morass in Iraq (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Iraq?tid=informline) and deepening difficulties in Afghanistan (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Afghanistan?tid=informline) have not deterred the Bush administration from taking on a dangerous and questionable new secret operation. High-level U.S. officials are working with their Turkish counterparts on a joint military operation to suppress Kurdish guerrillas and capture their leaders. Through covert activity, their goal is to forestall Turkey (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Turkey?tid=informline) from invading Iraq.
While detailed operational plans are necessarily concealed, the broad outlines have been presented to select members of Congress as required by law. U.S. Special Forces are to work with the Turkish army to suppress the Kurds' guerrilla campaign. The Bush administration is trying to prevent another front from opening in Iraq, which would have disastrous consequences. But this gamble risks major exposure and failure.
The Turkish initiative reflects the temperament and personality of George W. Bush (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/George+W.+Bush?tid=informline). Even faithful congressional supporters of his Iraq policy have been stunned by the president's upbeat mood, which makes him appear oblivious to the loss of his political base. Despite the failing effort to impose a military solution in Iraq, he is willing to try imposing arms -- though clandestinely -- on Turkey's ancient problems with its Kurdish minority, who comprise one-fifth of the country's population.
The development of an autonomous Kurdish entity inside Iraq, resulting from the decline and fall of Saddam Hussein (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Saddam+Hussein?tid=informline), has alarmed the Turkish government. That led to Ankara (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Ankara?tid=informline)'s refusal to allow U.S. combat troops to enter Iraq through Turkey, an eleventh-hour complication for the 2003 invasion. As the Kurds' political power grew inside Iraq, the Turkish government became steadily more uneasy about the centuries-old project of a Kurdistan (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Kurdistan?tid=informline) spreading across international boundaries -- and chewing up big pieces of Turkey.
The dormant Turkish Kurd guerrilla fighters of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Kurdistan+Workers%27+Party?tid=informline) came to life. By June, the Turkish government was demonstrating its concern by lobbing artillery shells across the border. Ankara began protesting, to both Washington and Baghdad (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Baghdad?tid=informline), that the PKK was using northern Iraq as a base for guerrilla operations. On July 11, in Washington, Turkish Ambassador Nabi Sensoy became the first Turkish official to assert publicly that Iraqi Kurds have claims on Turkish territory. On July 20, just two days before his successful reelection, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Recep+Tayyip+Erdogan?tid=informline) threatened a military incursion into Iraq against the Kurds. Last Wednesday, Murat Karayilan, head of the PKK political council, predicted that "the Turkish Army will attack southern Kurdistan."
Turkey has a well-trained, well-equipped army of 250,000 near the border, facing some 4,000 PKK fighters hiding in the mountains of northern Iraq. But significant cross-border operations surely would bring to the PKK's side the military forces of the Kurdistan Regional Government (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Kurdistan+Regional+Government?tid=informline), the best U.S. ally in Iraq. What is Washington to do in the dilemma of two friends battling each other on an unwanted new front in Iraq?
The surprising answer was given in secret briefings on Capitol Hill (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Capitol+Hill?tid=informline) last week by Eric S. Edelman, a former aide to Vice President Cheney (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Dick+Cheney?tid=informline) who is now undersecretary of defense for policy. Edelman, a Foreign Service officer who once was U.S. ambassador to Turkey, revealed to lawmakers plans for a covert operation of U.S. Special Forces to help the Turks neutralize the PKK. They would behead the guerrilla organization by helping Turkey get rid of PKK leaders that they have targeted for years.
Edelman's listeners were stunned. Wasn't this risky? He responded that he was sure of success, adding that the U.S. role could be concealed and always would be denied. Even if all this is true, some of the briefed lawmakers left wondering whether this was a wise policy for handling the beleaguered Kurds, who had been betrayed so often by the U.S. government in years past.
The plan shows that hard experience has not dissuaded President Bush from attempting difficult ventures employing the use of force. On the contrary, two of the most intrepid supporters of the Iraq intervention -- John McCain (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/m000303/) and Lindsey Graham (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/g000359/)-- were surprised by Bush during a recent meeting with him. When they shared their impressions with colleagues, they commented on how unconcerned the president seemed. That may explain his willingness to embark on such a questionable venture against the Kurds.
© 2007 Creators Syndicate Inc.
==========
Turkey is an ally, the Iraqi Kurds are one of dubya's best allies within Iraq. Incredibly complex situation. I'm sure dubya is the best commander-in-chief to handle it.
