This just sounds so beautiful

[peewee's lovechild]

February 7, 2008 --

SCARLETT Johansson (below) has a steamy lesbian sex scene with Penelope Cruz in Woody Allen's upcoming "Vicky Cristina Barcelona." A source tells us: "It is also extremely erotic. People will be blown away and even shocked. Penelope and Scarlett go at it in a red-tinted photography dark room, and it will leave the audience gasping." The women later have a threesome with Javier Bardem (below), who plays Cruz's husband. The film also stars Patricia Clarkson, Rebecca Hall, Kevin Dunn and Chris Messina.

************************************************** *******************************

http://www.nypost.com/seven/02072008/gossip/pagesix/sapphic_steam_441536.htm

[spurs_fan_in_exile]

I'm getting mixed messages Peewee. The line about Scarlet and Penelope getting it on is bolded, showing that it is a point of emphasis (and rightfully so!). However the next line is underlined AND in italics, meaning that twice as much emphasis is put on that line. It would seem that you are saying that you are interested some hot Johannson on Cruz action, but twice as interested in the fact that Javier Bardim gets a sex scene as well.

[peewee's lovechild]

Dude, a threesome is always good.

It's the closest we'll get to having a Scarlett porn.

First a lesbian scene, then a threesome???
How fucking sweet is that?

[T Park]

Wow when does this movie come out....

[bigzak25]

i don't know that penelope can be any hotter than she was in woman on top.

woody allen movies never interested me until now though.

[peewee's lovechild]

You have to watch "Match Point".

[ATRAIN]

question is will there be nudity or just like back and side profiles.

[atxrocker]

cruz is sooooo fucking overrated it's not even funny. that said, a lesbo scene with scarlett may be worth the watch.

[CuckingFunt]

God damn your decline in talent, Woody Allen, for making me unsure if I want to watch this.

[E20]

WTF is up with Woody Allen always trying to cast Johanseen.

[peewee's lovechild]

God damn your decline in talent, Woody Allen, for making me unsure if I want to watch this.

Match Point is actually one of the best movies he's ever made.

He's still got it.

[peewee's lovechild]

WTF is up with Woody Allen always trying to cast Johanseen.

She's his new muse.

He's said it, she knows it, and she likes being his muse.

[CuckingFunt]

Match Point is actually one of the best movies he's ever made.

He's still got it.I hated that film.

And it wasn't particularly innovative -- pretty much just a remake of his Crimes and Misdemeanors set in London.

[T Park]

What was the name of the movie he made with Hugh Jackman and Scarlett Johannsen. I saw that movie on a plane last year and it was painfully bad.

[CuckingFunt]

What was the name of the movie he made with Hugh Jackman and Scarlett Johannsen. I saw that movie on a plane last year and it was painfully bad.Scoop.

[Ed Helicopter Jones]

WTF is up with Woody Allen always trying to cast Johanseen.

Perhaps because he has a penis?












If I knew her I'd be trying to 'cast' her all the live long day.

[T Park]

Scoop.


Yes thats it.

That movie was like a pocketknife being dug into the back of my head.

[desflood]

I quit watching Woody Allen when he turned out to be a bit of a pedophile.

[E20]

Perhaps because he has a penis?






If I knew her I'd be trying to 'cast' her all the live long day.
No I read exclusively that he has a vagina.

[Ronaldo McDonald]

scarlett mentioned in this interview i read a long time ago that she actually wanted to be naked (it may have been braless) for scene in this movie she was in even though the director didn't want that.

hopefully she does it in this movie. would be cool, and it would be the only reason to go see her in a movie because in every movie i have seen her in she sucks.

[peewee's lovechild]

I hated that film.

And it wasn't particularly innovative -- pretty much just a remake of his Crimes and Misdemeanors set in London.

You're insane.

That movie had great acting and direction.

But, go ahead and hate on Woody if it's cool to do so.

[CuckingFunt]

You're insane.

That movie had great acting and direction.
Sadly, those aren't the only things needed to make a good movie.

