PDA

View Full Version : The super-patriots at bottom of barrel: Show me the money



boutons_
08-10-2007, 11:42 AM
Army to Expand Recruiting Incentives

By Kimberly Hefling
The Associated Press Friday 09 August 2007

Need a down-payment for your home? Seed money to start a business? The Army wants to help - if you're willing to join up. Despite spending nearly $1 billion last year on recruiting bonuses and ads, Army leaders say an even bolder approach is needed to fill wartime ranks.

Under a new proposal, men and women who enlist could pick from a "buffet" of incentives, including up to $45,000 tax-free that they accrue during their career to help buy a home or build a business. Other options would include money for college and to pay off student loans.

An Associated Press review of the increasingly aggressive recruiting offerings found the Army is not only dangling more sign-up rewards - it's loosening rules on age and weight limits, education and drug and criminal records.

It's all part of an Army effort to fill its ranks even as the percentage of young people who say they plan to join the military has hit a historic low - 16 percent by the Pentagon's own surveying - in the fifth year of the Iraq war.

In June, the Army failed to meet its recruitment target for the second month in a row, although it apparently met its goal to recruit 9,750 troops in July and is on target for 80,000 for the year that ends Sept. 30.

As part of a push to make its 2007 goals, the Army is boosting the size of its 8,000-member recruiting force with 1,000 to 2,000 assistants - including some former recruiters.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates wants to increase the size of the active-duty Army by 65,000 to a total of 547,000 within five years. In part, that's to ease the wartime strain on the Army, which is the largest branch of the military.

"Recruiting next year and beyond will remain challenging and will ... require additional innovative approaches," said Lt. Col. Michael Rochelle, the Pentagon's deputy chief of staff for personnel. He asked lawmakers last week on Capitol Hill for money to pay for the new program.

Rochelle described the latest offering as an updated version of the Army's college fund, a popular program started in 1982 to help soldiers pay for college.

The Army would like to start a pilot program targeting 500 people who might not otherwise considering joining. In the pilot, the takers who complete a 4-year enlistment would be eligible for up to $30,000 in incentives - including money for a home loan or business. Eventually, the Army wants to offer up to $45,000.

Beyond the Iraq war, the military says other factors have affected its ability to recruit. More high school graduates are going to college, and the economy is strong, providing lots of civilian jobs. At the same time, only three of 10 people between 17 and 24 fully meet the military's standards.

( WTF? )

Less obvious factors have also decreased the recruitment pool. They include higher obesity rates, more people diagnosed with mental health conditions such as attention-deficit disorder, more criminal citations due to the increase of the drinking age from 18 to 21.

"The numbers of people who meet our enlistment standards is astonishingly low," said Michael Dominguez, principal deputy undersecretary of defense.

Among the changes that have helped attract more recruits:



Increasing to $20,000 the bonus for troops who join by Sept. 30 and leave for boot camp within a month.
Raising the enlistment age to 42.
Allowing recruits to come in with non-offensive tattoos on their hands and neck.
Offering a $2,000 bonus to Army soldiers who refer a new recruit.
Enlisting recruits who don't meet weight standards and must trim down their first year.
Advertising that targets potential recruits' parents.
Increasing the number of recruits with general education diplomas rather than regular high school diplomas.
Creating a more pleasant boot camp environment.
Sending "gung-ho" soldiers fresh from boot camp or war zones back to their hometowns to visit old friends and schoolmates to promote the Army.
Increasing to more than 15 percent the number of Army and Army Reserve troops given waivers for medical and moral reasons or for positive drug and alcohol screen tests.
Tyka Pettey, 21, of Philadelphia, said she was fully aware of the risks when she signed up in late July for a six-year stint in the Army Reserve. Doing so will help her pay to go to college in a medical field. With her $20,000 bonus, she plans to buy a car and pay off debt.

She said she had been thinking about joining for more than a year. Once she made the decision, she said she was impressed with how much the recruiters in Upper Darby, Pa., were able to help her.

"You really have to want to do something like that. You're really taking a major step from your civilian life ... but I just decided to go for it," said Pettey, who leaves in about a week for boot camp.

The Army spent $353 million last year on enlistment bonuses, $583 million on recruiting and advertising and $700 million on pay and benefits for recruiters, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, said her organization is concerned that low-income young people and minorities are targeted by recruiters and lured with promises into making decisions they would not otherwise have made.