By Robert D. Novak
Monday, July 30, 2007; A15
The morass in Iraq (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Iraq?tid=informline) and deepening difficulties in Afghanistan (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Afghanistan?tid=informline) have not deterred the Bush administration from taking on a dangerous and questionable new secret operation. High-level U.S. officials are working with their Turkish counterparts on a joint military operation to suppress Kurdish guerrillas and capture their leaders. Through covert activity, their goal is to forestall Turkey (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Turkey?tid=informline) from invading Iraq.
While detailed operational plans are necessarily concealed, the broad outlines have been presented to select members of Congress as required by law. U.S. Special Forces are to work with the Turkish army to suppress the Kurds' guerrilla campaign. The Bush administration is trying to prevent another front from opening in Iraq, which would have disastrous consequences. But this gamble risks major exposure and failure.
The Turkish initiative reflects the temperament and personality of George W. Bush (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/George+W.+Bush?tid=informline). Even faithful congressional supporters of his Iraq policy have been stunned by the president's upbeat mood, which makes him appear oblivious to the loss of his political base. Despite the failing effort to impose a military solution in Iraq, he is willing to try imposing arms -- though clandestinely -- on Turkey's ancient problems with its Kurdish minority, who comprise one-fifth of the country's population.
The development of an autonomous Kurdish entity inside Iraq, resulting from the decline and fall of Saddam Hussein (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Saddam+Hussein?tid=informline), has alarmed the Turkish government. That led to Ankara (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Ankara?tid=informline)'s refusal to allow U.S. combat troops to enter Iraq through Turkey, an eleventh-hour complication for the 2003 invasion. As the Kurds' political power grew inside Iraq, the Turkish government became steadily more uneasy about the centuries-old project of a Kurdistan (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Kurdistan?tid=informline) spreading across international boundaries -- and chewing up big pieces of Turkey.
The dormant Turkish Kurd guerrilla fighters of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Kurdistan+Workers%27+Party?tid=informline) came to life. By June, the Turkish government was demonstrating its concern by lobbing artillery shells across the border. Ankara began protesting, to both Washington and Baghdad (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Baghdad?tid=informline), that the PKK was using northern Iraq as a base for guerrilla operations. On July 11, in Washington, Turkish Ambassador Nabi Sensoy became the first Turkish official to assert publicly that Iraqi Kurds have claims on Turkish territory. On July 20, just two days before his successful reelection, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Recep+Tayyip+Erdogan?tid=informline) threatened a military incursion into Iraq against the Kurds. Last Wednesday, Murat Karayilan, head of the PKK political council, predicted that "the Turkish Army will attack southern Kurdistan."
Turkey has a well-trained, well-equipped army of 250,000 near the border, facing some 4,000 PKK fighters hiding in the mountains of northern Iraq. But significant cross-border operations surely would bring to the PKK's side the military forces of the Kurdistan Regional Government (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Kurdistan+Regional+Government?tid=informline), the best U.S. ally in Iraq. What is Washington to do in the dilemma of two friends battling each other on an unwanted new front in Iraq?
The surprising answer was given in secret briefings on Capitol Hill (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Capitol+Hill?tid=informline) last week by Eric S. Edelman, a former aide to Vice President Cheney (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Dick+Cheney?tid=informline) who is now undersecretary of defense for policy. Edelman, a Foreign Service officer who once was U.S. ambassador to Turkey, revealed to lawmakers plans for a covert operation of U.S. Special Forces to help the Turks neutralize the PKK. They would behead the guerrilla organization by helping Turkey get rid of PKK leaders that they have targeted for years.
Edelman's listeners were stunned. Wasn't this risky? He responded that he was sure of success, adding that the U.S. role could be concealed and always would be denied. Even if all this is true, some of the briefed lawmakers left wondering whether this was a wise policy for handling the beleaguered Kurds, who had been betrayed so often by the U.S. government in years past.
The plan shows that hard experience has not dissuaded President Bush from attempting difficult ventures employing the use of force. On the contrary, two of the most intrepid supporters of the Iraq intervention -- John McCain (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/m000303/) and Lindsey Graham (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/g000359/)-- were surprised by Bush during a recent meeting with him. When they shared their impressions with colleagues, they commented on how unconcerned the president seemed. That may explain his willingness to embark on such a questionable venture against the Kurds.
© 2007 Creators Syndicate Inc.
==========
Turkey is an ally, the Iraqi Kurds are one of dubya's best allies within Iraq. Incredibly complex situation. I'm sure dubya is the best commander-in-chief to handle it.