[The Dude]

You mean, coitus?

[peewee's lovechild]

Sadly, those aren't the only things needed to make a good movie.

So, there was something wrong with the plot??

If that's where you're going, then I don't think you understood the movie.

[CuckingFunt]

So, there was something wrong with the plot??

If that's where you're going, then I don't think you understood the movie.
I understood it, I just didn't like it.

And is it really necessary to be a condescending prick every time someone disagrees with you?

[Johnny_Blaze_47]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/JavierBardem.jpg

I get the whole Quagmire feel with this exact picture.

"Javier, a threesome with Scarlett and Penelope?"

"Hehe, all right...."

[CuckingFunt]

I get the whole Quagmire feel with this exact picture.

"Javier, a threesome with Scarlett and Penelope?"

"Hehe, all right...."
I can almost hear the "Giggity."

[peewee's lovechild]

I understood it, I just didn't like it.

And is it really necessary to be a condescending prick every time someone disagrees with you?

Yes, pretty much, when the arguement is weak.

You said that acting and directing aren't the only things that make for a good movie. What does that leave? Plot? Art direction? Costume design? Cinematography?

The only obvious thing after acting and directing is the script, or plot of the story. The plot of this story is about a guy who wants to get in good with a rich family at all costs. He's tired of living at the bottom of society. But, just when he gets what he wants, he falls for a vixen that excites his life. He would much rather be with the latter woman, but the woman he married ensures that he would have the life he's always wanted.

He tries to have a little bit of both, but then everything goes wrong when his paramour gets pregnant. The only choice he has, in order to keep his new life, is to kill his paramour.

That sounds like a good plot.

[ploto]

I will never understand the obsession of heterosexual men in watching two women together.

I have ZERO heterosexual female friends who have any interest at all in watching two men go at it, not even if it's Brad Pitt and Orlando Bloom.

[CuckingFunt]

Yes, pretty much, when the arguement is weak.
If my argument was really so weak, then couldn't you prove your point without the condescending response?


You said that acting and directing aren't the only things that make for a good movie. What does that leave? Plot? Art direction? Costume design? Cinematography?

The only obvious thing after acting and directing is the script, or plot of the story. The plot of this story is about a guy who wants to get in good with a rich family at all costs. He's tired of living at the bottom of society. But, just when he gets what he wants, he falls for a vixen that excites his life. He would much rather be with the latter woman, but the woman he married ensures that he would have the life he's always wanted.

He tries to have a little bit of both, but then everything goes wrong when his paramour gets pregnant. The only choice he has, in order to keep his new life, is to kill his paramour.

That sounds like a good plot.
Which is probably why you liked it.

To me, however, it sounds very much like the plot of a film that Woody Allen himself made twenty years ago. And I didn't much like it the first time.

When a director, for the second time, makes a film in which the male lead can fuck over and eventually kill a woman without suffering any consequences whatsoever, my inner female creep-o-meter starts to go off pretty vociferously and it doesn't make for a particularly pleasurable movie watching experience.

[RashoFan]

Thanks Ploto, I would have never ever paired Brad and Orlando in any regards to any homosexual...anything. Now I may never be able to look upon there beautiful faces without the urge to :vomit:
Thanks a lot! :dramaquee

[mrsmaalox]

..

[Johnny_Blaze_47]

I will never understand the obsession of heterosexual men in watching two women together.

I have ZERO heterosexual female friends who have any interest at all in watching two men go at it, not even if it's Brad Pitt and Orlando Bloom.

http://www.smbc-comics.com/comics/20071212.gif

[1369]

Giggity?

http://celebslam.buzznet.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/penelope-cruz-hayek-lesbian-7.jpg

http://kscakes.com/LolCats/Uploads/Saved/do-want-dowantdowantdowant.jpg

[CuckingFunt]

It appears that picture was taken at the premiere of Bandidas.

Which was a completely horrible film, of course, unless you count the magnificent performance given by Salma Hayek's tits and ass. Truly award worthy.