"I think as the incentives increase, the potential for misrepresentation and abuse increases," Lieberman said.

Irene Fiala, a sociology professor at Edinboro University of Pennsylvania who has researched recruiting trends, said the military is attempting to change with society because the days are over when it was an American virtue to join and it was expected that all young men would do so.

"Uncle Sam pointing his finger at you saying, 'We want you,' isn't cutting it for today's kids," Fiala said. "Today's kids are saying, 'Yeah, you want me and so does GE and so does MIT, so what else are you going to offer me?'"

( golly darn! where is the patriotism and desire to help dubya and dickhead grab that oil? )


It's not just the attitudes of young people that have seemingly shifted. In 2005, statistical surveys revealed that because of the Iraq war, adults who work with students were less likely to suggest joining the military.

"The willingness of coaches, teachers, counselors and parents to commend military service to America's youth is lower than is good for our nation and our military," said Dominguez, the Defense Department official.

=============

Hey Dominguez, how about not lying your way into starting bullshit wars of choice you don't know how to run, and don't know how to finish?

boutons_
08-10-2007, 11:52 AM
But when it comes to helping this mostly lower-class kids get a college education and out of poverty and crime:

http://www.navytimes.com/news/2007/07/military_gibill_opposition_070731w/


Administration opposes broad GI Bill changes

By Rick Maze - Staff writer
Posted : Tuesday Jul 31, 2007 20:47:38 EDT

The Bush administration opposes a Senate plan to dramatically increase GI Bill education benefits, but it does support some more modest changes, including one that could refund money to service members who paid the $1,200 enrollment fee to sign up for the current benefits program.

Defense officials testified July 31 before the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee about S 22, a bill promising to pay full tuition plus a $1,000 monthly stipend for qualified active-duty veterans. Defense officials said GI Bill benefits are an important recruiting benefit, but making the program too generous could hurt, rather than help, the services.

S 22, known as the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2007, was introduced in January by Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., and has become a major initiative for Senate Democrats. The only thing standing in its way has been money. Webb said the bill’s purpose is to restore the veterans’ education benefits program to the value it held after World War II, when it paid for tuition, fees and books, plus a monthly living expense so veterans could afford to attend college.

Webb’s bill wouldn’t pay for full tuition at any school; the maximum payment would be capped at the average cost of in-state tuition at a four-year public college or university.

With an average cost of about $1,450 for a four-year public school, Webb’s bill would result in a monthly benefit of about $2,400, defense officials said. That is enough to cause concern about some service members who might otherwise re-enlist in the military, possibly deciding instead to get out and attend college after their initial military obligation. To prevent mass departures, the services could be forced to increase already growing re-enlistment and specialty bonuses, defense officials said.

( it's not "patriotism", the military competes for resources like any any other organization. The Repugs have greatly increased the pay to (FDA) polictial appointees, but vets get fucked. The Repugs are all about stuffing their own pockets with tax dollars, not about running the govt and help the country. Make a few more years in the military more attractive than going to college. kids aren't stupid. )

Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, the veterans’ committee chairman, has twice delayed a vote on Webb’s bill while looking for ways to fund it. A decision on whether to push ahead with the bill is not expected until after Labor Day.

The Defense Department does not oppose extending the current 10-year post-service limitation on when benefits can be used, nor does it oppose another bill that would stop requiring a $1,200 contribution from service members enrolling in the Montgomery GI Bill program. The contribution is paid in 100 tax-free installments during the first year of active duty for new recruits. National Guard and reserve members who qualify for active-duty GI Bill benefits after being mobilized continuously for two years or longer can pay it in a lump sum.

Defense officials said doing away with the enrollment fee would amount to a $100-a-month pay increase, certain to be appreciated by service members. However, defense officials also said that because 97 percent of recruits enroll in the GI Bill — and pay the current contribution — they do not believe the fee is a disincentive to enrollment.

The bill eliminating the $1,200 fee is S 723, the Montgomery GI Bill Enhancement Act. It would provide refunds of the $1,200 contribution to anyone who has served on active duty since Nov. 16, 2001, regardless of whether they used any GI Bill benefits and whether they are still on active duty. That could mean refunds to 1.2 million people, since about 200,000 enroll in the GI bill program each year.

George Gervin's Afro
08-10-2007, 11:59 AM
Those un-patriotic dems who don't support the troops are at it again....