View Full Version : this team does not need mailman
ducks
12-28-2004, 10:55 PM
why mess with something that is not broken
ChumpDumper
12-28-2004, 10:58 PM
No personnel changes
(until the next loss)
Rummpd
12-28-2004, 11:38 PM
Dah - Scola next year is all we need to ensure dynasty.
MadDoc
Ginofan
12-29-2004, 12:29 AM
A Mailman Elbow would've been nice after Manu was getting beat up.
SequSpur
12-29-2004, 01:54 AM
The Spurs need another big man, how many times does Horry need to bail Rasho out?
Aud21946
12-29-2004, 02:07 AM
Agreed! The Kandi man ....( T - Wolfs ) Sounds like a better look now.
Aggie Hoopsfan
12-29-2004, 02:09 AM
We need another enforcer, especially come playoff time vs. Seattle and Minny.
Does San Antonio NEED Malone? No.
Should we pick him up if the chance arises? Probably
airjer15
12-29-2004, 09:02 AM
if you have a Bently, and you add 24" spinners, it is still a Bently just a nicer one
angel_luv
12-29-2004, 03:38 PM
Let's put aside southern hospitality in this instance and tell the mailman to return himself to sender.
gregcoy
12-29-2004, 04:13 PM
if we can get him for the vets minimum why not? and no we dont need kandi on our team...he has a terrible attitude and kareem said he wasn't interested in learning anything from him.
emveepee
12-29-2004, 06:06 PM
I think Malone will be a great addition for the Spurs especially come play-off time.
angel_luv
12-30-2004, 08:21 PM
If you object to attitude, then Malone is a no.
Brodels
12-30-2004, 08:48 PM
Agreed! The Kandi man ....( T - Wolfs ) Sounds like a better look now.
Ugh. I'd take Rasho over Kandi any day.
Ugh. I'd take Rasho over Kandi any day.
I would too, only because Rasho has been healthy (knock on wood)....
angel_luv
12-30-2004, 09:12 PM
Rasho is sweeter than Kandi !
( haha get it Kandi sounds like candy) Hehe!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.