View Full Version : Chris Paul is good, but Deron Williams OWNS him.......
lebomb
04-22-2008, 09:35 AM
............look at their past match ups. Deron clearly has the edge in every single statistic, including more victories against one another. :downspin:
sribb43
04-22-2008, 09:37 AM
id wish theyd play each other in the playoffs so D-Will could dominate CP3 and shut everyone up
lebomb
04-22-2008, 09:39 AM
id wish theyd play each other in the playoffs so D-Will could dominate CP3 and shut everyone up
X2.........Man, Im agreeing with a Maverick???? :wtf
ShoogarBear
04-22-2008, 09:40 AM
Uh, them meeting in the playoffs this year would be very bad.
Uh, them meeting in the playoffs this year would be very bad.
In order for that to happen, not only does Dallas have to lose, so does San Antonio. :lol
Allanon
04-22-2008, 12:18 PM
If Hornets meet Utah in the Playoffs, it's a 4-0 sweep.
DWill takes games against "MVP Candidate" Chris Paul very personally :D
Who are you saying sweeps who?
Str8Ballin
04-22-2008, 02:10 PM
Chris Paul is a little asshole.
Rummpd
04-22-2008, 03:48 PM
Count the rings:
Parker 3
Paul 0
Williams 0
Nash 0
Kidd 0
Billups 1
Iverson (when he played PG) 0
Baron Davis 0
Stephon Marbury (used to be good) 0
Parker more than this whole crowd = A PG role is to win, so gimme Parker anytime!
sribb43
04-22-2008, 03:49 PM
Count the rings:
Parker 3
Paul 0
Williams 0
Nash 0
Kidd 0
Billups 1
Iverson (when he played PG) 0
Baron Davis 0
Stephon Marbury (used to be good) 0
Parker more than this whole crowd = A PG role is to win, so gimme Parker anytime!
um....this thread has nothing to do with TP
balli
04-22-2008, 04:00 PM
Parker more than this whole crowd = A PG role is to win, so gimme Parker anytime!
You're a kook for having that opinion. Parker didn't win those championships, Duncan did. (And fuck the Finals MVP, BTW) I don't even want to be discussing your foolish ideas. I'm sorry I did. Go blow Parker in the Spurs forum if you have to do it.
Deron is the shit. CP3 is great at ball and probably is the better passer, but damn I'll take that size any day. Paul's size and shit poor defense is a major chink in the armor. Deron may not be as great as Paul is at passing and dribbling, but at least he doesn't have two major, major flaws in his game.
JamStone
04-22-2008, 04:05 PM
edit: sorry, quoted the wrong poster...
Count the rings:
Parker 3
Paul 0
Williams 0
Nash 0
Kidd 0
Billups 1
Iverson (when he played PG) 0
Baron Davis 0
Stephon Marbury (used to be good) 0
Parker more than this whole crowd = A PG role is to win, so gimme Parker anytime!
And, then you'll take Derek Fisher second.
monosylab1k
04-22-2008, 04:06 PM
um....this thread has nothing to do with TP
It's always about the Spurs, even when it isn't.
balli
04-22-2008, 04:07 PM
And, then you'll take Derek Fisher second.
:toast :blah
Count the rings:
Parker 3
Paul 0
Williams 0
Nash 0
Kidd 0
Billups 1
Iverson (when he played PG) 0
Baron Davis 0
Stephon Marbury (used to be good) 0
Parker more than this whole crowd = A PG role is to win, so gimme Parker anytime!
I guess BJ armstrong was better than John Stockton, huh?
Tony Parker?
:rolleyes
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.