PDA

View Full Version : brent barry on the block?



ducks
12-14-2004, 05:18 PM
ESPN NBA Insider - 12/14/04
Tuesday, December 14, 2004

By Chad Ford
ESPN Insider

General managers, start your engines. Players, keep your bags packed. After six weeks of pretty intense trade rumors, the gloves come off Wednesday.

Dec. 15 marks the day both free agents who signed contracts this summer and NBA rookies are eligible to be traded. Those players represent nearly a quarter of the players in the league. That explains why doing deals before Wednesday was a little bit difficult.

"Like a lot of teams, we're sitting back with Dec. 15 around the corner, which, for a lot of players, represents a lot more names that can come into the mix," Heat GM Randy Pfund said over the weekend.

It's ironic, really. This summer, the same guys about to go on the trading block were supposed to be the guys who would help put their new teams over the top.

Best-laid plans ...

How can things go so wrong, so quickly? And why do teams think a player will play any differently with a change of scenery?

Today, Insider looks at 10 guys who will be eligible to be traded beginning Wednesday who might be wearing a new uniform by the Feb. 24 trade deadline.


Brent Barry, G, Spurs

Brent Barry
Guard
San Antonio Spurs
Profile


2004-2005 SEASON STATISTICS
GM PPG RPG APG FG% FT%
22 6.5 2.2 2.4 .387 .800
Remember all those preseason stories claiming Barry was the missing piece to the Spurs' championship aspirations? Someone forgot to tell Spurs head coach Gregg Popovich. Barry's minutes have been dwindling by the week. Over his last five games he's averaged just 11 mpg and 2.6 ppg. What's the problem?

His 3-point shot has been cold as ice (28 percent this year to 45 percent last year). Without his shooting, Barry can be a liability. His defense is not up to Popovich's standards, and the Spurs haven't needed Barry to play backup point thanks to a terrific start by rookie Beno Udrih. With so many teams in need of a veteran shooter, will the Spurs cut their losses while Barry has trade value? He turns 33 on Dec. 31. His stock won't stay high forever.

Brent might not be the only Barry on the move. His brother, Jon, isn't getting minutes for the Hawks and has some value around the league.

Marcus Camby, C, Nuggets
Marquis Daniels #6 and Tim Duncan #21
The Mavs might use Daniels (right) as bait to make a run at Jason Kidd.
There has been plenty of Nene trade talk going around, but on one level it makes absolutely no sense for Denver. Aren't the Nuggets better off keeping Nene, playing him at center and trying to trade Camby? While Camby is a better rebounder and shotblocker, he's also eight years older than Nene, has a history of injury problems and makes about $6 million more.

Camby pines for a return to New York. The Knicks have a plethora of guards they could give to Denver to fill that gaping hole at the two. The Sonics, Blazers and Grizzlies are other teams that could use a big man like Camby. And don't forget the Nets. If the Nuggets do make a play for Jason Kidd, Camby will be one of the players, along with Andre Miller, that would have to be included to make the deal work financially.

Marquis Daniels, G, Mavericks
Mark Cuban and the Mavs might have overreacted a bit this summer when they threw $37 million at Daniels, who went undrafted in 2003, after a brilliant end to his rookie season. The Mavs had just lost Steve Nash to Phoenix and wanted to stop the bleeding, especially if they couldn't find another point guard.

Since then, they have acquired Jason Terry and Darrell Armstrong, leaving Daniels only about 22 minutes a night. His numbers haven't been bad (8.8 ppg, 3 apg in his last five games), but they aren't exactly what he did toward the end of last season, either. If the Mavs try to make a run at Kidd, or another veteran point guard, Daniels could be the bait.

Quentin Richardson, G, Suns
Richardson was really the fourth option for the Suns in free agency. After landing Nash, they spent time wooing Hedo Turkoglu, Manu Ginobili and Mehmet Okur. When Turkolgu bolted for Orlando and it became clear that Ginobili and Okur wanted too much money, the Suns settled on Richardson.

The team believed the Clippers would match their relatively modest offer – modest for last summer, anyway – and were surprised when they didn't. Over the course of the summer, there were a number of trade rumors linked to Shawn Marion and Joe Johnson, but neither reached fruition.


Quentin Richardson
Guard
Phoenix Suns
Profile


2004-2005 SEASON STATISTICS
GM PPG RPG APG FG% FT%
21 14.8 5.9 1.9 .394 .830

It turns out Richardson was money well spent. He's been fantastic of late and plays a big role on the team with the best record in the league. So why trade him?

The thinking goes that once the Suns reach the postseason, the days of endless running will end. They'll need a bigger post presence than Amare Stoudemire and don't have many good options. If they could land a player like Nene or Samuel Dalembert for Richardson, it would be a tough deal to decline. Then again, the Suns could very well stick with what's working right now. Richardson plays an important role on the team – one slight change in chemistry could wreck things for the Suns. They don't want that to happen.

Jamal Crawford, G, Knicks
Isiah Thomas loves Crawford. On July 1, when free agency began, Thomas was the first and only GM to call Crawford. He was willing to bid against himself, constantly ramping up the dollar signs until he eventually paid Crawford $20 million more than what the Bulls or anyone else was offering. In turn, Crawford loves Isiah, a critical attribute for any player who plays under Isiah (just ask Shandon Anderson).

So why is Crawford on this list? Because Isiah can't sit still while his team wallows in mediocrity. He has big ideas of landing another superstar like Vince Carter and his current offers – with players like Nazr Mohammed and Tim Thomas – are getting him nowhere. Crawford is the one young player on his team with some trade value. Would he be willing to sacrifice him to bring another star in the Garden? So far the answer has been no. But, as Isiah gets more desperate to make a deal, who knows?

Steve Smith, G, Bobcats
The Bobcats signed Smith to be a mentor to one of the youngest teams in the league. But that isn't the whole story. Last summer, most GMs were convinced Smith was teetering on retirment. With sore knees and plenty of wear and tear, it wasn't like GMs were beating down his door. Smith claims he chose the Bobcats, but the truth is the Bobcats also chose him.

Smith has been great in Charlotte, averaging a surprising 22 mpg, and shooting a sizzling 44 percent from the 3-point arc. You think a team with championship aspirations – a team like the Heat, Pistons or even the Nuggets – wouldn't like some of that? GM and head coach Bernie Bickerstaff claims he'll let Smith go if that's what the veteran wants to do. It should be a tough choice for Smith. He can play big minutes on a bad team, or play a smaller role on a good one. If a team offers the right deal, Bickerstaff, who is building for the future, might have no choice but to say yes.

ROOKIES

Luke Jackson, G, Cavs

Luke Jackson
Guard
Cleveland Cavaliers
Profile


2004-2005 SEASON STATISTICS
GM PPG RPG APG FG% FT%
9 3.0 0.6 0.3 .360 .833
Jackson was one of the highest risers in the draft last summer. After scouts routinely predicted most of the year that Jackson would be a bubble first-round pick, he rocketed up the charts after a series of strong workouts and landed in Cleveland with the 10th pick. The book on Jackson said he was one of the few players in the draft that would be able to come in and immediately provide a team with solid outside shooting and a mature offensive game.

The Cavs need a solid outside shooter and another perimeter scoring option, but so far Jackson hasn't seen the light of day. With the Cavs taking their pursuit of the playoffs very seriously this year, it looks like Jackson might not get off the bench. While the team is still high on him, if he could be used to draw in a veteran shooter like Michael Redd, the team would jump at a deal.

Redd has been telling people close to him he wants to sign with the Cavs this summer when he hits restricted free agency. The Cavs will have the cash to do it, and the Bucks will have few resources to stop him. If the Cavs offered Jackson and Anderson Varejao, another rookie the Bucks are high on, would the Bucks bite? It might be their only legit shot to get something of value for Redd before he leaves.

