If Democrats Had Any Brains

[Wild Cobra]

Ann Coulter has a new book out titled If Democrats Had Any Brains, They’d Be Republicans (http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?r=1&ean=9780307353450). She is jealous of the attention Rush is getting. She wants some criticism about her new book!

You Tube link:

Ann Coulter If dem had brains Part 1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LmztRFiH_g)

Ann Coulter If dems had brains Part 2 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mX8c1ELHnmI)

She first mentions it just less than 30 seconds into the first clip. I couldn’t find the interview I wanted. I saw another one, I think on MSNBC, where she more clearly talks about her getting left out by the media, Kind of funny.

I don’t have this book yet, but it is the next one I will buy.

[boutons_]

"next one I will buy"

self-ridiculing http://spurstalk.com/forums/images/smilies/smilol.gif

self-incriminating http://spurstalk.com/forums/images/smilies/smilol.gif

[exstatic]

M'Ann Coulter is a gay man. Why aren't you afraid of him?

[FromWayDowntown]

and it's conservatives who aren't tolerated in America . . . .

[FromWayDowntown]

Ann Coulter will get criticism the next time s/he says something relevant. Until then it's just noise -- of course, that's all it's ever been . . . .

[Holt's Cat]

Why does that person matter either way?

[George Gervin's Afro]

she's becoming more marginalized everytime she opens her mouth or writes a book. she's only taken seriously by the resident kool aid types, wc, xray,yoni, am i missing some? she is fast becoming one of the demorcats best fundraisers. one thing i would enjoy seeing is commercials of her making an ass of herself, (sorry, for the kool aid crowd, "being dead on about democrats)and then asking the question, " Are mainstream Republicans what America wants?"

If anyone ever wants to endure the same dry heaving I experience I did try her and her ilk's websites. They all recomend eachother's books.. hush, whannity,levin all endorse her books.. hilarious.. :lol

[ChumpDumper]

If Republicans had any brains, they wouldn't have lost both houses of Congress to those guys.

[Walter Craparita]

If Americans had any brains they wouldn't want a socialist America. Americans are fat and lazy though so...

[FromWayDowntown]

If Americans had any brains they wouldn't want a socialist America. Americans are fat and lazy though so...

Socialist on one side, quasi-authoritarian on the other -- you make the call. . . .

[Spurminator]

Clowns to left of me, jokers to the right

[Oh, Gee!!]

This is Ann at her best, covering every topic from A to Z. Here you’ll read Coulter’s take on:
• Her politics: “As far as I’m concerned, I’m a middle-of-the-road moderate and the rest of you are crazy.”
• Hillary Clinton: “Hillary wants to be the first woman president, which would also make her the first woman in a Clinton administration to sit behind the desk in the Oval Office instead of under it.”
• The environment: “God gave us the earth. We have dominionover the plants, the animals, the trees. God said, ‘Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It’s yours.’”
• Religion: “It’s become increasingly difficult to distinguish the pronouncements of the Episcopal Church from the latest Madonna video.”
• Global warming: “The temperature of the planet has increased about one degree Fahrenheit in the last century. So imagine a summer afternoon when it’s 63 degrees and the next thing you know it’s . . . 64 degrees. Ahhhh!!!! Run for your lives, everybody! Women and children first!”
• Gun control: “Mass murderers apparently can’t read, since they are constantly shooting up ‘gun-free zones.’”
• Bill Clinton: “Bill Clinton’s library is the first one to ever feature an Adults Only section.”
• Illegal aliens: “I am the illegal alien of commentary. I will do the jokes that no one else will do.”

reason #876 that foxnews can't successfully pull off a Daily Show-esque program

[boutons_]

socialism is just another totally bogus straw-man, a checklist word devoid of any meaning for the USA, a hot button that right-wingers hit to avoid serious discussion and to rouse the ever-ready rabble.

[xrayzebra]

she's becoming more marginalized everytime she opens her mouth or writes a book. she's only taken seriously by the resident kool aid types, wc, xray,yoni, am i missing some? she is fast becoming one of the demorcats best fundraisers. one thing i would enjoy seeing is commercials of her making an ass of herself, (sorry, for the kool aid crowd, "being dead on about democrats)and then asking the question, " Are mainstream Republicans what America wants?"

If anyone ever wants to endure the same dry heaving I experience I did try her and her ilk's websites. They all recomend eachother's books.. hush, whannity,levin all endorse her books.. hilarious.. :lol

Hehehehehe.....don't you wish, with all your heart, that
you have just one little bit of her success. Yeah, you
do twerp. :reading

But you don't.

[George Gervin's Afro]

Hehehehehe.....don't you wish, with all your heart, that
you have just one little bit of her success. Yeah, you
do twerp. :reading

But you don't.


ray,ray,ray... once you sell your soul you can never get it back.. she has sold her soul...

[xrayzebra]

I sold mine.....you gotta be kidding? When you had a soul
you gave it to the dimm-o-craps and now you have none.

[smeagol]

Bill Maher's friend

[Wild Cobra]

Ann Coulter gats pretty intense with her jokes about democrats and liberals. I find it amazing how people can criticize her about the facts she states. This is what I would like to see, is for someone to prove she is wrong about the things she writes about! She probably has less mistakes in a year when it comes to facts than any liberal in a day!

[ChumpDumper]

Has she ever written a fact? All I have seen her write are bad blowjob jokes and traitor smack.

[Spurminator]

Ann Coulter gats pretty intense with her jokes about democrats and liberals. I find it amazing how people can criticize her about the facts she states. This is what I would like to see, is for someone to prove she is wrong about the things she writes about! She probably has less mistakes in a year when it comes to facts than any liberal in a day!


She's an opinion writer. What does this have anything to do with facts?

[xrayzebra]

Ann Coulter gats pretty intense with her jokes about democrats and liberals. I find it amazing how people can criticize her about the facts she states. This is what I would like to see, is for someone to prove she is wrong about the things she writes about! She probably has less mistakes in a year when it comes to facts than any liberal in a day!

Actually WC, they have a hard time justifying much of
anything they say and disproving anything that Coulter
says or any other conservative.

Coulter goes to the colleges and universities and puts
it on the line. And the dimm-o-craps have only one
defense, screaming, hollering, and demonstrating.
Yeah, the party of openness, that is the good old
dimm-o-craps. Well demonstrated here on this forum.

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao at anyone who takes Coulter seriously. He's just another clown hustling for a buck.

[xrayzebra]

:lmao at anyone who takes Coulter seriously. He's just another clown hustling for a buck.

Typical dimm-o-crap.

[clambake]

at least Jon Stewart's funny

Coulter has to rake it in now because her audience is old and dying.

[xrayzebra]

Obviously she is killing the dimm-o-craps. Listen to the
anguish, gnashing of teeth and general overall caterwalling.

Somehow, I feel little sympathy for them, the dimm-o-craps.

[ChumpDumper]

Typical dimm-o-crap.:lol Coulter? What serious political discourse do you get from him?

[xrayzebra]

A lot more from her than from you. But again, that is no
compliment to Ann, since you aren't much of a challenge.

[ChumpDumper]

Please, give me an example of his serious political discourse.

[xrayzebra]

When you get serious, I will to. Otherwise, keep your homosexual
innuendo crap out of the forum. It is typical of you and others to
attack the person not the message.

I throw it back to you. Where has she been wrong. Just being
a conservative is not being wrong.

[Walter Craparita]

socialism is just another totally bogus straw-man, a checklist word devoid of any meaning for the USA, a hot button that right-wingers hit to avoid serious discussion and to rouse the ever-ready rabble.

Kind of like the left has jumped onto global warming?

I dunno man. I'm on the edge of my seat waiting for the genius program Hillary hopes to implement next week.

I'd have no problem voting for a woman. No problem voting for a black person. No problem voting for a democrat, depending on the cirumstances. But some of the stuff she talks about really scares me.

Make the people dependant on you and you will stay in office I guess.

[ChumpDumper]

When you get serious, I will to.I am serious. What serious political discourse have you received from Ann Coulter?
Otherwise, keep your homosexual
innuendo crap out of the forum.I don't have any opinion about Coulter's sexuality. I just think he's a man. Seriously.

[xrayzebra]

I don't have any opinion about Coulter's sexuality. I just think he's a man. Seriously.

You have a problem then.

[clambake]

I'm with ray here.

I don't want to see him whip it out!!

[xrayzebra]

I'm with ray here.

I don't want to see him whip it out!!

Penis fetish. How do you handle that when you go
to a public rest room. Do you use the men's restroom,
right?

[Oh, Gee!!]

Has she ever written a fact?

I think fact, in the context in which WC uses the word, means she says stuff WC agrees with.

[ChumpDumper]

You have a problem then. Not really. It will probably never be proven definitively either way. I am content to let the mystery be.

[clambake]

Penis fetish. How do you handle that when you go
to a public rest room. Do you use the men's restroom,
right?
ask larry

[FromWayDowntown]

It is typical of you and others to attack the person not the message.

I throw it back to you. Where has she been wrong. Just being
a conservative is not being wrong.

Yes, dimm-o-crap is solidly about message and not the person.

Interesting argument strategy, too -- refuse to answer a question and then ask someone to disprove something that you never bothered to prove.

[xrayzebra]

Yes, dimm-o-crap is solidly about message and not the person.



And you point being? Sarcasm? Fact? I fail to see
the point you are trying to make.

[FromWayDowntown]

And you point being? Sarcasm? Fact? I fail to see
the point you are trying to make.

That's somehow unsurprising.

You said to ChumpDumper:


It is typical of you and others to attack the person not the message.

Et tu, xray?

When you refer to Dimm-o-craps, aren't you attacking the person as well? You seem to indicate in the above-quoted language that attacking the person is somehow unseemly in discussing politics; but why is it okay for you to attack the person and not for those who have a different view than yours?

[ChumpDumper]

I don't know that Coulter has a message to attack -- his statements are so hyperbolic I can't take them seriously.

[FromWayDowntown]

I don't know that Coulter has a message to attack -- his statements are so hyperbolic I can't take them seriously.

Well, there is that. . . . .

[spurster]

Are there any rational Republicans left?

[clambake]

ron paul

[xrayzebra]

That's somehow unsurprising.

You said to ChumpDumper:



Et tu, xray?

When you refer to Dimm-o-craps, aren't you attacking the person as well? You seem to indicate in the above-quoted language that attacking the person is somehow unseemly in discussing politics; but why is it okay for you to attack the person and not for those who have a different view than yours?

I point out the idiocy of the dimm-o-crap philosophy.
So I suppose you are correct in the sense that if you
want to discuss the point of view where they are wrong
then I have attacked the person. I, seldom, attack a person
on the personal level. I do sometime proffer some
remarks about their reasoning capability. But
sexual orientation or preference is not my style.

[ChumpDumper]

I, seldom, attack a person
on the personal level.

:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao

[FromWayDowntown]

So I suppose you are correct in the sense that if you
want to discuss the point of view where they are wrong then I have attacked the person. I, seldom, attack a person on the personal level.

So, you don't attack on a personal level except when you attack on a personal level?

Gotcha.


I do sometime proffer some remarks about their reasoning capability. But sexual orientation or preference is not my style.

I'm not saying that only comments or allusions concerning a person's sexual orientation are personal attack. I'm saying that deliberately and repeatedly calling people names -- the thing that you've objected to about Coulter -- is the very sort of personal attack that you called out ChumpDumper for undertaking. Hypocritical much?

[Yonivore]

Forget Coulter, if you would like to look at the science here, instead of just going along with the leftist crowd, get a copy of Dr. John Lott's book "Freedomnomics." There's a chapter there on voting ... it will open your eyes. Here's your link (http://www.amazon.com/Freedomnomics-Market-Works-Half-Baked-Theories/dp/1596985062/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-0373621-4365527?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1191594706&sr=8-1) if you want to order the book. I enjoyed it immensely.

[PixelPusher]

Forget Coulter, if you would like to look at the science here, instead of just going along with the leftist crowd, get a copy of Dr. John Lott's book "Freedomnomics." There's a chapter there on voting ... it will open your eyes. Here's your link (http://www.amazon.com/Freedomnomics-Market-Works-Half-Baked-Theories/dp/1596985062/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-0373621-4365527?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1191594706&sr=8-1) if you want to order the book. I enjoyed it immensely.
Using partisan, half-baked theories to justify sexism and misogyny...hilarious.

[Wild Cobra]

Using partisan, half-baked theories to justify sexism and misogyny...hilarious.
The problem is, these are statistically tested facts! Before the 19th amendment was passed, which states:


The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Several states passed legislation allowing women to vote before this. One by one, in order, historical documents show that social spending increased in line with the law allowing women to vote. Women are more emotional than men. That is why as more women started voting, social spending increased.

[ChumpDumper]

Statistically tested misogyny!

[George W. Bush]

DIMM O CRAPS!! hahahahaha

I love it!

[PixelPusher]

The problem is, these are statistically tested facts! Before the 19th amendment was passed, which states:

.

Several states passed legislation allowing women to vote before this. One by one, in order, historical documents show that social spending increased in line with the law allowing women to vote. Women are more emotional than men. That is why as more women started voting, social spending increased.
Yeah, all those crazy, hysterical women, supporting child labor laws and such.

[Wild Cobra]

Here are a few You Tube links of Ann:

Ann coulter having fun (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d70_083nWs)

NBC still promoting Coulter's books, despite Fox & Friends' (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3z10NKvmPw)