PDA

View Full Version : OK, The Main Event Has Started, Get Your Gloves on, Pussies



boutons_
06-04-2008, 03:53 PM
Jonah Goldberg Rewrites McCain’s Consistently Wrong Record on Iraq (http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/06/04/jonah-goldberg-rewrites-mccains-consistently-wrong-record-on-iraq/)

By: Jon Perr on Wednesday, June 4th, 2008 at 9:00 AM - PDT


http://static.crooksandliars.com/2008/06/mccain_iraq.thumbnail.JPG (http://static.crooksandliars.com/2008/06/mccain_iraq.JPG)



In the Los Angeles Times today, Jonah Goldberg (http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-goldberg3-2008jun03,0,4829049.column) began the right’s extreme makeover of John McCain’s disastrous record on Iraq (http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/001084.htm). Declaring “there is one candidate who’s been consistently right about the war, and it isn’t the Democrat,” Goldberg invents a fictional McCain at odds with President Bush from the outset of the war:
“Meantime, there was the supposedly dogmatic McCain challenging Bush’s approach to Iraq nearly from the get-go.”
As the history shows, not so much.


Demonstrating that experience is truly no substitute for judgment, John McCain like President Bush was wrong at almost every turn in promoting the invasion and occupation of Iraq. From his predictions of a short war and claims U.S. troops would be greeted as liberators to his announcements of mission accomplished, his ongoing confusion over friend and foe in Iraq and so much more, McCain’s is an unbroken legacy of error.


Here, then, is a brief summary of John McCain’s consistently wrong record (http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/001084.htm) on Iraq:

On the Run-Up to War

“Look, we’re going to send young men and women in harm’s way and that’s always a great danger, but I cannot believe that there is an Iraqi soldier who is going to be willing to die for Saddam Hussein, particularly since he will know that our objective is to remove Saddam Hussein from power.” (John McCain, September 15, 2002 (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/16/ftn/main522136.shtml?CMP=ILC-SearchStories).)

“But the fact is, I think we could go in with much smaller numbers than we had to do in the past. But any military man worth his salt is going to have to prepare for any contingency, but I don’t believe it’s going to be nearly the size and scope that it was in 1991.” (John McCain, September 15, 2002 (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/16/ftn/main522136.shtml?CMP=ILC-SearchStories).)

“He’s a patriot who has the best interests of his country at heart.” (John McCain, on Ahmed Chalabi, 2003 (http://thinkprogress.org/2008/03/09/chalabi-mccain/).)

On Saddam’s Weapons of Mass Destruction “

Proponents of containment claim that Iraq is in a “box.” But it is a box with no lid, no bottom, and whose sides are falling out. Within this box are definitive footprints of germ, chemical and nuclear programs.” (John McCain, February 13, 2003 (http://mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=880a7550-648a-4dc3-a896-1628b11ef6d2&Region_id=&Issue_id=).)

“I remain confident that we will find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.” (John McCain, June 11, 2003 (http://mediamatters.org/items/200704300011).)

On Being Greeted as Liberators

“Absolutely. Absolutely.” John McCain, asked by Chris Matthews, “you believe that the people of Iraq or at least a large number of them will treat us as liberators?” (March 12, 2003 (http://mediamatters.org/items/200704300011).)

“Not only that, they’ll be relieved that he’s not in the neighborhood because he has invaded his neighbors on several occasions.” John McCain, asked by Chris Matthews, “And you think the Arab world will come to a grudging recognition that what we did was necessary?” (March 12, 2003 (http://mediamatters.org/items/200704300011).)

“There’s no doubt in my mind that we will prevail and there’s no doubt in my mind, once these people are gone, that we will be welcomed as liberators.” (John McCain, March 24, 2003 (http://mediamatters.org/items/200704300011).)

On a Rapid Victory and Mission Accomplished

“I think the victory will be rapid, within about three weeks.” (John McCain, January 28, 2003 (http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/25/mccain-war-over/).)

