View Full Version : Dramatic video of Hillary Clinton ducking sniper fire during trip to Bosnia
PixelPusher
03-22-2008, 07:32 PM
"I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base." - Hillary Clinton (http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/speech/view/?id=6553)
iOsGo_HWP-c
Shame on Bill for exposing his wife AND his daughter to such mortal peril!
The agility of a C-130?
Yea, I can totally see that.
And somebody forgot to tell that 8 year old to duck as well.
Yonivore
03-23-2008, 12:45 AM
It's as if the Clinton machine doesn't know the internet, video storage devices, and human memory exists.
Wild Cobra
03-23-2008, 06:59 PM
Well, we all know she's a chronic liar. I can give her a little slack though. I'm sure she is ignorant of the difference between a combat landing, and evasive maneuvers.
Wow...now that's some good stuff.
Nbadan
03-24-2008, 01:51 AM
Well, we all know she's a chronic liar. I can give her a little slack though. I'm sure she is ignorant of the difference between a combat landing, and evasive maneuvers.
WC is becoming a Clinton stooge...now that's classic!
:hat
AFE7FATMAN
03-24-2008, 11:58 AM
It's as if the Clinton machine doesn't know the internet, video storage devices, and human memory exists.
They should have known - They had a Vice President that invented the internet :spin
IceColdBrewski
03-24-2008, 12:20 PM
That poor child was obviously wearing a bomb, so Hillary bravely went in and disarmed it using her teeth.
Doc Jerome
03-24-2008, 02:14 PM
This is just one more incident of HRC lying. It's a pattern of behavior over many years. She was lying and using unethical practices when she was 27 years old:
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/print/hillarys-crocodile-tears-in-connecticut
If Senator Clinton has gravitas and experience, then why would she continue to lie about her experience?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/07/nobel-winner-hillarys-n_n_90505.html
http://www.againsthillary.com/2008/03/14/hillary-clintons-role-in-health-program-disputed/
More of Senator Clinton's lies:
http://www.thebluesite.com/archives/000527.html
http://www.againsthillary.com/2008/03/22/hillary-clintons-nafta-nonsense/
http://www.againsthillary.com/2008/03/22/bill-clinton-lying-for-his-wife-does-hillary-attend-her-committee-meetings/
http://www.againsthillary.com/2008/03/19/hillary-clinton-a-long-way-from-the-white-house-at-key-foreign-policy-moments/
http://www.againsthillary.com/2008/03/19/hillary-clinton-boasted-about-first-lady-role/
Yonivore
03-24-2008, 02:23 PM
This is just one more incident of HRC lying. It's a pattern of behavior over many years. She was lying and using unethical practices when she was 27 years old:
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/print/hillarys-crocodile-tears-in-connecticut
If Senator Clinton has gravitas and experience, then why would she continue to lie about her experience?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/07/nobel-winner-hillarys-n_n_90505.html
http://www.againsthillary.com/2008/03/14/hillary-clintons-role-in-health-program-disputed/
More of Senator Clinton's lies:
http://www.thebluesite.com/archives/000527.html
http://www.againsthillary.com/2008/03/22/hillary-clintons-nafta-nonsense/
http://www.againsthillary.com/2008/03/22/bill-clinton-lying-for-his-wife-does-hillary-attend-her-committee-meetings/
http://www.againsthillary.com/2008/03/19/hillary-clinton-a-long-way-from-the-white-house-at-key-foreign-policy-moments/
http://www.againsthillary.com/2008/03/19/hillary-clinton-boasted-about-first-lady-role/
She's lying to you about big oil too, Doc.
Doc Jerome
03-24-2008, 05:26 PM
She's lying to you about big oil too, Doc.
You must work for an oil company, that is the only explanation for it.
Yonivore
03-24-2008, 06:24 PM
You must work for an oil company, that is the only explanation for it.
No, the other explanation could be that you're wrong, she's lying, and that you suffer from some kind of envy that you can't be as prosperous as some.
Wild Cobra
03-24-2008, 07:24 PM
WC is becoming a Clinton stooge...now that's classic!
:hat
Oh really? I call her a chronic liar and ignorant, and I'm a Clinton stooge?
I guess that's better than being NAMBLA-Dan...
BonnerDynasty
03-24-2008, 08:39 PM
That poor child was obviously wearing a bomb, so Hillary bravely went in and disarmed it using her teeth.
"If you set off that bomb little girl, I will personally suck out your soul and feed it to my blood hounds of the apocalypse."
inconvertible
03-24-2008, 09:59 PM
Hillary, duck.
inconvertible
03-24-2008, 10:01 PM
Hillary is not that bad looking, I'd hit it.
Yonivore
03-24-2008, 10:24 PM
Hillary is not that bad looking, I'd hit it.
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/TexasFred/Political%20Pics/UglyHillary.jpg
I wouldn't hit it with your red-tipped cane.
inconvertible
03-24-2008, 11:14 PM
ok, maybe if we were back in bosnia.