[1369]

Which was a completely horrible film, of course, unless you count the magnificent performance given by Salma Hayek's tits and ass. Truly award worthy.

Why yes....yes they are....

http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/1148/salmahayekdusktildawnfarm7.jpg

/Six more weeks in the bunk

[atxrocker]

I will never understand the obsession of heterosexual men in watching two women together.



for the record, i have ZERO interest in seeing two nasty ass butch dykes going at eachother. now, two hot sexy freaky chicks getting nasty is never a bad thing.

[jman3000]

trade in hayek for penelope and you have solid gold.

solid in more than one way.

[CuckingFunt]

trade in hayek for penelope and you have solid gold.

solid in more than one way.Ditto x 1,000.

:hungry:







Well... not so much the last part.

[peewee's lovechild]

When a director, for the second time, makes a film in which the male lead can fuck over and eventually kill a woman without suffering any consequences whatsoever, my inner female creep-o-meter starts to go off pretty vociferously and it doesn't make for a particularly pleasurable movie watching experience.


Feminism must've killed so many good movies for you.

[CuckingFunt]

Feminism must've killed so many good movies for you.No. Not really. Match Point was just one of the few that really, really bothered me and made me feel uncomfortable.

Its overwhelmingly anti-feminist point of view was certainly not helping things, but in general I'm not a fan of films where I can't find a single character with whom I can sympathize. Or, if not sympathize, at least a character whose actions make sense within the framework of the film.

[peewee's lovechild]

No. Not really. Match Point was just one of the few that really, really bothered me and made me feel uncomfortable.

Its overwhelmingly anti-feminist point of view was certainly not helping things, but in general I'm not a fan of films where I can't find a single character with whom I can sympathize. Or, if not sympathize, at least a character whose actions make sense within the framework of the film.

You couldn't sympathize with any of the women??

That doesn't make much sense.

The fact that the lead character bothered you so much should have given you a better appreciation for the women in the film. You should have been empathizing with them.

[spurs_fan_in_exile]

Which was a completely horrible film, of course, unless you count the magnificent performance given by Salma Hayek's tits and ass. Truly award worthy.
GREATEST ACCEPTANCE SPEECH EVER.

[CuckingFunt]

You couldn't sympathize with any of the women??

That doesn't make much sense.

The fact that the lead character bothered you so much should have given you a better appreciation for the women in the film. You should have been empathizing with them.The women in that film were merely plot points, and not fleshed out characters. Which was kind of the problem.

Scarlett Johansson's character in particular was written more as a problem for which we need to find a solution, rather than an actual human female with actual human feelings, motivations, and emotions. Bad girl - make trouble - need die. Character done.

[ploto]

Thanks Ploto, I would have never ever paired Brad and Orlando in any regards to any homosexual...anything. Now I may never be able to look upon there beautiful faces without the urge to :vomit:
Thanks a lot! :dramaquee
My point exactly-- not an image you drool over.

[peewee's lovechild]

The women in that film were merely plot points, and not fleshed out characters. Which was kind of the problem.

Scarlett Johansson's character in particular was written more as a problem for which we need to find a solution, rather than an actual human female with actual human feelings, motivations, and emotions. Bad girl - make trouble - need die. Character done.

You're missing the essence of the movie.

How far will you go to get what you want? What are you willing to do??

This wasn't about Woody degrading women.

[CuckingFunt]

You're missing the essence of the movie.

How far will you go to get what you want? What are you willing to do??

This wasn't about Woody degrading women.I'm not missing the essence of anything.

I get the point Allen was trying to make, I just don't like the way he made it. At no point have I suggested that this film was about Woody Allen degrading women. It was about much more, it just so happened to degrade women along the way.

And, I didn't like it. You did. That's cool.

[peewee's lovechild]

I'm not missing the essence of anything.

I get the point Allen was trying to make, I just don't like the way he made it. At no point have I suggested that this film was about Woody Allen degrading women. It was about much more, it just so happened to degrade women along the way.

And, I didn't like it. You did. That's cool.