Ben Gordon, G, Bulls
No rookie has been tougher to get a read on than Gordon. One minute he looks like the second coming of Allen Iverson. The next night he's going 0-for-7 from the field. Luckily for the Bulls, his good games are coming closer together. When he's been on lately, the Bulls have found that winning comes much easier. So why dump Gordon now?

The issue with Gordon is this: He's not a great fit in the Bulls backcourt with Kirk Hinrich. He needs to be on the floor with a big point guard or he needs to make the transition from a 'two' to a 'one'. Neither is likely to happen as long as Hinrich is around. Some Bulls fans might suggest Hinrich be shipped out instead, but that's probably not going to happen on John Paxson's watch.

The likelihood of a Gordon trade is pretty slim, but there are several teams that really covet him. If Paxson could package him with Eddy Curry and get a legit, young All-Star in return, it might be something the Bulls would have to consider. It's tough to win with rookies, and the Bulls have six on their roster right now. If Paxson is serious about changing the culture of losing in Chicago, he at least has to listen.

Sebastian Telfair, PG, Blazers
Telfair is starting to get some playing time in Portland, and he's showing he can fly on the fast break and get to the line just about whenever he wants to. The shooting is atrocious and the turnovers are bad, but scouts who liked him in the draft knew that before he was selected.

Telfair has been mentioned as possible bait in a Jason Kidd trade, either directly to Portland or as part of a three-way. If the Nets are going to trade Kidd, they need to replace him with a young point guard. Telfair is from Brooklyn, and he'd sell tickets ... if he pans out. Right now that's still a huge if, but the Nets might be willing to gamble.

Josh Childress, G/F, Hawks

Josh Childress
Guard
Atlanta Hawks
Profile


2004-2005 SEASON STATISTICS
GM PPG RPG APG FG% FT%
19 6.1 3.5 1.3 .435 .762
The Hawks passed on Luol Deng and Andre Iguodala to get Childress, and so far the results have been unimpressive. Childress began the season in the starting lineup but was quickly sent to the bench. Lately, the Hawks' other first-round pick, high school phenom Josh Smith, has been getting the important minutes.

It might be foolish to dump Childress now, however. He has a history of starting slowly at both the college and high school levels, and his stock right now is at rock bottom. Still, if you believe other GMs around the league who are doing business with the Hawks, he's available.

Chad Ford covers the NBA for ESPN Insider.

-----------

Tuesday, December 14 Updated 1:18 PM EST

Rumor Central

Time for Wizards to trade Kwame?

WHO INTERESTED THE SKINNY
Kwame Brown
Kwame Brown
Wizards
Sonics
Raptors
Knicks
Hawks Dec. 14 - Kwame Brown has been a complete nonfactor in the Wizards hot start. After missing the start of the season with an injury, he's averaging just 6 ppg and 1.6 rpg.

After a promising third season, Brown is struggling to get with the program. He got in head coach Eddie Jordan's doghouse this week when he refused to enter a game after a timeout. That led to a two-game suspension, along with the promise his name would immediately find its way back on the trading block.

The prospects of getting Brown in a trade have other GMs drooling. He's a 7-foot, 270-pound, 22-year-old athletic big man who is slowly becoming a center.

The Sonics, Raptors, Knicks and Hawks have shown interest ESPN Insider Chad Ford reports. If the Wizards could land a top-flight small forward and defensive-minded big in return, it seems like it would be the perfect opportunity to cash in and make a run in the East.

WHO INTERESTED THE SKINNY
Marcus Camby
Marcus Camby
Nuggets
Knicks?
Dec. 14 - Camby just signed a long-term extension with the Nuggets last summer, but his heart belongs to the Knicks, he told the New York Post.

Camby said he and Timberwolves forward Latrell Sprewell, who can be a free agent next summer, Marcus Camby wants another crack at New York.

"Myself, I wish I was still here," Camby said the host Knicks routed his Nuggets on Dec. 13. Camby, whom former Knicks GM Scott Layden traded to the Nuggets, figures he and Sprewell would enjoy playing for Layden's successor, Isiah Thomas.

In July, when Camby re-signed with the Nuggets, he said in a statement issued by agent Rick Kaplan: "I've said all along that Denver was my first choice."

WHO WHAT THE SKINNY
Karl Malone
Karl Malone
Lakers
Knicks?
Spurs?
Timberwolves?
Heat?
Retirement? Dec. 14 - Agent Dwight Manley contacted the Spurs this past weekend to set up a conversation between Malone and Spurs coach and executive Gregg Popovich, the San Antonio Express-News reports.

This is another sign that the Spurs might be the frontrunners for the services of free-agent Malone, who seems to have burned all bridges back to the Lakers in wake of his evolving dispute with Kobe Bryant.

The Spurs have promised to keep a roster spot available should Malone, who estimates he should be recovered from offseason knew surgery by January, decide to play a 20th NBA season.

Former Lakers teammate Shaquille O'Neal hinted in the Miami Herald that Malone might be angry enough with Bryant to join O'Neal, just to spite Bryant.

"If he makes like he wants to come back and play," O'Neal said, "I'll be the first assistant general manager to give him a call."

WHO INTERESTED THE SKINNY
DeShawn Stevenson
DeShawn Stevenson
Magic
? Dec. 14 - Frustrated by his role deep in the Magic rotation, shooting guard Stevenson hopes the Magic trade him, the Orlando Sentinel reports.

"I want out of here. Get me out," said Stevenson, who since signing a three-year, $8.5 million contract has survived one supposed threat to his roster spot when the Magic traded Keith Bogans to the Bobcats last month.

But now Stevenson, who started 24 games last season with the Magic after arriving from the Jazz in a trade, is tired of being the backup to Cuttino Mobley and Stacey Augmon.

GM John Weisbrod said he had "no plans" to trade Stevenson, who did not play in two games and played just five minutes in a recent loss to the Suns.

-------------------

Tuesday, December 14, 2004

By George Karl
ESPN Insider

More from George Karl -- Losing has upside for Bobcats

Editor's Note -- The Hornets visit the Bobcats on Tuesday night, marking the Hornets' first return to Charlotte since moving to New Orleans.

Losing is a painful hell. The New Orleans Hornets (1-18) and Charlotte Bobcats (4-14) can expect to be in that hell all season long. As a coach, what can you do to build for the future while injecting some hope into the present?

That's the challenge facing both Byron Scott in his first year with the Hornets and Bernie Bickerstaff of the expansion Bobcats.

Scott is in an unusual situation.


Scott
It's tough when you lose your three best players to injury (Baron Davis, Jamal Mashburn and Jamaal Magloire). Offseason pickup Rodney Rogers is also on injured reserve.

While the Hornets have lost plenty of games and probably will lose plenty more, every day Scott must fight against a culture of losing. Every day, he must respond to losing by looking for the positive as much as possible.

I know from experience that the hell of losing makes this extremely difficult.

Scott Needs Support,
Not Scrutiny
The New Orleans organization and ownership should support coach Byron Scott. With the injuries his team has suffered, his job should be secure.

Scott shouldn't be judged on wins and losses right now. He needs to be judged on his team's competitiveness and focus, its mental and physical development. Because of the talent gap, the goals are different than simply winning games.

Some of the Hornets' key players are as close to the CBA as the NBA. Injuries have forced guys onto the court who normally would be watching from the bench.

Of course, the upside is that players like Matt Freije, Alex Garcia, Dan Dickau and Junior Harrington are getting the opportunity to improve by playing important minutes.

In the face of this challenge, the organization needs to give players and coaches hope, because they won't see lots of hope in the game results. The Hornets don't need a one-year plan -- more like a five-year plan. Of course, getting healthy would be a good start.

Scott's job is difficult. Rather than focusing on winning now, Scott must help his team stay together and see the long-term goal, which is to get back on a winning track.
— George Karl
When I coached the Cleveland Cavaliers in 1985-86, we started the season at 2-19. Sometimes, as I drove up to the arena, I would actually have trouble turning my car into the parking lot, knowing how hard the task was at the other end.