“It’s clear that the end is very much in sight…It won’t be long. It, it’ll be a fairly short period of time.” (John McCain, April 9, 2003 (http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/25/mccain-war-over/).)

“We won a massive victory in a few weeks, and we did so with very limited loss of American and allied lives.” (John McCain, May 22, 2003 (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/01/flashback-read-mccains-mi_n_99585.html).)

“I thought it was wrong at the time. Do I blame him for that specific banner? I can’t.” (John McCain, on President Bush’s “Mission Accomplished” speech, May 1, 2008 (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20080501/mccain-iraq-war/).)

“Well, then why was there a banner that said mission accomplished on the aircraft carrier?” (John McCain, responding to assertion by Fox News’ Neil Cavuto that “many argue the conflict isn’t over,” June 11, 2003 (http://mediamatters.org/items/200704300011).)

“I have said a long time that reconstruction of Iraq would be a long, long, difficult process, but the conflict — the major conflict is over, the regime change has been accomplished, and it’s very appropriate.” (John McCain, June 11, 2003 (http://mediamatters.org/items/200704300011).)

“I’m confident we’re on the right course.” (John McCain, March 7, 2004 (http://mediamatters.org/items/200704300011).)
“We’re either going to lose this thing or win this thing within the next several months.” (John McCain, November 12, 2006 (http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/25/mccain-war-over/).)

“My friends, the war will be over soon, the war for all intents and purposes although the insurgency will go on for years and years and years.” (John McCain, February 25, 2008 (http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/25/mccain-war-over/).)

On the Safe Streets of Baghdad

“[There] there “are neighborhoods in Baghdad where you and I could walk through those neighborhoods, today.” John McCain, after touring a Baghdad market wearing a bulletproof vest and guarded by “100 American soldiers, with three Blackhawk helicopters, and two Apache gunships overhead, (April 1, 2007 (http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/01/mccain-iraq-stroll/).)

“There’s problems in America with safe neighborhoods as we well know.” (John McCain, March 8, 2008 (http://thinkprogress.org/2008/03/09/mccain-walks-back-claim-that-baghdad-is-like-any-american-city/).)

On President Bush and His Team

We are very fortunate that our president in these challenging days can rely on the counsel of a man who has demonstrated time and again the resolve, experience, and patriotism that will be required for success and the hard-headed clear thinking necessary to prevail in this global fight between good and evil.” (John McCain, on Dick Cheney, July 16, 2004 (http://mediamatters.org/items/200704300011).)

“I think he strengthened our national defenses. I think he has a good team around him.” (John McCain, on President Bush, September 3, 2004 (http://mediamatters.org/items/200704300011). )

“I said no. My answer is still no. No confidence.” (John McCain, on whether he had confidence in Bush Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, December 15, 2004 (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6708495/).)

On the Non-Existent Alliance Between Al Qaeda and Iran

“But Al Qaeda is there, they are functioning, they are supported in many times, in many ways by the Iranians.” (John McCain, February 28, 2008 (http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/000985.htm).)

“As you know, there are al Qaeda operatives that are taken back into Iran, given training as leaders, and they’re moving back into Iraq.” (John McCain, March 17, 2008 (http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/000985.htm).)

“[Iranian operatives are] “taking al-Qaeda into Iran, training them and sending them back.” (John McCain, March 18, 2008 (http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/000985.htm).)

“[It is] common knowledge and has been reported in the media that al-Qaeda is going back into Iran and receiving training and are coming back into Iraq from Iran, that’s well known. And it’s unfortunate.” (John McCain, March 18, 2008 (http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/000985.htm).)

“Al Qaeda and Shia extremists — with support from external powers such as Iran — are on the run but not defeated.” McCain campaign statement, (March 19, 2008 (http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/000985.htm).)

“To think that I would have some lack of knowledge about Sunni and Shia after my eighth visit and my deep involvement in this issue is a bit ludicrous.” (John McCain, March 19, 2008 (http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/000985.htm).)

“Do you still view Al Qaeda in Iraq as a major threat? Certainly not an obscure sect of the Shiites overall…” (John McCain, questioning General David Petraeus, April 8, 2008 (http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/04/08/raw-data-mccain-questions-and-answers-at-petraeus-crocker-hearing/).)