GaryJohnston
03-24-2008, 11:57 PM
The Clinton Machine will do anything(lie, point fingers, rewrite history, kill) to get what they want. I resent her for this latest mishap.
Nothing new from her camp, just like she lied about being heavily involved in bringing peace to Ireland. :rolleyes
Bitch Please.
Nbadan
03-26-2008, 03:36 PM
Looks like Hitlary wasn't stretching the truth...
uHVEDq6RVXc
YouTube
03-26-2008, 03:46 PM
Good job guys. :lmao
smeagol
03-26-2008, 03:52 PM
GGA and peewee are working on the comeback as we speak.
UV Ray
03-26-2008, 04:30 PM
:lol
Nbadan
03-28-2008, 04:26 PM
Campaign collapsing? Lie.....
SBCmKkLdCuA
Wild Cobra
03-28-2008, 04:44 PM
Looks like Hitlary wasn't stretching the truth...
If this incident is just streaching the truth, what do you call a lie?
Ocotillo
03-28-2008, 06:28 PM
If this incident is just streaching the truth, what do you call a lie?
Saying we don't wiretap American citizens in this country without a warrant.
Wild Cobra
03-28-2008, 07:39 PM
Saying we don't wiretap American citizens in this country without a warrant.
Yep, that would be a lie.
The constitution does not require a warrant. A warrant is a legal order for enforcement to act. The act it self only requires probable cause for the executive branch. Some actions by police and other enforcement activities also only require probable cause. The constitution only protects from "UNREASONABLE" actions.
Nbadan
03-28-2008, 11:45 PM
The constitution does not require a warrant. A warrant is a legal order for enforcement to act. The act it self only requires probable cause for the executive branch. Some actions by police and other enforcement activities also only require probable cause. The constitution only protects from "UNREASONABLE" actions.
Oh please, that's why we have the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act..
The act was created to provide Judicial and congressional oversight of the government's covert surveillance activities of foreign entities and individuals in the United States, while maintaining the secrecy needed to protect national security. It allowed warrant-less surveillance within the United States for up to one year unless the "surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party". If a United States person is involved, judicial authorization was required within 72 hours after surveillance begins....
The act created a court which meets in secret, and approves or denies requests for search warrants. Only the number of warrants applied for, issued and denied, is reported. In 1980 (the first full year after its inception), it approved 322 warrants.[2] This number has steadily grown to 2224 warrants[3] in 2006. In the period 1979-2006 a total of 22,990 applications for warrants were made to the Court of which 22,985 were approved (sometimes with modifications; or with the splitting up, or combining together, of warrants for legal purposes), and only 5 were definitively rejected.
Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Act)
I guess that was 5 to many for some conservatives?
Wild Cobra
03-29-2008, 04:58 PM
Dan, what you posted is true to a point and concerning cases not under the executive branch. Legal decisions have expanded the protections under the fourth amendment, but such decisions cannot bind the executive branch as the president is the executor of law. They can only bind lower law enforcement activities not serving the interests of the Executor.
Read the fourth amendment carefully and note the "unreasonable" aspect of it. Now here are the definitions for "warrant":
1. An act, instrument, or obligation, by which one person authorizes another to do something which he has not otherwise a right to do; an act or instrument investing one with a right or authority, and thus securing him from loss or damage; authority; commission; sanction.
2. A legal instrument ordering a judicial act, such as an arrest, search, etc., to be executed by an officer of the court.
3. A writing that authorizes a person to receive money or other things; a license.
4. The certificate of appointment given to a noncommissioned officer or the Army or Navy.
5. A voucher; that which attests or proves; an attestation.
6. That which secures; security; guarantee, pledge; assurance given.
Definition one is used on a regular basis to protect the police from liability. Definition 2 is as I said, an order to take such actions. Notice that no definition says a warrant is required to take action.
Again, look at the constitution. It is written for plain folks to understand. However, words and phases are not used the same today. You must understand the definition s of then, not now. If such an action isn't unreasonable, then it is often reasonable and therefore legal without a warrant! Things like the FISA law allow less than reasonable suspicion to be decided and acted upon by enforcement activities not immediately authorized under the president. There are large gray areas normally between reasonable and unreasonable, especially when dealing with different peoples experiences and values. Still, the law is needed so the president or his delegated appointee does not need to act individually on every case. This allows the FBI and other enforcement to act without disciplinary actions taken.
BonnerDynasty
03-29-2008, 05:56 PM
IT WASN'T A LIE!!!
uHVEDq6RVXc
mouse
03-30-2008, 02:05 AM
Just think if you posted a video of every time Bush lied! :lmao
:lol
or Tpark's arteries.
Spurtacular
08-27-2019, 08:12 AM
Pavlov
You didn't even want to check-in as present for this one.
benefactor
08-27-2019, 08:29 AM
You really do think about him all day long, don't you?
Thread
08-27-2019, 11:13 AM
You really do think about him all day long, don't you?
As you think about Florida all day long.
+ you think about this as well as Florida::: Zogby Analytics 86 percent...chance the old man will get that xtra 4 years to pulverize your tight ass.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.