There were days when I would drive by the parking lot and then have to turn around because I just couldn't get myself to turn in. That's what losing can do to your psyche.

Winning is the best coach, and losing is the worst coach. Losing is a tough opponent and an awful coach, but losing also can be the best teacher in the game. Players don't want to lose.

When a team is losing, though, it's the coach's job to find that positive element day by day and week by week.

The coach needs to go into practices with enthusiasm, work constructively with individual players and develop team concepts -- all while trying to keep everybody's head above water. It takes lots of energy.

A coach can do this by emphasizing getting better every day rather than winning every game.

He can use film to show how his players are improving. You can play games within a game, like trying to win the fourth quarter in a blowout loss.

Or you can focus on rebounding: "Let's get six offensive rebounds this quarter." A coach can take a small aspect of the game and put it under the microscope (in certain games or quarters) as a way of building confidence.

In the intangibles department, a coach can build camaraderie by going out to dinner as a team. It's important to develop team unity and to foster loyalty among teammates so they can trust that even though they're losing, things will be OK in the long run.

A coach can also use humor. When you're losing, there's a lot of intensity at both ends of the emotional spectrum. There's a lot of anger -- and an intensity to that anger -- because you're not winning. And there's also an opportunity at times for comic relief even though you're enduring the hell of losing.

There's a camaraderie in both that can bring closeness to a team.

George Karl, an NBA analyst for ESPN and former NBA coach, is a regular contributor to Insider.

ducks
12-14-2004, 05:19 PM
barry for luke jackson?

cavs get their vet shooter

barry would fit in with his no d to :lol

thispego
12-14-2004, 05:22 PM
No Way Barry gets traded... Spurs will regret it and I will be super pissed. Barry WILL turn things around.. I'd put my entire bank account on it..... BOOK IT!

Aud21946
12-14-2004, 05:23 PM
Why give up on Barry ?

violentkitten
12-14-2004, 05:23 PM
dude twenty bucks dont buy shit nowadays

ChumpDumper
12-14-2004, 05:27 PM
If he isn't playing well by February, it has to be considered -- especially for a shorter contract to better accomodate Brown this summer. That said, I think he'll turn it around.

boutons
12-14-2004, 05:31 PM
"not playing well by February"

Yep, Nov-Dec-Jan-Feb is more than enough time to pull out of his shooting slump, and get a feel what he should be doing on defense. Ruthless but heartbreaking to lose an Spurs-type of guy and what should have been a huge contributor.

Come on, Pop, work it out with this guy.

whottt
12-14-2004, 05:31 PM
This is actually good news...Since Pop elects to be an idiot and build a team that will strain in 4th quarters...like every other Spurs team he has built...at least we won't be paying the MLE to a guy that never plays.

It's a good move. I honestly hope it's what the Spurs are trying to do...because at least this way there is more of a chance Holt will pony up to keep Devin Brown.

And I also hope that Beno and the other guards stay healthy.

But just remember, that beautiful transition team that we saw early in the season...it's dead Pop killed it...our offense and 4th second halves of late bear this out.

And this team will be like all those others teams that would blow 25 point second half leads through turnovers and vanillia O(and the only common denominators on all those teams were Pop, Duncan and Malik..it's Pop that causes it).

spurs_fan_in_exile
12-14-2004, 05:36 PM
"Trade Barry for who?" is the real question. I can think of plenty of teams that might want to take the chance on a slumping barry being their missing piece, but what is out there that the Spurs need? A quality center would be great, but who has one of those that they'd be willing to ship out for Brent Barry? I bet the Spurs are wishing they'd gone after Mehmet Okhur in the offseason.

BigVee
12-14-2004, 05:39 PM
Trade him for someone who can come in and give you 8 great minutes of stellar defense. Michael Cooper looks like he could still go 8.

CosmicCowboy
12-14-2004, 05:39 PM
No way Spurs trade Barry now....they could forget EVER getting another free agent to take less money to play here if they do...

whottt
12-14-2004, 05:42 PM
I agree...we definitely need to trade Barry for defense...I mean fuck, we are only #1 in the NBA in just about every D category, even when Barry was playing 20 mins a game...obviously that is where our room for improvement lies.

Need more D.

I think we might be able to pry Anthony Carter out of the TPups for Barry. And he'll come off the books this summer.

BigVee
12-14-2004, 05:45 PM
And who could complain? Afterall, Pop gave this 10 year veteran 15 games before he started to cut his minutes under 20...that seems fair.

Nikos
12-14-2004, 05:45 PM
So Whott are you agreeing to the fact that the Spurs do look shaky in fourth quarters, especially offensively?

Is Barry's temporary demotion the only reason you mention it? Or did you even think this before?

whottt
12-14-2004, 05:47 PM
No way Spurs trade Barry now....they could forget EVER getting another free agent to take less money to play here if they do...


And you think them watching Pop assfuck Barry on the bench is going to not catch their eye?

I think the best thing to keep guys willing to take less to play here is to trade Barry...

If you kill his career...as Pop is going to do...that's what will keep guys from coming here again...Barry not working out on this team, but still doing Barry right by trading him to a team that does value his skills..that's the best thing to do in this situation.

You cannot rot him out on the bench...you gotta trade him if you aren't going ot use him. Plus it's sickening waste of talent to rot him out on the bench.

Pop needs to trade him. It's in the best interest of the Spurs, this season and in future FA seasons...it's also the right thing to do by Barry...guy didn't take less, give up endorsements, to come ride the IR in a podunk down.

ChumpDumper
12-14-2004, 05:47 PM
Diop/Wagner.

Waive Wagner, get your young athletic center as a restricted FA.

Moot point though, trade won't happen.

whottt
12-14-2004, 05:51 PM
So Whott are you agreeing to the fact that the Spurs do look shaky in fourth quarters, especially offensively?

Is Barry's temporary demotion the only reason you mention it? Or did you even think this before?

Barry has prevented 3 second half collapses this season...Boston, Chicago, Detroit...

This is not to say we would have lost those games...it is to say that he definitely broke our stagnant offense.

And no I did not think our O looked shaky until the Detroit game when Pop refused to play Beno or Barry hardly at all...it's a clear pattern that is what he is going to do in big games this season...even if it's the second night of a back to back.

Barry is an awesome transition player, he is an awesome offensive player efficiency wise..even if his shot does not fall...there's a reason we rolled over teams, non stop so early in the season and IMO Barry was the biggest reason why.

But Pop doesn't care about that.

Phenomanul
12-14-2004, 05:55 PM
I wouldn't trade Barry just yet.... In my mind that would be worse than the recent firing of the Notre Dame head coach after only 3 years.

I think pro-basketball players need at least 1 year with a team (plus a stint in the playoffs -- yes... the playoffs are on another grading system) before people can judge them as being a good or bad fit with a team...

On a deep team like this year's Spurs, Barry will get less minutes because of his known defensive defficiencies but that doesn't mean he doesn't deserve the opportunity to prove himself when it counts. Maybe Parker's absence will give him the minutes he needs to prove to Pop, Duncan and himself that he can stroke it from distance....

Come on people.... we're only 1 quarter into a season in which the Spurs have already overacheived (relative to their historical bad starts) so Barry is not the scape goat of anything just yet. Barry hasn't really been needed that much but that won't mean we won't need him... I know Brown is playing exceptionally well (outplaying Barry for minutes) but we all saw what the lack of experience can do to a player in the clutch moments of a game.... and check this, Pop hasn't given Barry much time in the closing moments of close games. In one of his few 4th quarter-non-garbage-time appearances he knocked down two clutch free-throws to put the Pistons down for good.

Barry if you're reading this, count to 10 and settle down.
settle down
settle down
settle down
settle down.... there... feel better?

Maybe the shaggy haircut has to go.... some players need to throw away a bad streak by shaving their hair, their goatees or simply trying another facial hair style...

