PDA

View Full Version : If Shaq became a free agent & expresses interest in joining the Spurs........



Axl Van Dam
10-25-2007, 04:58 AM
Would you go for it and sign him?

RuffnReadyOzStyle
10-25-2007, 06:11 AM
What, with 3 years left on his contract at $20mil per?

:rolleyes

LEN BIAS 4EVER
10-25-2007, 06:30 AM
If we have to pay per pound then HELL NO.....

urunobili
10-25-2007, 07:11 AM
NO WAY... not even for half a mill....

TDMVPDPOY
10-25-2007, 07:23 AM
shaq who?

beno>shaq who

exstatic
10-25-2007, 07:25 AM
By the time this contract is over, he may well be walking with a cane.

Ocotillo
10-25-2007, 07:57 AM
Snaq isn't one of those hungry vets that comes to the Spurs in search of a ring. He's just hungry in a Golden Corral kind of way.

ShoogarBear
10-25-2007, 07:59 AM
He's just hungry in a Golden Corral kind of way.:rollin

romain.star
10-25-2007, 08:28 AM
Would you go for it and sign him?

You're asking us on Spurs talk?
Well as for me, i would try to sign him but i think i would be a little bit short on money... plus i'm not part of any NBA team... so i'm not very confident about it

Slydragon
10-25-2007, 08:40 AM
Holt would have to to spring for a bigger cargo type plane, and that cost more $$$ so it's not going to happen.

Reggie Miller
10-25-2007, 08:41 AM
If he were available in an "Allan Houston Rule" scenario, where someone else is paying 99% of his contract, why not? I'm not going to address the chemistry issues, becuase this scenario would NEVER happen with Shaq. Otherwise, hell no, becuase his contract is an albatross. It's like saying, "if you had a time machine, would you use it to prevent WWII and the attendant genocide?" Of course, but the trick is getting the time machine.

MoSpur
10-25-2007, 09:06 AM
No way.

smeagol
10-25-2007, 09:17 AM
Nope

CubanMustGo
10-25-2007, 10:00 AM
http://img400.imageshack.us/img400/838/hellnojj9.jpg

Soul_Patch
10-25-2007, 10:05 AM
Your smoking something if you wouldnt sign a 15 / 8 sort of big man to put in back up minutes, as long as he wasnt asking too much...

LiarLiar
10-25-2007, 10:10 AM
He'd go back to the Lakers. Trust me.

SenorSpur
10-25-2007, 10:26 AM
Hell-to-the-NO!

thousandth
10-25-2007, 10:42 AM
Hell-to-the-NO!
Why not? Shaq and Timmy in the same team! Unbelievable! unbelievable his FreeT%, together 89%

SenorSpur
10-25-2007, 10:55 AM
Why not? Shaq and Timmy in the same team! Unbelievable! unbelievable his FreeT%, together 89%

Tell me you're being sarcastic. :sleep

Walter Craparita
10-25-2007, 11:29 AM
http://img400.imageshack.us/img400/838/hellnojj9.jpg

Big P
10-25-2007, 11:39 AM
If he were available in an "Allan Houston Rule" scenario, where someone else is paying 99% of his contract, why not? I'm not going to address the chemistry issues, becuase this scenario would NEVER happen with Shaq. Otherwise, hell no, becuase his contract is an albatross. It's like saying, "if you had a time machine, would you use it to prevent WWII and the attendant genocide?" Of course, but the trick is getting the time machine.

The Allan Houston rule was a one time thing. When players like Houston & Finley got cut, that was the only time teams were able to do that...it's not like that option is available to every team every year.

howbouthemspurs
10-25-2007, 11:58 AM
Tha would be a horrible idea...Shaq is way too expensive.. im sure we can get someone better for a hell of a lot less

Barbarian
10-25-2007, 12:00 PM
Would you go for it and sign him?
Shaq in a Spurs uni?! :shootme

midgetonadonkey
10-25-2007, 12:02 PM
Right now I would trade Tim for him straight up.

Walter Craparita
10-25-2007, 12:04 PM
Who cares about how much it would cost?

You want the Spurs to stoop to the level of the Yankees and try to build a team of already proven all-stars? In this case, mega-stars?

Besides, what respect has Shaq ever shown towards the Spurs? I don't care if the dude can walk on water and wants to play for free.

Then again, maybe I just don't like Shaq. I would have taken KG if he wanted to come here.

Reggie Miller
10-25-2007, 12:09 PM
The Allan Houston rule was a one time thing. When players like Houston & Finley got cut, that was the only time teams were able to do that...it's not like that option is available to every team every year.

Which is why it is like saying, "If I had a time machine..."

bdubya
10-25-2007, 12:11 PM
Were I Buford, I'd be more interested in 'Zo.

zrinkill
10-25-2007, 12:12 PM
In a second if he was cheap ......

But not at his current price tag.

SenorSpur
10-25-2007, 12:20 PM
First of all this is a silly question. There are two sides of this Shaq question.

First the economic part. Because if you know anything about Shaq, he doesn't become a free agent. He was fortunate enough to have signed his first and only FA contract with the Fakers back in '96. That contract affords him a non-slotted, top-tier salary of upwards of 20 mil+. Since then, he's never opted out or even allowed it to expire. He and his agent simply negotiate an extension as it nears the final year. Smart move to ensure his enormous salary.

As far as on-court Shaq, we all know he's guaranteed to miss at least 20-30 games a season with some ailment. His weight and desire are now beig questioned. At this stage of his career, Shaq is simply hanging on for the paycheck. Sure he's still dominant in stretches, but his negatives outweigh his positives. His economic liabilities clearly outweigh his part-time, on-court contributions.