Nbadan
11-22-2007, 06:39 AM
Isn't this where we went wrong in Vietnam too? The politicians/Generals started caring more about C.Y.A. with low body-counts than succeeding in the actual war and withdrawal from SE Asia? I thought we weren't gonna do body counts in this war? Hmmm.......
By Stephen Fidler in London and Demetri Sevastopulo in Washington
November 20 2007 22:15
Violence in Iraq has fallen at a rate that has surprised military commanders and even one of the architects of the “surge” that boosted US troop numbers in the country this year, according to figures gathered by the US.
The figures show the numbers of suicide attacks, roadside bombings, mortar and other attacks on US forces and on the Iraqi population have more than halved since 30,000 extra troops in June. The military attributes the decline to the surge, the spread of local ceasefire deals across Iraq, a ceasefire by radical Shia militias and an improvement in the Iraqi security forces.
Jack Keane, the former army general who helped persuade George W. Bush, US president, to increase troop numbers in Iraq, said the decrease in violence was “phenomenal” and had occurred far faster than he had expected. “When you understand you are dealing with the complexity of a counter-insurgency operation which can take years to resolve, to have this dramatic a success in a short period of time, it’s unprecedented,” he said.
...
The US military says the number of civilian deaths has also fallen 60 per cent since the surge took effect, with a drop of 75 per cent in Baghdad. According to icasualties.org, the average monthly US death toll dropped from 96 for the first half of 2007 to 66 in the past four months. The average monthly death toll for Iraqi civilians and security forces has dropped from 2,157 to 1,223 in the same period.
...
Link (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ca653412-97b4-11dc-9e08-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1)
A simple question to asked Conservative wing-nuts...we accept that the increased military presence has provided a reduction in violence (at the cost of additional American lives). However, the troops supporting the surge are now scheduled for eventual withdrawal. Given that the Iraqi Government has squandered this opportunity to achieve political reconciliation during the surge, are you prepared to publicly support sending these troops back to Iraq if the security situation worsens as troops leave?
By Stephen Fidler in London and Demetri Sevastopulo in Washington
November 20 2007 22:15
Violence in Iraq has fallen at a rate that has surprised military commanders and even one of the architects of the “surge” that boosted US troop numbers in the country this year, according to figures gathered by the US.
The figures show the numbers of suicide attacks, roadside bombings, mortar and other attacks on US forces and on the Iraqi population have more than halved since 30,000 extra troops in June. The military attributes the decline to the surge, the spread of local ceasefire deals across Iraq, a ceasefire by radical Shia militias and an improvement in the Iraqi security forces.
Jack Keane, the former army general who helped persuade George W. Bush, US president, to increase troop numbers in Iraq, said the decrease in violence was “phenomenal” and had occurred far faster than he had expected. “When you understand you are dealing with the complexity of a counter-insurgency operation which can take years to resolve, to have this dramatic a success in a short period of time, it’s unprecedented,” he said.
...
The US military says the number of civilian deaths has also fallen 60 per cent since the surge took effect, with a drop of 75 per cent in Baghdad. According to icasualties.org, the average monthly US death toll dropped from 96 for the first half of 2007 to 66 in the past four months. The average monthly death toll for Iraqi civilians and security forces has dropped from 2,157 to 1,223 in the same period.
...
Link (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ca653412-97b4-11dc-9e08-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1)
A simple question to asked Conservative wing-nuts...we accept that the increased military presence has provided a reduction in violence (at the cost of additional American lives). However, the troops supporting the surge are now scheduled for eventual withdrawal. Given that the Iraqi Government has squandered this opportunity to achieve political reconciliation during the surge, are you prepared to publicly support sending these troops back to Iraq if the security situation worsens as troops leave?