I wouldn't trade this sniper. Unless the other team gave me Ray Allen in return...

CosmicCowboy
12-14-2004, 05:55 PM
sheesh...its not even Christmas yet...If Parker misses Wednesday Barry should get some solid minutes...and I expect him to take advantage of the time...I expect a lot of you guys to be in here Thursday all over Barrys jock like everyone used to do about wanting more minutes for Steve Kerr...

BigVee
12-14-2004, 05:55 PM
No kidding, Barry is an artist in the open court. But, we can't let him play because we might give up 81 points again and lose.

ChumpDumper
12-14-2004, 05:55 PM
there's a reason we rolled over teams so early in the season and IMO Barry was the biggest reason why. Injuries to opponents' key players was the biggest reason for the Spurs' inflated record.

Nikos
12-14-2004, 05:58 PM
I must admit I am finding it troubling that guys like Barry aren't getting acclimated, Manu is starting to think its normal to score 2pts in games reguarly and that its OK as long as he plays hard D and the team is winning. Also Parker can do the same at times. Sometimes both Parker and Manu get in that mode.

It's fine that the team is defensive oriented, and has guys who can step up like Devin Brown, Malik Rose, and even Bruce Bowen (against Cavs).

But ultimately Parker, Ginobili, and Barry need to get in an offensive comfort zone. I know Manu is probably tired, and Barry is struggling. But at some point, they are just going to have to 'click'. Maybe it won't happen till later in the season, but I am hoping it happens sooner than later.

Maybe Parker and Ginobili need more help from Barry, who knows? But we do know Duncan can get his points whether other guys are hot or not.

It's up to the main guards to pony up, and start bringing consistency. I don't know if its the system, their inabilites to score, or if they are tired -- but somehow it has to be resolved, or the shaky fourth quarters might ensue.

whottt
12-14-2004, 06:00 PM
Pop'snutsac does an exceptional job of keeping my eyelids from getting wrinkles, unfortunately it also keeps me from seeing that Houston and Detroit were injured too.

ChumpDumper
12-14-2004, 06:03 PM
Houston and Detroit were injured too.Houston was a series of stupid mistakes -- big deal. If nothing else it gave Devin Brown experience he needs if Barry is going to continue to suck and not play.

Which Piston was injured? Smush Parker?

whottt
12-14-2004, 06:09 PM
Houston was a series of stupid mistakes -- big deal. If nothing else it gave Devin Brown experience he needs if Barry is going to continue to suck and not play.

Which Piston was injured? Smush Parker?

Derrick Coleman was injured, Mcdyess went down in that game, and Wallace was returning from a 5 game layoff...it's not like Detroit hasn't been getting it's ass kicked since...

and it's not like Houston hasn't either...

The Houston game was an offensive meltdown of the highest order...

Don't fucking tell me that Pop coached teams don't melt in the fucking second halves and 4th quarters...

Watch a fucking playoff game sometime.

4 fourth quarter double digit leads against the Lakers in 02...dozens of them in 03. The Mavs beat us if Duncan doesn't get Kerr off the bench in that series.

T Park
12-14-2004, 06:11 PM
Cleveland was missing Lucious Harris,

is that the reason the Spurs beat Cleveland so easy Chump?

T Park
12-14-2004, 06:12 PM
The Mavs beat us if Duncan doesn't get Kerr off the bench in that series

The Mavericks win a game 7 in SBC Center???


Highly unlikely.

ChumpDumper
12-14-2004, 06:14 PM
Derrick ColemanLMFAO. I can't believe after all your "Malone is old and in injured and useless" rants you have the fucking gall to call this guy a "key player." You officially have no credibility on this or any other board.
The Houston game was an offensive meltdown of the highest order.Yeah, TMac is our offense. Some smart shit right there.
Don't fucking tell me that Pop coached teams don't melt in the fucking second halves and 4th quarters.Don't tell me Brent Barry is the only reason the Spurs win any games.
4 fourth quarter double digit leads against the Lakers in 02...dozens of them in 03. The Mavs beat us if Duncan doesn't get Kerr off the bench in that series.Hey, Kerr got the system -- go figure. Brent Barry is not Kerr, so why act like he is?

You want to trade Barry now, so why are you still arguing this?

whottt
12-14-2004, 06:15 PM
THe fact is both titles were the result of getting lucky in that Pop's defensive guys just happened to either be clutch, or get hot...

98-99...Elie was there for his defense, clutch was secondary. JJax was a defensive player that went on the hot streak of his life. And Pop wasn't even the reason we got Elie...AJ was.

02-03...SJax only started because Manu's gambling D pissed Pop off to no end and because Jack was a better defender than Smitty...if Smitty had been a better defender...he would have started ahead of Jack..inspite of Smitty not being able to hit the side of a barn. And SJax was a Duncan reccomended signee anyway.

And Kerr was the biggest fluke of all...IF Duncan hadn't been in a contract year...and hadn't had the leverage to say to Pop, "hey idiot, how abou getting some one that can hit a fucking FT into this game before we blow yet another 4th quarter lead" ....we get beat by a team that plays no fucking D.

Well Duncan doesn't have that kind of leverage anymore...and if you doubt this look at the final minutes of the Houston game where Pop reams Duncan's ass out on the sideline for the first time I can ever remember.

We better just hope Beno(and the others) stay healthy...IMO he is the most sure handed and efficient passing guard that we have once Barry goes.

ALVAREZ6
12-14-2004, 06:19 PM
I agree...we definitely need to trade Barry for defense...I mean fuck, we are only #1 in the NBA in just about every D category, even when Barry was playing 20 mins a game...obviously that is where our room for improvement lies.

Need more D.

I think we might be able to pry Anthony Carter out of the TPups for Barry. And he'll come off the books this summer.


why are you so negative, why are people already talk about trading Barry?
he just signed this summer dude, give him time.

Thats the problem, we wanna keep people so they can get used to the team that they are on.

Barry will come out of the hole that he's in don't worry.

If you look at all the NBA franchises that have been struggling for a while, they are signing, releasing, dropping, trading players all the freakin time, they never get accustomed to the team that they are on. Thats not the way to do it.

For example, the Sixers have a different starting line up combination every game.
Last season( and this is a true fact), the Sixers had around 20 different combinations of starters, they never established an official starting line up.

You get the point?

whottt
12-14-2004, 06:20 PM
The Spurs blow a 25 point lead in SBC Center???


Highly unlikely.



FTFY

BigVee
12-14-2004, 06:26 PM
The reason we need to trade Barry is because the Spurs 4th quarter philosophy is not to out score the opposition, it is to make the opposition score less than we do. To do that you need defensive MoFo's at every position.

whottt
12-14-2004, 06:28 PM
LMFAO. I can't believe after all your "Malone is old and in jured and useless" rants you have the fucking gall to call this guy a "key player."

Hey dumbass...Malone is old and inured...the sonofabitch hasn't a played a game yet this season...why not?


Yeah, TMac is our offense. Some smart shit right there.

TMac wasn't the cause of 2 turnovers in the final 48 seconds. It was impossible for the Rockets to win that game without our help.




Don't tell me Brent Barry is the only reason the Spurs win any games.Hey, Kerr got the system -- go figure. Brent Barry is not Kerr, so why act like he is?

I am not saying Brent Barry is the only reason Spurs win games...I'm saying he's the main reason our offense was so polished looking throughout the game, and so ahead of schedule up until the Detroit game.

And I wish you'd stop making the assinine statements that Barry will hopefully get our D as well as guys like Smitty and Kerr...

Dumbass..they hardly played if there was any alternative...




You want to trade Barry now, so why are you still arguing this?

I want to trade Barry because Pop is too much of a singleminded dumbass to utilize him...and I don't like seeing guys get screwed...I don't like it because it's wrong..and I don't like because I think it's going be a detriment in the future as far as getting guys to take less to come here.

