Who would you rather have?

[mavs>spurs2]

Discuss.
http://www.waikiki-islanders.com/assets/round-turd-big.jpg
http://www.nba.com/media/espanol/scola_rockets_250.jpg

[GuerillaBlack]

This thread fails.

[SCOLA4MVP]

Well i'm obviously a little biased being the biggest Scola fan, but even I have to adit i'd probably go with Turd.

Rockets for Life.

[word]

http://videodetective.com/photos/356/014974_24.jpg

[mavsfan1000]

A turd of course.

[Mr.Bottomtooth]

Giant douche or turd sandwich?

http://images.southparkstudios.com/media/images/808/808_img_11.jpg http://images.southparkstudios.com/media/images/808/808_img_10.jpg

[mavs>spurs2]

Seriously Scola is like the worst starter in the nba, at least the turd isn't expected to play big minutes. Plus the turd has better D because theres a better chance of an opposing player slipping on the turd rather than Scola getting a stop.

[BonnerDynasty]

Watching the Spurs go into scoring droughts followed by the defense cracking smells shitty enough.

I'd take Scola.




Whoops nvm. Bonner is a defensive juggernaut.

[DAF86]

Seriously Scola is like the worst starter in the nba, at least the turd isn't expected to play big minutes. Plus the turd has better D because theres a better chance of an opposing player slipping on the turd rather than Scola getting a stop.

Seriously?...really?

[Vinnie_Johnson]

http://www.sakebomb.com/news/images/jeffandshit.jpg

A big pile of crap

[DiRkGOHARD]

Turd is the truth

[Obstructed_View]

Turd had no buyout.

[ChuckD]

Turd had no buyout.
:lmao

[mavs>spurs2]

Well there you have it Scola is the equivalent of a piece of shit. No defense, no real basketball moves, just moves around and tries to get layups off of tmacs playmaking abilities. He does hustle though, I guess I can give him that much credit.

[Mr.Bottomtooth]

Turd had no buyout.
:lmao owned.

[DiRkGOHARD]

Not enough hustle compared to Heath.