duncan228
01-20-2008, 11:32 AM
http://blogs.mysanantonio.com/weblogs/courtside/archives/2008/01/jeff_mcdonald_a_7.html
Jeff McDonald: Another no cigar
Rockets 83, Spurs 81.
That was the final score Saturday night from Houston's Toyota Center, but this could have been Thursday night against the Cleveland LeBrons at the AT&T Center or earlier this month in Denver or Oakland.
You've seen this game before Spurs fans, like a half dozen times in the span of a month. Spurs play well in spurts, Spurs fade for a too-long stretch, Spurs battle back, Spurs have a chance to win at the end ... and then don't.
All told, the Spurs have dropped 10 of their last 18, and haven't beaten a team above .500 in more than a month. If the playoffs started today, the defending champs would be the sixth seed out of the Western Conference.
Much like how it's hard to tell if an economic recession is coming until you're smack in the middle of one, it's hard to tell if this is just another of the Spurs' patented January swoons, or if it is something more catastrophic than that.
This much is certain: If the Spurs were a stock, most folks would be selling.
But step back from the ledge, Spurs fans. We're here to tell you the glass is still half full.
At least the Spurs are losing close. Six of the their losses during their recent slump have come down to the final possession or two of regulation.
Take a look at these losing scores: 100-95 to Phoenix; 88-85 at Memphis; 80-77 at Denver; 130-121 to Golden State (in overtime); 90-88 against Cleveland. Saturday's loss to Houston was simply the same sad song, a different sad verse.
For you eternal optimists in the Spurs' kingdom, it seems as if your favorite team is about six or seven plays away from being 31-7, which would by far give them the best record in the West. Had the Spurs simply split those six games, they'd be 28-10 and still sitting atop the conference.
But, of course, they're not. They are 25-13. Which begs the honest question: When are these guys going to figure out a way to win a close game?
The Spurs' turnaround, in all likelihood, won't begin in earnest until they answer it.
Jeff McDonald: Another no cigar
Rockets 83, Spurs 81.
That was the final score Saturday night from Houston's Toyota Center, but this could have been Thursday night against the Cleveland LeBrons at the AT&T Center or earlier this month in Denver or Oakland.
You've seen this game before Spurs fans, like a half dozen times in the span of a month. Spurs play well in spurts, Spurs fade for a too-long stretch, Spurs battle back, Spurs have a chance to win at the end ... and then don't.
All told, the Spurs have dropped 10 of their last 18, and haven't beaten a team above .500 in more than a month. If the playoffs started today, the defending champs would be the sixth seed out of the Western Conference.
Much like how it's hard to tell if an economic recession is coming until you're smack in the middle of one, it's hard to tell if this is just another of the Spurs' patented January swoons, or if it is something more catastrophic than that.
This much is certain: If the Spurs were a stock, most folks would be selling.
But step back from the ledge, Spurs fans. We're here to tell you the glass is still half full.
At least the Spurs are losing close. Six of the their losses during their recent slump have come down to the final possession or two of regulation.
Take a look at these losing scores: 100-95 to Phoenix; 88-85 at Memphis; 80-77 at Denver; 130-121 to Golden State (in overtime); 90-88 against Cleveland. Saturday's loss to Houston was simply the same sad song, a different sad verse.
For you eternal optimists in the Spurs' kingdom, it seems as if your favorite team is about six or seven plays away from being 31-7, which would by far give them the best record in the West. Had the Spurs simply split those six games, they'd be 28-10 and still sitting atop the conference.
But, of course, they're not. They are 25-13. Which begs the honest question: When are these guys going to figure out a way to win a close game?
The Spurs' turnaround, in all likelihood, won't begin in earnest until they answer it.