So, all movies that happen to degrade women, intentionally or not, are bad movies in your opinion?

[peewee's lovechild]

Because the Godfather movies should be shit for you.

[CuckingFunt]

So, all movies that happen to degrade women, intentionally or not, are bad movies in your opinion?No. There are several films in my collection that I know for a fact are degrading to women, but they had enough else going for them that I was at least entertained. Match Point isn't one of those films.

[peewee's lovechild]

No. There are several films in my collection that I know for a fact are degrading to women, but they had enough else going for them that I was at least entertained. Match Point isn't one of those films.

Do you like the Godfather movies?

[CuckingFunt]

Do you like the Godfather movies?Very much so, yes.

[peewee's lovechild]

But, how could you?

The Senator kills a woman and he get's away with it.

Sonny constantly treats his women like chattel.

Michael beats up on his wife and takes her children from her. He makes a servant out of his sister. Apolonia is just a background character.

For someone who has a strong feminist point of view, these are hard movies for you to defend.

[CuckingFunt]

But, how could you?

The Senator kills a woman and he get's away with it.

Sonny constantly treats his women like chattel.

Michael beats up on his wife and takes her children from her. He makes a servant out of his sister. Apolonia is just a background character.

For someone who has a strong feminist point of view, these are hard movies for you to defend.You're arguing points that I never even tried to make. And doing a piss poor job of it, to boot.

Firstly, the moments you mentioned are minor plot points and not the thrust of the entire film/trilogy.

Secondly, as a woman of Sicilian descent, I can feel very secure in saying that the misogyny inherent in that culture is a pretty important part of establishing the make-up of the individual characters and their community as a whole. The Godfather is not a film in which an otherwise mild mannered tennis pro sees murder as the only way to clean up a mess he made, it's a film depicting a family/lifestyle in which violence is a very real and frequent part of their daily lives.

Lastly, this "strong feminist point of view" is something created entirely out of your imagination. I'm pretty much as far from a militant feminist as one could be. As I've already said, I can overlook certain instances of degradation and objectification for the sake of entertainment. The Godfather, and its sequel, is a film that had enough going for it outside of its treatment of women that I was still entertained and engaged by what what happening on the screen. Match Point, on the other hand, was not.

[peewee's lovechild]

You're arguing points that I never even tried to make. And doing a piss poor job of it, to boot.

Firstly, the moments you mentioned are minor plot points and not the thrust of the entire film/trilogy.

Secondly, as a woman of Sicilian descent, I can feel very secure in saying that the misogyny inherent in that culture is a pretty important part of establishing the make-up of the individual characters and their community as a whole. The Godfather is not a film in which an otherwise mild mannered tennis pro sees murder as the only way to clean up a mess he made, it's a film depicting a family/lifestyle in which violence is a very real and frequent part of their daily lives.

Lastly, this "strong feminist point of view" is something created entirely out of your imagination. I'm pretty much as far from a militant feminist as one could be. As I've already said, I can overlook certain instances of degradation and objectification for the sake of entertainment. The Godfather, and its sequel, is a film that had enough going for it outside of its treatment of women that I was still entertained and engaged by what what happening on the screen. Match Point, on the other hand, was not.


Oh, I get it.

A little bit of misogyny is okay. And, it's okay if it's part of the culture. But, it's bad if a tennis player kills a woman.

Got it.

[midgetonadonkey]

I think CuckingFunt wins.

[CuckingFunt]

Got it.
Not even close.

But, I suspect you know that. And I've already been dragged further into this pointless argument than I ever wanted to go.

[peewee's lovechild]

I think CuckingFunt wins.

I think you're right.

One can never win an argument vs. a feminist.

[spurs_fan_in_exile]

How did a thread about some potential on screen HLA get turned into such a downer?

[1369]

How did a thread about some potential on screen HLA get turned into such a downer?
Because peewee is an idiot.

[midgetonadonkey]

peewee=spurstalks biggest dumbass

[marini martini]

Because peewee is an idiot.


:toast