On a Permanent American Military Presence in Iraq

“We cannot keep our forces indefinitely staged in the region. Were we to attempt again to contain Saddam, we would eventually have to withdraw them. The world is full of dangers and, more likely than not, we will need some of those brave men and women to face them down.” (John McCain, February 13, 2003 (http://mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=880a7550-648a-4dc3-a896-1628b11ef6d2&Region_id=&Issue_id=).)

“We have had troops in South Korea for 60 years and nobody minds.” (John McCain, June 7, 2007 (http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/JohnMcCaslin/2007/06/08/sod_story).)

“Make it a hundred.” John McCain, told that President Bush had said American troops could remain in Iraq for 50 years, (January 3, 2008 (http://thinkprogress.org/2008/01/04/mccain-100-years/).)
“I asked McCain about his ‘hundred years’ comment, and he reaffirmed the remark, excitedly declaring that U.S. troops could be in Iraq for ‘a thousand years’ or ‘a million years,’ as far as he was concerned.” (David Corn, January 3, 2008 (http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/01/6735_mccain_in_nh_wo.html).)

“The U.S. could have a military presence anywhere in the world for a long period of time.” (John McCain, February 20, 2008 (http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/20/mccain-more-occupations/).)


“By January 2013, America has welcomed home most of the servicemen and women who have sacrificed terribly so that America might be secure in her freedom.” (John McCain, May 15, 2008 (http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/001069.htm).)

“I can tell you that it is succeeding. I can look you in the eye and tell you it’s succeeding. We have drawn down to pre-surge levels. Basra, Mosul and now Sadr city are quiet and it’s long and it’s hard and it’s tough and there will be setbacks.” John McCain, on a day when Mosul was rocked by suicide bombs and U.S. troop strength remained abve pre-surge level, (May 30, 2008 (http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/001093.htm).)


================


Old Sick McFlopPanderKeating's opinions are risibly misinformed and his facts are just fucking funny.

And you right-wingers think you can score points on Obama's record?

Old Sick McFlopPanderKeating's record and current position on Iraq and Iran are more than enough to KO him easily.

Remember, Old Sick McFlopPanderKeating's main selling point is how experienced, effective, skilled, trustworthy, confidence-inspiring, leader-like he is on defense, security, and foreign affairs vs. HUSSEIN!

:lol :lol

JohnnyMarzetti
06-04-2008, 03:59 PM
McSame is the best the republicraps can offer. :lmao

ChumpDumper
06-04-2008, 04:05 PM
I thought we were supposed to take the gloves off now.

Wild Cobra
06-04-2008, 04:08 PM
McSame is the best the republicraps can offer. :lmao

How can a liberal republican possible be the best?

PEP
06-04-2008, 06:57 PM
Hmm, a choice between a Democrat and a Marxist. Both choices suck. Good lord bufoon, I bet you have a damn shrine in your closet of Bush, you probably have your lover wear a GW halloween mask while he fucks you in the ass so you can feel the pain the country is going through. :)

boutons_
06-04-2008, 07:22 PM
Sick Old McFlopPanderKeating's first day on the job with an official opponent, and he fucks up big time, more than once! :lol

================

McCain's Day Marked By False Statements And Gaffes (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/04/mccains-day-marked-by-fal_n_105283.html)


June 4, 2008 06:35 PM

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/24747/thumbs/s-GAF-large.jpg



A series of misstatements and verbal gaffes hampered Sen. John McCain on the day that unofficially marked the beginning of his general election campaign against Barack Obama.

Appearing at a press conference in Louisiana on Wednesday, McCain claimed that he had supported "every investigation" into the flawed response to Hurricane Katrina, when, in fact, he had twice voted against creating a commission to inspect the tragedy.

(oops!)

The remark immediately bounced around political circles and websites. After all it was just a few months ago when McCain defended those very votes on the back of his campaign bush, casting them as part of a broader campaign against wasteful spending.

