PDA

View Full Version : For all player A vs. player B posters



2centsworth
01-29-2005, 02:40 PM
http://www.btgraphix.com/nba/matchup.asp

Thats a statistics analyzer. Ran Ginobilli vs Parker and it didn't look good for one of them.

Ginobilli beats Ray Allen!


Lebron wipes the floor with Carmello.

Slomo
01-29-2005, 02:45 PM
I hate this type of threads but let me go on record that B>>>>A!

2centsworth
01-29-2005, 02:49 PM
OMG!

MANU beats KOBE in 48 minutes!

Manu20
01-29-2005, 02:54 PM
OMG!

MANU beats KOBE in 48 minutes!

He also beats Ray Allen!

td4mvp21
01-29-2005, 03:15 PM
TD beats Amare in both categories

2centsworth
01-29-2005, 03:30 PM
Jamaal Tinsely beats Tony bad.

ALVAREZ6
01-29-2005, 03:31 PM
Manu should be an all-star!

And for all of the complainers that say Ginobili has a lot of turnovers, it's not as many as you think.

2centsworth
01-29-2005, 03:34 PM
Bryant beats Mcgrady.

Lebron beat Wade pretty bad.

Kevin Willis edges Tony Massenberg.


Horry beats up Rose.

Beno better than Parker per 48 minutes.

Nestorovic better than Ratliff.

Nestorovic better than Ming per 48 minutes.

Frenchise player
01-29-2005, 03:54 PM
Marbury better than Steve Nash, don't look good for this analyzer

ShoogarBear
01-29-2005, 03:56 PM
Nestorovic better than Ming per 48 minutes.

http://www.coloradobluegrass.org/Images/credibil_logo.gif

manustarting2gd
01-29-2005, 03:59 PM
48 Minute Matchup
Matchup Totals
Winner
Advantage

Points: 25 | 31 Bryant 6.06
3Pointers: 2 | 2 Ginobili 0.03
Rebounds: 9 | 9 Ginobili 0.18
Assists: 6 | 7 Bryant 1.34
Steals: 3 | 2 Ginobili 1.23
Blocks: 1 | 1 Bryant 0.58
Turnovers: 4 | 5 Ginobili -1.28


48 Minute Matchup Results

Winner:
manu GINOBILI

Score:
4 - 3

NUFF SAID!

BronxCowboy
01-29-2005, 04:00 PM
That's nice if you want to know who has better numbers for your fantasy team, but really doesn't mean much. A ten-year-old who has never seen a basketball game could do this kind of "analysis," given enough time. :rolleyes

2centsworth
01-29-2005, 04:03 PM
Marbury better than Steve Nash, don't look good for this analyzer

It's just a stat comparison, apparently Marbury's stats are better if the outcome is as you sayl

2centsworth
01-29-2005, 04:04 PM
A ten-year-old who has never seen a basketball game could do this kind of "analysis," given enough time.

that's one special 10 year old.

BronxCowboy
01-29-2005, 04:06 PM
It's just a stat comparison, apparently Marbury's stats are better if the outcome is as you sayl

In this particular system, Marbury's stat's may be better. Point is that the system is incredibly simplified to the point of meaninglessness, so it's not a very good stat comparison.

2centsworth
01-29-2005, 04:07 PM
In this particular system, Marbury's stat's may be better. Point is that the system is incredibly simplified to the point of meaninglessness, so it's not a very good stat comparison.

all in fun. find a better system to play with.