I know, I know, you're are one of the idiots that think players don't care if they go 3 months without getting any playing time...and if they do care they are pussies...

Just save it...if I want to hear your thoughts on the subject...I'll ask Pop cut a fart...itll sounds more intelligent that way.

ChumpDumper
12-14-2004, 06:28 PM
04-05...Brown only made the rotation because Brown was a better defender than Barry...if Barry had been a better defender...he would have played ahead of Brown..inspite of Barry not being able to hit the side of a barn.

ALVAREZ6
12-14-2004, 06:28 PM
The reason we need to trade Barry is because the Spurs 4th quarter philosophy is not to out score the opposition, it is to make the opposition score less than we do. To do that you need defensive MoFo's at every position.

don't we already have that???

Rasho, Duncan, Bowen, Manu, TP... simple as that???

whottt
12-14-2004, 06:32 PM
04-05...Brown only made the rotation because Brown was a better defender than Barry...if Barry had been a better defender...he would have played ahead of Brown..inspite of Barry not being able to hit the side of a barn.

Copycat.

And by the way...that should read...the only reason Bowen started ahead of Brown was because he was a better defender. And Devin's not a ball hanlder like Barry is anyay.

ALVAREZ6
12-14-2004, 06:34 PM
Copycat.

And by the way...that should read...the only reason Bowen started ahead of Brown was because he was a better defender. And Devin's not a ball hanlder like Barry is anyay.


Devin can shoot though

ChumpDumper
12-14-2004, 06:37 PM
Hey dumbass...Malone is old and inured...the sonofabitch hasn't a played a game yet this season...why not? You just called Derrick Coleman a KEY PLAYER for the Pistons. Go back and bask in the stupidity of that one.
I am not saying Brent Barry is the only reason Spurs win games...I'm saying he's the main reason our offense was so polished looking throughout the game, and so ahead of schedule up until the Detroit game.We looked better than we were because we played injured teams. Playing good defensive teams with their stars made the Spurs look more like what they really are. Sorry, not every team can be injured to preserve your 70-win predictions.
I don't like seeing guys get screwed.He plays something resembling D, he's back in. Too bad you have no faith in his ability to do so.

ChumpDumper
12-14-2004, 06:39 PM
And Devin's not a ball hanlder like Barry is anyay.Or AJ. If all you wanted was a ballhandler....

ChumpDumper
12-14-2004, 06:41 PM
Devin can shoot thoughBut Barry has the rep. In hootie's world that counts for more than anything.

ALVAREZ6
12-14-2004, 06:43 PM
proceed the fight.

spurs_fan_in_exile
12-14-2004, 06:44 PM
Just who in the hell in particular would we trade him for? And right now I have to wonder who in the world would really take him. It's kind of a catch 22. We need him to play better if we can realistically expect to get a good offer, but if he was playing better we wouldn't feel the need to trade him.

ChumpDumper
12-14-2004, 06:45 PM
Nah, it's just another rehash.

Devin's playing better, so Devin gets the minutes.

Barry will get better, but if he doesn't -- Devin needs all the minutes he can get to develop into the kind of consistent player we all thought Barry was going to be.

whottt
12-14-2004, 06:46 PM
You just called Derrick Coleman a KEY PLAYER for the Pistons.

He is a key player once McDyess goes down and Wallace is coming back from 5 games off. On Detroit the whole is greater than the parts.




We looked better than we were because we played injured teams.

Nope, our offense has looked shitty against teams with injured players since Pop's stupidity took over.

You haven't got a fact to fucking stand on so either back it up or STFU.



Playing good defensive teams with their stars made the Spurs look more like what they really are. Sorry, not every team can be injured to preserve your 70-win predictions.

Funny those teams are getting their asses kicked by everyone else...including the Mavs.



He plays something resembling D, he's back in.
Too bad you have no faith in his ability to do so.

Yeah but your own words..he's back in as much as Smitty and Kerr were when the Spurs had aternatives...you're an idiot. And your stupidity would hurt the franchise in the long run.

Don't try and cram square pegs into round holes...Pop's a single minded asshole who doesn't care about offense...Barry is an offensive player, not Bowen light.

Trade him for someone Pop will play, trade him for someone that isn't so expansive to be the 11th man if nothing else, trade him to still get value for him......trade him so other FA's don't get scared away from taking less to come here...including our own.

Nikos
12-14-2004, 06:50 PM
Playing good defensive teams with their stars made the Spurs look more like what they really are.

Honestly, I think the Spurs struggle vs good OFFENSIVE teams who hit threes, hit the boards, and simply play loose.

Defensive teams I think the Spurs can handle when it comes down to it.

Its those teams that just run pick and rolls all day, hit threes, and have a few guys who get off rebounds and tipbacks. Those threes always seem to drop for the opposition when the Spurs are in a funk themselves on offense.

FromWayDowntown
12-14-2004, 06:51 PM
whottt -- are you sure you aren't Kevin O'Keeffe?

ChumpDumper
12-14-2004, 06:54 PM
He is a key playerYOU SAID IT AGAIN!!!!! LMFAO!!!!
Nope, our offense has looked shitty against teams with injured players since Pop's stupidity took over.Jim Jackson and Derrick Coleman are ALL-STARS, FRANCHISE PLAYERS I TELL YOU!!!!
You haven't got a fact to fucking stand on so either back it up or STFU.Look at all the fucking boxscores -- I think it's safer to say most of those teams were missing alot more than the likes of DERRICK FUCKING COLEMAN!!!!!!
Yeah but your own words..he's back in as much as Smitty and Kerr were when the Spurs had aternatives.Wait -- you WANTED to play Smitty over Jack? ANOTHER FUCKING GEM!!!!!! Thanks for the laughs!
And your stupidity would hurt the franchise in the long run.Your dream of a Kerr/Barry/Heal backcourt rotation wouldn't get much done either.

whottt
12-14-2004, 06:58 PM
Or AJ. If all you wanted was a ballhandler....


That's right...even in his struggling form about like what AJ gave us in his prime...No D and No J, fascillitate the offense.

The difference is...Barry wouldn't be the best PG on our team, you wouldn't hear me saying Barry saved Duncan's career, lead us to a title, and should have his jersey retired. And I'd probably be more forgiving if Barry talked shit after leaving as well...seeing as how he wasn't called Mr.Spur and didn't owe his career to this franchise.

ALVAREZ6
12-14-2004, 07:00 PM
and the fight continues...

ChumpDumper
12-14-2004, 07:00 PM
you wouldn't hear me saying Barry saved Duncan's career, lead us to a title, and should have his jersey retired.No, you'll just say he's the only reason the Spurs ever won anything this season.

whottt
12-14-2004, 07:01 PM
YOU SAID IT AGAIN!!!!! LMFAO!!!!Jim Jackson and Derrick Coleman are ALL-STARS, FRANCHISE PLAYERS I TELL YOU!!!!Look at all the fucking boxscores -- I think it's safer to say most of those teams were missing alot more than the likes of DERRICK FUCKING COLEMAN!!!!!!

And McDyess.


Wait -- you WANTED to play Smitty over Jack?

Show me where I said that or shut the fuck up.

Weak ass bitch can't use my own words so you make up your own. Fuck you.


ANOTHER FUCKING GEM!!!!!! Thanks for the laughs!Your dream of a Kerr/Barry/Heal backcourt rotation wouldn't get much done either.

Yawn.

whottt
12-14-2004, 07:02 PM
whottt -- are you sure you aren't Kevin O'Keeffe?


Congrats...you are the first on my ignore list...

ChumpDumper
12-14-2004, 07:13 PM
And McDyess. He played 24 minutes. We missed out on a whole 3 fucking minutes of Dice. Keep fishing. Besides YOU SAID DERRICK COLEMAN IS A KEY PLAYER FOR THE PISTONS!!!!!
Show me where I said that or shut the fuck up.Scroll up. Either you want it to happen all the time or you don't. Oh, that's right -- you have to have it both ways every time.

