The Two Faces of Hillary Clinton

[Nbadan]

Powerful viral video exposes Clinton..


bmyYCMoT8c4

[Yonivore]

If the left had been paying attention to the right for the past 16 years, they'd already know all this.

[JoeChalupa]

If the left had been paying attention to the right for the past 16 years, they'd already know all this.

Does everything always have to be "right" or "left" to you!?!?!? That is the freakin' problem!!! Damn!!

[Yonivore]

Does everything always have to be "right" or "left" to you!?!?!? That is the freakin' problem!!! Damn!!
Okay, if EVERYONE had been paying attention to Hillary's critics for the past 16 years, NO ONE would be surprised that she's a lying, opportunistic, power hungry, immoral, hypocritical, two-faced, she-devil.

Better?

[GaryJohnston]

Okay, if EVERYONE had been paying attention to Hillary's critics for the past 16 years, NO ONE would be surprised that she's a lying, opportunistic, power hungry, immoral, hypocritical, two-faced, she-devil.

Better?

:tu

[BonnerDynasty]

:tu


hahaha Curb your enthusiasm FTW

I say that quote in my head almost every time I hear Obama's name.

[trueD]

...

[Nbadan]

Oppssss she did it again...


In Eugene, Ore., Saturday. Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., attempted to change the measure by which anyone might assess who criticized the Iraq war first, her or Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., by saying those keeping records should start in January 2005, when Obama joined the Senate. (A measure that conveniently avoids her October 2002 vote to authorize use of force against Iraq at a time that Obama was speaking out against the war.) She claimed that using that measure, she criticized the war in Iraq before Obama did.

But Clinton's claim was false.

ABC News (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/in-oregon-clint.html)

[inconvertible]

In the beginning(of the USA)the two parties were states rights vs. federalism. now we have two types of federalism and to hell with the states.....rebellion and sedition may be our only recourse.

[Nbadan]

Well, actually in the beginning there were Federalist and Loyalists....

[inconvertible]

when she was young I would have hit it hard.

this video needs to be sent to every media outlet in Pennsylvannia.

[inconvertible]

Well, actually in the beginning there were Federalist and Loyalists....

That was before the fighting broke out.

[Nbadan]

It was the Jacksonian Democrats versus the Lincoln Republican-Democrats....the Jacksonian Democrats morphed into Republicans...while Lincoln's party morphed into Democrats...that's why most of the NE is Democrat...

[Nbadan]

That was before the fighting broke out.


NO, even after the fighting broke out there were many loyalist....they wanted to stay loyal to the King of England...

[inconvertible]

the right wing won't even bring it up, because they don't want to be exposed themselves.

[inconvertible]

NO, even after the fighting broke out there were many loyalist....they wanted to stay loyal to the King of England...


........after the fighting broke out they no longer were "loyalists" they were traitors.

[inconvertible]

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1381/1464689769_72d34ecaf0.jpg

[Nbadan]

...they would rather ride Lincoln's imaginary coat-tails, even though Lincoln was no Republican...I wonder what wing-nut pundits would say today about the emancipation proclamation?

[Nbadan]

........after the fighting broke out they no longer were "loyalists" they were traitors.


Maybe, but they got their land back, meanwhile, well,...... the trail-of-tears....fourty acres and a mule.......hell, we even paid France and Spain for Manifest Destiny...

[inconvertible]

^^^WTF......I think its time for you to take your medications^^^

its called "flight of ideas".....I would look into it.

[Nbadan]

I would look up the Treaty of Paris........

[Nbadan]

From Bosnia and back...


exsmFDYyK4U

[Nbadan]

It's Impossible to be Proud of the Way Hillary Has Run This Campaign
By Cenk Uygur



I feel like asking the same question about elitists that Jim Mora once famously asked about the playoffs. Elitists?! Elitists?! We're talking about elitists?!

The Clinton and McCain families both have over $100 million. Barack Obama has a father from Kenya and mother from Kansas. Who are they kidding about elitism?

I don't think money is necessarily the determinative factor in whether you're an elitist or not. And I think the Clintons did work their way up in this world. But to claim that a guy like Obama who built his success completely on his own and from the bottom up is an elitist is beyond ridiculous. In fact, it's worse; it's Republican.

Republicans charge Democrats with being elitists every campaign cycle as they themselves are dripping with money, status and privilege. And they get away with it every time. George W. Bush's grandfather was a senator, his father was president, he went to Andover, Yale and Harvard - and he claimed the Democrats were elitists and he was the regular guy you could have a beer with (ignoring the fact that he is an alcoholic).

And the media lets them get away with this insane shell game. You can say Obama went to Harvard, too. But one thing is for sure -- his daddy didn't get him in. There is all the difference in the world between having your family name get you into Harvard and earning your way in. One makes you privileged and upper class; the other makes you an American success story.

One more thing about Obama. When he got out of Harvard Law, he could have made a lot of money in private industry. Instead, he went to work for disadvantaged communities in Chicago. This guy spent his life helping the poor when he could have been stinking rich instead. And now they call him elitist and the media mindlessly goes along with it http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=how_blue_is... .

Meanwhile, McCain wants to give away billions of dollars in tax breaks to the richest people in America. And he has the nerve to bring up elitism? He married a woman who is a multi-millionaire. He is from the party that stands up for multi-millionaires. And he is going to accuse a guy who came up from nothing and helped others struggling to do the same of being an elitist? How can the media not see through this mind-numbingly obvious political hackery?

Now, Hillary is playing this game, too. And this is what pisses me off about her the most. She buys into everything Republicans say about Democrats. She has now resorted to using GOP Politics 101 against Obama. Not only is this damaging to our eventual candidate (every dollar she spends now is a dollar in McCain's pocket), not only is it infuriating because it has absolutely no validity but it is also ultimately self-defeating.

Once she accepts the Republican framing, she has done their job for them. Even in the wildly implausible scenario that she becomes the Democratic candidate, she is signing her own political death warrant by agreeing to all of the Republican attacks against Democrats.

If she wants to be the candidate who is reflexively pro-gun, accuses others of not being sufficiently religious and charges Democrats of being elitists when they're trying to stand up for the little guy, she can piss off and become a Republican already.

Seriously, who is still proud to say they are a Hillary Clinton supporter? Are you proud of this campaign? Has she inspired you? Has she made you proud to be a Democrat?

If you're a Clinton supporter at this point and you're honest with yourself, you know she's running a Republican campaign against him. You might trick yourself into thinking she is just being tough and doing what's necessary. But she certainly isn't the one fighting for our world-view and our vision of what makes this country great. You might think she has to win by any means necessary, but you're certainly not proud of her.

Let's elect a Democrat who doesn't actually mind being a Democrat.


The Young Turk (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cenk-uygur/its-impossible...)

[Spurtacular]

Powerful viral video exposes Clinton..


bmyYCMoT8c4



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsIsnIhmOcU