PDA

View Full Version : Nets Turned Down Jason Kidd Extension



Mr.Bottomtooth
12-02-2007, 05:22 PM
Kidd rebuffed on extension
Sunday, December 02, 2007
BY DAVE D'ALESSANDRO
Star-Ledger Staff
As it turns out, Jason Kidd wasn't plotting an exit strategy at all when he had his rant in Salt Lake City 13 days ago.

In effect, he was trying to form a more lasting union.

The Nets had turned down Kidd's appeal for a contract extension just days before he made his bleak assertion about the team's future, according to three people close to the point guard who requested anonymity so as not to damage his relationship with the team.

The 13th-year pro, one of the great players of his generation, makes $19.7 million this season and $21.4 million next year, the final year of his deal, which makes him eligible for a one-year extension for the 2009-10 season -- or a two-year extension, if he waits until this summer.

But Kidd would be 36 when that $24 million thank-you gift would kick in, so when agent Jeff Schwartz asked team president Rod Thorn to discuss it, he was told it isn't in the cards.

That rejection, Kidd's associates say, was at the root of his frustration -- though the team's play had a lot to do with it as well.

"Let's face it, he considers himself the face of the franchise, and feels he should be rewarded as such," one associate said. "And he's still busting his butt, playing better than ever, and sees that they're rewarding other guys. You can understand why the greatest player in franchise history believes he deserves to get what other guys are getting."

That was a reference to Vince Carter's $61.8 million extension, which he signed this past summer. The difference, of course, is that Carter is only 30. So Thorn informed Schwartz that ownership cannot pay close to that sum for someone who turns 37 during that extension year.

Kidd, who in days following the Salt Lake City snit said he wants to remain in New Jersey, would not comment on the specifics of his contract discussions.

http://www.nj.com/sports/ledger/index.ssf?/base/sports-1/119657557522160.xml&coll=1

itzsoweezee
12-02-2007, 06:00 PM
nets are fucking stupid. they grossly overpaid for that scrub vince carter. like i said last year, rjeff is a much better player than carter.

Kamnik
12-02-2007, 06:34 PM
nets are fucking stupid. they grossly overpaid for that scrub vince carter. like i said last year, rjeff is a much better player than carter.
i agree

they should have traded carter for a decent big and they would be in a good position

SpursIndonesia
12-03-2007, 10:04 AM
If Carter's a scrub, then who would trade a DECENT big for a scrub like him ? :lol

Axl Van Dam
12-05-2007, 07:42 AM
If Carter's a scrub, then who would trade a DECENT big for a scrub like him ? :lol

:smokin Hmmm how about the Knicks? :smokin

spurs_fan_in_exile
12-05-2007, 12:23 PM
Carter is entirely overpaid, but that's hardly a good reason to turn around and give 24 mil to a 37 year old player. I don't deny that even at that age Kidd is still one of the top PG's in the league, there's no way to justify spending that kind of cash on a guy on a guy at the tail end of his career. The Heat sold their cap souls to get Shaq and a championship, and that contract is going to slow down any sort of plans to build a real competitive team around Wade. Kidd sticking around for another year doesn't bring even the hope of a championship.

PM5K
12-05-2007, 12:27 PM
It's always interesting if you follow basketball long enough to eventually see these guys signing to play for scrub pay checks.