If you want to play up the analogies, it's just as conceivable that Barry=Smitty, Devin=Jack and Beno=Kerr. Who knows? If Beno can play both sides of the ball in his first year given his obvious shortcomings, why the fuck can't Barry?

xcoriate
12-14-2004, 07:15 PM
That hole is getting pretty deep....


STOP DIGGING

whottt
12-14-2004, 07:32 PM
He played 24 minutes. We missed out on a whole 3 fucking minutes of Dice.

Be glad...we only won that game by 3 points...and probably would have lost it if nor for Barry's clutch FT's.



Keep fishing. Besides YOU SAID DERRICK COLEMAN IS A KEY PLAYER FOR THE PISTONS!!!!!

I said he's a key player when McDyess is injured and Ben Wallace is returning from a 5 game layoffs. How hard is this to figure out? Romain Sato becomes a key player for us if enough people get injured.



Scroll up. Either you want it to happen all the time or you don't. Oh, that's right -- you have to have it both ways every time.

I don't have to scroll up...You asked me if I wanted to play Smitty over Jax...and I want you to show me where I said that bitch.




If you want to play up the analogies, it's just as conceivable that Barry=Smitty, Devin=Jack and Beno=Kerr.

In that case then why are you arguing with me about trading him? Sounds like you are the one who wants Smitty.



Who knows? If Beno can play both sides of the ball in his first year given his obvious shortcomings, why the fuck can't Barry?

I don't know, why couldn't AJ shoot threes...

You miss the entire point yet again...it's not that Brent Barry won't learn to play D...it's that he's not ever going to be better than Devin...and my problem with this is not that Devin gets more minutes...indeed I think Devin should start...it's Pop isn't going to use him except sparingly...I don't mean a reduction in minutes...I mean total garbage minutes or deep ice on the bench...he's going to use him like he used Kerr for the better part of 4 years.

Why do that do the guy?

Guy was classy, he took less to come here...

and you bunch of assholes want to fuck him for it. I'm not the ahole here...ya'll are. You don't seem to realize that this is San Antonio, you seem to have forgotten that two years ago we couldn't buy an outside FA of note...You can't just screw guys over...on top of that he's too expensive for that role.

Kori Ellis
12-14-2004, 07:34 PM
I'm sure this is pure speculation on the part of Chad Ford. Everyone knows that Brent Barry is going to be a key player for the Spurs this season.

ALVAREZ6
12-14-2004, 07:38 PM
I'm sure this is pure speculation on the part of Chad Ford. Everyone knows that Brent Barry is going to be a key player for the Spurs this season.
thank you

Aggie Hoopsfan
12-14-2004, 07:52 PM
And no I did not think our O looked shaky until the Detroit game when Pop refused to play Beno or Barry hardly at all...it's a clear pattern that is what he is going to do in big games this season...even if it's the second night of a back to back.

Barry is an awesome transition player, he is an awesome offensive player efficiency wise..even if his shot does not fall...there's a reason we rolled over teams, non stop so early in the season and IMO Barry was the biggest reason why.

But Pop doesn't care about that.

Damn, whott is tearing this topic up, I'll just sit back and watch.

If we trade Barry I hope it's to someone in the West. That way I can laugh my ass off at Pop's "all defense, all the time" mindfuck when it blows up in his face yet again while Barry goes postal on us and lends a leading hand in sending us home earlier.

We go lose a game, have the collapse against Detroit, and Pop stubbornly looks past his vanilla, motion is the plague of humanity inspired offense and thinks it's about the defense.

Fuckin' A....

baseline bum
12-14-2004, 07:56 PM
How can anyone take anything Chad Ford says seriously after his daily "LeBron sucks and Darko's the next Bird" articles a couple of years ago?

Marcus Bryant
12-14-2004, 08:08 PM
Don't mind whottt, he's just in love with all things white: Barry, Kerr, Heal, wrestling, Dubya, and The Coyote (you know his ass don't live on Eastside. Oh wait, according to his biography (http://www.nba.com/spurs/mascot/coyote_thestory_031121.html) The Coyote lives "in a lavish den outside Loop 1604"). I rest my case.

Gummi
12-14-2004, 08:19 PM
I definatly can see the Spurs taking a look at what teams are offering if in deed teams are interested in Barry. Who knows, the front office might bite on some deal that's been offered. I'm not off the Barry bandwagon and I still think that he's going to be an important player down the stretch for us, it's nothing wrong with listening for something R.C. and Pop might like.

I also read in some local newspaper (not from S.A.) that the Spurs sent Lance Blanks to scout a Bulls game. I don't know if it's anything credable, but one might think it's concerning Rasho and possibly some of the Bulls big man (Curry or Chandler).

Probably nothing but this time is always interesting because trade rumors are flying around the league.

Marcus Bryant
12-14-2004, 08:21 PM
Blanks might have scouted them before the Spurs played them the other week.

Marcus Bryant
12-14-2004, 08:28 PM
Damn, whott is tearing this topic up, I'll just sit back and watch.

If we trade Barry I hope it's to someone in the West. That way I can laugh my ass off at Pop's "all defense, all the time" mindfuck when it blows up in his face yet again while Barry goes postal on us and lends a leading hand in sending us home earlier.

We go lose a game, have the collapse against Detroit, and Pop stubbornly looks past his vanilla, motion is the plague of humanity inspired offense and thinks it's about the defense.

Fuckin' A....


Wha? The Spurs were running motion in that game when Detroit made their run.

What the fuck is wrong with emphasizing defense and offensive execution, especially when you are sitting on a lead? The Spurs have lost their leads in no small part to running that ever impressive motion offense.

I don't see how anyone could have watched the Spurs up to this point in the season and believe they are running strictly an inside outside halfcourt offense. WTF?

Aggie Hoopsfan
12-14-2004, 08:42 PM
No one said it was strictly inside-outside, just that every time Pop's nuts shrink he goes back to his four down security blanket. Manu's not even getting the touches in the offense he used to in the big games.

pjjrfan
12-14-2004, 10:01 PM
Derrick Coleman was injured, Mcdyess went down in that game, and Wallace was returning from a 5 game layoff...it's not like Detroit hasn't been getting it's ass kicked since...

and it's not like Houston hasn't either...

The Houston game was an offensive meltdown of the highest order...

Don't fucking tell me that Pop coached teams don't melt in the fucking second halves and 4th quarters...

Watch a fucking playoff game sometime.

4 fourth quarter double digit leads against the Lakers in 02...dozens of them in 03. The Mavs beat us if Duncan doesn't get Kerr off the bench in that series.
I thought it was the Creme Bruele or whatever that got Kerr off the bench.

ducks
12-14-2004, 10:43 PM
Steve Smith, G, Bobcats
The Bobcats signed Smith to be a mentor to one of the youngest teams in the league. But that isn't the whole story. Last summer, most GMs were convinced Smith was teetering on retirment. With sore knees and plenty of wear and tear, it wasn't like GMs were beating down his door. Smith claims he chose the Bobcats, but the truth is the Bobcats also chose him.

Smith has been great in Charlotte, averaging a surprising 22 mpg, and shooting a sizzling 44 percent from the 3-point arc. You think a team with championship aspirations – a team like the Heat, Pistons or even the Nuggets – wouldn't like some of that? GM and head coach Bernie Bickerstaff claims he'll let Smith go if that's what the veteran wants to do. It should be a tough choice for Smith. He can play big minutes on a bad team, or play a smaller role on a good one. If a team offers the right deal, Bickerstaff, who is building for the future, might have no choice but to say yes.


ok this may be a bad idea but the guy is shooting lights out this season. steve smith'd d sucks but he can atleast be a good mentor and help players with their outside shooting and free throws. if smith is only signed thru this year would the bobcats take a pick and barry for him. then the spurs would have cap relief if they let smith out.