"I'm proud of my support of American citizens regarding the taxpayers," the Senator said in April (http://articles.latimes.com/2008/apr/25/nation/na-campaign25). "I will not vote for projects and programs and bills that are laden with pork-barrel projects that waste taxpayers' dollars."
The entire episode elicited a scathing rebuttal from the Obama camp.
"Whether he simply wasn't aware of his voting record again or he was intentionally misleading the people of Louisiana, John McCain certainly isn't offering us 'leadership you can believe in,'" wrote aide Hari Sevugan. To which, McCain's aides accused Obama of negative campaigning, saying the Senator wasn't familiar with the specific votes and had always supported Senate investigations, just not commissions.

That trip-up, however, was mild in compared to the gaffe that happened earlier in the day, when McCain acknowledged he was not aware that Obama had introduced a bill that called for international divestment from Iran.
Reporter: Are you familiar with his disinvestment bill? McCain:

No, I am not familiar with it at all. I do not know if it passed the senate or had any hearing or anything else. I had, so, literally thousands and thousands pieces of legislation are proposed every year. I know what he did. He voted against the Iranian revolutionary guard being declared a terrorist organization. :lol :lol
The admission could prove damaging for a variety of reasons. For starters, Obama's bill, which passed overwhelmingly in the House of Representatives, is currently being held up in the Senate by Republican Sen. Richard Shelby. More significantly, two McCain surrogates, Sen. Joseph Lieberman and Rep. Eric Cantor, are co-sponsors of Obama's measure despite, on Wednesday, ripping the Illinois Democrat (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/04/lieberman-carries-mccains_n_105179.html) for not having the experience to deal with Iran.

But a more worrisome issue for the McCain campaign may just be that a theme is emerging, both within the media and political circles, that the Arizona Republican has a penchant for playing lose with the facts. Indeed, last week, McCain lost crucial news cycles after he falsely claimed that force levels in Iraq had been drawn down to pre-surge levels and then, instead of admitting he misspoke, said the whole thing was a debate over verb tense. This, in turn, came after the Senator claimed, again falsely, that Iran was training al-Qaeda in Iraq, when in fact the two groups are religious and political adversaries.

All told, the gaffes have provided Obama an opportunity to re-frame a man who is best known as a "straight talker," a image battle McCain can ill afford to lose.

===================

Old Sick McFlopPanderKeating a "straight talker", sure, as long as
straight = stupid = not having his facts straight, or any facts at all.

Old Sick McFlopPanderKeating is in so far over his head, The Peter Principle incarnate, that it's hilarious. The next few months will be great entertainment.

Aggie Hoopsfan
06-04-2008, 09:19 PM
Old Sick McFlopPanderKeating is in so far over his head, The Peter Principle incarnate, that it's hilarious. The next few months will be great entertainment.

Kinda like Obama will be, only we're going to be stuck with his 'entertainment' for four years, unfortunately.

boutons_
06-04-2008, 10:29 PM
ABR, anything but Repugs and dubyaII

Dim Tuncan
06-05-2008, 12:41 AM
McSame is the best the republicraps can offer. :lmao

Let's go over the "best" your party can offer:

A man whose name is Barack Hussein Obama, who dressed up in jihad garb in a post-9/11 world, who goes to a "black power" church in Chicago that says on its website, "we proclaim our allegiance to Africa", who's praised by Louis Farrakhan, who refuses to wear an American flag or sing the national anthem because of his anti-white hatred, whose wife wrote an essay at Princeton denouncing whites, whose wife declares she hates America and is only "proud" of it when they elect her husband, whose campaign supporters hang pictures of Che Guevara, whose only published article in public life is to denounce "The Bell Curve," who's.... Oh whatever, these are the reasons the BHO nuthuggers love him so much.

Anti.Hero
06-05-2008, 01:58 AM
Pretty much vote on best entertainment value. If you are self-sufficient and can adapt you will still get yours. I myself am curious and anxious to see an all demoloser guvment.

boutons_
06-05-2008, 10:51 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DqR7zis99I

:lol