Marcus Bryant
12-14-2004, 10:54 PM
ducks are you sparking up the lettuce again?

ducks
12-14-2004, 10:57 PM
hey atleast he can play a steve kerr role

barry can not do that yet

Aggie Hoopsfan
12-14-2004, 11:19 PM
If Bernie were smart he'd go offer Smitty to the Pistons for Darko. Worth the gamble for Charlotte, and it's not like Larry's gonna play Milicic anytime soon.

whottt
12-14-2004, 11:44 PM
That hole is getting pretty deep....


STOP DIGGING


I hope you aren't referring to me? Bwhahaha!

This is light compared to last season when the entire board piled on for me wanting to keep your boy Shane Heal over Anthony Carter...as you can see...they still dwell on that heavily. Where were you then?

whottt
12-14-2004, 11:45 PM
Don't mind whottt, he's just in love with all things white: Barry, Kerr, Heal, wrestling, Dubya, and The Coyote (you know his ass don't live on Eastside. Oh wait, according to his biography (http://www.nba.com/spurs/mascot/coyote_thestory_031121.html) The Coyote lives "in a lavish den outside Loop 1604"). I rest my case.


Dumb...how conveniently you forget that I raised hell about us not resigning Jax last season...and also this season(until it was pointed out to me that Jack made it impossible for us to keep him).

And I also do a similar defense of Horry...so don't pull the race card, it's cheap and weak...even by your standards.

whottt
12-14-2004, 11:49 PM
ok this may be a bad idea but the guy is shooting lights out this season. steve smith'd d sucks but he can atleast be a good mentor and help players with their outside shooting and free throws. if smith is only signed thru this year would the bobcats take a pick and barry for him. then the spurs would have cap relief if they let smith out.



Good lord...get of the quack ducks...now. Steve Smith? Steve Smith!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!

WTH is wrong with you ducks? What happened to ducks the genius?

Steve Smith? Steve bloody Smith? Smitty? Stevie the Brick? How can anyone say they want Smitty back.

Play the Steve Kerr role? He couldn't 2 years ago...or 3, what makes you think anything has changed?

ChumpDumper
12-14-2004, 11:56 PM
Some +/- stats are interesting Spurs are +4.0 when Barry's on the court -- but +16.0 when he isn't. That net differential of -12.0 is only above Wilks and Massenburg. Horry is the only bench player with a net positive. To be sure, there are floor combinations including Barry that are great -- but we aren't at the point in the season where those kinds of choices are set in stone. Let us now begin anew the firestorm, this time with stats. IMO, this is much ado about nothing.

wildbill2u
12-15-2004, 12:15 AM
"Trade Barry for who?" is the real question. I can think of plenty of teams that might want to take the chance on a slumping barry being their missing piece, but what is out there that the Spurs need? A quality center would be great, but who has one of those that they'd be willing to ship out for Brent Barry? I bet the Spurs are wishing they'd gone after Mehmet Okhur in the offseason.

For who? How about Steve Smith--now averaging 22ppg and 44% on threes.

Just kidding.

whottt
12-15-2004, 12:49 AM
Some +/- stats are interesting Spurs are +4.0 when Barry's on the court -- but +16.0 when he isn't. That net differential of -12.0 is only above Wilks and Massenburg. Horry is the only bench player with a net positive. To be sure, there are floor combinations including Barry that are great -- but we aren't at the point in the season where those kinds of choices are set in stone. Let us now begin anew the firestorm, this time with stats. IMO, this is much ado about nothing.

What's Devin's on court +/-? And Malik's?

ChumpDumper
12-15-2004, 12:53 AM
An enormously amount lower -- it's phenomenal, leaving no doubt as to whom should be the first man off the bench. The main thing you get from comparing bench +/- is that we really rely on our starters.

ChumpDumper
12-15-2004, 12:57 AM
Key Player Derrick Coleman is -18.5

whottt
12-15-2004, 01:26 AM
An enormously amount lower -- it's phenomenal, leaving no doubt as to whom should be the first man off the bench. The main thing you get from comparing bench +/- is that we really rely on our starters.

Would you mind posting the stats? I am very curious as to why you won't. And what do you mean it's phenomenal as to whom should be the first man off the bench? Not that I am arguing who should be the first...only that all the guys who have some to offer should get time...

this means Devin, Barry, Beno, Malik and Horry.

I'm pretty surprised Barry has any form of positive +/- IMO given the way he has been used...and his shooting slump. I guess he had a big +/- before he started struggling and being used poorly.

So just who were you talking about earlier? I'd say Devin probably should be the first man off the bench, in fact I think he should be starting for the 30th time..but that doesn't mean I think Barry should be getting 9 minutes per game in big games...I think he has a lot to do that can help our offensive stagnation...I think what he can do on offense far outweighs his defensive liabilities...and we could always plays a little zone.

I'm sorry but when you got Parker, Manu, Barry, Horry and Duncan out on the floor you have what is IMO the smartest and most versatile line up in the NBA. And it is foolish to never use it.


As for stats,

I already posted team w-l, ppg and point differential and they were all incrementally higher with Barry and even Beno getting over 10 and 20 minutes per game...It took me quite a bit of time to do it and since you totally ignored those stats at the time I posted them, I am not about to do it again.

+/- is a flukey stat but IMO, off court is even flukier than on court...I mean the best way to judge the way a player impacts the game is by what he does on it.

As for Horry...not surprised, Horry is a guy I have been defending on these boards as well...He is one of the smartest, if not energetic, players in the NBA.

whottt
12-15-2004, 11:35 AM
Amazing how quickly you disappeared when you were asked to post the stats of those bench players with better +/- than Barry. I hope you haven't injured yourself.

Marcus Bryant
12-15-2004, 11:36 AM
Damn, whottt. You done got beat by a girl.

whottt
12-15-2004, 12:48 PM
You and Chump have a funny view of victory...I've never considered having someone's foot up my ass as something that should be striven for...then again that's me.., you OTOH, spend half your time running around the forum in homo nicks, and Chump doesn't know if he's a guy or a girl...so I can see how you guys could have a warped sense of victory. Takes all kinds I guess.

Meanwhile...Chump got run.

Marcus Bryant
12-15-2004, 12:52 PM
I find it interesting that you accuse some of my ghost handles of being queer while you manage to advance some of the queerest arguments ever seen in a bball forum. In the case of Shane Heal that literally was queer, but I digress.

The fact you are ChumpHumper's property is beyond dispute. Those whip marks must hurt.

whottt
12-15-2004, 12:59 PM
I find it interesting that you accuse some of my ghost handles of being queer while you manage to advance some of the queerest arguments ever seen in a bball forum. In the case of Shane Heal that literally was queer, but I digress.

The fact you are ChumpHumper's property is beyond dispute. Those whip marks must hurt.



Yeah and it was another whottt hater that had to have been entering some questionable search words to find the site you are referring too...


4 Words give me unquestionable and eternal scoreboard on the both of you...

Jason Kidd...Hedo Turkoglu


LOL!




BTW, Chump knows not to post those stats because he will prove himself to be full of crap when he does. He was very selective in the stats he mentioned and his inability to have a objective opinion when engaged in an argument with myself will be proven for all to see.

Kinda like you go around the forum ripping on Ghost over what you percieve to be a lack of anger at the loss of Jax...

When everyone with one memory cell knows that Ghost, misguided as he can be sometimes, was pissed when we lost Jack and was always one of his biggest supporters.


Chump, like you, simply can't admit when he is wrong.

Marcus Bryant
12-15-2004, 01:08 PM
Yeah and it was another whottt hater that had to have been entering some questionable search words to find the site you are referring too...

Yeah, "shane heal."




4 Words give me unquestionable and eternal scoreboard on the both of you...

Jason Kidd...Hedo Turkoglu


LOL!

So a perennial all-star and all-nba team member gives you "scoreboard" while you jocked Shane Heal as the second coming for a year?

Um ok.

As for Hedo, up until the LA series he performed well and he certainly grasped how to play defense in San Antonio, unlike your current Anglo-Saxon heartthrob Brent Barry.

Before I forget Horry flamed out for the Spurs in that LA series as well. So I guess I have "scoreboard" again on your lame ass.




BTW, Chump knows not to post those stats because he will prove himself to be full of crap when he does. He was very selective in the stats he mentioned and his inability to have a objective opinion when engaged in an argument with myself will be proven for all to see.

Kinda like you go around the forum ripping on Ghost over what you percieve to be a lack of anger at the loss of Jax...


Nah, I just rip Ghost for being Ghost at this point. I learned long ago not to take his arguments seriously. You're in that category now.




When everyone with one memory cell knows that Ghost, misguided as he can be sometimes, was pissed when we lost Jack and was always one of his biggest supporters.


Chump, like you, simply can't admit when he is wrong.


Admit I am wrong about what? That Shane Heal was not a legit NBA player? That DRob > The Coyote? That pro wrestling is something people with pubic hair should not watch? You talk a lot of shit for being such a moron that you manage to make Ghost seem somewhat respectable.

ChumpDumper
12-15-2004, 01:20 PM
BTW, Chump knows not to post those stats because he will prove himself to be full of crap when he does.Hey, the stats are there -- you post them. His +/- when playing is a couple of tenths higher than Rose or Brown's but the Spurs +/- when Barry's not on the floor is much much higher. The difference between the two is more than that of any other Spur save garbagemen TMass and Wilks.

I was surprised that Horry had the best +/- and +/- differential of the bench players, but I guess the staff knows when to play him now.

I wish they had monthly splits for those stats -- it .

My question is did we not expect better from Barry?

And I went to a movie last night. Sue me.

whottt
12-15-2004, 01:29 PM
Yeah, "shane heal."

You yourself admitted Heal and Carter both sucked...since I wanted Heal over Carter...at worst it's a draw with those that mocked me.





So a perennial all-star and all-nba team member gives you "scoreboard" while you jocked Shane Heal as the second coming for a year?

The perennial all-star was an overpriced, old and illfitting piece, who if nothing else proved he was a loser when he did not come here...and you think that guy is gonna get us to a title? Not to mention we won a title that year. Something you didn't seem to think was going to happen. That's fact.

As for Heal...I never said he was the second coming. That's fiction.





As for Hedo, up until the LA series he performed well and he certainly grasped how to play defense in San Antonio, unlike your current Anglo-Saxon heartthrob Brent Barry.

Before I forget Horry flamed out for the Spurs in that LA series as well. So I guess I have "scoreboard" again on your lame ass.

So let me get this straight...you make an excuse over Hedo and claim board on Horry for the same LA series? All in the span of two sentences? Amazing. And I don't really remember you having much of an opionion on Horry anyway.

But what gives me board is Chump leaning towards Hedo over Manu.





Nah, I just rip Ghost for being Ghost at this point. I learned long ago not to take his arguments seriously. You're in that category now.

Sometimes he does have valid points, like we all do...true, sometimes he is just bitching senselessly...but he gets a lot of his words twisted into something different by the board bitches such as yourself and chump.

Just don't go talking shit about TPark when you do the same thing he does...






Admit I am wrong about what? That Shane Heal was not a legit NBA player? That DRob > The Coyote? That pro wrestling is something people with pubic hair should not watch? You talk a lot of shit for being such a moron that you manage to make Ghost seem somewhat respectable.

Yawn. 100% fiction on all levels...full of sound and fury, signifying shit!

Marcus Bryant
12-15-2004, 01:32 PM
You yourself admitted Heal and Carter both sucked...since I wanted Heal over Carter...at worst it's a draw with those that mocked me.


It's the fact that you obsessed over a shitty player.

Marcus Bryant
12-15-2004, 01:33 PM
The perennial all-star was an overpriced, old and illfitting piece, who if nothing else proved he was a loser when he did not come here...and you think that guy is gonna get us to a title? Not to mention we won a title that year. Something you didn't seem to think was going to happen. That's fact.

Yeah, then DRob retired and was replaced by a Slovene. Rose was replaced by a small forward.




As for Heal...I never said he was the second coming. That's fiction.

Then why the fucking obsession?

T Park
12-15-2004, 01:34 PM
Just don't go talking shit about TPark when you do the same thing he does...

Ok, whats that mean lol.

Not mad, just dont know what it means.

Marcus Bryant
12-15-2004, 01:34 PM
So let me get this straight...you make an excuse over Hedo and claim board on Horry for the same LA series? All in the span of two sentences? Amazing. And I don't really remember you having much of an opionion on Horry anyway.

But what gives me board is Chump leaning towards Hedo over Manu.

No dumbass, the point is that any knock on Hedo stems from his performance in the LA series. Figure it out.

Marcus Bryant
12-15-2004, 01:35 PM
Yawn. 100% fiction on all levels

Yeah, what you argue about pretty much is.

whottt
12-15-2004, 01:41 PM
Hey, the stats are there -- you post them. His +/- when playing is a couple of tenths higher than Rose or Brown's

Thank you. Now add that factor to the stats I posted earlier about what happens when Barry plays more than 10 or 20 minutes in a game. Then you can just look at his assist to to rate and low to rate...and it's not hard to conclude we are a very smart offensive team when Barry has the ball in his hands. Yes his shooting sucks right now...but your inability to admit other things he does...all it does is prove you to have a limited perception of the game.



but the Spurs +/- when Barry's not on the floor is much much higher. The difference between the two is more than that of any other Spur save garbagemen TMass and Wilks.

Just imagine if Barry's shot was falling.


I was surprised that Horry had the best +/- and +/- differential of the bench players, but I guess the staff knows when to play him now.

I'm not, because even if he doesn't put up stats(something he doesn't try to do in blowouts, of which there were many early in the season)..he's still one of the smartest players in the NBA.





My question is did we not expect better from Barry?

And I went to a movie last night. Sue me.

We expected more from Barry and I feel that early in the regular season is not the time to make a full judgement...at the same time I don't understand why we expected him to be a great defensive player...guys with his type of game are always a pain the butt on D...he just lacks the defensive mindset...

It's like trying to make Nowitzki into a defensive player...it's just not there...But that doesn't mean he can't play a role on this team and that his defficiencies can't be masked while still getting the benefit of his O...we did it for the first 18 games of the season...you tell me what the problem was?


We were still #1 in the NBA in defense and FG%...I mean we played injured teams, we beat them, we were #1 in D...we could not go any higher than that.

You can say we met injured teams...and maybe you have a point...but the offensive stagnation started at the time we reduced Barry's minutes..it's been occuring in those games with the exception of the Cleveland game(and Cleveland played no D so don't go there)...so I do have a point, whether you want to admit it or not.

ChumpDumper
12-15-2004, 02:06 PM
Just imagine if Barry's shot was falling.Everyone does. Why can't he make open shots?

If you're worried about stagnation, I'd rather get Beno out there. He actually does make shots.

T Park
12-15-2004, 02:12 PM
Beno to me, who is a rookie and new to American basketball, doesnt look shook like Barry does when he goes out there.

It SHOULD be the other freakin way around.

whottt
12-15-2004, 03:18 PM
Ok, whats that mean lol.

Not mad, just dont know what it means.


Shane Heal > ______

Coyote>_______

That's what I mean.

whottt
12-15-2004, 03:20 PM
Beno to me, who is a rookie and new to American basketball, doesnt look shook like Barry does when he goes out there.

It SHOULD be the other freakin way around.

It looks that way now...give it a month and let's see what happens...Beno wasn't supposed to be this good of a shooter..I don't see him continuing to hit at 47% from three for the season anymore than I expect to see Barry continuing to hit at 20%.

Let's see what happens...and try not to screw Barry up or stop using him.

ChumpDumper
12-15-2004, 03:21 PM
I agree, let's see what happens....maybe Barry will take a jumper tonight.